LCR41 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 week lead time (made-to-order)
Synonyms
LCR41 antibody; At3g04943 antibody; T9J14 antibody; Putative defensin-like protein 188 antibody; Putative low-molecular-weight cysteine-rich protein 41 antibody; Protein LCR41 antibody
Target Names
LCR41
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT3G04943

STRING: 3702.AT3G04943.1

UniGene: At.63242

Protein Families
DEFL family
Subcellular Location
Secreted.

Q&A

What is the LCR41 protein and what is its significance in Arabidopsis thaliana?

LCR41 (Low-molecular-weight Cysteine-Rich 41) is a plant protein encoded by the LCR41 gene (Entrez Gene ID: 3768828) in Arabidopsis thaliana . It belongs to the family of cysteine-rich peptides that play significant roles in plant defense mechanisms, growth regulation, and development processes. The protein is characterized by its low molecular weight and relatively high cysteine content, which contributes to its structural stability through disulfide bonding.

The LCR41 protein (UniProt Number: P82756) has been implicated in various biological processes in Arabidopsis thaliana, including pathogen response systems and cellular signaling pathways . Understanding its function provides insights into fundamental aspects of plant biology, particularly regarding how plants respond to environmental stresses and regulate developmental processes.

What are the key specifications of commercially available LCR41 antibodies?

Commercial LCR41 antibodies are typically rabbit polyclonal antibodies raised against recombinant Arabidopsis thaliana LCR41 protein . The key specifications include:

CharacteristicSpecification
Antibody TypePolyclonal
Host SpeciesRabbit
Target SpeciesPlant (Arabidopsis thaliana)
ImmunogenRecombinant Arabidopsis thaliana LCR41 protein
Purification MethodProtein A/G Purified
Validated ApplicationsELISA, Western Blot (WB)
IsotypeIgG
Storage Conditions-20°C or -80°C

Standard packages often include the purified antibody along with recombinant immunogen protein/peptide as a positive control and pre-immune serum for experimental validation .

What are the recommended applications for LCR41 antibody in plant research?

LCR41 antibody has been validated for several experimental applications in plant research:

  • Western Blotting: For detection and quantification of LCR41 protein expression levels in plant tissue extracts. The antibody allows researchers to evaluate protein expression across different plant tissues or under various treatment conditions .

  • ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay): For quantitative detection of LCR41 protein in complex biological samples, providing a sensitive measure of protein abundance .

  • Immunohistochemistry: Though not explicitly validated in the product information, polyclonal antibodies against plant proteins are commonly used for localization studies to determine tissue and subcellular distribution patterns.

  • Co-immunoprecipitation: For studying protein-protein interactions involving LCR41, helping to elucidate its functional networks and regulatory pathways.

When designing experiments, researchers should incorporate appropriate controls, including the provided pre-immune serum and positive control recombinant protein .

How should LCR41 antibody be stored and handled to maintain optimal activity?

To preserve antibody functionality and specificity, proper storage and handling of LCR41 antibody is essential:

  • Long-term storage: Store at either -20°C or -80°C in small aliquots to minimize freeze-thaw cycles .

  • Working dilutions: Prepare fresh working dilutions on the day of the experiment and store at 4°C if used within 24 hours.

  • Freeze-thaw cycles: Minimize the number of freeze-thaw cycles as these can lead to protein denaturation and loss of antibody activity.

  • Buffer conditions: When diluting for use, use buffers containing carrier proteins (e.g., 1% BSA) to prevent adsorption to tube walls.

  • Contamination prevention: Use sterile techniques when handling to prevent microbial contamination, which can degrade antibody proteins.

Following these guidelines will help ensure consistent experimental results and extend the useful life of the antibody preparation.

How can specificity of LCR41 antibody be validated in plant research applications?

Validating antibody specificity is crucial for ensuring reliable experimental results. For LCR41 antibody, several validation approaches should be employed:

  • Positive control verification: Use the provided recombinant immunogen protein (200μg) as a positive control in Western blots or ELISA to confirm antibody binding capacity .

