While direct functional studies on At5g27495 are not explicitly detailed in the provided sources, its genomic context offers clues:
Gene locus: Chromosome 5, position 27,495 in the Arabidopsis genome.
Protein structure: The UniProt entry (Q2V342) classifies it as a hypothetical protein, suggesting it may belong to uncharacterized gene families in Arabidopsis .
Orthologs: No direct homologs in other plant species are mentioned, indicating potential species-specific roles.
The antibody serves as a tool for:
Protein expression profiling in Arabidopsis mutants
Subcellular localization studies
Interaction partner identification via co-immunoprecipitation
No peer-reviewed studies using this specific antibody were identified in the analyzed sources. This contrasts with well-characterized Arabidopsis antibodies like PDF1.1 (P30224) or DDM1 (Q9XFH4), which have extensive functional data .
Key unanswered questions include:
Physiological role of At5g27495 in plant development
Stress-response profiles (e.g., drought, pathogen exposure)
Epigenetic regulation mechanisms involving this protein
Cusabio dominates current commercial offerings for Arabidopsis antibodies, with 43/47 entries in the analyzed tables targeting plant-specific proteins . No competing products for At5g27495 were identified in the provided data.
At5g27495 refers to a specific gene locus on chromosome 5 of Arabidopsis thaliana. Antibodies targeting proteins encoded by this locus are valuable tools for studying protein expression, localization, and function in plant developmental processes. Similar to other plant protein antibodies, At5g27495 antibodies enable researchers to investigate protein-protein interactions, post-translational modifications, and responses to environmental stimuli, contributing to our understanding of plant molecular biology . The development of specific antibodies against Arabidopsis proteins has revolutionized plant molecular biology by allowing precise detection and quantification of target proteins across various experimental conditions.
Antibodies for Arabidopsis proteins are generally available in two main forms: polyclonal and monoclonal. Polyclonal antibodies, like the Anti-ABI5 antibody described in the search results, are typically developed in rabbits using recombinant protein immunogens . These recognize multiple epitopes on the target protein, offering high sensitivity but potentially lower specificity. Monoclonal antibodies, such as the Anti-Actin-7 antibodies referenced, are produced from single B-cell clones (often in BALB/c mice) and recognize a single epitope, providing higher specificity but sometimes lower sensitivity . For At5g27495 research, either antibody type might be appropriate depending on experimental goals, with consideration given to the specific protein domain being targeted and the intended application.
At5g27495 antibodies would typically be employed in several standard research applications similar to other plant protein antibodies. Western blotting (WB) represents the most common application, allowing researchers to detect and quantify the target protein in complex mixtures . Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) provide quantitative measurement of protein levels across different conditions. Immunofluorescence (IF) enables visualization of protein localization within cellular compartments, while immunoprecipitation (IP) facilitates protein-protein interaction studies . When selecting an At5g27495 antibody, researchers should verify which applications have been validated as successful, as antibody performance can vary significantly between different experimental techniques.
When selecting an At5g27495 antibody, researchers should evaluate several critical parameters. First, determine which specific region of the protein needs targeting based on research objectives (full-length protein vs. specific domain). Second, consider the clonality - polyclonal antibodies may provide higher sensitivity for initial detection, while monoclonal antibodies offer greater specificity for distinguishing between closely related proteins . Third, verify which experimental applications have been validated (WB, ELISA, IF, etc.) and ensure they match your intended use. Finally, review available data on specificity, including cross-reactivity tests with related proteins and validation in knockout/knockdown systems . For plant antibodies specifically, evaluate whether the antibody has been tested in wild-type versus mutant lines as demonstrated with the Anti-ABI5 antibody testing in wild-type and abi5-8 mutant Arabidopsis seeds .
