The At1g65352 antibody is a specialized immunological reagent designed to detect the protein product of the At1g65352 gene in Arabidopsis thaliana. This gene encodes a putative membrane lipoprotein, though its precise biological role remains under investigation . The antibody serves as a critical tool for studying protein localization, expression patterns, and molecular interactions in plant developmental biology.
Gene ID: AT1G65352 (Arabidopsis Genome Initiative nomenclature)
UniProt ID: Q2V4F0
Protein Function: Predicted to function as a membrane-associated lipoprotein, potentially involved in cellular transport or signaling pathways .
Track tissue-specific protein localization.
Investigate stress-responsive gene expression.
Current gaps in knowledge include:
Functional Annotation: The exact biochemical role of At1g65352 remains uncharacterized.
Antibody Validation: Independent validation data (e.g., in peer-reviewed studies) are absent from accessible sources.
Future research could employ CRISPR-Cas9 mutants or transcriptomic analyses to elucidate its role in plant development or stress responses.
KEGG: ath:AT1G65352
STRING: 3702.AT1G65352.1
At1g65352 Antibody (Product Code: CSB-PA651206XA01DOA) targets the protein product encoded by the At1g65352 gene in Arabidopsis thaliana, corresponding to UniProt accession number Q2V4F0. This antibody is designed specifically for detecting the target protein in experimental applications, providing researchers with a tool for studying gene expression and protein localization in this model plant organism .
The At1g65352 Antibody is primarily utilized in immunological detection methods including Western blotting, immunoprecipitation, immunohistochemistry, and ELISA when studying Arabidopsis thaliana. Each application provides different insights: Western blotting confirms protein expression and molecular weight, immunoprecipitation isolates protein complexes, immunohistochemistry reveals spatial localization within tissues, and ELISA enables quantitative protein measurement. These applications form the foundation of protein-level studies in plant molecular biology research.
Mammalian cell expression systems like Expi293 cells have been demonstrated as effective for antibody production and validation, as evidenced in related research protocols. For plant-specific antibodies like At1g65352, researchers typically validate specificity using Arabidopsis wild-type tissues compared to knockout mutants, or through heterologous expression in systems like E. coli, yeast, or insect cells. Validation involves demonstrating signal presence in samples containing the target protein and absence in negative controls .
Proper storage and handling of At1g65352 Antibody is critical for maintaining its functional properties. The antibody is typically available in 0.1ml or 2ml sizes and should be stored at -20°C for long-term preservation . For routine use, aliquoting is recommended to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles that can compromise antibody function. When working with the antibody, maintaining cold chain conditions (4°C) during experimental procedures helps preserve binding capacity, and appropriate buffer conditions (typically PBS with stabilizers) should be used for dilution.
Designing experiments to evaluate antibody specificity requires multiple controls. Researchers should include:
Arabidopsis knockout/knockdown mutants lacking the At1g65352 gene product
Pre-absorption controls where the antibody is pre-incubated with purified target protein
Secondary antibody-only controls to assess background
Cross-reactivity assessment using closely related Arabidopsis proteins
The inclusion of these controls helps differentiate genuine signal from artifacts, particularly when working with plant tissues that may contain complex profiles of related proteins or compounds that could interfere with antibody binding.
Optimal sample preparation varies by tissue type and developmental stage. For protein extraction from Arabidopsis tissues, researchers should consider:
| Tissue Type | Recommended Buffer | Special Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Leaf | HEPES-based buffer with 1% Triton X-100 | Include protease inhibitors and antioxidants |
| Root | Phosphate buffer with 0.5% NP-40 | Higher detergent concentration may be needed |
| Floral | Tris-based buffer with 0.1% SDS | Gentle homogenization to preserve protein integrity |
| Seedling | RIPA buffer | Complete mix of protease and phosphatase inhibitors |
Tissue-specific optimization of extraction conditions ensures maximum recovery of the target protein while minimizing degradation or modification that could affect antibody recognition.
