KEGG: ddi:DDB_G0281167
STRING: 44689.DDB0229336
DNA-PKcs is a large 460-469 kDa nuclear protein encoded by the PRKDC gene that acts as a molecular sensor for DNA damage. It belongs to the PI3K kinase family and plays vital roles in DNA double-strand break repair via non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), V(D)J recombination, and immune system development .
Antibodies against DNA-PKcs are crucial research tools because they enable:
Detection of DNA-PKcs expression patterns across different cell types and tissues
Monitoring DNA-PKcs localization and recruitment to DNA damage sites
Studying activation through detection of specific phosphorylation events
Investigating DNA-PKcs interactions with other proteins in repair complexes
Assessing the efficacy of DNA-PKcs inhibitors in cancer therapeutic research
DNA-PKcs dysregulation has been implicated in multiple solid and hematologic tumors, including chronic lymphomas, colon, prostate, breast, cervical, and brain cancers, with overexpression often correlating with poor prognosis . This makes DNA-PKcs antibodies valuable tools for both basic research and translational applications.
DNA-PKcs antibodies are utilized across multiple experimental platforms:
| Application | Recommended Dilutions | Positive Controls | Key Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Western Blot | 1:1000-1:4000 | HeLa cells, MCF-7 cells | Use PVDF membrane; account for large size (460 kDa) |
| Immunohistochemistry | 1:50-1:500 | Human kidney tissue, mouse testis tissue | Antigen retrieval with TE buffer pH 9.0 or citrate buffer pH 6.0 |
| Immunofluorescence | 1:50-1:500 | HeLa cells | Excellent for visualizing subcellular localization |
| Antibody Microarrays | Application-specific | Varies by target | Useful for phosphorylation studies |
Beyond these common applications, specialized uses include:
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to study DNA-PKcs recruitment to chromatin
Co-immunoprecipitation to identify protein interaction partners
Phospho-specific detection to monitor activation status
High-throughput screening for DNA-PKcs inhibitor development
Each application requires optimization for the specific experimental system being used, with particular attention to antibody specificity and validation.
DNA-PKcs undergoes autophosphorylation at specific sites that regulate its function in DNA repair. The most crucial sites identified include:
| Phosphorylation Site | Functional Significance | Detection Methods |
|---|---|---|
| Threonine 2609 | Critical for DNA repair; mutation increases radiosensitivity | Phospho-specific antibodies in WB, IF, ELISA |
| Serine 2056 | Autophosphorylation site important for kinase activation | Phospho-specific antibodies in WB, IF, ELISA |
These phosphorylation events serve as indicators of DNA-PKcs activation following DNA damage. Phospho-specific antibodies that recognize these sites provide powerful tools for monitoring DNA-PKcs activity in response to DNA-damaging agents or inhibitor treatments .
For optimal detection of these phosphorylation sites:
Induce DNA damage with ionizing radiation or genotoxic agents
Collect samples at appropriate time points (typically 15-60 minutes post-damage)
Use phospho-specific antibodies that do not bind unphosphorylated DNA-PKcs
Include appropriate controls (phosphatase treatment, kinase inhibitors)
These phospho-specific antibodies have enabled researchers to track the temporal dynamics of DNA-PKcs activation in various experimental systems .
The large size and compartment-specific functions of DNA-PKcs require specialized approaches for detection in different cellular fractions:
For nuclear fraction analysis:
Use gentle lysis buffers (e.g., HEPES-based with 0.1% NP-40) to preserve nuclear integrity
Employ nuclear extraction protocols with DNase treatment to release chromatin-bound DNA-PKcs
Use phosphatase inhibitors to preserve phosphorylation status
Consider sonication to release tightly bound DNA-PKcs from chromatin fragments
For cytoplasmic fraction analysis:
Use hypotonic buffers without detergents for initial fractionation
Verify fraction purity with markers (e.g., GAPDH for cytoplasm, lamin for nuclear fraction)
Consider that non-canonical functions of DNA-PKcs may involve cytoplasmic localization, particularly in immune responses
For chromatin-bound fraction:
Employ sequential extraction with increasing salt concentrations
Consider micrococcal nuclease treatment to release DNA-bound proteins
Use specialized extraction buffers containing 300-420 mM NaCl
Optimization strategies should include validation with appropriate subcellular markers and comparison with total cellular extracts to ensure complete recovery .