  • Pre-immune serum comparison: Compare results with the included pre-immune serum (1ml) to identify non-specific binding .

  • Knockout/knockdown validation: Test the antibody in LCR41 knockout or knockdown plant lines where available, which should show reduced or absent signal compared to wild-type plants.

  • Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate the antibody with excess LCR41 recombinant protein or synthetic peptide before application in the experimental system. A specific antibody will show significantly reduced signal when its epitopes are blocked.

  • Cross-reactivity assessment: Test reactivity against related proteins from the LCR family to determine potential cross-reactivity, especially important when studying LCR41 in non-model plant species.

These validation methods follow similar principles to those employed for monoclonal antibodies in other research contexts, where binding site specificity critically determines experimental reliability and therapeutic efficacy .

What are the critical considerations when optimizing Western blot protocols with LCR41 antibody?

Optimizing Western blot protocols for LCR41 antibody requires careful attention to several parameters:

  • Sample preparation:

    • Efficient extraction of LCR41 from plant tissues requires appropriate buffer selection containing protease inhibitors

    • Optimize protein denaturation conditions (reducing vs. non-reducing, boiling time)

    • Consider enrichment steps for low-abundance proteins

  • Antibody concentration optimization:

    • Perform titration experiments to determine the optimal antibody concentration

    • Starting recommended dilutions typically range from 1:500 to 1:2000 for primary antibody

    • Signal-to-noise ratio should be the key determinant of optimal concentration

  • Blocking conditions:

    • Test different blocking agents (BSA, non-fat dry milk, commercial blocking solutions)

    • Optimize blocking time and temperature to minimize background

  • Incubation parameters:

    • Compare overnight incubation at 4°C versus shorter incubations at room temperature

    • Assess different washing stringencies to remove unbound antibody

  • Detection method selection:

    • Choose between chemiluminescent, fluorescent, or chromogenic detection based on sensitivity requirements

    • Consider two-color Western blotting for simultaneous detection of LCR41 and loading controls

This methodological approach mirrors principles used in optimizing protocols for other antibodies, such as the anti-V mAbs used in plague research .

How can LCR41 antibody be used to study protein-protein interactions in plant signaling pathways?

Investigating protein-protein interactions involving LCR41 requires sophisticated approaches:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):

    • Use LCR41 antibody immobilized on Protein A/G beads to capture LCR41 and its interacting partners

    • Elute bound proteins and analyze by mass spectrometry to identify novel interaction partners

    • Verify interactions by reciprocal Co-IP with antibodies against identified partner proteins

  • Proximity-based labeling:

    • Combine with techniques like BioID or APEX2 to identify proteins in close proximity to LCR41 in living cells

    • These approaches can reveal transient interactions that might be missed by traditional Co-IP

  • Immunofluorescence co-localization:

    • Use LCR41 antibody in combination with antibodies against suspected interaction partners

    • Quantitative co-localization analysis can provide evidence for potential interactions in situ

  • Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET):

    • Use fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies against LCR41 antibody and antibodies against potential interaction partners

    • FRET signals indicate close proximity (< 10 nm) between proteins

  • Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR):

    • Immobilize purified LCR41 and measure binding kinetics with potential interaction partners

    • This approach provides quantitative affinity measurements similar to those used in characterizing mAb 7.3 binding to V-antigen

These methodologies allow researchers to build comprehensive interaction networks and understand LCR41's role in plant signaling cascades.

What approaches can be used to characterize the avidity and affinity of LCR41 antibody?

