At2g06166 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 week lead time (made-to-order)
Synonyms
At2g06166 antibody; F5K7 antibody; Putative defensin-like protein 305 antibody
Target Names
At2g06166
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT2G06166

STRING: 3702.AT2G06166.1

UniGene: At.47608

Protein Families
DEFL family
Subcellular Location
Secreted.

Q&A

What is the AT2G06166 gene and why are antibodies against its protein product important?

AT2G06166 encodes a Defensin-like (DEFL) family protein in Arabidopsis thaliana . Antibodies targeting this protein are crucial for studying plant innate immunity, as defensin-like proteins often serve antimicrobial functions. These antibodies enable researchers to trace protein expression patterns, localize the protein within plant tissues, and understand its role in plant defense mechanisms. When developing research strategies, consider using monoclonal antibodies for highly specific detection of the target protein, similar to approaches used in other plant antibody applications . For definitive characterization, multiple detection methods should be employed alongside antibody-based techniques.

What validation methods should be used to confirm AT2G06166 antibody specificity?

Validating antibody specificity for AT2G06166 protein requires multiple complementary approaches. Western blot analysis using wild-type Arabidopsis tissues alongside AT2G06166 knockout/knockdown lines provides the fundamental confirmation of specificity. Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry can verify that the antibody pulls down the correct target protein. Pre-absorption tests, where the antibody is pre-incubated with purified antigen before immunolabeling experiments, help eliminate non-specific binding. For conclusive validation, consider comparing immunolabeling patterns with in situ hybridization of AT2G06166 mRNA. These approaches mirror validation techniques used for other plant antibodies, such as the CCRC-M36 antibody that targets rhamnogalacturonan I in Arabidopsis .

How should researchers optimize immunohistochemistry protocols for AT2G06166 detection in plant tissues?

Optimizing immunohistochemistry for AT2G06166 detection requires careful consideration of tissue fixation, embedding, and antigen retrieval steps. Plant tissues should be fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde to preserve protein structure while maintaining antigenicity. For Arabidopsis samples, vacuum infiltration during fixation improves reagent penetration. Testing multiple antigen retrieval methods (heat-induced citrate buffer, enzymatic digestion with proteinase K) is crucial, as defensin-like proteins may require specific conditions to expose epitopes. Blocking with 3-5% BSA in PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 1-2 hours minimizes background. Primary antibody dilutions should be titrated (typically 1:100 to 1:1000) and incubated overnight at 4°C. These approaches are consistent with established plant immunohistochemistry protocols used for other Arabidopsis proteins .

How can researchers distinguish between AT2G06166 and other closely related defensin family proteins using antibodies?

Distinguishing AT2G06166 from other defensin family proteins requires strategic epitope selection and rigorous cross-reactivity testing. When developing or selecting antibodies, target unique regions that differ from other defensin family members, particularly variable loops between conserved cysteine residues. Perform comprehensive cross-reactivity testing against recombinantly expressed related defensins using both Western blotting and ELISA. Competitive binding assays with related defensin peptides can quantitatively assess specificity. For enhanced discrimination, consider using a combination of antibodies targeting different epitopes on AT2G06166. Deep mutational scanning approaches, similar to those used for SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies , can map epitope specificity and identify potential cross-reactive regions. Furthermore, epitope-specific antibodies should be validated in plants with knocked-out AT2G06166 to confirm absence of signal.

What are the optimal approaches for using AT2G06166 antibodies in co-immunoprecipitation experiments to identify protein interaction partners?

For co-immunoprecipitation of AT2G06166 protein complexes, native extraction conditions are critical to preserve protein-protein interactions. Use gentle, non-ionic detergents (0.5-1% NP-40 or 0.1% Triton X-100) in extraction buffers containing 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), and protease inhibitors. Cross-linking with formaldehyde (0.5-1%) before extraction can stabilize transient interactions. For antibody coupling, use covalent attachment to magnetic beads rather than protein A/G beads to prevent antibody contamination in downstream mass spectrometry analysis. Include appropriate controls: IgG-matched control immunoprecipitations and samples from AT2G06166 knockout plants. To reduce non-specific binding, pre-clear lysates with naked beads before immunoprecipitation. This methodological approach is similar to techniques used for other plant protein interactions studies, as seen in immunoprecipitation protocols for various research applications .

How can machine learning approaches improve AT2G06166 antibody design and epitope prediction?