Rigorous validation is essential for ensuring antibody specificity and reliable experimental outcomes. For At5g27495 antibodies, validation should follow a multi-step approach:
Genetic validation: Testing in knockout/knockdown mutants like the strategy employed for ABI5 antibody testing in abi5-8 mutant Arabidopsis seeds
Peptide competition assays: Pre-incubating the antibody with excess immunizing peptide should eliminate specific signals
Protein expression analysis: Correlation of antibody signal with transcript levels or induced expression
Multiple antibodies comparison: Using antibodies recognizing different epitopes of the same protein
Cross-reactivity testing: Evaluation against related Arabidopsis proteins
A comprehensive validation approach increases confidence in experimental results and helps avoid artifacts that can lead to misinterpretation of data . Even commercially validated antibodies should undergo laboratory-specific validation to ensure they perform as expected under your specific experimental conditions.
Proper experimental controls are crucial for interpreting antibody-based results accurately. For At5g27495 antibody experiments, the following controls should be included:
Including these controls helps distinguish specific signal from background and validates both antibody performance and experimental procedures . Particularly important is the comparison between wild-type plants and genetic knockouts/knockdowns to confirm specificity, as demonstrated with ABI5 antibody testing .
Effective protein extraction is critical for successful antibody-based detection of plant proteins. For At5g27495 protein extraction from Arabidopsis tissues, researchers should consider buffer components carefully. Based on successful protocols for other Arabidopsis proteins, extraction buffer typically includes:
50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) to maintain protein stability
200 mM NaCl to enhance protein solubilization
10 mM DTT as a reducing agent to preserve protein structure
1% (v/v) Triton X-100 to solubilize membrane-associated proteins
Fresh tissue extraction is generally preferred over frozen material, particularly for developmental studies. For specificity in developmental analysis, the protocol used for ABI5 detection in 3-day-old germinating seeds demonstrates the importance of tissue-specific and developmental stage-specific extraction approaches . Researchers should optimize extraction conditions specifically for their target tissue and developmental stage, as protein expression can vary significantly across different plant parts and growth phases.
Western blotting with At5g27495 antibodies should follow optimized protocols for plant proteins. Based on successful approaches with other Arabidopsis antibodies:
Sample preparation: Denature protein samples at 95°C for 5 minutes in SDS sample buffer
Gel electrophoresis: Use 10-12% SDS-PAGE for optimal separation based on the expected molecular weight
Transfer conditions: Perform wet transfer to PVDF membrane (0.2 μm pore size) for highest protein retention
Blocking: Block with 5% non-fat dry milk or BSA in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Primary antibody: Incubate with At5g27495 antibody at 1:1000 dilution (adjusting based on antibody performance)
Detection: Utilize HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies with ECL detection systems
For quantitative analysis, researchers should include appropriate loading controls and use image analysis software to measure band intensities. When working with plant proteins that may have post-translational modifications, expect potential differences between predicted and apparent molecular weights . Additionally, researchers should verify the specificity of their signal by comparing results between wild-type and mutant lines when available.
Immunofluorescence (IF) experiments for At5g27495 cellular localization require careful consideration of fixation, permeabilization, and detection methods. Based on established protocols for plant immunofluorescence:
Sample preparation: Fix tissue sections in 4% paraformaldehyde to preserve cellular architecture
Permeabilization: Use 0.1-0.5% Triton X-100 to allow antibody access to intracellular compartments
Blocking: Block with 2-5% BSA or normal serum to reduce non-specific binding
Primary antibody: Apply At5g27495 antibody at optimized concentration (typically 1:100-1:500 for IF)
Secondary detection: Use fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies with minimal cross-reactivity
Controls: Include secondary-only controls and comparative analysis with mutant lines
Co-localization: Consider dual labeling with organelle markers to precisely determine subcellular localization
For interpreting IF results, researchers should be aware that fixation conditions may affect epitope accessibility and that autofluorescence can be problematic in plant tissues, particularly in chlorophyll-containing cells. Signal specificity should be confirmed by comparing with known expression patterns and through genetic controls when available.
