Commercial antibodies against At2g24693, such as CSB-PA664253XA01DOA, are produced using recombinant protein fragments or synthetic peptides. These antibodies are validated for applications including:
Western blotting to detect native or recombinant At2g24693 protein.
Immunohistochemistry for tissue-specific localization studies in Arabidopsis.
Protein-protein interaction assays to identify binding partners in defense signaling pathways .
At2g24693 is implicated in Arabidopsis responses to biotic and abiotic stressors. Its DEFL domain suggests involvement in pathogen defense, possibly through antimicrobial activity or redox signaling .
Studies using At2g24693 antibodies have identified interactions with:
Thioredoxin-related proteins, indicating a role in oxidative stress mitigation.
Chitinases and germin-like proteins, linking it to fungal pathogen resistance .
While commercially available (e.g., Cusabio), At2g24693 antibodies require rigorous validation due to risks of cross-reactivity. Controls using At2g24693 knockout mutants are essential to confirm specificity, as nonspecific binding is common in plant protein studies .
Current research gaps include:
At2g24693 is a gene locus in Arabidopsis thaliana, part of the diverse gene family that contributes to plant development and stress responses. The gene encodes a protein that functions in cellular signaling pathways, similar to other Arabidopsis proteins involved in transcriptional regulation. Based on sequence homology analysis, At2g24693 shares structural similarities with several other Arabidopsis genes including AT2G16750 (kinase with adenine nucleotide alpha hydrolases-like domain) and AT1G44760 (Adenine nucleotide alpha hydrolases-like superfamily protein) . The protein contains functional domains that suggest its involvement in regulatory processes similar to those seen in WRKY transcription factor networks.
For optimal detection of At2g24693 protein, researchers should consider multiple complementary approaches:
Western blotting: Provides quantitative analysis of protein expression levels across different tissues or treatment conditions
Immunoprecipitation: Enables investigation of protein-protein interactions
Immunohistochemistry/Immunofluorescence: Reveals spatial distribution patterns within tissues
ELISA: Allows quantitative measurement in complex samples
The choice of method should be guided by your specific research question and available resources. When analyzing tissue-specific expression patterns, consider that At2g24693, like other Arabidopsis regulatory proteins, may show variable expression across different plant structures, developmental stages, and stress conditions.
Antibody validation is critical for ensuring reliable research outcomes. For At2g24693 antibody validation:
Perform Western blot with recombinant At2g24693 protein
Include knockout/knockdown plant lines as negative controls
Conduct peptide competition assays to confirm binding specificity
Test cross-reactivity with closely related proteins (especially those with adenine nucleotide alpha hydrolases-like domains)
Compare results from antibodies targeting different epitopes of At2g24693
This multi-method validation approach helps distinguish between specific binding and potential artifacts, similar to validation protocols used for other plant protein antibodies in high-impact research.
The extraction protocol significantly impacts antibody detection quality. For At2g24693:
| Buffer Component | Recommended Concentration | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Tris-HCl pH 7.5 | 50 mM | Maintains neutral pH |
| NaCl | 150 mM | Preserves protein-protein interactions |
| EDTA | 1 mM | Inhibits metalloprotease activity |
| Triton X-100 | 0.5% | Solubilizes membrane components |
| Protease inhibitors | Manufacturer's recommendation | Prevents degradation |
| Phosphatase inhibitors | Manufacturer's recommendation | Preserves modification state |
| DTT | 1 mM | Maintains reducing environment |
For nuclear proteins like transcription factors, consider nuclear extraction protocols that include initial nuclei isolation steps. The extraction temperature should be maintained at 4°C throughout to minimize protein degradation. This approach has proven effective for extracting proteins with similar properties to At2g24693 in Arabidopsis research.
For successful immunoprecipitation:
Pre-clear lysates with protein A/G beads to reduce non-specific binding
Use gentle buffer conditions to preserve protein-protein interactions
Optimize antibody-to-lysate ratios through preliminary experiments
Include appropriate controls (IgG control, input sample, knockout controls)
Consider crosslinking approaches for transient interactions
Validate interactions through reciprocal co-IP experiments
When studying protein-DNA interactions involving At2g24693, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) protocols should be optimized for plant tissues, accounting for cell wall components and abundant secondary metabolites that may interfere with antibody binding.
Rigorous controls are critical for antibody-based experiments:
Positive controls: Recombinant At2g24693 protein or tissues known to express the target
Negative controls:
Knockout/knockdown plant lines
Pre-immune serum
Secondary antibody-only controls
Competing peptide controls
Loading controls: Constitutively expressed proteins like actin or tubulin
Specificity controls: Testing in multiple tissue types and conditions
These control measures help distinguish genuine biological phenomena from technical artifacts, particularly important when studying proteins like At2g24693 that may have condition-specific expression patterns.
