The term "DOX1" does not correspond to any recognized antibody, gene, or protein in major databases such as UniProt, NCBI Gene, or the Human Protein Atlas .
Antibody nomenclature typically follows standardized conventions (e.g., "anti-HER2" for antibodies targeting HER2) . The absence of "DOX1" in these frameworks suggests a potential typographical error or misinterpretation.
Description: DBX1 (Developing Brain Homeobox 1) is a transcription factor critical in neuronal development. Antibodies targeting DBX1 are used in neuroscience research to study brain patterning and spinal cord differentiation .
Research Applications:
Description: DDX11 (DEAD/H-Box Helicase 11) is involved in DNA replication and repair. Antibodies against DDX11 are utilized in cancer research to investigate genomic instability .
Key Findings:
Description: DOK1 (Docking Protein 1) regulates tyrosine kinase signaling pathways. Anti-DOK1 antibodies are employed in studies of insulin resistance and immune cell function .
Validation:
None of the 15 provided sources reference "DOX1 Antibody." Key findings from related antibodies include:
Typographical Error: "DOX1" may be a misspelling of "DBX1," "DDX11," or "DOK1," all of which have well-characterized antibodies .
Obscure or Novel Target: If "DOX1" refers to a newly discovered protein, it may not yet be indexed in public databases or validated experimentally.
Proprietary Compound: The term could represent an internal code name for a commercial antibody not disclosed in academic literature.
Database Searches: Query genomic databases (e.g., GenBank, Ensembl) for "DOX1" to confirm its existence.
Vendor Outreach: Contact antibody suppliers (e.g., Abcam, Sigma-Aldrich) to verify product availability under this designation.
Literature Review: Conduct a systematic review using PubMed or Google Scholar with alternative spellings or related keywords.
This antibody targets alpha-dioxygenase, an enzyme that catalyzes the initial oxygenation of fatty acids, producing oxylipins. This activity contributes to protection against oxidative stress and cell death, likely through the generation of lipid-derived signaling molecules. Furthermore, it promotes both local and systemic plant defense responses in a salicylic acid (SA)-dependent manner, including the establishment of systemic acquired resistance (SAR) following incompatible pathogen interactions. Finally, it plays a role in the negative regulation of abscisic acid (ABA)-mediated signaling pathways.
Relevant research includes:
DOX1 Antibody (product code CSB-PA830255XA01DOA) is a polyclonal antibody developed against the DOX1 protein (UniProt accession Q9SGH6) found in Arabidopsis thaliana (Mouse-ear cress). This antibody is typically available in both concentrated (0.1ml) and ready-to-use (2ml) formats for research applications . The antibody is designed to specifically recognize epitopes on the DOX1 protein in plant tissue samples, making it valuable for researchers studying protein expression, localization, and function in this model organism.
Unlike therapeutic antibodies that may generate anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) in patients, research antibodies like DOX1 Antibody are specifically engineered for consistent laboratory use in detection applications . When selecting this antibody for your research, consider its validated applications, which typically include Western blotting, immunoprecipitation, and possibly immunofluorescence techniques.
For optimal performance and longevity of DOX1 Antibody, researchers should follow these evidence-based storage and handling protocols:
Store the concentrated antibody (0.1ml format) at -20°C for long-term storage
Store the ready-to-use antibody (2ml format) at 4°C for up to one month
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles by preparing working aliquots upon first thaw
Add carrier proteins (such as BSA at 1-5%) if diluting the concentrated antibody
Use sterile techniques when handling to prevent microbial contamination
These recommendations align with standard protocols for research-grade antibodies to maintain their binding specificity and sensitivity over time. When preparing working dilutions, use high-quality buffers appropriate for your specific application to prevent degradation or aggregation that could compromise experimental results.
Proper validation of DOX1 Antibody is critical for ensuring experimental reproducibility and accurate data interpretation. Recommended validation steps include:
Positive control testing: Use known DOX1-expressing Arabidopsis tissue samples to confirm antibody binding
Negative control testing: Include samples from DOX1 knockout lines or non-expressing tissues
Western blot analysis: Verify single band detection at the expected molecular weight
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide to confirm specificity
Cross-reactivity assessment: Test against related plant species if examining conservation
Similar to validation approaches used for therapeutic antibodies in clinical research, these steps help establish confidence in antibody performance . Document all validation results thoroughly, as this information will strengthen the credibility of subsequent experimental findings and may be requested during peer review of publications.