Machine learning algorithms can significantly enhance AT2G06166 antibody design through improved epitope prediction and binding affinity optimization. Library-on-library approaches, where multiple antibody variants are tested against numerous antigen variants, can generate comprehensive datasets for training machine learning models . These models can then predict antibody-antigen binding with high accuracy. Active learning strategies, which iteratively expand training datasets based on model uncertainty, can reduce experimental costs by up to 35% compared to random sampling approaches . For AT2G06166-specific applications, models should incorporate both sequence-based features and structural information about defensin-like proteins. B-cell epitope prediction algorithms can identify antigenic regions with high solvent accessibility and flexibility. Out-of-distribution performance assessment is crucial to ensure model generalizability to novel antibody designs . Implementation of these computational approaches should precede wet-lab validation to prioritize the most promising antibody candidates.

What are common pitfalls in Western blot analysis using AT2G06166 antibodies and how can they be addressed?

Common pitfalls in Western blot analysis with AT2G06166 antibodies include high background, weak signals, and non-specific bands. To address high background, optimize blocking conditions (test 5% non-fat milk versus 3-5% BSA) and increase washing stringency with higher detergent concentrations (0.1-0.3% Tween-20). For weak signals, improve protein extraction using specialized plant protein extraction buffers containing 8M urea or 2% SDS to fully solubilize defensin-like proteins, which may form aggregates. Consider using gradient gels (4-20%) to better resolve the small AT2G06166 protein (typical defensins are 4-6 kDa). Non-specific bands can be identified by including AT2G06166 knockout plant samples as negative controls. For loading controls, avoid using housekeeping proteins that may vary under experimental conditions; instead, use total protein staining methods like Ponceau S or SYPRO Ruby. These approaches align with established Western blotting protocols used for detecting various proteins, including those in research kits .

How can researchers quantitatively assess AT2G06166 protein levels using antibodies in different plant tissues?

Quantitative assessment of AT2G06166 protein levels requires careful standardization and multiple methodological approaches. For Western blot-based quantification, use a standard curve of recombinant AT2G06166 protein loaded on each gel to normalize band intensities. Fluorescence-based Western blotting offers greater quantitative accuracy than chemiluminescence. For tissue-specific quantification, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) provides higher throughput and sensitivity. Develop a sandwich ELISA using two non-competing AT2G06166 antibodies recognizing different epitopes. Alternatively, use multiplex immunoassays to simultaneously measure AT2G06166 alongside other proteins of interest. For single-cell resolution, quantitative immunofluorescence with careful image analysis can detect tissue-specific variation. In all cases, include appropriate positive and negative controls, and validate findings with orthogonal methods such as targeted mass spectrometry using isotope-labeled peptide standards.

What strategies can overcome challenges in detecting low-abundance AT2G06166 protein in complex plant samples?

Detecting low-abundance AT2G06166 protein in complex plant samples requires specialized sample preparation and signal amplification techniques. Implement immunoprecipitation or affinity purification steps before Western blotting to concentrate the target protein. Consider using tyramide signal amplification (TSA) in immunohistochemistry, which can increase sensitivity by 10-100 fold compared to standard detection methods. For Western blots, highly sensitive chemiluminescent substrates or near-infrared fluorescent secondary antibodies improve detection limits. Sample preparation should include fractionation steps to reduce sample complexity—investigate membrane fractions separately as defensin-like proteins may associate with membranes. When working with recalcitrant plant tissues, optimize protein extraction using specialized buffers containing chaotropic agents (urea/thiourea) and reducing agents (DTT). For exceptionally low abundance proteins, proximity ligation assays can provide single-molecule detection sensitivity through rolling circle amplification of the detection signal.

How can AT2G06166 antibodies be used to study protein-protein interactions in plant immune responses?

AT2G06166 antibodies enable multiple approaches for studying protein-protein interactions in plant immunity. Proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID) can be combined with AT2G06166 antibodies to identify interaction partners in their native cellular environment. Express a BioID-AT2G06166 fusion protein in Arabidopsis, induce biotinylation of proximal proteins, then use AT2G06166 antibodies to confirm correct localization of the fusion protein. For direct interaction studies, implement bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) and validate findings with co-immunoprecipitation using AT2G06166 antibodies. Immunogold electron microscopy with AT2G06166 antibodies can precisely localize interaction complexes at subcellular resolution. To study dynamic interactions during immune responses, use time-course immunoprecipitation following pathogen challenge. These approaches parallel methodologies used in other protein interaction studies but are tailored to the unique characteristics of defensin-like proteins, which often function in multiprotein complexes during plant immune responses.

What role can structural information play in improving AT2G06166 antibody specificity and function?

