GDH3 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Functional Insights from Yeast Studies

GDH3 plays a pivotal role in glutamate metabolism and stress response:

Key Findings in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

  • Redox Homeostasis: GDH3-null yeast exhibit 74% lower glutathione (GSH) levels under standard conditions, increasing susceptibility to oxidative stress .

  • Stress Response: Deletion of GDH3 elevates reactive oxygen species (ROS) by 92% during thermal stress, accelerating apoptosis .

  • Genetic Interactions:

    • Co-deletion of GDH2 (NAD+-dependent GDH) restores GSH levels to 76% of wild type, mitigating oxidative damage .

    • Overexpression of GDH2 exacerbates glutamate depletion, reducing stress tolerance .

Diagnostic and Mechanistic Studies

  • Plant Metabolism: Used to dissect GDH3's role in nitrogen assimilation and ammonia detoxification in Arabidopsis .

  • Yeast Aging: GDH3 deletion accelerates chronological aging, linking glutamate metabolism to longevity .

  • Biomarker Potential: While not directly validated for human diagnostics, GDH isoforms (e.g., PfGDH in Plasmodium) are explored as malaria biomarkers , highlighting broader utility of GDH-targeting antibodies.

Comparative Analysis of GDH Isoforms

IsoformOrganismCofactorPrimary RoleReference
GDH1ArabidopsisNADH/NAD+Catabolic: glutamate → α-ketoglutarate
GDH3ArabidopsisNADPH/NADP+Anabolic: α-ketoglutarate → glutamate
GDH2YeastNAD+Oxidative deamination
GDH3YeastNADP+Reductive amination under stress

Future Directions

  • Therapeutic Exploration: Advances in antibody engineering, such as nanobodies and multispecific formats , could enhance GDH3-targeted tools for metabolic disease research.

  • Agricultural Biotechnology: Modulating GDH3 activity via antibody-guided studies may improve stress tolerance in crops .

  • Computational Design: AI-driven antibody optimization, as seen in recent Nobel-winning work , could refine GDH3 antibody specificity for high-throughput applications.

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
GDH3 antibody; YAL062W antibody; FUN51NADP-specific glutamate dehydrogenase 2 antibody; NADP-GDH 2 antibody; EC 1.4.1.4 antibody; NADP-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase 2 antibody
Target Names
GDH3
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is GDH3 and why are antibodies against it important in plant research?

GDH3 refers to Glycine decarboxylase complex H protein 3, a mitochondrial protein that plays a crucial role in photorespiration processes in plants. Antibodies targeting GDH3 are invaluable research tools for investigating photorespiratory pathways, which are essential metabolic processes in plants, particularly under stressed conditions. The glycine decarboxylase complex (GDC) catalyzes the degradation of glycine, and the H protein component specifically shuttles the methylamine group from the P protein to the T protein in this complex .

Studying GDH3 using specific antibodies allows researchers to understand its expression patterns, localization, and functional relationships in plant cellular physiology. This is particularly important given that photorespiration is closely linked to photosynthetic efficiency and plant responses to environmental stresses.

What are the common applications of GDH3 antibodies in plant science?

GDH3 antibodies are employed in multiple experimental techniques across plant science research:

  • Western blotting: The primary application of anti-GDH3 antibodies, enabling detection and quantification of GDH3 protein expression levels in plant tissues .

  • Immunolocalization studies: For determining the subcellular location of GDH3 in plant cells, confirming its mitochondrial localization.

  • Immunoprecipitation: To isolate GDH3 and associated protein complexes for studying protein-protein interactions in the glycine decarboxylase system.

  • Functional studies: For investigating the role of GDH3 in photorespiration and its response to environmental conditions.

  • Comparative analysis: For examining differences in GDH expression across plant species or under varying environmental conditions.

How do GDH3 antibodies differ from antibodies targeting GDH1 and GDH2?

While GDH1, GDH2, and GDH3 are related proteins within the glycine decarboxylase complex H family, researchers often need to understand the specific differences between antibodies targeting these isoforms:

What are the optimal conditions for Western blot analysis using anti-GDH3 antibodies?

