At3g05727 Antibody is a research-grade antibody targeting the protein encoded by the At3g05727 gene in Arabidopsis thaliana, a model organism in plant biology. This antibody is commercialized by Cusabio (Product Code: CSB-PA690935XA01DOA) for use in immunological and molecular studies . The Uniprot identifier Q56XB0 corresponds to the target protein, which is annotated as a defensin-like protein potentially involved in plant defense mechanisms .
The At3g05727 gene encodes a protein with a molecular weight of ~15–20 kDa (inferred from defensin-like protein sizes). Defensin-like proteins in plants often exhibit antimicrobial properties, particularly against fungal pathogens . The antibody is designed to recognize epitopes on this protein, enabling detection via immunoblotting, immunoprecipitation, or immunohistochemistry.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Product Code | CSB-PA690935XA01DOA |
| Target Organism | Arabidopsis thaliana |
| Antibody Format | Polyclonal or Monoclonal (exact type unspecified) |
| Concentration | 2 mL (concentration not specified) |
| Storage Conditions | Typically -20°C (standard practice) |
Source: Cusabio product specifications
Studies on Arabidopsis defensin-like genes reveal that At3g05727 exhibits strong expression in seedlings, suggesting a role in early developmental stages or stress responses . This contrasts with other defensin-like genes (e.g., At3g59930), which show tissue-specific expression in siliques (seed pods) .
| Gene | Expression in Seedlings | Expression in Siliques |
|---|---|---|
| At3g05727 | High | Low |
| At3g59930 | High | Low |
| At3g05730 | High | Low |
Adapted from gene expression profiles in Arabidopsis
The antibody is used to:
Localize At3g05727 in plant tissues (e.g., roots, leaves).
Quantify protein levels via Western blotting or ELISA.
Study stress-responsive pathways involving defensin-like proteins.
Defensin-like proteins are candidates for engineering crop resistance to pathogens. The At3g05727 Antibody could facilitate:
Protein purification for structural or functional analysis.
Gene editing validation (e.g., CRISPR-mediated knockout).
Biomarker discovery for stress-tolerant phenotypes.
At3g05727 is a gene locus in Arabidopsis thaliana that encodes a protein involved in specific cellular functions. Researchers develop antibodies against this protein to study its expression patterns, localization, interactions, and role in various biological processes. Antibodies enable visualization, quantification, and isolation of the target protein across different experimental contexts . This approach is fundamental to understanding gene function beyond sequence analysis alone, allowing researchers to investigate protein-level regulation and activity.
Validating antibody specificity is crucial for reliable research outcomes. Recommended validation protocols include:
Western blotting with positive and negative controls (wild-type vs. knockout plants)
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Immunohistochemistry with parallel experiments using secondary antibody only
Testing against recombinant protein and competing peptides
These methods help establish that the antibody recognizes the intended target with minimal cross-reactivity. Documentation of validation experiments should be maintained to support the reproducibility of subsequent research findings .
Optimization of immunoblotting conditions is essential for obtaining clear, specific signals. Begin with a titration experiment testing different antibody concentrations (typically 1:500 to 1:5000) to determine optimal dilution. Adjust blocking conditions (3-5% BSA or non-fat milk) and incubation times (1-24 hours) systematically. For plant proteins like At3g05727, sample preparation requires effective extraction buffers that address plant-specific challenges such as phenolic compounds and cell wall components. Including detergents like 0.1% Triton X-100 in wash steps can reduce background without affecting specific binding . Document all optimization steps to establish a reproducible protocol.
Advanced computational approaches can predict antibody binding regions on the At3g05727 protein. Modern AI-based tools like ABodyBuilder2, which shows improved performance over other models with a RMSD of 2.81 Å for CDR loops prediction, can be employed for structural modeling . These models help in identifying epitopes and optimizing antibody design.
