POL2A antibodies are immunoreagents designed to detect the POLR2A protein, particularly its post-translationally modified forms. Key targets include:
Phosphorylated residues in the C-terminal domain (CTD) heptapeptide repeats (YSPTSPS), such as phospho-Ser2 (pS2) or phospho-Ser5 (pS5) .
Epitope specificity: Antibodies like ab5131 (anti-pS5) and ab5095 (anti-pS2) distinguish phosphorylation states critical for transcription initiation (pS5) and elongation (pS2) .
POL2A antibodies are validated for multiple techniques:
Monophosphorylated CTD: Antibody E1Z3G binds pS2 with highest affinity (Kd = 0.5 nM) when phosphorylated at heptad 4, while EPR18855 and 2G1 prefer C-terminal pS2 (40-fold enhancement) .
Multiphosphorylation effects: Hexaphosphorylated CTD peptides enhance E1Z3G binding 5-fold, but clustered pS2 residues do not improve affinity for EPR18855/2G1 .
| Peptide | Phosphorylation Site | Kd (nM) |
|---|---|---|
| 32 | pS2 (heptad 1) | 3.2 |
| 35 | pS2 (heptad 4) | 0.5 |
| 37 | pS2 (heptad 6) | 0.7 |
PAF complex: Associates with POL2A during AID-induced antibody diversification in B cells .
SUVH2/9: POL2A interacts with these histone methyltransferases to regulate DNA methylation in plants .
Autoimmunity: Anti-POL2A antibodies in scleroderma target phosphorylated CTD repeats, correlating with disease severity .
Cancer: Dysregulated POL2A phosphorylation is implicated in transcriptional addiction in cancers .
This antibody targets DNA polymerase II, a crucial enzyme involved in chromosomal DNA replication. It plays a vital role in regulating cell fate during plant embryogenesis and root pole development by influencing cell cycle progression and cell type specification. Furthermore, it is essential for the proper function of shoot apical meristem (SAM) and root apical meristem (RAM). Its functions extend to the maintenance of epigenetic states, modulation of the hypersensitive response (HR), and mediation of abscisic acid (ABA) signaling. The antibody is also implicated in flowering repression via epigenetic gene silencing mechanisms and may participate in processes related to chromatin-mediated cellular memory.
POLR2A (DNA-directed RNA Polymerase II subunit RPB1) is the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II, the catalytic mechanism responsible for the synthesis of mRNA. The protein is approximately 217 kDa (calculated) with an observed molecular weight of 210-250 kDa on Western blots. It contains an N-terminus with six RNA polymerase domains (amino acids 15-1079) and a C-terminus (CTD) with 52 seven-amino acid repeats (YSPTSPS) that serve as a platform for polymerase subunit interaction . This CTD undergoes phosphorylation during transcription, with different phosphorylation states associated with various stages of the transcription cycle.
POLR2A is pivotal for research because its phosphorylation status directly correlates with transcriptional activity. When hyperphosphorylated, the subunit is called RNA pol IIo; when hypophosphorylated, it becomes RNA pol IIa . These modifications play crucial roles in transcript initiation, elongation, and termination, making POLR2A antibodies essential tools for studying transcription regulation mechanisms.
The selection between phospho-specific and total POLR2A antibodies should be based on your research question:
Total POLR2A antibodies:
Phospho-specific antibodies:
Select Ser2 phosphorylation (pSer2) antibodies when studying transcription elongation, as Ser2 phosphorylation occurs predominantly during elongation phase
Choose Ser5 phosphorylation (pSer5) antibodies when investigating transcription initiation and early elongation, as Ser5 phosphorylation facilitates 5' capping and recruitment of the capping enzyme
Consider using both pSer2 and pSer5 antibodies for comprehensive analysis of the transcription cycle
For experiments examining transcriptional dynamics, a combination approach using both total and phospho-specific antibodies provides the most comprehensive data . Western blot validation experiments show that phospho-specific antibodies are sensitive to phosphatase treatment, confirming their specificity, as demonstrated in HeLa cell lysates tested with the NB100-1805 antibody .
A rigorous POLR2A antibody validation protocol should include multiple approaches:
Essential validation methods:
Western blot with phosphatase treatment: Compare untreated samples with phosphatase-treated samples to confirm phospho-specificity
Peptide competition assays: Pre-incubate antibodies with phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated peptides to verify epitope specificity
siRNA knockdown: Analyze samples from cells transfected with POLR2A siRNA alongside untransfected controls
Cross-reactivity testing: Verify reactivity across intended species (human, mouse, etc.)
