Diacylglycerol Acyltransferase 3 (DGAT3) is an enzyme critical for triacylglycerol (TAG) biosynthesis, playing a central role in lipid storage across eukaryotic organisms. The DGAT3 antibody is a specialized immunological tool designed to detect and study this enzyme in various biological contexts. Its development has been driven by advancements in plant lipid metabolism research, particularly in model organisms like Arabidopsis thaliana and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.
3.1. Subcellular Localization
Western blotting and immunolocalization studies confirm DGAT3’s localization in chloroplasts of C. reinhardtii and cytosolic fractions of A. thaliana . Antibody-based assays revealed light-induced expression patterns, with DGAT3 accumulating in germinating seeds and during photosynthetic stress .
3.2. Functional Characterization
The antibody has enabled detection of DGAT3 activity in lipid biosynthesis pathways. In A. thaliana, recombinant DGAT3 exhibited TAG synthase activity in vitro, producing TAGs from DAG and acyl-CoA substrates . Proteomics analysis confirmed the enzyme’s [2Fe-2S] cluster, validating its role in redox-dependent lipid metabolism .
3.3. Gene Expression Analysis
Quantitative RT-PCR and immunoblotting revealed DGAT3 mRNA and protein levels correlate with TAG accumulation. In C. reinhardtii, light exposure triggered a 5-fold increase in DGAT3 transcripts within 6 hours, followed by TAG synthesis . Similarly, A. thaliana seeds showed immunoreactive DGAT3 bands increasing during germination .
| Condition | DGAT3 mRNA Fold Change | TAG Content |
|---|---|---|
| Dark → Light | +5-fold (C. reinhardtii) | Peak at 6h |
| Germination | +2.5-fold (A. thaliana) | Detectable at 48h |
The DGAT3 polyclonal antibody is generated by immunizing a rabbit with recombinant Arabidopsis thaliana DGAT3 protein. The antibody is collected from the rabbit serum and subsequently purified using protein A/G chromatography. This DGAT3 antibody is designed for the detection of Arabidopsis thaliana (mouse-ear cress) DGAT3 protein in ELISA and Western blot applications.
DGAT3 protein plays a critical role in lipid metabolism. It is primarily involved in the final step of triacylglycerol (TAG) synthesis, catalyzing the conversion of diacylglycerol (DAG) and fatty acyl-CoA into triglycerides. DGAT3 is particularly important in tissues actively engaged in lipid storage, such as adipose tissue and the small intestine. Additionally, DGAT3 is implicated in other physiological processes, including energy homeostasis, insulin sensitivity, and the regulation of lipid droplet formation.
DGAT3 (Diacylglycerol Acyltransferase 3) represents a distinct class of enzymes involved in triacylglycerol (TAG) synthesis. Unlike DGAT1 and DGAT2, which are integral membrane proteins typically located in the endoplasmic reticulum, DGAT3 enzymes are described as soluble proteins with unique structural features .
In Arabidopsis thaliana, DGAT3 has been characterized as a [2Fe-2S] protein that exhibits DGAT activity in vitro, making it the first metalloprotein described as a DGAT . This distinctive feature has significant implications for understanding alternative pathways of TAG synthesis, particularly in plants.
Recent research has shown that DGAT3 plays important roles in various biological contexts:
In Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, DGAT3 appears to participate in a soluble TAG synthesis pathway in the chloroplast
In tung tree (Vernicia fordii), DGAT3 expression varies across different tissues, with highest expression observed in flowers compared to seeds
In Arabidopsis, DGAT3 has been implicated in powdery mildew interactions, with evidence suggesting pathogen exploitation of host plastoglobuli functions via DGAT3
DGAT3 exhibits several structural features that distinguish it from DGAT1 and DGAT2:
Hydrophobicity profile: The content of hydrophobic regions in DGAT3 is considerably lower than those of DGAT1 and DGAT2. While DGAT1 and DGAT2 contain multiple hydrophobic regions that translate into transmembrane segments, DGAT3 appears to have no transmembrane domains .
Catalytic motifs: In DGAT1 and DGAT2, the catalytic motifs either flank or are partially embedded in hydrophobic regions, whereas the putative catalytic motifs of C. reinhardtii DGAT3 are flanked by hydrophilic regions .
Iron-sulfur cluster: A distinctive feature of DGAT3 is the presence of a [2Fe-2S] cluster-binding domain. In C. reinhardtii DGAT3, this domain was modeled on the thioredoxin-like ferredoxin of Aquifex aeolicus . This makes DGAT3 unique as the first metalloprotein described with DGAT activity .
Conserved residues: DGAT3s are distinct from DGAT1s and DGAT2s because none of the completely conserved residues in DGAT1s (41 residues) and DGAT2s (16 residues) are found in DGAT3 sequences .
