EMB3004 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
EMB3004 antibody; At3g06350 antibody; F24P17.18Bifunctional 3-dehydroquinate dehydratase/shikimate dehydrogenase antibody; chloroplastic antibody; DHQ-SDH protein antibody; DHQase-SORase antibody; Protein EMBRYO DEFECTIVE 3004) [Includes: Dehydroquinate dehydratase antibody; DHQ antibody; EC 4.2.1.10); Shikimate dehydrogenase antibody; SDH antibody; EC 1.1.1.25)] antibody
Target Names
EMB3004
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Gene References Into Functions
  1. Interactions observed in the DHQ-tartrate complex reveal a conserved mode for substrate binding between the plant and microbial DHQ dehydratase family. The SDH-shikimate complex provides the first direct evidence of the role of active site residues in the catalytic mechanism. PMID: 16784230
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT3G06350

STRING: 3702.AT3G06350.1

UniGene: At.43031

Protein Families
Type-I 3-dehydroquinase family; Shikimate dehydrogenase family
Subcellular Location
Plastid, chloroplast.

Q&A

What is EMB3004 and what cellular functions does it regulate?

EMB3004 (EMBRYO DEFECTIVE 3004) is a protein found in Arabidopsis thaliana, commonly known as mouse-ear cress. It plays crucial roles in embryonic development and cellular regulation. While specific antibodies against EMB3004 have been developed for research purposes, detailed characterization of this protein remains an active area of investigation. Research approaches typically involve immunohistochemistry, Western blotting, and functional assays to determine its localization patterns and interaction partners .

What are the key considerations when designing experiments using EMB3004 antibodies?

When designing experiments with EMB3004 antibodies, researchers should consider several critical factors: antibody specificity, appropriate controls, tissue preparation techniques, and detection methods. For immunohistochemistry applications, antigen retrieval methods may be necessary, similar to techniques developed for other plant proteins. As demonstrated with other antibodies like Ki-67, microwave treatment for antigen unmasking can significantly improve detection in fixed tissues . Always include both positive and negative controls to validate antibody specificity and minimize background signal.

How should EMB3004 antibodies be validated before experimental use?

Proper antibody validation requires multiple complementary approaches:

  • Western blot verification against recombinant and native proteins

  • Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry

  • Competitive binding assays using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

  • Cross-reactivity testing against related proteins

  • Testing in knockout/knockdown systems where available

This multi-method validation approach is essential, as demonstrated in other antibody development efforts where researchers used bacterially expressed proteins as immunogens to generate antibodies with specific reactivity profiles . For EMB3004 antibodies, verifying epitope specificity is particularly important given potential similarities with other plant proteins.

What are the optimal fixation and tissue preparation protocols for using EMB3004 antibodies in immunohistochemistry?

Optimization of fixation and tissue preparation is critical for successful EMB3004 antibody applications. Based on established practices for plant protein antibodies:

Fixation MethodDurationTemperatureAdvantagesLimitations
4% Paraformaldehyde24-48 hours4°CPreserves antigen structureMay require antigen retrieval
Methanol/Acetone10-30 min-20°CGood for membrane proteinsMay denature some epitopes
Glutaraldehyde2-4 hoursRoom tempExcellent morphologyStrong autofluorescence

For Arabidopsis tissues specifically, paraffin embedding followed by microtome sectioning at 5-10μm thickness generally provides good results. Similar to techniques developed for other antibodies like MIB 1 and MIB 3, microwave-based antigen unmasking (10mM citrate buffer, pH 6.0, for 15 minutes) often enhances detection in paraffin sections .

How can EMB3004 antibody specificity be improved for challenging applications?

Improving antibody specificity involves several strategies:

  • Pre-adsorption against related antigens to remove cross-reactive antibodies

  • Affinity purification using immobilized recombinant EMB3004 protein

  • Optimization of blocking reagents to reduce non-specific binding

  • Development of recombinant antibodies with engineered specificity

The Recombinant Antibody Network approach demonstrates how synthetic antibody technology can generate highly specific reagents against challenging targets. This technology uses phage display to select the highest-performing antibodies from large libraries . For EMB3004, similar approaches could potentially yield antibodies with enhanced specificity and reduced background signal.

How can EMB3004 antibodies be integrated into multi-parameter imaging approaches?

Multi-parameter imaging with EMB3004 antibodies requires careful consideration of compatible fluorophores and detection systems:

  • Spectral separation: When combining multiple antibodies, ensure adequate separation between fluorophore emission spectra

  • Sequential detection: Consider sequential rather than simultaneous detection if antibodies originate from the same species

  • Tyramide signal amplification: For low-abundance targets, this approach can enhance detection sensitivity by 10-100 fold

  • Super-resolution compatibility: Verify that selected fluorophores are compatible with STORM, PALM, or STED microscopy if nanoscale resolution is required

For co-localization studies with other cellular markers, control experiments should validate that secondary antibodies do not cross-react and that spectral bleed-through is minimized through appropriate compensation settings.

What are the current challenges in developing monoclonal versus polyclonal EMB3004 antibodies?