For analyzing potential epitopes on the At3g05727 protein, researchers can utilize tools like DiscoTope-3.0 that identify surface-exposed regions with higher probability of antibody recognition . This computational prediction should be validated experimentally through epitope mapping techniques such as hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry or alanine scanning mutagenesis. Integrating computational prediction with experimental validation creates a more robust approach to understanding antibody-antigen interactions.
Cross-reactivity represents a significant challenge for antibody specificity. When developing or troubleshooting At3g05727 antibodies, researchers should:
Conduct exhaustive BLAST analysis to identify proteins with similar epitopes
Perform pre-adsorption tests with related proteins
Use knockout/knockdown controls alongside wild-type samples
Consider epitope selection that minimizes homology with related proteins
If cross-reactivity persists, affinity purification against the specific antigen can improve specificity. Additionally, implementing multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of the same protein provides validation through convergent results . Document all cross-reactivity testing to provide transparency about antibody limitations.
Multiplexed detection enables simultaneous analysis of At3g05727 with other proteins of interest. This approach requires careful selection of primary antibodies from different host species and appropriate fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies with non-overlapping emission spectra.
For quantitative co-localization studies, researchers should:
Optimize individual antibody staining protocols before attempting multiplexing
Perform controls to verify absence of spectral bleed-through
Use appropriate image analysis software for quantitative co-localization metrics
Consider advanced techniques like proximity ligation assay (PLA) to detect protein-protein interactions within 40nm distance
Modern microscopy platforms with spectral unmixing capabilities further enhance multiplexed detection precision . Statistical analysis of co-localization should include Pearson's correlation coefficient and Manders' overlap coefficient to quantify the degree of association between proteins.
Sample preparation significantly impacts antibody performance across different applications. For plant tissue expressing At3g05727, consider these application-specific approaches:
For Western blotting:
Extract proteins using buffer containing 50mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, and protease inhibitors
Include reducing agents like DTT (1-5mM) to disrupt disulfide bonds
Heat samples at 70°C instead of 95°C to prevent aggregation of membrane-associated proteins
For immunohistochemistry:
Fix tissues with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30-45 minutes
Consider epitope retrieval methods (citrate buffer pH 6.0) if fixation masks the epitope
Optimize permeabilization conditions based on subcellular localization of the target
For immunoprecipitation:
Use gentler lysis conditions to preserve protein-protein interactions
Pre-clear lysates with protein A/G beads to reduce non-specific binding
Cross-validate results with reciprocal immunoprecipitation using antibodies against suspected interaction partners
Each application requires systematic optimization to achieve reliable, reproducible results.
Accurate quantification of At3g05727 protein requires robust methodological approaches. Consider these techniques:
Quantitative Western blotting:
Use internal loading controls (housekeeping proteins)
Include a standard curve of recombinant At3g05727 protein
Apply digital image analysis with background subtraction
Calculate relative expression normalized to controls
ELISA-based quantification:
Develop a sandwich ELISA using two antibodies recognizing different epitopes
Include technical triplicates and standard curves
Validate dynamic range and limit of detection
Mass spectrometry approaches:
Statistical analysis should account for biological variability and technical replication. For time-course experiments, apply appropriate statistical models for repeated measures data . Document all quantification procedures in detail to ensure reproducibility.
Proper controls are vital for interpreting antibody-based experimental results. Essential controls include:
Positive controls:
Recombinant At3g05727 protein
Overexpression systems (transient or stable)
Tissues/cells known to express the target
Negative controls:
Knockout/knockdown samples (CRISPR-edited or RNAi)
Pre-immune serum or isotype control antibodies
Secondary antibody-only controls
Competing peptide controls
Process controls:
Loading controls for Western blots
Staining controls for microscopy to assess sample quality
Cross-experiment reference samples to normalize batch effects
Additionally, biological replicates (n≥3) are essential to account for natural variation. Technical replicates help establish method reproducibility. The combination of appropriate controls and replication strategies ensures robust, reliable results.
