The NTD-recognizing antibody 5-7 was isolated from a convalescent donor who displayed a robust plasma neutralization response after experiencing severe acute symptoms .
| Antibody | Alpha (B.1.1.7) | Beta (B.1.351) | Gamma (P.1) | Epsilon (B.1.427/9) | Iota (B.1.526) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 | Retains ~50% | Retains ~50% | Retains ~50% | Retains ~50% | Retains ~50% |
While the potency of NTD monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) was reduced against the variants compared to the original isolate (WA1), 5-7 retained approximately 50% of its neutralization activity against all examined variants .
The antibody 5-7 operates through a distinct mechanism, different from other NTD supersite-targeting antibodies . It was observed that there is strong competition between 5-7 and all supersite antibodies, which could be due to steric hindrance or conformational competition . Comparison of NTD conformations revealed a structural coupling between the N3 β harpin and the N4 loop outlining the epitope of 5-7, which acts as a gate for the hydrophobic pocket .
Antibody 5-7's ability to neutralize SARS-CoV-2 variants makes it a potential therapeutic candidate . The 5-7 binding site represents a second site of neutralization vulnerability in SARS-CoV-2 NTD, remote from most VOC mutations, underscoring its potential therapeutic value .
Antibodies, also known as immunoglobulins (Ig), are glycoproteins that play a key role in the immune response . The basic structure of an antibody consists of two heavy chains and two light chains, forming a Y-shaped molecule . The arms of the Y contain Fab regions that bind to specific antigens, while the stem contains the Fc region, which interacts with immune system components to eliminate the antigen .
The heavy and light chains of antibodies fold into repeating immunoglobulin folds, creating constant and variable domains . The Fab domains include two variable and two constant domains, with the variable domains forming the variable fragment (Fv) that determines the antibody's antigen specificity . Variable loops, also known as complementarity determining regions (CDRs), within the variable domains are responsible for antigen binding .
DOF5.7 is a member of the plant-specific DOF (DNA-binding with One Finger) family of transcription factors. This protein family plays crucial roles in various plant developmental processes, with particular significance in vascular development and functioning. DOF transcription factors bind to the core sequence AAAG/CTTT and are involved in regulating numerous plant-specific processes. The DOF5.7 protein specifically belongs to the Arabidopsis thaliana DOF family and has been linked to vascular tissue development, making it an important target for research investigating plant growth regulation and tissue differentiation .
DOF5.7 antibody is typically produced using recombinant Arabidopsis thaliana DOF5.7 protein as the immunogen. The antibody is raised in rabbits (polyclonal) and undergoes antigen affinity purification to ensure specificity. Commercially available DOF5.7 antibodies are generally supplied in liquid form, containing preservatives such as 0.03% Proclin 300 and storage buffers like 50% Glycerol in 0.01M PBS (pH 7.4). The antibody demonstrates reactivity with Arabidopsis thaliana samples and is suitable for research applications including ELISA and Western Blot techniques. For optimal results, DOF5.7 antibody should be stored at -20°C or -80°C, avoiding repeated freeze-thaw cycles that can compromise antibody functionality .
DOF5.7 functions as a transcription factor that likely participates in regulating gene expression related to vascular tissue development in plants. Analysis of promoter regions of Arabidopsis DOF transcription factor family members indicates that most DOF genes, including DOF5.7, contain vascular-specific motifs such as CT/GA elements, suggesting expression in the vascular system. Transcriptome analyses have identified several DOF transcription factors expressed in phloem cells, xylem tissue, or both, indicating their importance in vascular development. DOF factors recognize specific DNA motifs, allowing them to control the expression of genes involved in tissue differentiation, particularly in developing vascular tissues .
DOF5.7 antibody has been validated for several research applications, with Western Blot (WB) and ELISA being the primary confirmed methods. In Western Blot applications, the antibody enables identification and quantification of DOF5.7 protein in plant tissue extracts, providing insights into expression levels across different developmental stages or experimental conditions. For ELISA applications, the antibody allows for quantitative measurement of DOF5.7 in complex biological samples. While these applications are well-established, researchers have also explored using DOF5.7 antibody in immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence experiments to localize the protein within plant tissues, though such applications may require additional optimization and validation .