Recent research has revealed DNA-PKcs as an essential component of the cGAS/STING-dependent interferon response to viral DNA. When designing experiments to study this non-canonical function:
Experimental design considerations:
Co-localization studies:
Use DNA-PKcs antibodies alongside markers for cytosolic DNA sensors (cGAS, STING)
Perform dual immunofluorescence to detect co-localization with viral components
Employ super-resolution microscopy for detailed spatial analysis
Use proximity ligation assays to confirm protein-protein interactions
Biochemical approaches:
Immunoprecipitate DNA-PKcs to identify viral DNA or proteins in the complex
Examine phosphorylation status using phospho-specific antibodies
Use chromatin immunoprecipitation to identify binding to viral DNA genomes
Functional validation:
Compare interferon responses in cells treated with DNA-PKcs inhibitors
Use CRISPR/Cas9 to generate DNA-PKcs knockout cells for comparison
Assess viral replication efficiency under different conditions
These approaches have revealed that DNA-PKcs functions beyond its canonical role in DNA repair, participating in innate immune responses against both cytoplasmic and nuclear-replicating DNA viruses .
DNA-PKcs inhibitors are being developed as potential cancer therapeutics, particularly as adjuncts to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Phospho-specific antibodies provide crucial tools for evaluating inhibitor efficacy:
Experimental design for inhibitor assessment:
Establish baseline phosphorylation levels using phospho-specific antibodies
Treat cells with inhibitor compounds (e.g., DA-143, NU7441) at varying concentrations
Induce DNA damage using radiation or DNA-damaging agents
Measure changes in phosphorylation at Thr2609 and Ser2056 sites
Quantitative evaluation methods:
Western blot with phospho-specific antibodies followed by densitometry
High-throughput ELISA-based methods for multiple sample analysis
Flow cytometry for single-cell resolution of phosphorylation status
Antibody microarrays for multiplexed phosphorylation analysis
Functional correlation assessment:
Associate inhibition of phosphorylation with functional outcomes:
DNA repair capacity using comet assays or γH2AX foci resolution
Cell survival following DNA damage
Effects on T cell function for immunological applications
Comparative inhibitor analysis:
Compare novel inhibitors (e.g., DA-143) with established compounds
Determine IC50 values based on phosphorylation inhibition
Assess bioavailability parameters alongside phosphorylation inhibition
The novel DNA-PKcs inhibitor DA-143 demonstrates improved aqueous solubility compared to previous inhibitors while achieving an IC50 of 2.5 nM, making it promising for both preclinical and clinical development .
Beyond its well-established role in DNA repair, DNA-PKcs has emerged as a critical regulator of T cell function. Researchers can investigate this role using the following approaches:
Expression and activation analysis:
Use Western blot and flow cytometry to assess DNA-PKcs expression in resting versus activated T cells
Employ phospho-specific antibodies to track activation status during T cell stimulation
Compare expression patterns across T cell subsets (naive, memory, effector)
Functional studies with inhibitors:
Treat T cells with DNA-PKcs inhibitors (e.g., NU7441) before activation
Measure activation markers (CD69, CD25), proliferation, and cytokine production
Use phospho-specific antibodies to confirm inhibition of DNA-PKcs activity
Mechanistic investigations:
Perform immunoprecipitation with DNA-PKcs antibodies to identify T cell-specific interaction partners
Use ChIP-seq to identify DNA-PKcs binding sites in T cell-specific genes
Study the relationship between DNA-PKcs and transcription factors like Egr1
In vivo implications:
Use immunohistochemistry to examine DNA-PKcs expression in lymphoid tissues
Correlate DNA-PKcs activity with T cell responses in disease models
Assess potential for DNA-PKcs inhibitors in immunological disorders
Research has shown that DNA-PKcs inhibition impedes proper T cell response post-stimulation and prevents T cells from producing inflammatory cytokines in response to alloantigen recognition. This suggests potential applications in transplantation medicine for preventing graft rejection .