Antibodies against At5g27495 can be powerful tools for investigating protein-protein interactions through several methodologies:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): Precipitate At5g27495 protein using the specific antibody and identify interacting partners through mass spectrometry analysis
Proximity ligation assay (PLA): Detect protein interactions in situ with high sensitivity by using antibodies against At5g27495 and its potential interacting partners
FRET-FLIM analysis: Combine antibody labeling with fluorescence resonance energy transfer techniques to detect interactions with nanometer-scale resolution
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP): If At5g27495 encodes a DNA-binding protein, identify DNA-protein interactions in vivo
Each method has specific advantages and limitations. For instance, Co-IP may identify indirect interactions within complexes, while PLA provides spatial information but requires careful optimization of antibody pairs . When studying plant protein interactions, researchers should be aware that some interactions may be transient or condition-dependent, requiring careful experimental design to capture physiologically relevant associations.
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) of At5g27495 protein can be studied using specialized antibody-based approaches:
Modification-specific antibodies: If available, use antibodies that specifically recognize phosphorylated, ubiquitinated, or otherwise modified forms of the protein
Sequential immunoprecipitation: First immunoprecipitate with At5g27495 antibody, then probe with antibodies against common PTMs (phospho-serine/threonine/tyrosine, ubiquitin, SUMO, etc.)
2D gel electrophoresis: Separate proteins by isoelectric point and molecular weight to resolve modified forms, then detect with At5g27495 antibodies
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry: Enrich for At5g27495 protein using the antibody, then identify PTMs by mass spectrometry analysis
When investigating PTMs, researchers should consider that modifications may be dynamic and responsive to environmental conditions or developmental stages. For example, as seen with ABI5 protein, ABA treatment can induce changes in protein abundance and potentially modification status . Comparative analysis between different conditions can reveal regulatory mechanisms controlling protein function through post-translational mechanisms.
Distinguishing between closely related protein isoforms presents a significant challenge in plant research. For At5g27495 and related proteins, several strategies can improve isoform specificity:
Epitope selection: Develop antibodies against unique regions that differ between isoforms
Preabsorption strategies: Deplete cross-reactive antibodies by preincubation with recombinant proteins of related isoforms
Genetic validation: Test antibody specificity in plants with specific isoform knockouts
Combined approaches: Use isoform-specific RT-PCR alongside antibody detection to correlate transcript and protein levels
Immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry: Identify isoform-specific peptides after enrichment with the antibody
When analyzing closely related proteins, as demonstrated in the analysis of IL-23 antibodies, differences in binding affinity and epitope recognition can significantly impact specificity . For plant research specifically, genetic resources like T-DNA insertion lines or CRISPR-generated mutations provide valuable tools for validating antibody specificity against individual gene family members.
Non-specific binding is a common challenge when working with plant antibodies. To address this issue with At5g27495 antibodies:
Optimize antibody concentration: Test a dilution series to determine the optimal concentration that maximizes specific signal while minimizing background
Modify blocking conditions: Try alternative blocking agents (BSA, normal serum, commercial blockers) or increase blocking time/concentration
Adjust washing stringency: Increase wash buffer salt concentration (150-500 mM NaCl) or add mild detergents (0.1-0.5% Tween-20)
Pre-adsorb antibody: Incubate antibody with proteins from knockout/knockdown plant tissue to remove cross-reactive antibodies
Optimize detection method: Use more sensitive detection systems or amplification methods for weak specific signals
As noted in the literature, "Using too much antibody can yield nonspecific results, and too little can lead to no data or false-negative results" . Finding the optimal concentration requires systematic testing across a range of dilutions, with careful attention to signal-to-noise ratio and dynamic range of detection.
Consistency challenges with plant antibodies require systematic troubleshooting approaches:
When facing reproducibility issues, researchers should systematically isolate variables by changing one parameter at a time. As emphasized in the literature, "based on the antibody application, the critical steps should be outlined and the experiment should have proper controls in place to make sure there are no or minimal artifacts" . Maintaining detailed laboratory records of all experimental conditions is essential for identifying sources of variability.
