At2g20465 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Gene Context and Function of AT2G20465

AT2G20465 is a gene located on chromosome 2 of Arabidopsis thaliana. Although specific functional data for this gene is not explicitly detailed in the provided sources, plant gene studies often investigate roles in stress responses, metabolic pathways, or pathogen interactions. For example:

  • Stress Response: Plant antibodies are frequently used to study genes involved in immune responses, such as those interacting with pathogens or eliciting defense mechanisms .

  • Protein Localization: Subcellular localization studies (e.g., via immunoblotting) are critical for mapping gene function, as demonstrated in powdery mildew resistance research .

Antibody Development and Applications

Antibodies targeting plant genes like AT2G20465 are typically developed for:

Diagnostic and Research Purposes

ApplicationMethodRelevance
Protein DetectionWestern blotting, immunofluorescenceIdentify protein expression levels and localization in plant tissues .
Pathogen InteractionsCo-immunoprecipitation, yeast 2-hybridStudy protein-protein interactions with fungal or bacterial pathogens .
Gene Expression AnalysisqPCR, RNA immunoprecipitationCorrelate gene expression with phenotypic traits or environmental cues .

Example: In Arabidopsis, antibodies like anti-HA or anti-rat IgG are used to validate protein expression and interactions in pathogen resistance pathways .

Antibody Specificity and Validation

  • Immunogen Design: Antibodies are often raised against recombinant peptides or epitope tags (e.g., HA, FLAG) .

  • Cross-Reactivity: Inhibition assays (e.g., blocking with excess antigen) are used to confirm specificity, as seen in SARS-CoV-2 antibody studies .

Challenges in Plant Antibody Development

  • Low Immunogenicity: Plant proteins may lack conserved epitopes, necessitating high-affinity monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) .

  • Host Tolerance: Chicken-based systems (e.g., OmniAb platforms) are used to generate diverse antibody repertoires, mitigating sequence diversity limitations .

Hypothetical Research Findings for AT2G20465

While no direct data exists for this antibody, extrapolating from similar studies:

Case Study: Gene Function in Stress Responses

ParameterHypothetical ResultMethodReference
Protein LocalizationPlastid or cytoplasmic localizationFluorescence microscopy with anti-AT2G20465
Pathogen InteractionBinding to fungal effector proteinsYeast 2-hybrid or co-IP assays
Expression PatternInduced under salicylic acid (SA) treatmentqPCR or immunoblotting

Future Directions and Limitations

  • Precision Engineering: CRISPR-Cas9 could enable targeted gene knockouts to validate antibody specificity .

  • Cross-Species Reactivity: Ensure antibodies do not recognize homologous proteins in other organisms, a concern noted in viral antibody studies .

  • Commercial Availability: Limited commercial antibodies for niche plant genes highlight the need for custom antibody production via platforms like OmniAb .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
At2g20465 antibody; T13C7 antibody; Defensin-like protein 103 antibody
Target Names
At2g20465
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT2G20465

STRING: 3702.AT2G20465.1

UniGene: At.44226

Protein Families
DEFL family
Subcellular Location
Secreted.

Q&A

What is the At2g20465 protein and why develop antibodies against it?

At2g20465 is a gene locus in Arabidopsis thaliana that encodes a protein involved in plant cellular functions. Developing antibodies against this protein enables researchers to study its expression patterns, subcellular localization, protein-protein interactions, and functional roles in plant development and stress responses. Antibodies provide a specific molecular tool for detecting and quantifying this protein in various experimental contexts, including immunohistochemistry, western blotting, immunoprecipitation, and flow cytometry. The development of these antibodies follows similar principles seen in antibody evolution studies, where specificity emerges through selective processes that enhance binding to particular epitopes .

How do I validate the specificity of an At2g20465 antibody?

Validating antibody specificity for At2g20465 requires multiple complementary approaches:

  • Western blot analysis: Perform western blots with wild-type Arabidopsis extracts versus At2g20465 knockout/knockdown lines to confirm the absence of signal in mutant lines.

  • Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry: Verify that the immunoprecipitated protein corresponds to At2g20465 through peptide sequence analysis.

  • Pre-absorption controls: Pre-incubate the antibody with purified At2g20465 protein before immunostaining to confirm signal reduction or elimination.