When performing Western blot analysis with anti-GDH3 antibodies, researchers should consider the following optimization parameters:

Sample Preparation Protocol:

  • Extract plant tissue proteins using a buffer containing protease inhibitors to prevent degradation

  • Centrifuge at 12,000 × g for 15 minutes at 4°C to remove cellular debris

  • Quantify protein concentration using Bradford or BCA assay

  • Denature proteins at 95°C for 5 minutes in Laemmli buffer with β-mercaptoethanol

Electrophoresis and Transfer Conditions:

  • Use 12-15% SDS-PAGE gels (GDH3 has an observed size of approximately 18 kDa)

  • Transfer to PVDF or nitrocellulose membrane at 100V for 1 hour in cold transfer buffer

Antibody Incubation Parameters:

  • Block membrane with 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature

  • Dilute primary anti-GDH3 antibody according to manufacturer recommendations (typically starting at 1:1000 dilution)

  • Incubate with primary antibody overnight at 4°C

  • Wash 3-4 times with TBST

  • Incubate with appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (anti-rabbit IgG for rabbit polyclonal antibodies) at 1:5000 dilution for 1 hour at room temperature

  • Develop using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents

For antibodies that recognize multiple GDH isoforms, researchers should be aware that bands for GDH1, GDH2, and GDH3 might be very close in molecular weight, potentially requiring higher resolution gels or longer running times to differentiate them properly.

How can researchers validate the specificity of GDH3 antibodies in experimental systems?

Validating antibody specificity is critical for ensuring reliable research results. For GDH3 antibodies, researchers should implement multiple validation approaches:

  • Positive and negative controls: Include samples with known GDH3 expression (positive control) and samples where GDH3 is not expressed or has been knocked out (negative control).

  • Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate the antibody with the immunizing peptide prior to application. If the antibody is specific, the peptide should block binding to GDH3 in your samples, eliminating signal.

  • Cross-reactivity testing: Test the antibody against purified GDH1, GDH2, and GDH3 proteins to assess cross-reactivity, particularly important when working with antibodies designed to recognize all three isoforms .

  • Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry: This approach can confirm that the antibody is indeed pulling down GDH3 and can identify any unintended targets.

  • Genetic validation: Use RNAi or CRISPR-Cas9 to knock down or knock out GDH3 expression and confirm a corresponding reduction in antibody signal.

A comprehensive validation strategy might include the following experimental design:

Validation MethodExperimental ApproachExpected Outcome for Specific Antibody
Western blotCompare wild-type vs. GDH3 knockdown tissueReduced or absent band at 18 kDa in knockdown
Peptide competitionPre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptideSignal reduction or elimination
Cross-reactivityTest against purified GDH1, GDH2, and GDH3Signal pattern matching antibody design intent
ImmunofluorescenceCompare localization pattern with known GDH3 distributionMitochondrial localization pattern
Mass spectrometryAnalyze proteins immunoprecipitated by the antibodyGDH3 identification as major precipitated protein

What approaches can resolve contradictory results when using anti-GDH3 antibodies across different experimental systems?

Researchers occasionally encounter contradictory results when using the same antibody in different experimental contexts. To resolve such discrepancies:

  • Antibody characterization: Thoroughly characterize the antibody's performance under varying conditions to understand its limitations and optimal working parameters.

  • Antibody batch variability: Different production lots of the same antibody may have varying characteristics. Maintain detailed records of antibody lot numbers and standardize experiments using the same lot when possible.

  • Sample preparation variations: Differences in sample preparation protocols can significantly impact antibody performance:

    • Buffer composition and pH

    • Fixation methods for immunohistochemistry

    • Denaturing vs. non-denaturing conditions

    • Presence of detergents or reducing agents

  • Cross-validation: Employ multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of GDH3 to confirm results.

  • Complementary techniques: Supplement antibody-based detection with non-antibody methods such as:

    • mRNA expression analysis (RT-qPCR)

    • Activity assays for GDH3

    • Genetic approaches (overexpression or knockdown)

  • Environmental and physiological factors: Consider how different growth conditions or developmental stages affect GDH3 expression and post-translational modifications that might influence antibody recognition.