Characterizing the binding properties of LCR41 antibody is essential for understanding its performance in different applications:

  • ELISA-based avidity determination:

    • Perform titration curves with varying concentrations of antibody against immobilized antigen

    • Calculate apparent avidity (EC50) from the resulting binding curves

    • Compare binding under different buffer conditions to assess stability of interactions

  • Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR):

    • Immobilize antibody on a sensor chip and measure binding kinetics of LCR41 protein

    • Determine association (kon) and dissociation (koff) rate constants

    • Calculate equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) to quantify affinity

  • Bio-Layer Interferometry (BLI):

    • Alternative optical technique for measuring real-time binding kinetics

    • Provides similar kinetic parameters to SPR with different instrumental requirements

  • Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC):

    • Measures thermodynamic parameters (ΔH, ΔS) of antibody-antigen binding

    • Provides insights into the nature of the binding interaction

These approaches mirror those used to analyze protective anti-V mAbs, where researchers found that protective efficacy correlated more with binding site specificity than with avidity or affinity metrics .

What troubleshooting strategies can address common challenges with LCR41 antibody experiments?

When facing challenges with LCR41 antibody experiments, systematic troubleshooting approaches should be employed:

  • Western Blot Issues:

    ProblemPotential CausesSolutions
    No signalInsufficient protein, degraded antibodyIncrease protein loading, verify antibody activity with positive control
    Multiple bandsCross-reactivity, protein degradationIncrease antibody specificity with more stringent washing, add protease inhibitors
    High backgroundInsufficient blocking, antibody concentration too highOptimize blocking conditions, titrate antibody, increase wash stringency
    Inconsistent resultsVariable extraction efficiencyStandardize protein extraction protocol, use loading controls
  • ELISA Troubleshooting:

    • For low signal: increase antibody concentration or sample incubation time

    • For high background: optimize blocking conditions and washing steps

    • For poor reproducibility: standardize plate coating conditions and sample preparation

  • Immunofluorescence Issues:

    • For weak signal: optimize fixation method, increase antibody concentration

    • For non-specific binding: pre-adsorb antibody with plant extract from unrelated species

    • For autofluorescence: include appropriate controls and consider spectral unmixing

  • Cross-reactivity Management:

    • Pre-adsorb antibody against related proteins

    • Use more stringent washing conditions

    • Consider epitope mapping to identify unique regions for more specific antibody generation

These approaches draw on principles similar to those applied when optimizing monoclonal antibody protocols for bacterial antigens .

How can LCR41 antibody be adapted for use in non-model plant species?

Adapting LCR41 antibody for use in non-model plants requires careful consideration of evolutionary conservation and methodological adjustments:

  • Sequence homology assessment:

    • Perform in silico analysis of LCR41 sequence conservation between Arabidopsis and the target species

    • Identify conserved epitopes that might be recognized by the antibody

    • Predict potential cross-reactivity based on sequence similarity

  • Cross-reactivity testing:

    • Perform Western blot analysis on protein extracts from the non-model species

    • Compare band patterns with those from Arabidopsis extracts

    • Confirm specificity using recombinant proteins where available

  • Protocol optimization:

    • Adjust extraction buffers to account for different tissue compositions

    • Modify blocking conditions to reduce plant-specific background

    • Test multiple fixation methods for immunohistochemistry applications

  • Validation approaches:

    • Use heterologous expression systems to produce the LCR41 ortholog from the target species

    • Test antibody reactivity against the recombinant protein

    • Consider epitope tagging approaches as complementary methods

This cross-species adaptation approach is conceptually similar to the broader application of monoclonal antibodies against conserved bacterial targets .

What strategies can enhance detection sensitivity for low-abundance LCR41 protein?

When LCR41 is expressed at low levels, enhanced detection strategies become necessary:

  • Sample enrichment methods:

    • Immunoprecipitation-based enrichment prior to analysis

    • Subcellular fractionation to concentrate compartment-specific signals

    • Protein concentration techniques like TCA precipitation

  • Signal amplification systems:

    • Tyramide signal amplification (TSA) for immunohistochemistry

    • Polymer-based detection systems with multiple secondary antibodies

    • Biotin-streptavidin amplification systems similar to those used in competitive binding ELISAs

  • Enhanced detection technologies:

    • Highly sensitive chemiluminescent substrates for Western blotting

    • Quantum dot-conjugated secondary antibodies for fluorescence applications

    • Digital imaging systems with extended exposure capabilities

  • Alternative detection formats:

    • Single-molecule detection methods

    • Digital ELISA platforms with femtomolar sensitivity

    • Proximity ligation assay (PLA) for in situ protein detection

These approaches can significantly lower detection thresholds, enabling visualization of LCR41 even in tissues with minimal expression.