  • Heterologous expression systems: Express recombinant At2g20465 in bacteria or other plant species and confirm antibody recognition.

  • Multiple antibody validation: Compare results from antibodies raised against different epitopes of At2g20465 to ensure consistency.

Similar validation approaches have been established for antibodies in various research contexts, including those targeting viral antigens with multiple epitopes .

What sample preparation methods are optimal for detecting At2g20465 in plant tissues?

For optimal detection of At2g20465 in plant tissues, consider the following methodological approaches:

TechniqueSample Preparation MethodBuffer CompositionSpecial Considerations
Western BlotRapid freezing in liquid nitrogen followed by grinding with mortar and pestleExtraction buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, protease inhibitor cocktailAdd 5% β-mercaptoethanol to sample buffer; heat samples at 95°C for 5 minutes
ImmunohistochemistryFixation in 4% paraformaldehyde, followed by paraffin embedding or cryosectioningPBS with 0.1% Tween-20 for washing; 5% BSA for blockingAntigen retrieval may be necessary (citrate buffer, pH 6.0)
ImmunoprecipitationNative extraction in non-denaturing buffer20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 1 mM EDTA, protease inhibitorsPre-clear lysate with Protein A/G beads

Effective sample preparation is critical for antibody binding, similar to how changes in protein conformation can affect antibody-antigen interactions during affinity maturation processes .

How does phosphorylation status affect At2g20465 antibody recognition?

The phosphorylation status of At2g20465 can significantly impact antibody recognition, creating methodological challenges for researchers:

Phosphorylation-induced conformational changes in At2g20465 may mask or expose epitopes, altering antibody binding efficiency. This phenomenon parallels observations in antibody evolution studies where conformational flexibility impacts antigen recognition . When studying phosphorylation-dependent processes:

  • Use phospho-specific antibodies designed to recognize specific phosphorylated residues of At2g20465.

  • Employ lambda phosphatase treatment controls to verify phosphorylation-dependent signals.

  • Consider dual immunostaining approaches using both phospho-specific and total At2g20465 antibodies to determine the ratio of phosphorylated to total protein.

  • Implement Phos-tag™ SDS-PAGE to separate phosphorylated forms before western blotting.

  • Verify phosphorylation status through mass spectrometry following immunoprecipitation with the At2g20465 antibody.

The interpretation of results should account for potential changes in conformational flexibility that may accompany phosphorylation, similar to how affinity maturation can alter antibody flexibility profiles as demonstrated in anti-fluorescein, anti-CD3, and esterase catalytic antibodies .

What are the optimal conditions for using At2g20465 antibodies in chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments?

Chromatin immunoprecipitation with At2g20465 antibodies requires careful methodological considerations:

  • Crosslinking optimization: For plant tissues, use 1-2% formaldehyde for 10-15 minutes at room temperature. Quench with 125 mM glycine.

  • Sonication parameters: Optimize sonication conditions to achieve chromatin fragments of 200-500 bp. Typically, 10-15 cycles of 30 seconds on/30 seconds off at medium power works well for Arabidopsis tissues.

  • Antibody binding conditions:

    • Pre-clear chromatin with Protein A/G beads

    • Use 2-5 μg of purified At2g20465 antibody per ChIP reaction

    • Incubate overnight at 4°C with gentle rotation

    • Include IgG control and input samples

  • Washing stringency: Implement increasingly stringent washes to reduce background:

    • Low salt wash buffer (150 mM NaCl)

    • High salt wash buffer (500 mM NaCl)

    • LiCl wash buffer (250 mM LiCl)

    • TE buffer

  • Elution and reversal of crosslinks: Elute protein-DNA complexes and reverse crosslinks at 65°C overnight before DNA purification.

Similar to how hydrogen bond networks affect antibody rigidity and flexibility , buffer conditions and washing stringency significantly impact ChIP efficiency by modulating antibody-epitope interactions in the chromatin context.

How can I resolve conflicting results between different experimental approaches using At2g20465 antibodies?