Structural information is crucial for enhancing AT2G06166 antibody specificity and function. X-ray crystallography or NMR spectroscopy of AT2G06166 protein can reveal surface-exposed epitopes ideal for antibody recognition while avoiding regions conserved across defensin families. Computational modeling, when experimental structures are unavailable, can predict epitope accessibility and antigenicity. Epitope mapping through hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) can identify antibody binding sites at peptide-level resolution. Structure-guided antibody engineering, similar to approaches used for therapeutic antibodies , can improve specificity by targeting unique structural features of AT2G06166. The defensin fold typically contains a cysteine-stabilized αβ motif; therefore, antibodies targeting non-conserved loop regions between secondary structure elements will likely show higher specificity. Complete escape-mutation maps from deep mutational scanning can further guide the design of antibody cocktails that maintain recognition despite potential epitope variations .

How can researchers develop a multiplex immunoassay system incorporating AT2G06166 antibodies to study plant defense responses?

Developing a multiplex immunoassay for plant defense requires careful selection of compatible antibodies and detection systems. Begin by conjugating AT2G06166 antibodies to spectrally distinct fluorophores or quantum dots that allow simultaneous detection without signal overlap. For bead-based multiplex assays, couple AT2G06166 antibodies to uniquely identifiable microspheres (differentiated by size or internal dye). Develop capture antibody pairs that do not compete for the same epitope to enable sandwich assay formats. Include antibodies against established defense markers such as pathogenesis-related proteins and plant hormones for comprehensive pathway analysis. Validate the multiplex system by comparing results with single-plex assays to ensure no cross-reactivity or interference between detection systems. For spatial analysis, implement multiplexed immunofluorescence using primary antibodies from different host species, followed by species-specific secondary antibodies with distinct fluorophores. This approach allows simultaneous visualization of AT2G06166 alongside other defense proteins in the same tissue section.

How can AT2G06166 antibodies be adapted for use in high-throughput phenotypic screening of plant immune responses?

Adapting AT2G06166 antibodies for high-throughput phenotypic screening requires automation-compatible immunoassay formats. Develop homogeneous assay formats like time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (TR-FRET) or AlphaLISA that eliminate washing steps and enable miniaturization to 384 or 1536-well formats. These assays can use paired antibodies recognizing different epitopes on AT2G06166 or detect AT2G06166 interactions with target proteins. For cell-based screening, create fluorescently-tagged AT2G06166 antibody fragments for live-cell imaging in plant protoplasts. Implement high-content imaging systems to simultaneously measure AT2G06166 protein levels, subcellular localization, and co-localization with other defense proteins. Develop reverse-phase protein arrays (RPPA) using robotically spotted plant extracts probed with AT2G06166 antibodies to enable simultaneous analysis of hundreds of experimental conditions. These approaches can be integrated with active learning strategies similar to those used in antibody-antigen binding prediction to efficiently explore complex treatment conditions with minimal experimental iterations.

What are the considerations for developing single-domain antibodies (nanobodies) against AT2G06166 for in vivo imaging applications?

Developing nanobodies against AT2G06166 requires specialized immunization and selection strategies. Consider immunizing camelids (alpacas or llamas) with purified recombinant AT2G06166 protein to generate heavy-chain-only antibodies. Construct a phage display library from peripheral blood B cells and perform several rounds of selection against folded AT2G06166 protein. Screen isolated nanobodies for specificity using competitive binding assays against related defensin-like proteins. For in vivo applications, characterize nanobody stability in plant cellular environments and confirm target recognition using fluorescence microscopy with GFP-tagged nanobodies. Ensure nanobodies maintain binding capacity in reducing environments typical of plant cytosol. For enhanced imaging capabilities, engineer nanobody fusions with split fluorescent proteins to enable visualization only upon target binding. These approaches draw on established principles from antibody engineering while addressing the unique challenges of developing highly specific reagents for plant cellular imaging.

How can researchers integrate AT2G06166 antibody-based detection with -omics approaches to understand comprehensive defense signaling networks?

Integrating antibody-based detection with -omics approaches provides multi-dimensional insights into defense signaling networks. Combine immunoprecipitation using AT2G06166 antibodies with mass spectrometry (IP-MS) to identify protein interaction networks, then validate key interactions using targeted co-IP. For integrated transcriptomics, isolate AT2G06166-expressing cells using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) with fluorescently labeled antibodies, followed by RNA-seq to identify cell-type-specific transcriptional responses. Implement antibody-based chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) on transcription factors co-immunoprecipitated with AT2G06166 to map downstream regulatory networks. Correlate spatial transcriptomics data with immunohistochemistry using AT2G06166 antibodies to connect gene expression patterns with protein localization. For metabolomic integration, use immunoaffinity chromatography with AT2G06166 antibodies to isolate protein complexes, then identify associated metabolites using mass spectrometry. These multi-omics approaches should be analyzed using computational network integration methods to reconstruct comprehensive signaling pathways activated during plant immune responses.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.