For co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) studies, At1g65352 Antibody should be conjugated to a solid support (typically Protein A/G beads) via direct chemical coupling or using secondary antibody bridges. The experimental workflow should include:
Preparation of plant lysates under non-denaturing conditions
Pre-clearing of lysates with blank beads to reduce non-specific binding
Incubation with antibody-conjugated beads
Stringent washing to remove non-specific interactions
Elution of bound complexes for downstream analysis by mass spectrometry
This approach enables identification of proteins that physically interact with the At1g65352 gene product in vivo, providing insights into its biological function and regulatory networks in Arabidopsis.
When adapting At1g65352 Antibody for ChIP applications, researchers should consider:
Crosslinking optimization (typically 1-2% formaldehyde for 10-15 minutes)
Sonication parameters to generate appropriate DNA fragment sizes (200-600 bp)
Antibody specificity validation through epitope controls
Input normalization and negative region controls
Sequential ChIP approaches if investigating protein complexes
If the At1g65352 protein functions in transcriptional regulation or chromatin modification, ChIP experiments can reveal its genomic binding sites and contribute to understanding its role in gene expression control.
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) can significantly impact antibody recognition of the At1g65352 protein. Common plant protein PTMs include phosphorylation, ubiquitination, SUMOylation, and glycosylation. Researchers should consider:
Epitope mapping to determine if the antibody recognition site includes known or predicted modification sites
Comparison of detection in samples treated with phosphatases or deglycosylation enzymes
Use of modification-specific antibodies if studying particular PTM states
Western blot analysis to identify potential mobility shifts associated with modifications
Understanding these factors helps interpret variation in detection efficiency across different experimental conditions or developmental stages.
False negative results may arise from several factors:
| Issue | Potential Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| No signal detected | Low protein expression | Enrich sample with subcellular fractionation |
| Protein degradation | Include additional protease inhibitors | |
| Epitope masking | Try alternative extraction buffers or denaturing conditions | |
| Incorrect secondary antibody | Verify host species compatibility | |
| Weak signal | Insufficient antibody concentration | Optimize antibody titration |
| Inadequate incubation time | Extend primary antibody incubation (overnight at 4°C) | |
| Buffer incompatibility | Test different blocking agents and wash solutions |
Systematic troubleshooting using this framework can help identify and overcome technical challenges in At1g65352 protein detection.
When faced with contradictory results across platforms, researchers should:
Evaluate antibody validation data for each experimental method
Consider epitope accessibility differences between applications (native vs. denatured conditions)
Assess potential cross-reactivity with related proteins
Implement orthogonal detection methods (e.g., mass spectrometry, reporter gene fusion)
Examine the literature for known technical challenges with the specific protein
Statistical analysis of immunological data should be tailored to the specific experimental design. For quantitative Western blot or ELISA data, researchers should:
Perform at least three biological replicates with technical replicates
Apply appropriate normalization to loading controls or reference genes
Test for normal distribution before selecting parametric or non-parametric tests
Use paired tests when comparing treatments within the same biological sample
Apply multiple testing correction for experiments analyzing multiple conditions
For spatial data (immunohistochemistry), quantification should include representative sampling across tissues and statistical comparison of signal intensity or pattern distribution.
Recent advancements in antibody engineering, like those described in the DyAb platform, could enhance At1g65352 Antibody performance. This sequence-based antibody design approach uses machine learning to predict and optimize properties like binding affinity . Applied to plant antibodies, these technologies could:
Improve specificity through complementarity-determining region (CDR) optimization
Enhance affinity through mutational scanning and combinatorial design
Increase stability for challenging experimental conditions
Develop cross-species reactivity for comparative studies across plant models
These engineered antibodies could provide more consistent results and expand the range of applicable techniques for At1g65352 research.
Developing multiplexed assays requires careful antibody selection and validation. Researchers should:
Verify compatible fixation and antigen retrieval conditions across all targets
Select primary antibodies from different host species to enable distinct detection
Test for cross-reactivity between secondary detection systems
Optimize signal amplification methods to balance detection of low and high abundance targets
Validate spectral separation when using fluorescent detection systems
Multiplexed approaches allow simultaneous analysis of At1g65352 with interacting partners or pathway components, providing more comprehensive biological insights.