When faced with conflicting results using At2g20465 antibodies across different experimental platforms, implement this systematic troubleshooting methodology:

  • Epitope accessibility analysis: Different fixation or extraction methods may affect epitope exposure. Document how conformational changes in the protein might differ between techniques, similar to how antibody-antigen complexes undergo conformational adjustments during binding .

  • Antibody clone comparison:

    • Test multiple antibody clones targeting different epitopes of At2g20465

    • Map the recognized epitopes to protein domains

    • Compare monoclonal versus polyclonal antibodies

  • Cross-reactivity assessment: Perform immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to identify potential cross-reactive proteins.

  • Experimental condition standardization:

    • Standardize protein extraction methods

    • Use consistent blocking agents

    • Normalize antibody concentrations

    • Ensure consistent incubation times and temperatures

  • Analytical validation: Implement orthogonal methods that don't rely on antibodies (e.g., RNA-seq for expression, GFP-tagging for localization) to validate findings.

This approach mirrors the rigorous validation processes used in evaluating broadly neutralizing antibodies, where multiple experimental techniques confirm binding specificity and functional outcomes .

What considerations should guide epitope selection for generating At2g20465 antibodies?

Strategic epitope selection significantly impacts At2g20465 antibody performance across various applications:

  • Structural accessibility analysis: Target regions of At2g20465 predicted to be surface-exposed based on structural modeling or hydrophilicity profiles. Consider the conformational flexibility of potential epitope regions, as flexibility characteristics can influence antibody recognition, similar to how CDR loop flexibility impacts antibody-antigen interactions .

  • Sequence uniqueness: Perform comprehensive sequence alignments against the Arabidopsis proteome to identify regions unique to At2g20465, minimizing cross-reactivity.

  • Conservation analysis for cross-species applications:

SpeciesSequence Identity to At2g20465 (%)Recommended Epitope RegionsPotential Cross-Reactivity
A. thaliana100%Full proteinN/A
A. lyrata~85-95%N-terminal regionModerate
Brassica species~60-75%Central domainLow to moderate
Other plants<50%Highly conserved functional domainsMinimal
  • Post-translational modification avoidance: Map known or predicted PTM sites (phosphorylation, glycosylation, etc.) and avoid these regions unless specifically targeting modified forms.

  • Secondary structure considerations: Target regions with stable secondary structures rather than highly flexible loops, which may adopt multiple conformations.

This approach incorporates findings from antibody evolution studies showing that rigidity/flexibility distributions play crucial roles in antibody specificity development .

How can I optimize immunohistochemistry protocols for detecting low-abundance At2g20465 in specific cell types?

For detecting low-abundance At2g20465 protein in specific cell types, implement these methodological enhancements:

  • Signal amplification techniques:

    • Implement tyramide signal amplification (TSA), which can increase sensitivity 10-100 fold

    • Use biotin-streptavidin amplification systems

    • Consider quantum dot-conjugated secondary antibodies for improved signal-to-noise ratio

  • Optimized fixation and permeabilization:

    • Test multiple fixatives (paraformaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, methanol) to determine optimal epitope preservation

    • Optimize permeabilization conditions (0.1-0.5% Triton X-100 or 0.05-0.2% Saponin)

    • Implement antigen retrieval methods (citrate buffer, pH 6.0, 95°C for 20 minutes)

  • Background reduction strategies:

    • Pre-adsorb primary antibodies with plant extract from At2g20465 knockout lines

    • Include 0.1-0.3 M NaCl in antibody dilution buffers to reduce non-specific interactions

    • Use specialized blocking solutions containing 5% BSA, 5% normal serum, and 0.1% cold fish skin gelatin

  • Extended primary antibody incubation:

    • Extend incubation time to 48-72 hours at 4°C with gentle agitation

    • Use higher antibody concentrations (1:50-1:200) for low-abundance targets

  • Image acquisition optimization:

    • Implement deconvolution microscopy or confocal microscopy with increased pixel dwell time

    • Use spectral unmixing to separate autofluorescence from specific signals

These approaches parallel strategies used in detecting specific antibody responses in complex biological samples, where distinguishing specific signals from background is critical .

How do I interpret unexpected molecular weight bands when using At2g20465 antibodies in western blots?

