DOF2.4 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Antibody Validation Pipeline

High-quality antibodies require rigorous validation. A standardized workflow includes:

  1. Proteomics-driven cell line selection: Identifying cell lines with high target expression (e.g., using PaxDB) .

  2. CRISPR/Cas9 knockout (KO) controls: Generating isogenic KO lines to confirm antibody specificity .

  3. Multi-application screening: Testing antibodies in immunoblot, immunoprecipitation (IP), and immunofluorescence (IF) .

For DOF2, validation might involve:

  • Immunoblot: Comparing parental and KO Arabidopsis lines to confirm loss of signal .

  • Epitope mapping: Ensuring the antibody recognizes the conserved zinc finger domain .

Applications in Plant Research

DOF antibodies enable functional studies, including:

  • Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP): Mapping DNA-binding sites of DOF2 in gene promoters .

  • Subcellular localization: Confirming nuclear localization via IF .

  • Mutant phenotyping: Assessing developmental defects in DOF2 knockdown lines .

Example data from Arabidopsis antibody screens :

Antibody TargetCross-Reactivity TestedSpecificity Confirmed
DOF1194 other proteinsYes (no cross-reactivity)
MYB6Other MYB family membersYes

Challenges and Solutions

  • Low target abundance: DOF transcription factors are often expressed at low levels, necessitating sensitive detection methods (e.g., chemiluminescence) .

  • Sequence similarity: DOF family members share conserved domains, requiring careful epitope selection to avoid cross-reactivity .

Future Directions

Advances in antibody engineering, such as cell-free synthesis and site-specific conjugation (e.g., CRISPR-edited sortase tags), could improve the reproducibility of plant antibody production . For DOF2.4, further studies might:

  • Use cryo-EM or X-ray crystallography to resolve its structure in complex with DNA.

  • Leverage single-domain antibodies (nanobodies) for in vivo tracking .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
DOF2.4 antibody; PEAR1 antibody; At2g37590 antibody; F13M22.9Dof zinc finger protein DOF2.4 antibody; AtDOF2.4 antibody; Protein PHLOEM EARLY DOF 1 antibody
Target Names
DOF2.4
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
DOF2.4 is a transcription factor exhibiting specific binding affinity for the 5'-AA[AG]G-3' consensus core sequence. It is implicated in the early stages of vascular development. Specifically, DOF2.4, along with other PEAR proteins (e.g., DOF5.1, DOF3.2, DOF1.1, DOF5.6, and DOF5.3), activates gene expression promoting the radial growth of protophloem sieve elements. Furthermore, DOF2.4 triggers the transcription of HD-ZIP III genes, particularly within the central vascular tissue domain.
Gene References Into Functions
  • AtDof2.4 and AtDof5.8 may play roles in distinct, yet early, stages of vascular development. PMID: 17583520
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT2G37590

STRING: 3702.AT2G37590.1

UniGene: At.50120

Subcellular Location
Nucleus. Symplast.
Tissue Specificity
Specific to the vascular tissues. The PEAR proteins (e.g. DOF2.4, DOF5.1, DOF3.2, DOF1.1, DOF5.6 and DOF5.3) form a short-range concentration gradient that peaks at protophloem sieve elements (PSE).

Q&A

Basic Research Questions

What validation strategies ensure DOF2.4 antibody specificity for immunoblotting?

To confirm specificity:

  • Perform genetic validation using CRISPR/Cas9-generated knockout (KO) cell lines. Compare immunoblot signals between parental and KO lysates (Figure 2 in ).

  • Use orthogonal validation by correlating antibody signals with proteomics databases (e.g., PaxDB) for expected expression levels .

  • Include loading controls (e.g., β-actin) and validate via immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry .

How to optimize DOF2.4 antibody protocols for immunohistochemistry (IHC) versus immunocytochemistry (ICC)?

ParameterIHCICC
FixationFormalin-fixed, paraffin-embeddedMethanol/acetone for membrane permeabilization
Antigen retrievalRequired (heat-induced epitope retrieval)Optional, depending on epitope accessibility
DetectionIndirect with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodiesDirect fluorescent conjugates (e.g., Alexa Fluor® 488)

What controls are essential for DOF2.4 antibody experiments?

  • Negative controls: KO cell lines, isotype-matched irrelevant antibodies.

  • Positive controls: Cell lines with confirmed high DOF2.4 expression (validated via proteomics databases) .

  • Technical controls: Secondary-only and no-primary-antibody conditions to rule out non-specific binding .

Advanced Research Questions

How to resolve discrepancies in DOF2.4 localization data across studies?

  • Hypothesis 1: Epitope masking due to post-translational modifications. Test alternative epitope retrieval methods (e.g., enzymatic vs. heat-mediated) .

  • Hypothesis 2: Antibody cross-reactivity. Perform immunodepletion assays by pre-incubating the antibody with recombinant DOF2.4 protein. Loss of signal confirms specificity .

  • Hypothesis 3: Cell-type-specific splicing variants. Validate using isoform-specific KO models .

What methodologies enable quantitative analysis of DOF2.4 expression levels?

  • Dual-labeling assays: Combine DOF2.4 antibody with a reference protein antibody (e.g., GAPDH) for normalization.

  • Standard curve approach: Use recombinant DOF2.4 protein serial dilutions to establish a linear signal range (Table 3 in ).

  • Digital quantification: Software-based analysis (e.g., ImageJ) for Western blot band intensity or fluorescent signal quantification .

How to design multiplex assays using DOF2.4 antibody without cross-talk?

StrategyImplementation
Spectral separationUse secondary antibodies conjugated to fluorophores with non-overlapping emission spectra (e.g., Alexa Fluor® 488 vs. 647) .
Sequential stainingPerform DOF2.4 detection first, followed by acid stripping before adding subsequent antibodies.
Antibody validationPre-test all antibodies in monoplex to confirm no off-target binding (Figure 17 in ).

Methodological Notes

  • For low-abundance targets, use recombinant multiclonal antibodies to enhance sensitivity while maintaining specificity .

  • In flow cytometry, prioritize indirect detection with signal-amplifying secondary antibodies (e.g., biotin-streptavidin systems) .

  • Always validate DOF2.4 antibody performance in native vs. denatured conditions, as epitope accessibility varies with sample processing (Table 2 in ).

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.