The most convincing validation combines multiple approaches. For instance, research data shows that the RNA Polymerase II pSer2 antibody (NB100-1805) specificity can be confirmed by peptide competition assays, demonstrating that pre-incubation with the phosphorylated S2 peptide blocks antibody binding, while pre-incubation with non-phosphorylated peptide or phosphorylated S5 peptide does not affect binding .
Optimizing Western blot protocols for POLR2A requires special considerations due to its high molecular weight and various phosphorylation states:
Recommended Western blot protocol for POLR2A:
Sample preparation:
Gel preparation and running:
Use low percentage (6-8%) gels or gradient gels (4-15%) to properly resolve the 210-250 kDa protein
Run gels at lower voltage (80-100V) for better resolution of high molecular weight proteins
Transfer conditions:
Use wet transfer methods with 0.45 μm PVDF membranes
Transfer at 30V overnight at 4°C for high molecular weight proteins
Add 0.1% SDS to transfer buffer to facilitate high molecular weight protein transfer
Antibody dilutions:
Detection:
This protocol has been validated with multiple POLR2A antibodies including AF6160, 20655-1-AP, and NB100-1805 across various cell lines including HeLa, HepG2, MCF-7, and NIH/3T3 .
POLR2A antibodies are frequently used in ChIP and ChIP-seq experiments to monitor transcriptional activity genome-wide. Here's a methodological approach for optimizing these experiments:
ChIP protocol optimization for POLR2A:
Antibody selection:
For identifying actively transcribing genes: Use phospho-Ser2 antibodies
For identifying genes with initiated but paused transcription: Use phospho-Ser5 antibodies
For total Pol II occupancy: Use antibodies targeting non-phosphorylated regions
Chromatin preparation:
Crosslink cells with 1% formaldehyde for 10 minutes at room temperature
Sonicate chromatin to generate fragments of 200-500 bp
Use 1-10 million cells per ChIP reaction
Antibody titration:
qPCR validation:
ChIP-seq considerations:
Sequence to a depth of at least 20 million uniquely mapped reads
Use peak-calling algorithms designed for broad peaks (typical of Pol II binding)
Normalize to input DNA and IgG controls
Experimental data shows that the optimal antibody amount varies by application. For ChIP-qPCR using the C.15200005 antibody, titration experiments demonstrated that 5 μg of antibody per ChIP provided optimal enrichment of Pol II pSer2 at active genes, with 30-40% recovery at the GAPDH locus compared to <5% at inactive genomic regions .
POLR2A antibodies can be powerful tools for studying transcription in fixed specimens through immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF). Here's a methodological approach:
Protocol for POLR2A detection in fixed specimens:
Sample preparation:
Antibody selection and dilution:
Signal detection options:
Chromogenic detection: Use DAB substrate for standard bright-field microscopy
Fluorescent detection: Use fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies for co-localization studies
Counterstaining:
Nuclear counterstain (DAPI or hematoxylin) to visualize nuclear localization of POLR2A
Consider co-staining with markers of specific cell types or other transcription factors
Controls and validation:
Include phosphatase-treated sections as negative controls for phospho-specific antibodies
Use tissue/cells known to have high transcriptional activity as positive controls
This approach has been validated in mouse teratoma sections using the NB100-1805 antibody at 1:200 dilution with DAB detection and in human pancreatic cancer tissues using the 20655-1-AP antibody .
Multiple bands or variable molecular weights when detecting POLR2A can be attributed to several biological and technical factors:
Biological factors:
Phosphorylation states: The hyperphosphorylated form (Pol IIo) runs at a higher molecular weight (~250 kDa) than the hypophosphorylated form (Pol IIa, ~220 kDa)
CTD length variation: The C-terminal domain can vary in apparent size due to different degrees of phosphorylation across the 52 heptapeptide repeats
Proteolytic processing: Partial degradation during sample preparation can generate truncated forms
Technical factors:
Gel percentage: Lower percentage gels (6-8%) resolve the high molecular weight bands better than higher percentage gels
Sample preparation: Incomplete denaturation or phosphatase activity during extraction can alter band patterns
Antibody specificity: Some antibodies may recognize specific phosphorylation states or epitopes that are variably accessible
Interpretation guide:
| Band MW (kDa) | Likely identity | Resolution approach |
|---|---|---|
| 240-250 | Hyperphosphorylated (Pol IIo) | Add phosphatase inhibitors to preserve |
| 210-220 | Hypophosphorylated (Pol IIa) | Use phospho-specific antibodies to distinguish |
| 180-200 | Partially degraded/processed form | Add protease inhibitors during extraction |
| <180 | Degradation products | Prepare fresh samples, optimize extraction |
To confirm band identity, compare phosphorylated and dephosphorylated samples. In validation studies with the NB100-1805 antibody, phosphatase treatment abolished the signal, confirming that the antibody specifically recognizes the phosphorylated form of the protein .