To optimize protein extraction for DOF5.7 detection, researchers should:
Use fresh plant tissue whenever possible, particularly focusing on vascular-rich samples where DOF5.7 is likely expressed
Implement a nuclear protein extraction protocol, as DOF5.7 is a transcription factor primarily located in the nucleus
Include protease inhibitors (complete cocktail) in extraction buffers to prevent degradation
Incorporate phosphatase inhibitors if investigating post-translational modifications
Maintain cold conditions throughout extraction to preserve protein integrity
Consider using specialized extraction buffers containing 20-25% glycerol, 0.4-0.6M NaCl, and non-ionic detergents that effectively solubilize nuclear proteins
Perform tissue disruption methods that effectively break cell walls (bead-beating or liquid nitrogen grinding)
This methodological approach will significantly increase the likelihood of successful DOF5.7 detection in subsequent immunological applications .
When conducting Western blot experiments with DOF5.7 antibody, researchers should include the following essential controls:
Positive control: Include samples from tissues known to express DOF5.7 based on transcriptomic data, such as vascular-enriched tissue samples from Arabidopsis
Negative control: Use samples from tissues with minimal DOF5.7 expression or from DOF5.7 knockout/knockdown plants
Loading control: Include detection of a constitutively expressed protein (e.g., actin, tubulin, or GAPDH) to normalize for protein loading variations
Antibody specificity control: Pre-absorb the antibody with recombinant DOF5.7 protein prior to immunoblotting to confirm signal specificity
Secondary antibody-only control: Omit primary antibody to assess background signal from secondary antibody
Size verification: Include molecular weight markers to confirm the detected band corresponds to the expected size of DOF5.7
Including these controls will significantly enhance experimental rigor and facilitate accurate interpretation of results in DOF5.7 detection experiments .
DOF5.7 antibody can be instrumental in investigating the fascinating phenomenon of transcription factor mobility between plant cells and tissues. Research has shown that some DOF family transcription factors, including DOF3.7/DAG1 and DOF4.1, display broader translational patterns compared to their transcriptional domains, suggesting protein movement between cells. To investigate DOF5.7 mobility:
Perform parallel immunolocalization experiments using DOF5.7 antibody alongside in situ hybridization for DOF5.7 mRNA
Develop transgenic plants expressing fluorescently-tagged DOF5.7 under its native promoter to track protein movement
Use DOF5.7 antibody in tissue-specific proteomics approaches, comparing protein presence across adjacent tissue types
Implement microinjection studies with fluorescently-labeled DOF5.7 antibody to track potential movement through plasmodesmata
Conduct protein-tethering experiments to determine if size exclusion limits affect DOF5.7 mobility
This methodological approach allows researchers to determine whether DOF5.7 acts cell-autonomously or if it moves between cells to coordinate developmental responses across tissues, providing insights into transcriptional regulatory networks in plants .
Investigating DOF5.7 protein-protein interactions is crucial for understanding its regulatory mechanisms. Researchers can employ several complementary approaches:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): Use DOF5.7 antibody to pull down the protein complex from plant extracts, followed by mass spectrometry to identify interacting partners
Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) screening: Utilize DOF5.7 as bait to screen plant cDNA libraries for potential interactors
Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC): Generate fusion constructs with split fluorescent protein fragments to visualize interactions in planta
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET): Create donor-acceptor fluorophore pairs to detect close-proximity interactions in living cells
Protein microarrays: Use purified DOF5.7 to probe arrays containing other plant proteins to identify binding partners
Proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID): Fuse DOF5.7 with a biotin ligase to biotinylate proximal proteins for subsequent identification
Each method offers distinct advantages, and combining multiple approaches provides stronger evidence for biologically relevant interactions. Particular attention should be given to interactions with other transcription factors or chromatin-modifying complexes that may contribute to DOF5.7's regulatory functions in vascular development .