Domain structure: In C. reinhardtii, DGAT3 features a transit peptide of approximately 70 amino acids, followed by a disordered region of about 223 amino acids containing putative acyltransferase motifs, and then the 2Fe-2S cluster-binding domain .
Researchers face several significant challenges when producing antibodies against DGAT3:
Protein instability: As demonstrated with Arabidopsis thaliana DGAT3, the recombinant purified protein produced from E. coli is very unstable in vitro . This instability complicates the production of high-quality antigens for antibody generation.
Iron-sulfur cluster: The presence of a [2Fe-2S] cluster adds complexity to protein folding and stability. AtDGAT3 is unstable in its reduced form, which affects the consistency of the antigen preparation .
Expression difficulties: Full-length DGAT3 proteins have shown limited activity in vitro compared to truncated versions. For instance, a shorter protein version of AtDGAT3 devoid of its N-terminal putative chloroplast transit peptide (Δ46AtDGAT3) demonstrated greater stability in vitro, allowing for biochemical and spectroscopic characterization .
Lack of established protocols: Unlike DGAT1 and DGAT2, for which antibody production protocols have been developed and optimized over time, DGAT3-specific antibody production remains less standardized, as evidenced by the limited literature on DGAT3 antibodies compared to other DGAT family members .
Specificity concerns: The distinct structure of DGAT3 compared to other family members requires careful epitope selection to ensure antibody specificity and avoid cross-reactivity with other proteins containing [2Fe-2S] clusters.
Based on successful approaches with other DGAT family members and the specific challenges of DGAT3, the following methods are recommended:
Recombinant protein expression systems:
Expression in E. coli has been successful for generating antigens for DGAT family members, with purification via immobilized-metal affinity chromatography
For DGAT3, consider using truncated constructs lacking the transit peptide (similar to Δ46AtDGAT3 or Δ75AtDGAT3), which have shown improved stability in vitro
Fusion protein strategies:
Peptide antigens:
Synthetic peptides corresponding to unique regions of DGAT3 can be designed for generating antibodies
Target hydrophilic regions of DGAT3 that are predicted to be surface-exposed and avoid regions with the [2Fe-2S] cluster
Purification protocol optimization:
Include reducing agents during purification to maintain the [2Fe-2S] cluster integrity
Consider rapid purification procedures under anaerobic conditions to prevent oxidative damage
Implement buffer optimization to maximize protein stability during purification
The success of the DGAT2 antibody production strategy described in search result provides a useful template:
"The antigen rDGAT2 was purified from overexpressed E. coli as reported and concentrated with a Centricon-10 concentrator to a protein concentration of 1 mg/ml. Anti-rDGAT2 serum was produced in rabbits immunized with the purified rDGAT2 fusion protein."
Validating antibody specificity is critical, especially for less-studied proteins like DGAT3. The following validation approaches are recommended:
Western blot analysis:
Compare wild-type samples with DGAT3 knockout/knockdown lines
Include recombinant DGAT3 protein as a positive control
Test for cross-reactivity with DGAT1 and DGAT2 proteins
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry:
This approach was successfully used for AtDGAT3, where "In-gel tryptic digestion was performed with the Progest system according to after protein reduction (10 mM DTT) and alkylation (55 mM iodoacetamide). NanoLC-MS/MS analysis was performed using an Ultimate 3000 LC system connected to a LTQ Orbitrap mass spectrometer"
Immunofluorescence with controls:
Compare staining patterns in tissues with known DGAT3 expression patterns
Include appropriate negative controls (pre-immune serum, isotype controls)
Perform peptide competition assays where available
RNA expression correlation:
Subcellular localization confirmation:
Given the unique properties of DGAT3, standard immunodetection protocols may require optimization:
Western blot optimization:
Buffer systems: Consider using native PAGE for maintaining protein structure, especially for preserving the [2Fe-2S] cluster
Reducing conditions: Test both reducing and non-reducing conditions as they may affect epitope accessibility
Transfer conditions: Optimize transfer parameters for soluble proteins
Immunohistochemistry considerations:
Fixation methods: Compare cross-linking fixatives (paraformaldehyde) vs. precipitating fixatives (acetone)
Antigen retrieval: Test different antigen retrieval methods, particularly for formalin-fixed tissues
Signal amplification: Consider tyramide signal amplification for low-abundance proteins
Immunofluorescence optimization:
Sample preparation considerations:
Protein extraction buffers should be optimized to preserve DGAT3 stability
Include protease inhibitors and reducing agents during extraction
Consider detergent selection carefully, as DGAT3 is a soluble protein unlike DGAT1/2
DGAT3 likely functions within protein complexes, and antibodies can help elucidate these interactions:
Co-immunoprecipitation approaches:
Use DGAT3 antibodies for pull-down experiments followed by mass spectrometry
For membrane-associated pools of DGAT3, consider crosslinking prior to immunoprecipitation
Include appropriate controls to distinguish specific from non-specific interactions
Proximity labeling techniques:
BioID or APEX2 fusions with DGAT3 combined with antibody detection can reveal proximity interactors
These approaches are particularly useful for transient interactions
Two-hybrid system validation:
Putative interactions identified in yeast or bacterial two-hybrid systems can be validated using co-immunoprecipitation with DGAT3 antibodies
FRET/FLIM analysis:
Combine fluorescently-tagged proteins with antibody detection to study interactions in situ
This can be particularly useful for studying DGAT3 interactions in plastoglobuli
Research has suggested that DGAT3 may interact with other proteins involved in TAG synthesis pathways. In the case of powdery mildew interactions, evidence suggests that "DGAT3 is localized to PGs formed in response to powdery mildew or dark induction" and that "DGAT3 is unusual in that it is a [2Fe-2S] metalloenzyme that is unstable in its reduced form" , indicating potential interactions with proteins that regulate redox status.