Inconsistencies between phospho-specific and total POLR2A antibody results often reflect biological realities rather than technical issues. Here's a systematic approach to understanding and resolving these discrepancies:
Common scenarios and interpretations:
High phospho-signal with low total POLR2A:
Interpretation: Increased phosphorylation per molecule rather than increased total protein
Validation: Normalize phospho-signal to total POLR2A rather than to loading controls
Unchanged phospho-signal with increased total POLR2A:
Interpretation: More polymerase molecules, but not more active transcription
Validation: Examine transcripts of target genes to confirm transcriptional output
Different localization patterns in IF/IHC:
Interpretation: Phosphorylated POLR2A may localize to specific nuclear regions
Validation: Co-stain with markers of transcription factories or specific genome regions
Resolution strategies:
Sequential probing approach:
Strip and reprobe the same membrane with both antibodies
Always probe for phospho-forms first, then strip and reprobe for total protein
Parallel sample analysis:
Run identical samples on separate blots for phospho and total detection
Ensure identical loading and transfer conditions
Quantification method:
For Western blots, calculate the ratio of phospho-POLR2A to total POLR2A
For imaging, measure co-localization coefficients between phospho and total signals
When using both phospho-specific (such as NB100-1805) and total POLR2A antibodies, it's crucial to optimize stripping conditions to avoid epitope damage or incomplete stripping, which can lead to false interpretations .
Proper controls are essential for ensuring valid and interpretable results when using POLR2A antibodies. Here are application-specific control recommendations:
Controls for Western blot:
Positive controls:
Negative controls:
Specificity controls:
Controls for ChIP/ChIP-seq:
Positive genomic regions:
Negative genomic regions:
Antibody controls:
Controls for IHC/IF:
Tissue controls:
Tissues with known high (proliferating cells) and low (quiescent cells) transcriptional activity
Serial sections stained with total and phospho-specific antibodies
Technical controls:
Antibody omission controls
Blocking peptide controls for phospho-specific antibodies
Experimental data from ChIP assays using the C.15200005 antibody demonstrated 30-40% recovery at active GAPDH and ACTB genes compared to <5% recovery at the inactive myoglobin gene and Sat2 satellite repeats, confirming antibody specificity .
Transcriptional pausing and elongation dynamics are critical regulatory mechanisms in gene expression. POLR2A antibodies provide powerful tools for investigating these processes:
Methodological approach:
Differential phosphorylation analysis:
Use pSer5 antibodies to detect initiated/paused polymerase (enriched at promoter-proximal regions)
Use pSer2 antibodies to detect elongating polymerase (enriched in gene bodies)
Calculate pSer2/pSer5 ratios to assess pausing release and elongation efficiency
ChIP-seq with multiple antibodies:
Perform parallel ChIP-seq with pSer2, pSer5, and total POLR2A antibodies
Analyze the distribution patterns:
Promoter-proximal enrichment of pSer5 indicates pausing
Gene body enrichment of pSer2 indicates active elongation
Calculate traveling ratios (TR = promoter signal/gene body signal)
Drug response studies:
Treat cells with transcription elongation inhibitors (e.g., DRB, flavopiridol)
Monitor changes in pSer2/pSer5 ratios and distribution patterns
Correlate with nascent RNA production (e.g., using GRO-seq or PRO-seq)
Single-cell Western analysis:
This approach has been validated in multiple studies, with antibodies like NB100-1805 (pSer2) and C.15200005 (pSer2) providing reliable detection of elongating polymerase across diverse experimental systems .
POLR2A is highly conserved across eukaryotes, making cross-species studies valuable but requiring specific considerations:
Species compatibility and validation:
Model system-specific approaches:
Cell lines:
Tissue analysis:
Developmental studies:
When working with non-mammalian models, preliminary validation via Western blot is essential before proceeding to more complex applications like ChIP-seq. The high conservation of POLR2A means most mammalian-targeted antibodies will work across species, but the specific phosphorylation patterns may vary in timing and distribution .