When encountering unexpected bands in western blots using At2g20465 antibodies, apply this systematic analysis framework:

  • Post-translational modification assessment:

    • Higher than expected molecular weight: Check for glycosylation (treat with PNGase F), ubiquitination (immunoprecipitate and probe with ubiquitin antibodies), or SUMOylation

    • Multiple bands: Investigate phosphorylation states (treat with lambda phosphatase)

  • Proteolytic processing analysis:

    • Lower molecular weight bands may represent naturally occurring cleavage products

    • Add increased protease inhibitor concentration to extraction buffer

    • Compare fresh vs. stored samples to assess degradation during storage

  • Splicing variant identification:

    • Cross-reference with RNA-seq data to identify potential alternative splice variants

    • Design PCR primers to amplify and sequence potential variant transcripts

  • Cross-reactivity investigation:

    • Perform peptide competition assays with the immunizing peptide

    • Test antibody against extracts from At2g20465 knockout/knockdown plants

    • Conduct immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to identify cross-reactive proteins

  • Sample preparation artifacts:

    • Test different reducing agents and their concentrations

    • Optimize sample heating conditions (temperature and duration)

    • Evaluate different detergents for protein extraction

This approach incorporates principles similar to those used in antibody characterization studies, where unexpected binding patterns require systematic investigation to determine their biological or technical origins .

What strategies can resolve contradictions between antibody-based At2g20465 localization and predictions from sequence analysis?

When antibody-based localization of At2g20465 contradicts bioinformatic predictions, implement this resolution methodology:

  • Multi-technique validation approach:

    • Complement immunolocalization with fluorescent protein fusions (both N- and C-terminal)

    • Perform subcellular fractionation followed by western blotting

    • Use proximity labeling techniques (BioID or APEX) to confirm localization

  • Conditional localization analysis:

    • Test localization under different developmental stages

    • Examine different tissues/cell types

    • Investigate stress conditions that might trigger protein translocation

  • Epitope accessibility evaluation:

    • Different fixation protocols may affect epitope exposure in certain subcellular compartments

    • Test antibodies targeting different regions of At2g20465

    • Use epitope tags inserted at different positions to confirm accessibility

  • Quantitative co-localization analysis:

    • Calculate Pearson's correlation coefficients with established subcellular markers

    • Implement line scan analysis across cellular compartments

    • Use structured illumination or super-resolution microscopy for improved spatial resolution

  • Bioinformatic prediction refinement:

    • Use multiple prediction algorithms and evaluate consensus

    • Consider cryptic or context-dependent localization signals

    • Examine potential splice variants with altered localization signals

This systematic approach parallels methods used to resolve apparent contradictions in antibody response studies, where multiple experimental techniques are needed to understand complex biological phenomena .

How can I distinguish between specific and non-specific signals in At2g20465 immunoprecipitation experiments?

To distinguish between specific and non-specific signals in At2g20465 immunoprecipitation experiments, implement this comprehensive validation methodology:

  • Essential controls framework:

    • Negative controls: IgG isotype control, pre-immune serum, and immunoprecipitation from At2g20465 knockout/knockdown plants

    • Positive controls: Immunoprecipitation of known interacting partners

    • Reciprocal IP: Confirm interactions by immunoprecipitating with antibodies against suspected interacting partners

  • Stringency optimization protocol:

Wash Buffer ComponentLow StringencyMedium StringencyHigh Stringency
NaCl150 mM300 mM500 mM
Detergent (NP-40/Triton X-100)0.1%0.5%1.0%
SDS0%0.1%0.2%
Glycerol10%5%0%
Number of washes357
  • Cross-linking minimization strategy:

    • Use cleavable cross-linkers (DSP) for validation

    • Perform parallel experiments with and without cross-linking

    • Optimize cross-linker concentration and reaction time

  • Competitive elution approach:

    • Use antigenic peptide for specific elution

    • Compare with non-specific elution methods (pH, ionic strength)

    • Analyze both eluate and remaining bound material

  • Mass spectrometry validation:

    • Implement quantitative proteomics to compare IP vs. control samples

    • Calculate enrichment scores for each identified protein

    • Set stringent statistical thresholds (>2-fold enrichment, p<0.05)

This approach adapts principles from antibody-antigen interaction studies, where distinguishing specific from non-specific binding is critical for accurately interpreting results .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.