How can LCR41 antibody be incorporated into multi-parameter analysis workflows?

Modern plant biology research often requires simultaneous analysis of multiple proteins and parameters:

  • Multiplexed immunofluorescence:

    • Combine LCR41 antibody with antibodies against other proteins of interest

    • Use host species-specific secondary antibodies with distinct fluorophores

    • Implement spectral unmixing for closely overlapping emission spectra

  • Multi-color flow cytometry:

    • Apply to plant protoplasts for quantitative analysis of LCR41 expression

    • Combine with cell cycle markers or other cellular parameters

    • Enable high-throughput single-cell analysis

  • Mass cytometry (CyTOF):

    • Label LCR41 antibody with rare earth metals

    • Combine with dozens of other antibodies for highly multiplexed analysis

    • Ideal for complex phenotyping in heterogeneous plant tissues

  • Sequential immunostaining:

    • Apply antibody stripping and reprobing techniques

    • Use cyclic immunofluorescence for highly multiplexed imaging

    • Document precise spatial relationships between LCR41 and other proteins

These multiplexed approaches allow researchers to place LCR41 function within broader cellular contexts and regulatory networks.

How might genetic engineering approaches enhance LCR41 antibody specificity and utility?

Genetic engineering techniques similar to those used for humanized monoclonal antibodies could improve LCR41 antibody performance:

  • Recombinant antibody fragment production:

    • Generate single-chain variable fragments (scFv) from hybridoma cells

    • Express antigen-binding fragments (Fab) in bacterial or plant expression systems

    • Create bispecific antibodies targeting LCR41 and another protein of interest

  • Phage display technology:

    • Screen antibody libraries for fragments with enhanced specificity for LCR41

    • Select variants with improved affinity or reduced cross-reactivity

    • Generate completely synthetic antibodies against difficult epitopes

  • Transgenic approaches:

    • Develop transgenic plants expressing anti-LCR41 nanobodies fused to fluorescent proteins

    • Create plants with inducible expression of anti-LCR41 intrabodies for functional studies

    • Similar to transgenic mice with humanized immune systems used for antibody development

  • CRISPR-based epitope tagging:

    • Edit the endogenous LCR41 gene to incorporate epitope tags

    • Enable detection with high-specificity commercial antibodies

    • Preserve natural expression patterns and regulation

These approaches parallel the modern techniques being developed for monoclonal antibodies against bacterial targets, which focus on enhancing specificity and therapeutic potential .

What are the potential applications of LCR41 antibody in studying plant stress responses?

LCR41 antibody could play a crucial role in understanding plant responses to various stressors:

  • Pathogen response studies:

    • Monitor LCR41 expression changes during pathogen infection

    • Examine localization shifts in response to pathogen-associated molecular patterns

    • Compare responses across resistant and susceptible plant varieties

  • Abiotic stress analysis:

    • Quantify LCR41 expression changes under drought, salinity, or temperature stress

    • Investigate post-translational modifications using modification-specific antibodies

    • Examine tissue-specific responses through immunohistochemistry

  • Hormone signaling integration:

    • Study how plant hormones regulate LCR41 expression and localization

    • Investigate co-localization with hormone receptors and signaling components

    • Examine the timing of LCR41 responses in hormone signaling cascades

  • Climate change adaptation research:

    • Compare LCR41 expression patterns across ecotypes from different environments

    • Investigate evolutionary conservation of LCR41 responses to stress

    • Develop LCR41-based markers for stress resilience

These applications highlight how antibody-based techniques remain foundational to understanding complex biological responses, much as monoclonal antibodies have revolutionized our understanding of bacterial pathogenesis .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.