POLR2A antibodies serve as powerful tools for studying the integration of transcription with other nuclear processes:
Integrated experimental approaches:
Sequential ChIP (Re-ChIP) for co-occupancy analysis:
First IP: Use POLR2A antibodies (total or phospho-specific)
Second IP: Use antibodies against:
mRNA processing factors (splicing, capping, polyadenylation)
Chromatin modifiers (methyltransferases, acetylases)
Chromatin remodelers (SWI/SNF, ISWI complexes)
Analysis reveals co-occupancy and potential interaction
Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA):
IP-Mass Spectrometry:
ChIP-seq integration with other genomic data:
Overlay POLR2A ChIP-seq with:
RNA-seq for correlation with gene expression
ChIP-seq for histone modifications
ATAC-seq for chromatin accessibility
Identify coordination between transcription and chromatin states
These approaches have been validated using various POLR2A antibodies. For instance, proximity ligation assays using phospho-specific POLR2A antibodies have revealed spatial relationships between elongating polymerase and mRNA processing factors . Similarly, IP methods using 2-10 μg/mg of antibody successfully capture POLR2A and associated factors .
The advent of single-cell technologies has opened new avenues for POLR2A antibody applications:
Single-cell methodological approaches:
Single-cell Western blotting:
CUT&Tag and CUT&RUN adaptations:
Emerging applications of POLR2A antibodies for single-cell epigenomic profiling
Requires optimization of antibody concentrations for cellular permeability
Enables mapping of polymerase occupancy in rare cell populations
Imaging-based approaches:
Single-cell multi-omics integration:
Combining protein detection (using POLR2A antibodies) with scRNA-seq
CITE-seq adaptations for detecting POLR2A modifications alongside transcriptome
These emerging approaches extend beyond traditional bulk assays to reveal the heterogeneity in transcriptional states within seemingly homogeneous populations. The single-cell Western blot application, validated with antibodies like NB100-1805, represents a significant advancement in understanding transcriptional dynamics at single-cell resolution .
POLR2A antibodies have specific applications and considerations in specialized research fields:
Neuroscience applications:
Activity-dependent transcription:
Monitor activity-induced phosphorylation changes in neurons
Track transcriptional dynamics during memory formation
Consider penetration issues in fixed brain tissues; optimize antigen retrieval
Neuronal development:
Study transcriptional waves during neurogenesis and differentiation
Track changes in phosphorylation patterns during axon/dendrite development
Combine with neuronal markers for cell type-specific analysis
Cancer research applications:
Transcriptional signatures in tumors:
Response to transcription-targeting therapeutics:
Monitor CDK inhibitor effects on Ser2/Ser5 phosphorylation
Track global transcriptional changes during treatment response
Combine with proliferation markers to distinguish direct vs. indirect effects
Predictive/prognostic biomarker development:
When working with patient-derived samples, consider fixation effects on epitope accessibility. For neuroscience applications, background staining can be an issue; validated phospho-specific antibodies like NB100-1805 have shown good specificity in complex tissues like mouse teratoma .
Computational analyses significantly enhance the value of POLR2A antibody data, particularly for genome-wide studies:
Advanced computational approaches:
ChIP-seq data analysis pipelines:
Specialized peak calling for broad POLR2A signals vs. sharp TF binding sites
Calculate pausing indices: promoter-proximal signal vs. gene body signal
Metagene analyses to generate aggregate profiles across genes
Combine pSer2 and pSer5 data to identify paused vs. actively transcribing genes
Integration with chromatin state data:
Correlate POLR2A occupancy with histone modification patterns
Define chromatin environments associated with different polymerase states
Machine learning approaches to predict POLR2A binding from chromatin features
Network analysis of POLR2A-regulated genes:
Identify transcription factor networks associated with paused vs. active genes
Gene ontology enrichment analysis for biological process interpretation
Pathway analysis to identify cellular functions regulated by specific POLR2A states
Visualization tools for multi-antibody datasets:
Genome browsers with custom tracks for different phospho-forms
Scatter plots comparing pSer2 vs. pSer5 enrichment to identify gene clusters
Heatmaps aligning genes by expression level, pausing index, or other features
These computational approaches transform antibody-generated data into biological insights. For example, ChIP-seq data generated using phospho-specific antibodies like C.15200005 can be analyzed to reveal genome-wide patterns of transcriptional regulation, identifying groups of genes with similar regulatory mechanisms .