When utilizing DNA-PKcs antibodies for cancer research, several methodological considerations are essential:
Expression analysis in tumor tissues:
Use validated antibodies for immunohistochemistry on tumor sections
Compare expression between tumor and adjacent normal tissue
Consider tissue microarrays for high-throughput analysis across multiple samples
Correlate expression levels with clinical outcomes (survival, treatment response)
Activation status assessment:
Employ phospho-specific antibodies to evaluate DNA-PKcs activation in tumors
Compare phosphorylation patterns between normal and malignant tissues
Associate activation status with DNA damage markers (γH2AX, 53BP1)
Inhibitor response studies:
Use phospho-specific antibodies to monitor inhibition of DNA-PKcs activity
Assess changes in downstream pathways following inhibitor treatment
Combine with functional assays (clonogenic survival, DNA repair capacity)
Cancer-specific functions:
Investigate DNA-PKcs in metastasis by examining its role in angiogenesis and tumor migration
Study effects on the tumor microenvironment using co-culture systems
Examine regulation of cancer-related genes using ChIP and gene expression analysis
DNA-PKcs has been identified as a metastatic driver in melanoma by stimulating angiogenesis and tumor migration. Upregulation of DNA-PKcs has been observed in multiple cancer types including hepatocellular carcinoma and multiple myeloma, and is associated with radioresistance in thyroid, nasopharyngeal, oral cavity, and cervical cancers .
Rigorous validation is essential when developing or using new DNA-PKcs antibodies. A comprehensive validation strategy should include:
Western blot validation:
Verify detection of a single band at the correct molecular weight (~460 kDa)
Test in multiple cell types with known DNA-PKcs expression (HeLa, MCF-7, U2OS)
Include negative controls (PRKDC knockout cells, pre-absorption with immunizing antigen)
Compare with established antibodies targeting different epitopes
Genetic validation:
Test antibody in wild-type versus CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout cells
Use siRNA/shRNA knockdown to create a gradient of expression levels
Perform rescue experiments with recombinant DNA-PKcs expression
Phospho-antibody validation:
Verify increased signal following DNA damage induction
Confirm signal reduction after phosphatase treatment
Test specificity using phospho-mimetic and phospho-null mutants
Validate with kinase inhibitors to show reduced phosphorylation
Application-specific validation:
Validate separately for each intended application (WB, IP, IF, IHC)
Optimize protocols including antigen retrieval methods for IHC
Document lot-to-lot variation and optimal conditions
Cross-reactivity assessment:
Test for potential cross-reactivity with related kinases
Verify species cross-reactivity if claiming reactivity across species
Document specificity across different experimental conditions
A well-validated antibody will show consistent results across multiple validation methods and maintain specificity under varied experimental conditions .
The development of therapeutic approaches targeting DNA-PKcs is an active area of research, with antibodies playing crucial roles in several aspects:
Inhibitor development and assessment:
Phospho-specific antibodies are used to evaluate inhibitor efficacy
Western blots and antibody microarrays help establish structure-activity relationships
Immunofluorescence detects subcellular localization changes following inhibitor treatment
Pharmacodynamic markers for clinical trials rely on antibody-based detection methods
Combination therapy evaluation:
Antibodies help assess DNA-PKcs status when combining inhibitors with:
Radiotherapy (monitoring DNA repair capacity)
Chemotherapy (evaluating synergistic effects)
Immunotherapy (examining effects on immune responses)
Companion diagnostics:
IHC with DNA-PKcs antibodies can identify patients likely to respond to inhibitors
Phospho-specific antibodies may serve as biomarkers of target engagement
Expression analysis helps stratify patients for clinical trials
Beyond inhibition:
Novel approaches targeting protein-protein interactions rather than kinase activity
Development of proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) for DNA-PKcs degradation
Potential for antibody-drug conjugates targeting DNA-PKcs in cancer cells
Recently developed inhibitor DA-143 demonstrates enhanced bioavailability compared to earlier compounds, which is critical for effective preclinical and clinical evaluation. This improved solubility facilitates efficacy at reduced doses, addressing a significant limitation of previous DNA-PKcs inhibitors .