Integrating DOF5.7 antibody-based protein analysis with transcriptomic data provides a powerful approach for understanding vascular development mechanisms. Researchers should:
Perform chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) using DOF5.7 antibody to identify direct target genes
Conduct RNA-seq on tissues with altered DOF5.7 expression (overexpression, knockout, or knockdown lines)
Compare DOF5.7 protein levels (detected via Western blot) with mRNA abundance across developmental stages
Analyze the promoters of differentially expressed genes for DOF binding motifs (AAAG/CTTT core sequences)
Utilize bioinformatic tools to compare DOF5.7 ChIP-seq data with publicly available transcriptome datasets from vascular tissues
Perform immunohistochemistry with DOF5.7 antibody alongside in situ hybridization for putative target genes to correlate spatial expression patterns
This integrative approach allows researchers to construct regulatory networks involving DOF5.7 and identify its role in orchestrating vascular tissue specification, differentiation, and function. The combination of protein-level analysis with transcriptomic data provides mechanistic insights beyond what either approach could reveal independently .
Inconsistent DOF5.7 detection across plant tissues can arise from multiple factors. To address this challenge:
Tissue-specific optimization: Modify extraction buffers based on tissue type, with increased detergent concentrations for tissues with higher cell wall rigidity
Consider developmental regulation: DOF5.7 expression may vary significantly across developmental stages; ensure sampling at appropriate time points
Evaluate tissue-specific post-translational modifications: Phosphorylation or other modifications may affect epitope accessibility in different tissues
Assess protein abundance thresholds: Use more sensitive detection methods (e.g., enhanced chemiluminescence) for tissues with lower expression
Consider protein stability differences: Include additional protease inhibitors for tissues with high proteolytic activity
Evaluate technical variables: Standardize protein loading, transfer efficiency, and incubation conditions
Compare results with transcriptomic data: Examine if inconsistencies in protein detection align with mRNA expression patterns
By systematically addressing these factors, researchers can develop optimized protocols for consistent DOF5.7 detection across diverse plant tissues and experimental conditions .
Cross-reactivity is a significant concern when working with transcription factor antibodies due to conserved domains within protein families. For DOF5.7 antibody:
Evaluate sequence homology: Compare the immunogen sequence with other DOF family members to predict potential cross-reactivity
Validate specificity: Use tissues from DOF5.7 knockout plants as negative controls
Perform antibody pre-absorption: Incubate the antibody with recombinant DOF5.7 protein prior to use to confirm signal abolishment
Consider epitope mapping: Determine which region of DOF5.7 the antibody recognizes and assess its uniqueness within the DOF family
Implement additional controls: Include samples overexpressing DOF5.7 alongside samples overexpressing closely related DOF proteins
Combine detection methods: Corroborate antibody-based detection with orthogonal techniques like mass spectrometry
Compare banding patterns: Analyze molecular weight patterns to differentiate between DOF5.7 and potential cross-reactive proteins
The Arabidopsis DOF family contains multiple members with structural similarities, making careful validation of antibody specificity essential for accurate data interpretation .
Distinguishing between specific and non-specific signals is crucial for accurate interpretation of DOF5.7 antibody results. Researchers should implement the following methodological approaches:
Titrate antibody concentrations: Determine the optimal antibody dilution that maximizes specific signal while minimizing background
Implement competitive binding assays: Pre-incubate the antibody with purified recombinant DOF5.7 protein before application to samples
Utilize genetic controls: Compare signals between wild-type and DOF5.7 mutant (knockout or knockdown) plant tissues
Employ multiple blocking agents: Test different blocking solutions (BSA, milk, commercial blockers) to reduce non-specific binding
Analyze band patterns: Verify that detected bands match the expected molecular weight of DOF5.7 (approximately 46.5 kDa)
Compare results across methods: Confirm findings using multiple detection techniques (Western blot, ELISA, immunohistochemistry)
Evaluate signal in tissues with known DOF5.7 expression: Compare signal intensity with transcriptomic data from vascular tissues
By implementing these rigorous validation strategies, researchers can confidently distinguish authentic DOF5.7 signals from technical artifacts or cross-reactivity with related proteins .
Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) using DOF5.7 antibody can reveal genome-wide binding profiles of this transcription factor. For successful implementation:
Crosslinking optimization: Test various formaldehyde concentrations (1-3%) and incubation times (10-20 minutes) to efficiently crosslink DOF5.7 to DNA while maintaining chromatin quality
Sonication parameters: Optimize sonication conditions to generate DNA fragments between 200-500 bp for optimal sequencing resolution
Antibody validation: Pre-validate DOF5.7 antibody for ChIP applications using known target regions containing AAAG/CTTT core motifs
Input controls: Prepare input chromatin controls alongside immunoprecipitated samples for accurate peak calling
Biological replicates: Include 3-4 biological replicates to ensure statistical robustness
Additional controls: Consider performing ChIP-seq with pre-immune serum and in DOF5.7 knockout plants to identify non-specific signals
Bioinformatic analysis: Apply appropriate peak-calling algorithms and motif discovery tools to identify enriched binding motifs
This comprehensive approach enables researchers to identify direct DOF5.7 target genes and understand its contribution to transcriptional networks regulating vascular development in plants .
Immunolocalization of DOF5.7 in plant tissues requires careful methodological considerations due to unique challenges associated with plant cell architecture and tissue complexity:
Fixation optimization: Test multiple fixatives (paraformaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, or combinations) at various concentrations to preserve antigen recognition while maintaining tissue structure
Cell wall permeabilization: Include appropriate enzymatic digestion steps (cellulase, pectinase) to facilitate antibody penetration
Antigen retrieval: Evaluate heat-induced or enzymatic antigen retrieval methods to expose epitopes potentially masked during fixation
Signal amplification: Consider tyramide signal amplification or other enhancement techniques for low-abundance transcription factors
Autofluorescence management: Implement strategies to reduce plant tissue autofluorescence, including specific blocking steps or spectral unmixing during imaging
Co-localization studies: Combine DOF5.7 detection with markers for nuclear localization and vascular tissue identification
Three-dimensional analysis: Utilize confocal microscopy for spatial resolution of DOF5.7 localization within complex tissues
These methodological refinements enable precise spatial localization of DOF5.7 protein within plant tissues, providing insights into its subcellular distribution and tissue-specific expression patterns during development .
After generating DOF5.7 binding data using ChIP-seq or similar approaches, researchers should implement the following bioinformatic strategies:
Motif enrichment analysis: Identify over-represented DNA motifs in DOF5.7-bound regions, focusing on the AAAG/CTTT core sequence and potential extended binding preferences
Gene Ontology (GO) analysis: Categorize DOF5.7 target genes into functional classes to identify enriched biological processes relevant to vascular development
Integrative genomics: Compare DOF5.7 binding sites with publicly available datasets on chromatin accessibility (ATAC-seq), histone modifications, and transcriptome profiles from vascular tissues
Comparative analysis: Assess conservation of DOF5.7 binding sites across related plant species to identify evolutionarily conserved regulatory networks
Network construction: Build gene regulatory networks connecting DOF5.7 to downstream targets and parallel transcriptional regulators
Time-series analysis: When possible, analyze DOF5.7 binding across developmental time points to capture dynamic regulatory events
Genome browser visualization: Create integrated views of DOF5.7 binding in relation to gene structure, chromatin features, and expression patterns
This comprehensive bioinformatic approach enables researchers to extract meaningful biological insights from DOF5.7 binding data and place them in the broader context of vascular development regulation .
Interpreting DOF5.7 localization patterns requires careful consideration of its biological context and potential functions:
Nuclear vs. cytoplasmic distribution: Assess whether DOF5.7 shows exclusive nuclear localization or if cytoplasmic pools exist that might indicate regulatory mechanisms controlling nuclear import/export
Cell-type specificity: Analyze which vascular cell types (phloem, xylem, cambium) show DOF5.7 expression and how this correlates with developmental processes
Developmental dynamics: Evaluate changes in DOF5.7 localization across developmental stages to identify temporal regulation patterns
Stimulus-dependent changes: Determine if environmental cues or hormonal treatments alter DOF5.7 localization, suggesting a role in adaptive responses
Co-localization with interacting partners: Examine whether DOF5.7 co-localizes with other transcription factors or chromatin regulators in specific nuclear domains
Sub-nuclear organization: Assess if DOF5.7 forms nuclear speckles or associates with particular chromatin regions
Correlation with target gene expression: Compare DOF5.7 localization with the expression patterns of its target genes to establish functional relationships
This multifaceted interpretative approach helps researchers connect DOF5.7 localization patterns to its functional roles in regulating vascular development and other plant processes .