The provided materials emphasize the following antibody-related themes, none of which intersect with At1g59620:
Recombinant antibody engineering for improved sensitivity and reproducibility .
Bispecific antibodies in cancer immunotherapy (e.g., REGN5459 targeting BCMA/CD3) .
Antibody validation challenges, particularly for GPCR-targeting antibodies like angiotensin II AT1 receptor antibodies .
Antibody databases (e.g., PLAbDab, cAb-Rep) tracking therapeutic and structural data .
If At1g59620 encodes a protein in Arabidopsis thaliana, a custom antibody might be used to study:
Gene expression patterns via immunohistochemistry.
Protein-protein interactions in plant signaling pathways.
Subcellular localization of the target protein.
Based on critiques of commercial antibody specificity , rigorous validation would be essential, including:
| Validation Metric | Recommended Method |
|---|---|
| Target specificity | Western blotting with knockout controls |
| Cross-reactivity | Immunostaining in heterologous systems |
| Epitope mapping | Peptide blocking assays |
To obtain authoritative data on At1g59620 Antibody:
Specialized plant biology databases: Consult TAIR (The Arabidopsis Information Resource) for gene annotations.
Antibody repositories: Explore vendors like Agrisera or PhytoAB, which focus on plant-specific antibodies.
Direct literature search: Use queries like "At1g59620 immunohistochemistry" or "Arabidopsis thaliana locus 1g59620 antibody" in PubMed or Google Scholar.
At1g59620, also known as CW9, is a gene in Arabidopsis thaliana that encodes a disease resistance protein belonging to the CC-NBS-LRR (coiled-coil nucleotide-binding site leucine-rich repeat) class family . This protein is part of the plant's innate immune system that recognizes pathogen effectors and triggers defense responses. NBS-LRR proteins function as immune receptors that detect pathogen invasion and initiate signaling cascades leading to disease resistance. The CC domain is particularly important for signaling and protein-protein interactions during the immune response. Studies of CC-NBS-LRR proteins like At1g59620 are crucial for understanding the molecular basis of plant disease resistance and developing strategies to enhance crop protection against pathogens .
Several types of At1g59620 antibodies are available for research purposes, targeting different regions of the protein:
Mouse monoclonal antibody combinations targeting:
Rabbit polyclonal antibody (CSB-PA864811XA01DOA) raised against recombinant Arabidopsis thaliana At1g59620 protein
Each antibody type has been validated for specific applications such as ELISA and Western blotting, with the monoclonal combinations showing ELISA titers of approximately 10,000, corresponding to detection sensitivity of about 1 ng of target protein on Western blots .
Proper storage and handling of At1g59620 antibodies are critical for maintaining their specificity and sensitivity over time. Store antibodies at -20°C or -80°C immediately upon receipt . Repeated freeze-thaw cycles should be strictly avoided as they can lead to protein denaturation and loss of antibody activity . When working with the antibodies:
Aliquot the stock solution into smaller volumes before freezing to minimize freeze-thaw cycles
When thawing, allow the antibody to slowly warm to room temperature by placing it on ice
Use sterile techniques when handling to prevent contamination
If diluting for use, prepare working solutions in fresh buffer containing a carrier protein (such as BSA) and preservative
Store working dilutions at 4°C for short-term use (1-2 weeks) or re-freeze in aliquots for long-term storage
Follow the manufacturer's recommendations for storage buffer conditions (typically containing 50% glycerol and 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4, with 0.03% Proclin 300 as a preservative)
At1g59620 functions within the complex network of NLR immune receptors that collectively provide resistance against diverse pathogens. Recent research indicates that NLR gene expression is carefully balanced within plant cells, with some NLRs being positively regulated while others are suppressed . The PHD-finger protein EDM2 has been shown to play a critical role in this balancing act, acting as both an activator and suppressor of different NLR genes .
In the context of this regulatory network, At1g59620 may be subject to similar fine-tuning mechanisms that control its expression levels. The balance between different NLR proteins appears to be critical for optimal immune function while minimizing fitness costs to the plant. The specific regulatory elements controlling At1g59620 expression likely include epigenetic marks such as H3K9me2, which has been shown to influence NLR gene expression through mechanisms involving alternative polyadenylation .