An example troubleshooting decision tree for resolving contradictory Western blot results:

  • Verify antibody performance with positive controls

  • Check protein extraction method compatibility with the antibody

  • Optimize blocking conditions to reduce background

  • Adjust antibody concentration and incubation time

  • Confirm target protein size (18 kDa for GDH3)

  • Test alternative detection methods

How should researchers design experiments to study GDH3 interaction with other components of the glycine decarboxylase complex?

Studying protein-protein interactions within the glycine decarboxylase complex requires careful experimental design. For GDH3 interaction studies:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):

    • Use anti-GDH3 antibody to pull down GDH3 and associated proteins

    • Analyze precipitated proteins by Western blot with antibodies against other glycine decarboxylase components

    • Confirm results with reciprocal Co-IP using antibodies against interacting partners

  • Proximity ligation assay (PLA):

    • This technique detects protein interactions in situ when proteins are within 40 nm of each other

    • Requires antibodies raised in different species for GDH3 and its potential interacting partners

    • Provides spatial information about interactions within cellular compartments

  • Yeast two-hybrid screening:

    • Use GDH3 as bait to screen for interacting proteins

    • Validate interactions identified through this screening with Co-IP or PLA in plant cells

  • Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC):

    • Fuse GDH3 and potential interacting proteins to complementary fragments of a fluorescent protein

    • Reconstitution of fluorescence indicates protein-protein interaction

  • Crosslinking mass spectrometry:

    • Use chemical crosslinkers to stabilize transient protein interactions

    • Digest crosslinked complexes and analyze by mass spectrometry

    • Identifies not only interacting partners but also specific interaction sites

A comprehensive experimental approach might include:

MethodAdvantageLimitationControl Experiment
Co-IP with anti-GDH3Preserves native complexesMay lose weak interactionsIgG control precipitation
PLAVisualizes interactions in situRequires specific antibody pairsOmission of one primary antibody
BiFCLive cell visualizationPotential artifacts from protein fusionEmpty vector controls
Crosslinking MSIdentifies interaction domainsComplex data analysisNon-crosslinked samples

What are the critical considerations when using anti-GDH3 antibodies for comparative studies across different plant species?

When conducting comparative studies of GDH3 across plant species, researchers must address several key factors:

  • Sequence homology assessment: Evaluate the conservation of GDH3 protein sequence, particularly at the antibody epitope region, across the plant species being studied. The epitope sequence conservation directly impacts antibody cross-reactivity.

  • Antibody validation in each species: Even with high sequence homology, antibody performance can vary between species. Validate the antibody in each species separately using:

    • Western blot analysis to confirm correct molecular weight recognition

    • Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to confirm target identity

    • Peptide competition assays to verify specificity

  • Standardization of detection methods:

    • Use consistent protein extraction protocols across species

    • Normalize loading based on total protein rather than single housekeeping proteins

    • Include standard curves with known quantities of recombinant GDH3 when quantifying expression levels

  • Evolutionary context interpretation:

    • Consider the evolutionary relationships between studied species

    • Account for potential differences in GDH isoform distribution and function

    • Interpret differential antibody reactivity in light of protein function conservation

  • Alternative detection strategies:

    • Use multiple antibodies targeting different GDH3 epitopes

    • Complement antibody-based approaches with gene expression analysis

    • Consider using conserved protein domain-specific antibodies

A methodical approach to cross-species antibody validation might include:

Validation StepMethodExpected Outcome
In silico analysisSequence alignment of GDH3 epitope regionsPrediction of cross-reactivity potential
Preliminary testingWestern blot on each speciesConfirmation of appropriate band size
Specificity confirmationPeptide competition assaySignal reduction with competing peptide
Quantitative calibrationStandard curve with recombinant proteinDetermination of detection limits in each species
Functional validationActivity assays correlated with antibody signalConfirmation that detected protein is functional

How can researchers effectively use anti-GDH3 antibodies to investigate changes in protein expression under different environmental stresses?