Development of both monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against EMB3004 presents distinct challenges:

Antibody TypeAdvantagesChallengesDevelopment Considerations
MonoclonalConsistent specificity, Renewable source, Reduced batch variationMay recognize limited epitopes, Potentially sensitive to conformational changesRequires careful epitope selection and screening of multiple clones
PolyclonalRecognizes multiple epitopes, Often higher sensitivity, Robust to protein modificationsBatch-to-batch variation, Higher background in some applicationsRequires affinity purification against recombinant protein

Drawing from approaches used in other antibody development programs, it's possible to express parts of the EMB3004 protein as bacterial fusion proteins to generate highly specific monoclonal antibodies, as demonstrated in the development of Ki-67 equivalent antibodies (MIB series) .

How can biophysical models help predict EMB3004 antibody epitope binding and specificity?

Biophysical modeling approaches can significantly enhance understanding of antibody-epitope interactions. Recent advances in computational biology allow researchers to:

  • Model antibody-antigen binding energetics

  • Predict impacts of mutations on binding affinity

  • Map conformational epitopes beyond linear sequence recognition

As demonstrated in viral escape modeling, sophisticated biophysical approaches can partition antibody activity by epitope and quantify how mutations affect antibody activity against each epitope . For EMB3004 antibodies, similar approaches could help identify key binding determinants and potential cross-reactivity with related proteins.

The biophysical model described by Yu et al. partitions the total polyclonal antibody activity by epitope, quantifying how mutations affect antibody activity against specific epitopes . This approach, while developed for viral antigens, provides a framework that could be adapted for EMB3004 antibody characterization:

p(v,c)=exp(ceawt,em(1βm,eb(v)m))p(v,c) = \exp\left(-c \cdot \sum_e a_{wt,e} \cdot \prod_m (1 - \beta_{m,e} \cdot b(v)_m)\right)

Where p(v,c)p(v,c) represents antibody escape for variant vv at concentration cc, awt,ea_{wt,e} represents pre-mutation functional activity at epitope ee, and βm,e\beta_{m,e} represents the escape effect of mutation mm at epitope ee .

What advanced techniques can characterize the binding kinetics of EMB3004 antibodies?

Several advanced biophysical techniques can provide detailed characterization of EMB3004 antibody binding properties:

  • Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR): Measures real-time binding kinetics (ka, kd) and equilibrium constants (KD)

  • Bio-Layer Interferometry (BLI): Provides label-free kinetic analysis with lower sample consumption

  • Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC): Delivers thermodynamic parameters (ΔH, ΔS, ΔG) of binding

  • Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry (HDX-MS): Maps conformational epitopes with high resolution

These techniques can help researchers understand not just whether an antibody binds, but the quality of that interaction, including binding strength, speed of association/dissociation, and the thermodynamic drivers of the interaction.

What strategies can resolve inconsistent EMB3004 antibody performance across different experimental batches?

Inconsistent antibody performance represents a significant challenge in research applications. Key troubleshooting strategies include:

  • Implement rigorous quality control testing of each antibody batch using standardized positive controls

  • Develop reference standard protocols with detailed documentation of critical parameters

  • Consider moving from polyclonal to recombinant monoclonal antibodies for improved consistency

  • Validate antibody performance under application-specific conditions (fixation, buffers, pH)

For recombinant antibodies, as developed by the Recombinant Antibody Network, batch-to-batch consistency is typically higher as they are generated from cloned synthetic genes with defined sequences rather than animal immunization . This approach might be beneficial for developing more consistent EMB3004 antibodies.

How can researchers optimize EMB3004 antibody concentration for different experimental conditions?

Optimization of antibody concentration is critical for balancing specific signal and background. As demonstrated in viral neutralization studies, concentrations that are too high may result in non-specific binding, while concentrations that are too low may fail to detect the target protein . A systematic titration approach is recommended:

  • Perform an initial broad-range titration (e.g., 0.1-10 μg/mL for typical applications)

  • Narrow to a fine-grained titration around the optimal range

  • Validate across different experimental conditions (buffer systems, blocking agents)

  • Consider signal-to-noise ratio rather than absolute signal intensity

For quantitative applications, standard curves using recombinant EMB3004 protein should be established to ensure measurements fall within the linear dynamic range of detection.

How are next-generation sequencing approaches enhancing EMB3004 antibody development?

Next-generation sequencing technologies are revolutionizing antibody development through several mechanisms:

  • High-throughput screening of antibody libraries using phage display coupled with deep sequencing

  • Comprehensive epitope mapping using mutagenesis scanning and sequencing

  • Single B-cell sequencing to identify novel antibody candidates with unique binding properties

These approaches align with methods used by the Recombinant Antibody Network, which has developed a fully automated, high-throughput antibody engineering platform capable of generating thousands of antibodies against hundreds of cell-surface proteins . For EMB3004 antibody development, similar approaches could accelerate the identification of antibodies with optimal specificity and affinity profiles.

What are the emerging applications of EMB3004 antibodies in functional genomics research?

As functional genomics continues to advance, EMB3004 antibodies are finding applications in several cutting-edge research areas:

  • ChIP-seq and CUT&RUN approaches for genome-wide binding site identification

  • Proximity labeling techniques (BioID, APEX) to map protein interaction networks

  • CRISPR screens coupled with antibody-based phenotypic readouts

  • Single-cell protein profiling to understand cellular heterogeneity

These applications require highly specific antibodies with validated performance in the particular application context. The development of validated EMB3004 antibodies would enable researchers to better understand the functional genomics landscape of Arabidopsis thaliana development and potentially provide insights applicable to other plant systems.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.