Epigenetic regulation plays a significant role in controlling NLR gene expression, including At1g59620. Key epigenetic factors influencing this regulation include:
Histone modifications, particularly H3K9me2 (dimethylation of lysine 9 on histone H3), which is associated with transcriptional repression
DNA methylation patterns, especially in CHG contexts, which are linked to H3K9me2 via cytosine methyltransferases CMT2 and CMT3
Alternative polyadenylation mechanisms that can produce either full-length functional transcripts or truncated non-coding variants
Antibodies against At1g59620 can be powerful tools for investigating these epigenetic regulatory mechanisms through techniques such as:
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) to identify regions where the protein interacts with specific chromatin marks
RNA Immunoprecipitation (RIP) to detect associations between At1g59620 protein and specific RNA transcripts
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry (IP-MS) to identify protein interaction partners involved in epigenetic regulation
These approaches can reveal how At1g59620 expression and function are integrated into broader epigenetic regulatory networks that control plant immunity .
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) of At1g59620 likely play crucial roles in regulating its function as an immune receptor. For CC-NBS-LRR proteins, known PTMs include:
Phosphorylation: Often regulates protein activation state and signaling capacity
Ubiquitination: Can influence protein stability, localization, and activity
SUMOylation: May affect protein-protein interactions and subcellular localization
Glycosylation: Can impact protein folding, stability, and recognition properties
These modifications can significantly influence antibody recognition of the target protein. Researchers should consider the following when using At1g59620 antibodies:
Antibodies raised against recombinant proteins (like CSB-PA864811XA01DOA ) may not recognize certain PTMs present in the native protein
Some antibodies may preferentially bind to modified or unmodified forms of the protein
PTMs might mask epitopes, reducing antibody binding efficiency in certain cellular contexts
Using multiple antibodies targeting different regions (N-terminus, C-terminus, and middle region ) can help detect the protein regardless of some PTM states
When interpreting experimental results, researchers should consider how cellular conditions that alter PTM status (such as pathogen infection or abiotic stress) might affect antibody detection efficiency and potentially lead to false negative results.
For optimal Western blot detection of At1g59620, follow these methodological guidelines:
Sample Preparation:
Extract total protein from plant tissue using a buffer containing protease inhibitors to prevent degradation
Include phosphatase inhibitors if investigating phosphorylation states
Use fresh tissue whenever possible; if using frozen tissue, minimize freeze-thaw cycles
SDS-PAGE Conditions:
Use 8-10% polyacrylamide gels to effectively resolve the 343 amino acid At1g59620 protein
Load 20-50 μg of total protein per lane
Include positive controls (recombinant At1g59620) and negative controls (extracts from knockout lines)
Transfer and Blocking:
Transfer proteins to a PVDF membrane (recommended over nitrocellulose for plant proteins)
Block with 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST (Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween-20) for 1 hour at room temperature
Antibody Incubation:
Primary antibody dilution: 1:1000 to 1:2000 for monoclonal antibodies , 1:500 to 1:1000 for polyclonal antibodies
Incubate overnight at 4°C with gentle agitation
Wash thoroughly (4 × 5 minutes) with TBST
Secondary antibody (anti-mouse for monoclonal , anti-rabbit for polyclonal ): 1:5000 to 1:10000 dilution
Incubate for 1 hour at room temperature
Detection:
Use enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) for sensitive detection
Exposure time may vary depending on protein abundance (typically 30 seconds to 5 minutes)
For quantitative analysis, use a digital imaging system rather than film
These conditions should be optimized based on specific experimental requirements and antibody characteristics.