GDH3 protein expression can be modulated by various environmental stresses, making antibody-based detection crucial for understanding plant stress responses. An effective experimental approach includes:

  • Experimental design considerations:

    • Include appropriate biological replicates (minimum n=3)

    • Implement time-course experiments to capture dynamic changes

    • Use gradients of stress intensity rather than single-point measurements

    • Include recovery periods to assess reversibility of changes

  • Protein extraction optimization:

    • Adapt extraction protocols to specific plant tissues and stress conditions

    • Include protease inhibitors to prevent stress-induced proteolytic degradation

    • Consider subcellular fractionation to detect potential redistribution of GDH3

  • Quantification methods:

    • Use fluorescent or chemiluminescent detection with linear dynamic range

    • Implement internal loading controls appropriate for stress conditions (some traditional housekeeping proteins may change under stress)

    • Consider multiplexing with differentially labeled secondary antibodies

  • Complementary approaches:

    • Correlate protein levels with GDH enzymatic activity measurements

    • Monitor transcript levels to distinguish transcriptional vs. post-transcriptional regulation

    • Assess post-translational modifications that may affect antibody binding

  • Data analysis and interpretation:

    • Use statistical methods appropriate for time-series data

    • Account for both biological and technical variability

    • Consider potential changes in protein turnover rates under stress

A typical stress response experiment workflow might include:

Experimental PhaseKey ComponentsAnalytical Considerations
Stress applicationControlled growth conditions with defined stress parametersDocumentation of physiological responses
Tissue samplingFlash-freezing at defined timepointsConsistency in sampling procedure
Protein extractionOptimized buffers with protease/phosphatase inhibitorsEqual protein loading verification
Western blot analysisAnti-GDH3 antibody at validated dilutionQuantification against appropriate controls
Activity assaysMeasurement of glycine decarboxylase activityCorrelation with protein levels
Data integrationCombination of protein levels, activity, and physiological dataStatistical analysis of correlations

What are the common pitfalls when using anti-GDH3 antibodies and how can they be addressed?

Researchers working with anti-GDH3 antibodies may encounter several challenges. Here's a systematic approach to identifying and resolving common issues:

  • High background signal:

    • Cause: Insufficient blocking, too high antibody concentration, or non-specific binding

    • Solution: Optimize blocking (try different blocking agents such as BSA, non-fat milk, or commercial blockers), increase washing stringency, titrate antibody to find optimal concentration, use more specific secondary antibodies

  • Weak or absent signal:

    • Cause: Low target protein abundance, inefficient protein extraction, epitope masking, or antibody degradation

    • Solution: Increase protein loading, optimize extraction protocol for mitochondrial proteins, try different epitope retrieval methods, ensure proper antibody storage conditions

  • Multiple bands or unexpected band sizes:

    • Cause: Protein degradation, cross-reactivity with GDH1/GDH2, post-translational modifications, or non-specific binding

    • Solution: Use fresh samples with protease inhibitors, perform peptide competition assays to identify specific bands, use purified recombinant GDH3 as a positive control

  • Inconsistent results between experiments:

    • Cause: Variations in sample preparation, antibody lot differences, or inconsistent transfer efficiency

    • Solution: Standardize protocols, use the same antibody lot when possible, include internal controls, and normalize data appropriately

  • Poor reproducibility across different tissues:

    • Cause: Tissue-specific interfering compounds, varying GDH3 expression levels, or matrix effects

    • Solution: Adapt extraction protocols to specific tissues, adjust antibody concentration for different tissues, validate antibody performance in each tissue type

A comprehensive troubleshooting guide for Western blot applications:

ProblemPossible CausesDiagnostic TestSolution
No signalProtein degradationRun fresh sampleAdd protease inhibitors
Inefficient transferStain membrane for total proteinOptimize transfer conditions
Primary antibody failureTest with known positive controlUse new antibody aliquot
Multiple bandsDegradation productsInclude protease inhibitorsPrepare fresh samples
Cross-reactivityPeptide competition assayUse more specific antibody
High backgroundInsufficient blockingIncrease blocking time/concentrationOptimize blocking protocol
Secondary antibody cross-reactivityIncubate membrane with secondary onlyUse different secondary antibody

How can researchers use anti-GDH3 antibodies in combination with other techniques to gain deeper insights into photorespiration pathways?