For optimal Western blot results with DOX1 Antibody in Arabidopsis research, follow this methodologically robust protocol:
Sample preparation: Extract total protein from plant tissues using a buffer containing protease inhibitors
Protein separation: Use 10-12% SDS-PAGE gels with 20-40μg total protein per lane
Transfer conditions: Transfer to PVDF membrane (which showed superior results compared to nitrocellulose in similar antibody applications)
Blocking: Block with 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Primary antibody incubation: Dilute DOX1 Antibody 1:500-1:1000 in blocking buffer and incubate overnight at 4°C
Washing: Wash 3-5 times with TBST, 5 minutes each
Secondary antibody: Use HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (similar to protocols referenced for other plant antibodies)
Detection: Employ enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) with appropriate exposure times
This protocol incorporates methodological elements from successful antibody applications in plant research, with parameters similar to those used for detection of proteins in human adrenal gland and placenta tissues with antibodies of comparable specification .
For subcellular localization studies of DOX1 protein in Arabidopsis tissues, implement these methodology-focused optimization steps:
Fixation optimization: Test both paraformaldehyde (4%) and glutaraldehyde (0.1-0.5%) fixation methods
Antigen retrieval: Evaluate citrate buffer (pH 6.0) heat-mediated retrieval if initial staining is weak
Permeabilization: Compare Triton X-100 (0.1-0.5%) and saponin (0.01-0.1%) for optimal antibody access
Antibody dilution series: Test dilutions from 1:100 to 1:1000 to determine optimal signal-to-noise ratio
Incubation conditions: Compare room temperature (2-4 hours) versus 4°C (overnight) incubation
Detection systems: For fluorescence applications, evaluate different secondary antibodies (similar to NorthernLights™ 557-conjugated system mentioned in reference materials)
When imaging, counterstain with DAPI for nuclear visualization, similar to the approach used in the HepG2 cell line staining protocol referenced in the search results . Document all optimization parameters methodically to establish a reproducible protocol for your specific application.
When designing co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) experiments with DOX1 Antibody to identify protein interaction partners, consider these methodological details:
Pre-clearing lysates: Reduce non-specific binding by pre-clearing plant lysates with protein A/G beads
Antibody immobilization: Covalently couple DOX1 Antibody to beads to prevent antibody co-elution
Cross-linking optimization: If using formaldehyde cross-linking, titrate concentrations (0.1-1%) and exposure times
Washing stringency: Develop a gradient of washing buffers with increasing salt concentrations
Elution conditions: Test both acidic glycine elution and competitive peptide elution methods
Controls: Include IgG control, input sample, and flow-through samples as experimental controls
Proper experimental controls are essential for interpretable and publishable results when using DOX1 Antibody. Include these methodologically important controls:
Control Type | Application | Purpose | Implementation |
---|---|---|---|
Positive Control | All applications | Verify antibody works | Use known DOX1-expressing tissue |
Negative Control | All applications | Assess non-specific binding | Use DOX1 knockout tissue |
Loading Control | Western blot | Normalize protein loading | Anti-tubulin or anti-actin antibody |
Secondary Only | IHC/IF | Determine secondary background | Omit primary antibody |
Isotype Control | IP/Co-IP | Evaluate non-specific pull-down | Use matched IgG concentration |
Peptide Competition | All applications | Confirm epitope specificity | Pre-incubate with immunizing peptide |
When investigating DOX1 protein expression under various experimental conditions, implement this systematic experimental design:
Establish baseline expression: Determine DOX1 expression levels across different tissues and developmental stages
Define treatment variables: Design factorial experiments with clear independent variables
Include time-course analysis: Sample at multiple time points to capture expression dynamics
Use biological replicates: Include at least three biological replicates per condition
Apply appropriate statistics: Use ANOVA with post-hoc tests for multi-condition comparisons
Quantify expression: Use densitometry for Western blots with normalization to loading controls
This approach parallels the systematic methodology employed in studying anti-drug antibody formation in clinical trials, where multiple variables and time points are critical for understanding biological responses . Careful experimental design increases statistical power and allows for more confident interpretation of results relating to DOX1 protein regulation.