Detecting low-abundance proteins in plant tissues requires specialized approaches:
Sample enrichment: Concentrate proteins through immunoprecipitation or subcellular fractionation
Signal amplification: Utilize tyramide signal amplification (TSA) or other enzymatic amplification methods
Detection sensitivity: Switch to more sensitive detection methods (ECL Prime, fluorescent secondary antibodies)
Increase sample loading: Load more total protein while ensuring linear detection range isn't exceeded
Extended exposure times: For Western blots, use longer exposure times with low-noise imaging systems
Protein induction: When applicable, use treatments that upregulate the target protein (similar to ABA treatment for ABI5)
When optimizing for low-abundance proteins, researchers should be particularly vigilant about non-specific background, as signal amplification can also increase background noise. Appropriate negative controls become especially important in these scenarios to distinguish genuine signal from artifacts.
Emerging technologies are creating new opportunities for plant protein research using antibodies:
Single-domain antibodies: The development of nanobodies derived from camelid antibodies offers improved tissue penetration and stability
Recombinant antibody fragments: Custom-engineered Fab or scFv fragments can provide enhanced specificity for plant proteins
Proximity-dependent labeling: Integration of antibodies with BioID or APEX2 systems enables identification of protein neighborhoods in complex tissues
Combining CRISPR and antibody technology: As demonstrated with CAR development for hepatitis B, antibody isolation from single B cells followed by genetic characterization offers opportunities for highly specific plant antibodies
Mass cytometry (CyTOF): Antibody labeling with rare earth metals for multiplexed detection of proteins in complex plant tissues
These emerging approaches could overcome current limitations in plant antibody research, particularly the challenges related to specificity and cross-reactivity. As demonstrated with the development of monoclonal antibodies for hepatitis B, isolation of B cells from immunized organisms followed by cloning of antibody-encoding genes represents a powerful approach for developing new reagents with enhanced specificity .
Researchers developing custom antibodies against At5g27495 should consider several critical factors:
Antigen design: Select unique, soluble, and immunogenic regions of the protein; consider using full-length protein versus peptide immunogens
Host species selection: Choose immunization hosts (rabbit, mouse, chicken) based on evolutionary distance from plants and intended applications
Purification strategy: Plan for affinity purification using the immunizing antigen to enhance specificity
Validation planning: Design comprehensive validation experiments including genetic controls (knockout lines)
Application optimization: Develop protocols specifically optimized for intended applications (WB, IF, IP)
When designing custom antibodies, researchers should prioritize epitopes that are accessible in the native protein conformation for applications requiring recognition of properly folded proteins. For Arabidopsis proteins specifically, researchers might consider the approach used for ABI5 antibody development, where recombinant HIS-tagged full-length protein was used as the immunogen . This strategy often produces antibodies capable of recognizing multiple epitopes across the protein structure.
When publishing research utilizing At5g27495 antibodies, researchers should adhere to best practices that promote reproducibility and transparency:
Detailed materials reporting: Provide complete antibody information including source, catalog number, RRID, clonality, and host species
Validation evidence: Include data demonstrating antibody specificity such as knockout/knockdown controls
Protocol transparency: Describe all experimental conditions, including blocking agents, antibody dilutions, and incubation times
Image processing disclosure: Clearly state any image adjustments and provide unprocessed original images as supplementary material
Limitations acknowledgment: Discuss potential limitations of the antibody-based methods used
Data availability: Deposit raw data in appropriate repositories to enable reanalysis by other researchers
Following these practices addresses the reproducibility challenges in antibody-based research identified in the literature . As emphasized in antibody validation guidelines, "the experiment should have proper controls in place to make sure there are no or minimal artifacts" , and these controls should be clearly presented in publications to enable proper interpretation of the results.
Antibody-based detection of At5g27495 protein represents one part of a comprehensive molecular biology toolkit. Integration with complementary approaches provides more robust insights:
Transcript analysis: Combining protein detection with RT-qPCR analysis of gene expression reveals post-transcriptional regulation
Fluorescent protein fusions: Comparing antibody-based localization with fluorescent protein tagging strengthens localization evidence
Proteomics integration: Using antibodies for targeted proteomics alongside global profiling approaches
Functional studies: Correlating protein detection with phenotypic analysis of mutant lines
Structural biology: Relating antibody epitope mapping to protein structure-function relationships