When facing detection challenges:
| Problem | Potential Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| No signal | Low protein expression | Increase sample concentration, use enrichment techniques |
| Epitope destruction | Try different extraction buffers, avoid excessive heating | |
| Antibody denaturation | Verify antibody storage conditions, use fresh aliquots | |
| Weak signal | Insufficient transfer | Optimize transfer conditions for protein MW |
| Suboptimal blocking | Test different blocking agents and concentrations | |
| Inadequate incubation | Extend primary antibody incubation time, optimize temperature | |
| Multiple bands | Cross-reactivity | Increase washing stringency, verify using knockout controls |
| Protein degradation | Add additional protease inhibitors, maintain cold chain |
Similar troubleshooting approaches have proven effective for detection of low-abundance transcription factors and regulatory proteins in Arabidopsis research. For particularly challenging samples, consider signal amplification methods like HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies with enhanced chemiluminescence detection.
For protein interaction studies:
Co-immunoprecipitation: Optimal for direct interactors, but may miss weak or transient interactions
Proximity labeling: BioID or APEX2 fusions to capture neighborhood proteins
Yeast two-hybrid: For binary interaction screening, complemented with in planta validation
Split-reporter assays: BiFC or split-luciferase for validating interactions in native context
Mass spectrometry following IP: For unbiased interactome mapping
Each method has distinct advantages and limitations. Consider performing orthogonal approaches for critical interactions. The ability to detect regulatory protein interactions often depends on developmental timing and environmental conditions, so experimental conditions should be carefully controlled.
For precise quantification:
Include a concentration gradient of recombinant At2g24693 protein as a standard curve
Use fluorescent secondary antibodies for wider linear range of detection
Normalize signals to multiple housekeeping proteins
Perform biological and technical replicates (minimum n=3)
Use image analysis software with background subtraction and lane normalization functions
Consider parallel qPCR analysis to correlate transcript and protein levels
Digital image acquisition systems with CCD cameras provide superior quantitative performance compared to film-based methods. When comparing samples from different treatment conditions, process all samples simultaneously to minimize technical variation.
Discrepancies between transcript and protein levels are common in biological systems and can reveal important regulatory mechanisms. Consider:
Post-transcriptional regulation through miRNAs or RNA-binding proteins
Translational efficiency differences across conditions
Protein stability and degradation kinetics
Technical limitations in detection methods
To resolve contradictions:
Perform time-course experiments to capture dynamics
Examine protein half-life using cycloheximide chase assays
Investigate potential post-translational modifications
Consider cellular compartmentalization effects
This approach mirrors methods used to study other plant regulatory proteins where transcript levels often poorly correlate with protein abundance. Similar regulatory complexity has been observed in WRKY transcription factor networks in Arabidopsis .
Consider these potential modifications:
| Modification | Functional Implication | Detection Method |
|---|---|---|
| Phosphorylation | Activation/inhibition of function | Phospho-specific antibodies, Phos-tag gels |
| Ubiquitination | Protein stability regulation | Ubiquitin pull-down, K-ε-GG antibodies |
| SUMOylation | Altered localization/activity | SUMO-IP, SUMO-specific antibodies |
| Acetylation | Altered DNA binding affinity | Acetylation-specific antibodies |
| Redox modifications | Stress-responsive regulation | Redox proteomics approaches |
Post-translational modifications can dramatically alter epitope accessibility, potentially explaining variable detection across different experimental conditions. Kinase with adenine nucleotide alpha hydrolases-like domain-containing proteins in Arabidopsis, similar to At2g24693, commonly undergo regulatory phosphorylation events that modulate their activity .
For comprehensive understanding:
Correlate protein abundance with transcriptomic data
Map interaction networks using proteomics
Connect with metabolomic changes in response to perturbations
Integrate with phenotypic data from mutant lines
Incorporate ChIP-seq data to identify binding sites
Multi-omics integration requires normalizing data across platforms and applying appropriate statistical methods. Consider using specialized tools for biological network analysis to place At2g24693 within broader regulatory networks. This approach has proven valuable for understanding the functional roles of regulatory proteins in Arabidopsis, including WRKY transcription factors and their targets .
For stress response studies:
Design time-course experiments with appropriate sampling intervals
Compare multiple stress treatments (drought, salt, pathogen, heat)
Combine subcellular fractionation with immunoblotting
Use phospho-specific antibodies to detect activation
Consider reporter gene fusions for live-imaging studies
This experimental framework enables detection of both rapid responses (minutes to hours) and long-term adaptation (days). Studies of WRKY transcription factors and other regulatory proteins in Arabidopsis demonstrate that stress responses often involve complex translocation and modification dynamics that can be captured through carefully designed immunological approaches .
When designing custom antibodies:
Select peptide regions with:
High antigenicity (use prediction algorithms)
Low sequence similarity to related proteins
Surface exposure in the native protein
Minimal post-translational modification sites
Consider multiple antibody formats:
Polyclonal: Broader epitope recognition, higher sensitivity
Monoclonal: Consistent reproducibility, higher specificity
Recombinant: Renewable resource, consistent performance
Design validation experiments before initiating antibody production:
Expression constructs for positive controls
CRISPR knockout lines for negative controls
This strategic approach to antibody design has proven effective for developing tools to study low-abundance regulatory proteins in plant systems and minimizes wasted resources on ineffective reagents.