DNA-PKcs functions at the intersection of DNA repair and immune responses, making antibodies against it valuable tools for investigating this relationship:
Viral DNA sensing mechanisms:
DNA-PKcs is essential for cGAS/STING-dependent IFN-I responses
Antibodies help track DNA-PKcs recruitment to viral DNA
Co-localization studies reveal interactions with viral sensing components
IP experiments identify complexes formed during immune activation
T cell signaling pathways:
DNA-PKcs regulates critical transcription factors like Egr1 in T cells
Phospho-specific antibodies detect DNA-PKcs activation during T cell stimulation
ChIP experiments reveal DNA-PKcs association with immune-related gene promoters
Inhibitor studies combined with antibody detection demonstrate functional outcomes
Innate/adaptive immunity intersection:
Antibodies help study DNA-PKcs in both innate and adaptive immune contexts
Quantitative proteomic approaches with TMT technology identify phosphorylation targets
Expression analysis across immune cell types reveals tissue-specific functions
Therapeutic implications:
DNA-PKcs inhibition prevents T cells from producing inflammatory cytokines
Potential applications in transplantation medicine to prevent rejection
Possible dual targeting of DNA repair and immune function in cancer
Studies have demonstrated that DNA-PKcs functions as a molecular link between DNA damage repair pathways and immune responses, participating in both nuclear DNA repair and cytoplasmic viral DNA sensing. This dual functionality makes it a promising target for therapeutic interventions in both cancer and immune-related disorders .
Integrating DNA-PKcs antibodies with advanced proteomics enables comprehensive identification of substrates and interaction partners:
Phosphoproteomic approaches:
Utilize quantitative mass spectrometry with TMT (tandem mass tag) technology
Compare phosphoproteomes between stimulated cells with or without DNA-PKcs inhibition
Immunoprecipitate DNA-PKcs to identify associated proteins and phosphorylation targets
Employ SILAC labeling for quantitative comparison of substrate phosphorylation
Experimental design considerations:
Include appropriate stimuli (DNA damage, immune activation)
Use specific DNA-PKcs inhibitors (NU7441) to distinguish direct from indirect effects
Consider temporal dynamics with multiple time points after stimulation
Include appropriate controls (kinase-dead mutants, CRISPR knockout cells)
Validation strategies:
Confirm direct phosphorylation using in vitro kinase assays
Generate phospho-specific antibodies against identified sites
Perform site-directed mutagenesis to assess functional significance
Use proximity-based labeling methods (BioID, APEX) to verify spatial relationships
Functional characterization:
Assess how phosphorylation affects substrate localization, stability, or activity
Examine cell type-specific differences in substrate utilization
Investigate context-dependent (damage, immune stimulation) substrate preferences
A quantitative proteomic mass spectrometry screen utilizing TMT technology identified the transcription factor Egr1 as a DNA-PKcs phosphorylation target in T cell activation. This finding revealed that DNA-PKcs stabilizes Egr1, which is crucial for T cell responses to immunogenic stimuli, suggesting broader influence on immune outcomes than previously understood .