Integrating anti-GDH3 antibody-based methods with complementary techniques creates a more comprehensive understanding of photorespiratory pathways:

  • Antibody-based spatial analysis combined with metabolomics:

    • Use immunolocalization to determine GDH3 distribution in plant tissues and subcellular compartments

    • Perform targeted metabolomics on microdissected tissue regions with known GDH3 expression patterns

    • Correlate metabolite profiles with GDH3 protein levels to understand local metabolic impacts

  • Temporal protein dynamics with activity measurements:

    • Track GDH3 protein levels using quantitative Western blotting during stress responses or developmental transitions

    • Simultaneously measure glycine decarboxylase complex activity

    • Analyze the relationship between protein abundance and enzymatic activity to identify potential post-translational regulatory mechanisms

  • Protein interaction networks and metabolic flux:

    • Use anti-GDH3 antibodies for co-immunoprecipitation to identify interaction partners

    • Perform isotope labeling studies to track carbon flow through the photorespiratory pathway

    • Integrate interaction data with metabolic flux analysis to understand how protein-protein interactions regulate metabolic outcomes

  • Multi-omics integration:

    • Correlate GDH3 protein levels (determined by antibody-based methods) with:

      • Transcriptome data (RNA-seq)

      • Metabolome profiles (GC-MS, LC-MS)

      • Epigenetic modifications (ChIP-seq)

    • Develop predictive models of photorespiratory regulation based on integrated datasets

A systematic approach to multi-technique integration might look like this:

TechniqueData GeneratedIntegration Point
Immunoblotting with anti-GDH3Protein abundance quantificationCore measurement of GDH3 levels
ImmunoprecipitationProtein-protein interaction identificationNetwork analysis of GDH3 interactome
RNA-seqTranscript-level changesCorrelation with protein abundance to identify regulatory mechanisms
MetabolomicsMetabolite profile alterationsAssociation with GDH3 levels to determine metabolic impacts
Isotope labelingMetabolic flux measurementsFunctional consequence of GDH3 abundance changes

What are the emerging technologies and approaches that enhance the utility of anti-GDH3 antibodies in plant research?

Several cutting-edge technologies are expanding the applications of anti-GDH3 antibodies in plant research:

  • Super-resolution microscopy with antibody labeling:

    • Techniques like STORM, PALM, and SIM break the diffraction limit of conventional microscopy

    • When combined with anti-GDH3 antibodies, these approaches provide nanoscale visualization of GDH3 distribution within mitochondria

    • Enables co-localization studies with other photorespiratory enzymes at unprecedented resolution

  • Single-cell proteomics with antibody-based detection:

    • Emerging methods like CyTOF (mass cytometry) use antibodies conjugated to rare earth metals

    • Allows quantification of GDH3 in individual cells within heterogeneous plant tissues

    • Can be combined with other antibodies to profile multiple proteins in the same cell

  • Proximity-dependent labeling combined with antibody purification:

    • Methods like BioID or APEX2 fused to GDH3 label proximal proteins in living cells

    • Anti-GDH3 antibodies can verify expression and localization of the fusion protein

    • Reveals the dynamic spatial proteome surrounding GDH3 in its native context

  • Microfluidic antibody-based assays:

    • Miniaturized immunoassay platforms require minimal sample volumes

    • Enables high-throughput screening of GDH3 levels across multiple conditions or genotypes

    • Can be integrated with lab-on-a-chip technologies for automated analysis

  • Antibody engineering for enhanced specificity:

    • Development of recombinant antibody fragments (Fab, scFv) with improved specificity for GDH3 over GDH1/GDH2

    • CRISPR-based epitope tagging of endogenous GDH3 followed by detection with anti-tag antibodies

    • Nanobodies (single-domain antibodies) that can access epitopes unavailable to conventional antibodies

Emerging methodologies that can be integrated with antibody-based approaches:

TechnologyApplication with Anti-GDH3Research Advantage
OptogeneticsLight-controlled GDH3 interaction studies validated by antibody detectionTemporal control of protein function
CRISPR-Cas9Creation of epitope-tagged GDH3 variants for improved antibody detectionEnhanced specificity without overexpression artifacts
Spatial transcriptomicsCorrelation of spatial GDH3 protein patterns with local gene expressionMulti-omics spatial integration
Cryo-electron tomographyValidation of GDH3 localization within mitochondrial ultrastructureStructural context of protein function
Synthetic biologyDesign of GDH3 variants with altered function verified by antibody detectionEngineering photorespiratory efficiency

How might anti-GDH3 antibodies contribute to understanding plant adaptation to climate change?