If experiencing non-specific binding with DOX1 Antibody, implement these methodological solutions:
Optimize blocking conditions: Test different blocking agents (BSA, casein, normal serum) and concentrations
Adjust antibody dilution: Prepare a dilution series to identify optimal concentration
Modify washing protocol: Increase wash duration, frequency, or detergent concentration
Pre-adsorb antibody: Incubate with non-target tissue lysate to remove cross-reacting antibodies
Use additives in dilution buffer: Add 0.1-0.5% Tween-20 or 100-500mM NaCl to reduce non-specific interactions
This systematic approach to reducing background is similar to optimization strategies used in clinical antibody assays, where signal specificity is paramount for accurate results . Document all optimization steps and their outcomes to establish the most reliable protocol for your specific experimental system.
When troubleshooting weak or absent signals with DOX1 Antibody, consider these methodological issues and solutions:
Protein denaturation: Adjust sample preparation to preserve the recognized epitope
Target protein abundance: Increase sample concentration or use enrichment techniques
Detection sensitivity: Switch to more sensitive detection methods (e.g., from colorimetric to chemiluminescent)
Antibody degradation: Test a new antibody lot and improve storage practices
Inefficient transfer: Optimize transfer conditions for the specific molecular weight of DOX1
Antigen masking: Try different antigen retrieval methods for IHC/IF applications
These troubleshooting approaches incorporate principles from established antibody research techniques, similar to the systematic validation processes described for therapeutic antibody development . For each parameter, test one variable at a time and document outcomes to identify the specific limiting factor in your experimental system.
For rigorous quantitative analysis of DOX1 Antibody experiments, follow these methodological guidelines:
Signal normalization: Always normalize to appropriate loading controls or housekeeping proteins
Technical replicates: Use at least three technical replicates for each biological sample
Statistical analysis: Apply appropriate statistical tests based on data distribution and experimental design
Fold-change reporting: Report relative changes rather than absolute values for more reliable comparisons
Dynamic range verification: Ensure measurements fall within the linear range of detection
Correlation with other methods: Validate key findings with orthogonal methods (qPCR, mass spectrometry)
For adapting DOX1 Antibody to chromatin immunoprecipitation studies, follow this methodological framework:
Cross-linking optimization: Test formaldehyde concentrations (0.5-1.5%) and incubation times (5-20 minutes)
Sonication parameters: Optimize sonication conditions to generate 200-500bp DNA fragments
Antibody validation: Verify DOX1 Antibody can recognize its epitope in fixed chromatin
IP protocol modification: Increase antibody amount (2-5μg) and incubation time (overnight at 4°C)
Washing stringency: Develop a series of increasingly stringent washes to reduce background
Controls: Include input DNA, IgG control, and positive control target (if available)
When analyzing ChIP data, apply statistical methods similar to those used in HLA association studies, where specific DNA-protein interactions are evaluated for significance . For ChIP-seq applications, ensure sufficient sequencing depth and appropriate bioinformatic pipelines for peak calling and annotation.
To employ DOX1 Antibody in protein interaction screening, implement these methodological approaches:
Affinity purification:
Covalently couple antibody to support matrix
Optimize extraction buffers to preserve protein complexes
Use gentle elution to maintain interaction integrity
Proximity labeling techniques:
Consider DOX1 fusion with BioID or APEX2 systems
Optimize biotin labeling conditions and proximity radius
Use DOX1 Antibody to validate expression of fusion constructs
Mass spectrometry integration:
Process samples using protocols designed to minimize contamination
Implement appropriate controls for non-specific binding
Apply stringent statistical criteria for identifying true interactors
These approaches parallel the systematic methods used in therapeutic antibody research, where understanding protein-protein interactions is essential for characterizing mechanism of action . When reporting interaction partners, clearly distinguish between direct and indirect interactions and provide statistical confidence measures for each identified partner.
This multifaceted approach to using DOX1 Antibody in protein interaction studies allows researchers to build a comprehensive understanding of DOX1's biological function in Arabidopsis research contexts, supporting mechanistic insights into plant biology.