Proper storage and handling of DNA-PKcs antibodies is critical for maintaining their performance across applications:
| Storage Condition | Duration | Temperature | Special Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long-term storage | 12 months | -20°C to -70°C | As supplied |
| Medium-term | 1 month | 2-8°C | Under sterile conditions after reconstitution |
| Working stocks | 6 months | -20°C to -70°C | Under sterile conditions after reconstitution |
For optimal performance:
Use a manual defrost freezer and avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Store antibodies in small aliquots to minimize freeze-thaw cycles
Some formulations contain preservatives like 0.02% sodium azide and 50% glycerol at pH 7.3
For small volume antibodies (20µL), aliquoting may be unnecessary for -20°C storage
Follow manufacturer-specific recommendations as formulations may vary
When handling antibodies during experiments:
Allow solutions to equilibrate to room temperature before opening
Centrifuge briefly before use to collect contents at the bottom of the tube
Use sterile technique when handling reconstituted antibodies
Return to recommended storage conditions immediately after use
When working with DNA-PKcs antibodies, researchers may encounter several challenges. Here are methodological approaches to troubleshoot common issues:
Western blot challenges:
No signal or weak signal:
Increase antibody concentration (start with 1:1000 and adjust as needed)
Extend primary antibody incubation time (overnight at 4°C)
Use enhanced detection systems for low abundance samples
Consider the large size of DNA-PKcs (460 kDa) - extend transfer time
Multiple bands:
Verify specificity with knockout controls
Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation
Use freshly prepared samples to minimize degradation
Optimize gel percentage (use low percentage gels for this large protein)
Immunofluorescence/IHC challenges:
High background:
Increase blocking time/concentration
Optimize antibody dilution (try 1:100-1:500 range)
Include additional washing steps
No signal:
Optimize antigen retrieval (TE buffer pH 9.0 or citrate buffer pH 6.0)
Increase antibody concentration
Extend primary antibody incubation time
Consider signal amplification methods
Phospho-specific antibody issues:
Loss of phospho-signal:
Include phosphatase inhibitors in all buffers
Process samples quickly and keep cold
Verify phosphorylation induction protocol
Consider fixation methods that preserve phospho-epitopes
Cross-reactivity concerns:
Validate antibody specificity in your experimental system
Include appropriate positive and negative controls
Consider blocking with immunizing peptide if available
Compare results with alternative antibodies targeting different epitopes
For all applications, appropriate controls are essential: positive controls (HeLa cells, MCF-7 cells), negative controls (knockdown/knockout samples), and procedural controls (secondary antibody only) .
When incorporating DNA-PKcs antibodies into multiplexed imaging or flow cytometry protocols, several methodological considerations become critical:
Panel design considerations:
Spectral compatibility:
Select fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap
Consider brightness hierarchy (assign brightest fluorophores to lowest expressed targets)
Plan for appropriate compensation controls
Antibody compatibility:
Ensure antibodies are from different host species or use directly conjugated antibodies
Test for cross-reactivity between antibodies in the panel
Verify that detection systems don't interfere with each other
Staining protocol optimization:
Sequential staining:
Consider sequential rather than simultaneous staining for complex panels
Test different fixation and permeabilization protocols for compatibility
Optimize incubation times and temperatures for each antibody
Signal-to-noise optimization:
Titrate each antibody individually before combining
Include appropriate blocking steps between antibody applications
Consider signal amplification for low-abundance targets
Technical considerations for DNA-PKcs detection:
Nuclear localization:
Ensure permeabilization protocol allows nuclear access
Use appropriate nuclear counterstains for localization
Consider subcellular fractionation for flow cytometry
Phosphorylation detection:
Use specific fixation methods that preserve phospho-epitopes
Include phosphatase inhibitors throughout the protocol
Consider baseline versus activated states in experimental design
Data analysis approaches:
For flow cytometry:
Use appropriate gating strategies to analyze nuclear proteins
Consider median fluorescence intensity rather than percent positive
Include fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls
For imaging:
Employ quantitative analysis tools for co-localization
Use nuclear masks for accurate quantification
Consider 3D analysis for volumetric data
These methodological approaches enable researchers to effectively incorporate DNA-PKcs antibodies into complex multiplexed analyses, facilitating the study of DNA-PKcs in relation to other proteins and cellular processes .