As climate change intensifies, understanding plant photorespiration becomes increasingly important. Anti-GDH3 antibodies can play a crucial role in this research:

  • Monitoring photorespiratory responses to elevated CO₂:

    • Anti-GDH3 antibodies can track changes in protein abundance as plants adjust to rising atmospheric CO₂

    • Western blot analysis across CO₂ gradients can reveal adaptation mechanisms

    • Immunolocalization can detect potential reorganization of photorespiratory machinery

  • Heat stress impacts on photorespiration:

    • Quantifying GDH3 expression changes during heat stress using antibody-based methods

    • Correlating GDH3 levels with photorespiratory flux and photosynthetic efficiency

    • Identifying heat-tolerant varieties based on GDH3 expression and localization patterns

  • Drought adaptation mechanisms:

    • Assessing GDH3 regulation during water limitation using quantitative immunoblotting

    • Comparing GDH3 expression between drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive varieties

    • Investigating post-translational modifications of GDH3 during drought stress

  • Cross-species comparative studies:

    • Using validated anti-GDH3 antibodies to compare photorespiratory adaptations across plant species with different climate tolerances

    • Identifying evolutionary adaptations in GDH3 structure and regulation

    • Informing crop improvement strategies based on natural adaptations

Potential experimental approaches for climate change research using anti-GDH3 antibodies:

Climate FactorExperimental ApproachAnti-GDH3 Antibody Application
Elevated CO₂FACE (Free-Air CO₂ Enrichment) experimentsQuantifying GDH3 protein level adaptation
Temperature stressControlled temperature gradient tunnelsMonitoring temperature-dependent changes in GDH3 localization
DroughtRegulated deficit irrigation trialsAssessing GDH3 expression correlation with water use efficiency
Multiple stressorsFactorial design experimentsDetermining interactive effects on GDH3 regulation

What challenges remain in developing more specific and sensitive antibodies for studying GDH3 and related proteins?

Despite advances in antibody technology, several challenges persist in developing optimal anti-GDH3 antibodies:

  • Cross-reactivity with GDH1 and GDH2:

    • The high sequence similarity between GDH1, GDH2, and GDH3 makes developing isoform-specific antibodies difficult

    • Strategies to overcome this include:

      • Targeting hypervariable regions unique to GDH3

      • Using synthetic peptide immunogens corresponding to unique GDH3 sequences

      • Implementing negative selection during antibody development to eliminate cross-reactive antibodies

  • Post-translational modification detection:

    • GDH3 may undergo various post-translational modifications affecting its function

    • Developing modification-specific antibodies (e.g., phospho-GDH3, acetylated GDH3) remains challenging

    • Approaches include using modified peptides as immunogens and screening for modification-dependent binding

  • Conformational epitope recognition:

    • Many commercial antibodies target linear epitopes, potentially missing functionally relevant conformational states

    • Developing conformation-specific antibodies requires immunization with properly folded GDH3 protein

    • Techniques like phage display can select antibodies recognizing specific GDH3 conformations

  • Quantitative accuracy:

    • Ensuring consistent quantitative performance of anti-GDH3 antibodies across experimental conditions

    • Strategies include developing calibrated antibody standards and implementing absolute quantification methods

  • Antibody reproducibility:

    • Batch-to-batch variation in polyclonal antibodies affects experimental reproducibility

    • Moving toward recombinant antibody technology with defined sequences improves consistency

    • Implementing rigorous validation protocols for each new antibody lot

Current approaches to improving anti-GDH3 antibodies:

ChallengeTraditional ApproachAdvanced Solution
Isoform specificityPolyclonal antibodies against unique peptidesRecombinant antibodies with engineered binding sites
PTM detectionSeparate antibodies for each modificationProximity ligation assays with dual antibody recognition
Conformational recognitionImmunization with native proteinPhage display selection under native conditions
Quantitative performanceWestern blot with standard curvesMass spectrometry with isotope-labeled internal standards
ReproducibilityLarge-scale antibody production lotsSequenced recombinant antibodies with consistent production

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.