Validating antibody specificity is crucial for ensuring reliable experimental results. For At1g59620 antibodies, consider implementing the following validation strategies:
Genetic Controls:
Test the antibody on samples from At1g59620 knockout or knockdown lines (expected: no signal or reduced signal)
Use overexpression lines as positive controls (expected: enhanced signal)
Molecular Weight Verification:
Confirm that the detected band corresponds to the expected molecular weight of At1g59620 (approximately 38 kDa for the 343 amino acid protein )
Be aware that post-translational modifications may alter the apparent molecular weight
Cross-Reactivity Assessment:
Test on related Arabidopsis CC-NBS-LRR proteins to assess potential cross-reactivity
If working with other plant species, evaluate homologs with high sequence similarity
Blocking Peptide Competition:
Pre-incubate the antibody with the immunizing peptide or recombinant protein
This should abolish or significantly reduce the specific signal
Multiple Antibody Comparison:
Compare results using antibodies targeting different regions of At1g59620 (N-terminus, C-terminus, and middle region )
Consistent detection with multiple antibodies increases confidence in specificity
Mass Spectrometry Validation:
Perform immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to confirm the identity of the pulled-down protein
This approach provides the highest level of validation for antibody specificity
Document all validation steps thoroughly as they will strengthen the credibility of your research findings.
For immunofluorescence studies of At1g59620 subcellular localization in Arabidopsis, the following protocol is recommended:
Sample Preparation:
Fix plant tissues (protoplasts or thin tissue sections) in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.4) for 30 minutes at room temperature
Permeabilize with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 15 minutes
Block with 3% BSA in PBS for 1 hour
Antibody Incubation:
Primary antibody: Use At1g59620-specific antibodies at 1:100 to 1:200 dilution
Incubate overnight at 4°C in a humid chamber
Wash 3 × 10 minutes with PBS
Secondary antibody: Use fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor series recommended) at 1:500 dilution
Incubate for 2 hours at room temperature
Wash 3 × 10 minutes with PBS
Nuclear Counterstaining:
Stain with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) at 1 μg/mL for 10 minutes
Wash briefly with PBS
Mounting and Imaging:
Mount in an anti-fade medium
Image using confocal microscopy with appropriate laser settings for the selected fluorophores
Controls to Include:
Primary antibody omission control
Secondary antibody only control
Unrelated primary antibody control
Tissues from At1g59620 knockout plants
This protocol can be adapted for co-localization studies by including additional primary antibodies against known subcellular markers (e.g., ER, Golgi, plasma membrane, or nuclear markers) and using secondary antibodies with non-overlapping emission spectra.
Inconsistent detection of At1g59620 in Western blots can stem from multiple factors. Here's a troubleshooting guide to address common issues:
| Problem | Possible Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| No signal | - Protein degradation - Inefficient transfer - Antibody deterioration - Low protein expression | - Use fresh extraction buffer with protease inhibitors - Check transfer efficiency with Ponceau S staining - Test antibody with positive control - Concentrate protein samples |
| Multiple bands | - Post-translational modifications - Protein degradation - Non-specific binding - Cross-reactivity | - Use phosphatase inhibitors if investigating phosphorylation - Prepare fresh samples and add more protease inhibitors - Increase blocking time/concentration - Use higher antibody dilution (1:2000-1:5000) |
| Varying signal intensity | - Inconsistent protein loading - Variable expression levels - Transfer inconsistencies - Developmental or stress-induced changes | - Use loading controls (e.g., anti-actin or anti-GAPDH) - Normalize to total protein (with Ponceau S) - Standardize growth conditions - Consider tissue-specific or developmental regulation |
| High background | - Insufficient blocking - Too high antibody concentration - Inadequate washing - Membrane contamination | - Extend blocking time (overnight at 4°C) - Increase antibody dilution - Add more/longer wash steps - Use fresh buffers and clean containers |
It's worth noting that At1g59620 expression, like other CC-NBS-LRR proteins, may be influenced by pathogen exposure or abiotic stress conditions, which could explain some variability in detection between experiments .
Cross-reactivity can be a significant challenge when studying CC-NBS-LRR proteins like At1g59620 due to sequence similarities within this protein family. To minimize cross-reactivity:
Antibody Selection:
Protocol Optimization:
Increase antibody dilution (1:2000 or higher) to reduce non-specific binding
Use more stringent washing conditions (higher salt concentration or addition of 0.1% SDS)
Extend blocking time to 2 hours or overnight with 5% BSA instead of milk
Pre-absorb antibodies with extracts from At1g59620 knockout plants
Genetic Controls:
Always include samples from At1g59620 mutant or knockout lines as negative controls
Use transgenic lines expressing tagged versions of At1g59620 as positive controls
Buffer Additives:
Add 0.1-0.5% non-ionic detergents (e.g., Tween-20) to reduce hydrophobic interactions
Include 150-300 mM NaCl to minimize electrostatic interactions
Consider adding 1-5% polyethylene glycol to reduce non-specific binding
Alternative Approaches:
Use epitope-tagged At1g59620 expressed under its native promoter when possible
Consider immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to confirm antibody specificity
These approaches can significantly improve the specificity of At1g59620 detection in complex plant samples.