When facing weak or absent signals, a systematic troubleshooting approach is recommended:
Antibody functionality assessment:
Verify antibody viability through dot blot against the immunizing peptide
Test alternative antibody lots or sources
Confirm storage conditions haven't compromised activity
Protocol optimization:
Increase antibody concentration or incubation time
Optimize antigen retrieval methods for fixed samples
Test different blocking reagents to improve signal-to-noise ratio
Enhance sensitivity with amplification systems (e.g., tyramide signal amplification)
Sample-related factors:
Document all troubleshooting steps methodically to build an effective protocol. If signals remain problematic, consider alternative detection approaches like mass spectrometry or proximity ligation assays.
Experimental setup:
Immobilize purified At3g05727 protein or antibody on sensor surface
Flow varying concentrations of the binding partner
Monitor association and dissociation phases
Include regeneration steps between measurements
Data analysis:
Apply appropriate binding models (1:1 Langmuir, heterogeneous ligand)
Calculate association rate (kon), dissociation rate (koff), and equilibrium dissociation constant (KD)
Compare with published standards for research-grade antibodies
Quality control:
Advanced analysis might include thermodynamic characterization through isothermal titration calorimetry or microscale thermophoresis to complement kinetic studies.
Contradictory results require careful investigation and methodical resolution approaches:
Verification of antibody specificity:
Confirm epitope integrity in different experimental conditions
Evaluate potential cross-reactivity with homologous proteins
Consider isoform-specific recognition issues
Methodological differences:
Compare fixation/extraction protocols between contradictory experiments
Assess detection sensitivity thresholds across methods
Evaluate sample preparation differences that might affect epitope accessibility
Biological variability considerations:
When publishing contradictory findings, transparently report all experimental conditions and consider using multiple antibodies against different epitopes of At3g05727 protein. Statistical approaches like finite mixture models can be valuable for analyzing heterogeneous antibody data distributions and resolving apparent contradictions in serological data .
Developing custom antibodies with enhanced specificity requires strategic planning:
Epitope selection:
Use computational tools to identify unique regions with high antigenicity
Avoid regions with post-translational modifications unless specifically targeting them
Consider protein domains with minimal homology to related proteins
Target multiple epitopes for validation through convergent results
Production strategy:
Compare monoclonal versus polyclonal approaches based on research needs
Consider recombinant antibody technologies for reproducibility
Implement rigorous screening against related proteins to minimize cross-reactivity
Validation framework:
Document all development steps to provide complete transparency about antibody characteristics and limitations.
AI-based tools are revolutionizing antibody research. For At3g05727 antibody work, consider:
Structure prediction tools:
ABodyBuilder2, which has demonstrated superior performance with a RMSD of 2.81Å for CDR loops
IgFold for modeling antibody-antigen complexes
AlphaFold-Multimer for predicting structural interactions
Sequence optimization approaches:
ESM-IF1 or AntiFold for inverse folding applications
Hu-mAb for humanization of antibody sequences if developing therapeutic applications
ProRefiner for optimizing developability properties while maintaining binding affinity
Data analysis frameworks:
These computational approaches complement experimental methods and can accelerate research while reducing resource requirements. Integration of AI predictions with experimental validation creates robust research pathways.
Advanced microscopy techniques enable detailed analysis of At3g05727 protein localization and dynamics:
Super-resolution microscopy approaches:
STED (Stimulated Emission Depletion) microscopy for 30-80nm resolution
PALM/STORM for single-molecule localization beyond diffraction limit
Expansion microscopy to physically enlarge specimens while maintaining molecular relationships
Live-cell imaging applications:
Consider developing nanobodies against At3g05727 for live-cell applications
Use split fluorescent protein complementation to study protein-protein interactions
Implement FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching) to study protein dynamics
Quantitative analysis strategies:
For complex plant tissues, clearing techniques like CLARITY or iDISCO can improve imaging depth while preserving antibody binding sites. Combine structural imaging with functional data from techniques like FRET (Förster Resonance Energy Transfer) to link localization with activity.