DGAT3 activity and stability may be regulated by post-translational modifications (PTMs), which can be studied using antibodies:
Phosphorylation analysis:
Use phospho-specific antibodies if phosphorylation sites are known
Combine immunoprecipitation with phospho-proteomic analysis
Compare PTM status under different physiological conditions
Redox state detection:
Stability and turnover studies:
Protein complex formation:
Blue native PAGE combined with immunoblotting can reveal different DGAT3-containing complexes
This approach is particularly relevant given the potential for DGAT3 to participate in multiprotein complexes
DGAT3 has been implicated in stress responses, making stress-specific analysis important:
Differential expression analysis:
Subcellular localization changes:
Activity correlation studies:
Protein-protein interaction changes:
The table below summarizes observed DGAT3 responses to different stress conditions:
Several factors can contribute to misleading results when working with DGAT3 antibodies:
Causes of false positives:
Cross-reactivity with other [2Fe-2S] proteins:
The distinctive [2Fe-2S] cluster domain in DGAT3 shares structural similarities with other iron-sulfur proteins
Validate specificity against known [2Fe-2S] proteins in your experimental system
Non-specific binding to hydrophobic domains:
Even though DGAT3 is more soluble than other DGAT family members, it may still contain hydrophobic regions that can lead to non-specific antibody binding
Include appropriate blocking agents and detergents in immunodetection protocols
Reactivity with bacterial contaminants:
E. coli proteins co-purifying with recombinant DGAT3 may generate antibodies that cross-react with bacterial proteins
Perform careful purification of antigens and validate antibodies against multiple negative controls
Causes of false negatives:
Protein instability:
Epitope masking:
The [2Fe-2S] cluster or interacting proteins may mask antibody epitopes
Test different extraction and denaturation conditions
Low abundance:
Post-translational modifications:
PTMs may alter epitope recognition
Consider using multiple antibodies targeting different regions of DGAT3
When evaluating different detection methods for DGAT3, consider the following comparative approach:
Western blot vs. ELISA:
Western blotting provides size information and can distinguish specific from non-specific binding
ELISA offers higher throughput and potential quantification but may be more prone to cross-reactivity
Immunofluorescence vs. immunohistochemistry:
Immunofluorescence provides higher resolution for subcellular localization
Immunohistochemistry may offer better tissue context and is more stable long-term
Direct comparison methodology:
Use the same samples across different detection methods
Include appropriate positive and negative controls for each method
Quantify and statistically analyze the results when possible
Method-specific optimization:
For Western blotting: Test different extraction buffers, gel types, and transfer conditions
For immunolocalization: Compare fixation methods, permeabilization approaches, and detection systems
The efficacy of fluorescence anisotropy for studying DGAT3 interactions with lipids has been demonstrated: "Steady-state anisotropy from DGAT3 as a function of [lipid]/[protein] ratio where the lipid is POPC (blue) and POPG (purple). Excitation and emission wavelengths were 290 and 340 nm, respectively" . This approach could be complemented with antibody-based methods for comprehensive analysis.
Proper validation of DGAT3 antibodies requires thoughtfully selected reference materials:
Positive controls:
Negative controls:
DGAT3 knockout or knockdown lines
Pre-immune serum controls
Peptide competition assays
Specificity controls:
Recombinant DGAT1 and DGAT2 proteins to verify absence of cross-reactivity
Other [2Fe-2S] proteins to confirm specificity against the structural domain
Technical validation samples:
Standard curves with known amounts of purified protein
Samples from multiple biological replicates
Different tissue types with varying DGAT3 expression levels
Inter-laboratory validation materials:
Standard reference samples that can be shared between research groups
Detailed protocols for reproducible results across laboratories