Several factors can influence At1g59620 protein levels during pathogen infection studies, complicating the interpretation of immunoblot or immunolocalization results:
Transcriptional Regulation:
Post-transcriptional Control:
microRNA-mediated silencing may be activated during infection
RNA-binding proteins might affect transcript stability or translation efficiency
Alternative splicing patterns could change in response to pathogen signals
Protein Stability Regulation:
Ubiquitin-proteasome pathway activation during infection may alter protein turnover rates
Pathogen effectors might directly target At1g59620 for degradation
Protein stabilization through interaction with defense-related chaperones
Technical Considerations:
Timing of sample collection is critical (protein levels may peak and then decline)
Different pathogens may elicit different expression patterns
Plant age and developmental stage affect baseline expression
Environmental conditions (light, temperature, humidity) can influence both basal expression and pathogen-induced changes
Experimental Design Recommendations:
Include a detailed time-course analysis (0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours post-infection)
Compare compatible and incompatible pathogen interactions
Use both mock-inoculated and untreated controls
Consider employing protein synthesis inhibitors to distinguish between new synthesis and protein stability effects
Understanding these factors is essential for correctly interpreting changes in At1g59620 protein levels observed during infection studies.
The study of At1g59620 using antibody-based approaches has significant potential for advancing our understanding of plant immunity. Future research directions include:
Systems Biology Integration:
Using At1g59620 antibodies in multiplexed protein detection systems to understand its dynamics within broader immune networks
Combining antibody-based detection with transcriptomics and metabolomics for a comprehensive view of defense responses
Structural and Functional Studies:
Employing antibodies as tools for protein purification to enable structural studies (X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM)
Using antibody-mediated protein depletion to assess functional roles in vivo
Developing antibodies against specific post-translationally modified forms of At1g59620
Crop Improvement Applications:
Translating knowledge from Arabidopsis to develop antibodies against orthologous proteins in crop species
Using antibodies to screen for desired protein expression levels in breeding programs
Monitoring NLR protein accumulation in response to various agricultural treatments
Technical Advancements:
Development of single-domain antibodies (nanobodies) against At1g59620 for in vivo imaging
Creating biosensors using At1g59620 antibodies to monitor plant health in real-time
Establishing proximity-labeling techniques with At1g59620 antibodies to identify transient protein interactions during immune signaling
Epigenetic Regulation:
These research directions will benefit from continued development and characterization of highly specific antibodies targeting different epitopes and modified forms of At1g59620.
Research on At1g59620 and related CC-NBS-LRR proteins has made significant contributions to our understanding of plant immunity in several key areas:
Immune Receptor Diversity and Evolution:
Studies of At1g59620 contribute to our understanding of how NLR gene families diversify and evolve to recognize new pathogen threats
The specific structural features of At1g59620 provide insights into the molecular basis of pathogen recognition
Balanced Regulation of Defense Responses:
At1g59620 research supports the emerging concept that plants maintain careful balance in NLR expression to optimize defense while minimizing fitness costs
The involvement of epigenetic regulators like EDM2 in controlling NLR expression demonstrates sophisticated regulatory mechanisms for immune homeostasis
Integration of Epigenetic and Transcriptional Control:
Translational Implications:
Understanding At1g59620 regulation and function provides targets for genetic improvement of disease resistance in crops
Knowledge of NLR protein dynamics informs strategies for deploying durable resistance in agricultural systems
Methodological Advances:
Development and characterization of At1g59620 antibodies establishes protocols that benefit research on other plant immune receptors
Validation strategies for these antibodies contribute to improved standards in plant molecular biology research