DHN1 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Components: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 week lead time (made-to-order)
Synonyms
DHN1Dehydrin DHN1 antibody; M3 antibody; RAB-17 protein antibody
Target Names
DHN1
Uniprot No.

Q&A

How to Validate DHN1 Antibody Specificity for Plant Stress Response Studies

Methodological Approach

  • Recombinant Protein Controls: Use purified DHN1 protein expressed in E. coli or Pichia systems to test binding in Western blot or ELISA .

  • Knockout Models: Compare signal intensity between wild-type and dhn1 knockout plants to confirm absence of cross-reactivity .

  • Epitope Mapping: Perform peptide blocking assays to identify antibody-binding regions (e.g., K-segment motifs in DHN1) .

Key Considerations

  • Avoid using plant extracts with high lipid content (e.g., phospholipids) that may nonspecifically bind DHN1 .

  • Include ovalbumin as a negative control to rule out lipid-mediated false positives .

Validation MethodAdvantagesLimitations
Recombinant proteinDirect proof of bindingLimited to in vitro conditions
Knockout mutantsGold standard for specificityRequires transgenic plant lines
Peptide blockingEpitope identificationRequires synthetic peptides

What Experimental Controls Should Be Included in DHN1 Antibody Experiments?

Essential Controls

  • Negative Controls:

    • Secondary antibody alone (to detect nonspecific binding).

    • Non-transgenic plant tissue (for genetic studies).

  • Positive Controls:

    • Recombinant DHN1 or stress-induced plant samples (e.g., dehydration-treated Arabidopsis) .

Application-Specific Adjustments

  • Western Blot: Include molecular weight markers and loading controls (e.g., β-actin) .

  • Immunohistochemistry: Use antigen retrieval buffers (e.g., citrate) for membrane-bound DHN1 detection .

Common Applications of DHN1 Antibody in Plant Stress Biology

Primary Use Cases

  • Protein Localization:

    • Subcellular targeting (e.g., cytosol vs. nucleus during drought stress) .

  • Protein Interaction Studies:

    • Co-immunoprecipitation with lipid-binding partners (e.g., phosphatidic acid) .

  • Quantitative Analysis:

    • Densitometric quantification of DHN1 abundance under osmotic stress .

Optimized Protocols

ApplicationOptimal Antibody DilutionKey Buffer
Western blot1:5,000–1:10,0005% BSA in TBS-T
Immunoblotting1:2,0001% milk in TBS-T
IP2–5 µg per reactionIP buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris pH 8.0)

Resolving Cross-Reactivity in DHN1 Antibody Assays

Troubleshooting Strategies

  • Sequence Homology Analysis:

    • BLAST DHN1 against plant proteomes to identify paralogs (e.g., DHN2, DHN3) with similar epitopes .

  • Blocking Peptides:

    • Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide to saturate nonspecific binding sites .

  • Denaturing vs. Native Conditions:

    • Use SDS-PAGE for denaturing conditions to minimize conformational epitope interference .

Case Study
A researcher observed unexpected bands in DHN1 Western blots of Zea mays extracts. BLAST analysis revealed 85% identity with DHN2. Solution:

  • Perform peptide blocking with DHN2-specific sequences.

  • Switch to native PAGE to preserve conformational epitopes .

Optimizing DHN1 Antibody for Membrane-Binding Assays

Protocol Enhancements

  • Vesicle Preparation:

    • Use SUVs (small unilamellar vesicles) over LUVs (large unilamellar vesicles) to maximize curvature-dependent binding .

  • Lipid Composition:

    • Enrich vesicles with phosphatidic acid (PA) to mimic in vivo conditions where DHN1 binds anionic lipids .

  • CD Spectroscopy Integration:

    • Monitor α-helical structure gain (208–222 nm) post-binding to confirm functional epitope recognition .

ParameterOptimal ConditionImpact on Binding
Vesicle sizeSUV (30–50 nm)Higher curvature → enhanced binding
Lipid type50% PA, 50% PCMimics stress-induced membrane composition
Incubation time30–60 minutesEquilibrium binding achieved

Analyzing DHN1 Antibody Data Contradictions Across Studies

Root Cause Identification

  • Antibody Source Variability:

    • Compare epitope regions between commercial and custom antibodies (e.g., N-terminal vs. K-segment) .

  • Sample Preparation:

    • Check for protease inhibitors (e.g., PMSF) to prevent DHN1 degradation during extraction .

  • Stress Induction Protocols:

    • Standardize dehydration conditions (e.g., 4-hour PEG-6000 treatment) .

Example Resolution
Study A reported cytosolic DHN1, while Study B found nuclear localization. Root cause:

  • Study A used denaturing Western blot (SDS-PAGE), disrupting membrane-bound interactions.

  • Study B employed native conditions, preserving DHN1’s association with nuclear membranes .

Integrating DHN1 Antibody with Lipidomics

Workflow Design

  • Co-IP with Lipid Profiling:

    • Immunoprecipitate DHN1-lipid complexes and analyze bound lipids via LC-MS .

  • Structural Probing:

    • Use cryo-EM to resolve DHN1’s α-helical conformation when bound to PA-rich vesicles .

Predicted Insights

  • Identification of DHN1’s lipid-binding partners (e.g., diacylglycerol) during osmotic stress.

  • Elucidation of membrane-stabilizing mechanisms via structural rearrangements .

Developing DHN1 Antibody-Based Biosensors

Technical Challenges

  • Epitope Accessibility:

    • Engineer antibodies targeting exposed regions in DHN1’s lipid-bound state .

  • Real-Time Monitoring:

    • Conjugate antibodies to fluorescent probes for live-cell imaging of DHN1 dynamics.

Potential Applications

  • High-throughput screening of drought-tolerant crops.

  • In situ detection of DHN1 during cold acclimation .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.