DRP4C Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 weeks (Made-to-order)
Synonyms
DRP4C antibody; At1g60500 antibody; F8A5.5Dynamin-related protein 4C antibody
Target Names
DRP4C
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody targets a putative microtubule-associated protein with force-producing capabilities. The protein exhibits GTP binding and hydrolysis activity.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT1G60500

STRING: 3702.AT1G60500.1

UniGene: At.36640

Protein Families
TRAFAC class dynamin-like GTPase superfamily, Dynamin/Fzo/YdjA family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm. Cytoplasm, cytoskeleton.

Q&A

What is the proper characterization process for antibodies targeting dopamine receptors?

Proper characterization of antibodies targeting dopamine receptors, including DRP4C, requires a systematic validation approach. A comprehensive characterization process should include:

  • Specificity testing in multiple systems: Validate antibody binding using transfected cells expressing the target receptor and negative controls .

  • Multiple technique validation: Test antibodies in both immunoblot (Western blot) and immunohistochemical applications to ensure consistent performance across platforms .

  • Cellular expression pattern analysis: Compare expression patterns in native tissues with expected distribution based on mRNA expression data .

  • Cross-reactivity assessment: Test against related receptor subtypes to ensure specificity to the target dopamine receptor .

The study by Pharr et al. demonstrated that from six antibodies raised against DRD4 peptides, only one (N-20) was effective across all testing platforms including immunoblot analysis in DRD4 transfected cells and immunohistochemistry of mouse retinal sections . This highlights the importance of rigorous validation using multiple techniques.

How can researchers verify antibody specificity for immunohistochemical applications?

Verification of antibody specificity for immunohistochemical applications requires:

  • Positive control testing: Use cells or tissues known to express the target protein at varying levels .

  • Knockout or knockdown controls: Compare staining in wild-type versus genetically modified samples lacking the target protein .

  • Peptide competition assays: Pre-incubate the antibody with the immunizing peptide to confirm signal elimination .

  • Parallel validation with multiple antibodies: Use different antibodies targeting distinct epitopes of the same protein and compare staining patterns .

A systematic approach should include:

Validation StepMethodExpected Outcome
Expression systemTransfected vs. non-transfected cellsSignal in transfected cells only
Tissue specificityKnown expressing vs. non-expressing tissuesDistribution matching known expression pattern
Signal verificationSecondary antibody-only controlsAbsence of signal
Cross-reactivityTesting against related proteinsNo binding to related protein family members

Researchers should document complete validation procedures in publications to ensure reproducibility and reliability of immunohistochemical data .

What are the critical considerations when selecting antibodies for ion channel research?

When selecting antibodies for ion channel research, consider these critical factors:

  • Epitope accessibility: Choose antibodies targeting epitopes that remain accessible in the native conformation of the ion channel .

  • Application compatibility: Ensure the antibody is validated for your specific application (electrophysiology, immunocytochemistry, etc.) .

  • Functional effects: Determine whether the antibody binds without affecting channel function or deliberately modulates channel activity .

  • Format selection: Consider different antibody formats (full IgG, Fab fragments, nanobodies) based on experimental requirements .

Renewable and recombinant antibodies offer significant advantages for ion channel research compared to traditional polyclonal antibodies, including consistent performance across batches and the ability to genetically encode them as intrabodies for intracellular expression .

How can recombinant antibodies be engineered to control ion channel function?

Recombinant antibodies can be engineered to control ion channel function through several sophisticated approaches:

  • Intrabody expression: Genetically encoded antibody fragments (scFvs or nanobodies) can be expressed inside cells to bind to specific domains of ion channels, allowing precise spatiotemporal control of channel function .

  • Allosteric modulation: Antibodies can be designed to bind to non-pore regions of ion channels, inducing conformational changes that alter channel gating properties without completely blocking ion flow .

  • Domain-specific targeting: By targeting specific functional domains (voltage sensors, pore regions, or auxiliary subunits), antibodies can be engineered to modulate distinct aspects of channel function .

Experimental design considerations include:

  • Selection of antibody format based on target accessibility

  • Incorporation of subcellular targeting sequences

  • Engineering of binding affinity to achieve desired modulation kinetics

As noted in physiological studies, "renewable and recombinant antibodies can be used to control ion channel function... as genetically encoded tools to control ion channel function" , offering advantages over traditional pharmacological approaches in terms of specificity and experimental flexibility.

What methodological approaches are most effective for generating antibodies against conformational epitopes of membrane proteins?

Generating antibodies against conformational epitopes of membrane proteins requires specialized techniques:

  • Native conformation preservation:

    • Use detergent-solubilized purified proteins in lipid nanodiscs or proteoliposomes

    • Employ cell-based immunization with transfected cells overexpressing the target

    • Utilize virus-like particles displaying the membrane protein

  • Selection strategies:

    • Implement phage display with conformation-selective sorting

    • Use cell-based panning against native protein

    • Apply competitive elution to isolate conformation-specific binders

  • Functional screening:

    • Screen candidate antibodies for functional effects on channel activity

    • Test for binding to both denatured and native forms of the protein

    • Evaluate epitope accessibility in intact cells versus fixed/permeabilized preparations

These methodologies have proven particularly effective for generating antibodies that recognize native conformations of complex membrane proteins while maintaining functional relevance in experimental systems.

How do biochemical patterns of antibody polyreactivity impact experimental design?

Antibody polyreactivity can significantly impact experimental design and should be addressed through:

  • Molecular characterization of polyreactivity determinants:

    • CDR3H loops in polyreactive antibodies tend to have more neutral amino acids that are neither exceptionally hydrophobic nor hydrophilic, with a net charge close to 0 .

    • Position-sensitive sequence analysis reveals that "polyreactive antibodies have a tendency to have more hydrophobic residues in CDR2H, and a decreased preference for phenylalanine in CDR1H" .

  • Screening protocols to identify and mitigate polyreactivity:

    • Test candidate antibodies against multiple unrelated antigens

    • Implement competition assays with target and non-target proteins

    • Pre-adsorb antibodies against common cross-reactive materials

  • Data interpretation considerations:

    • Account for background binding in quantitative analyses

    • Include appropriate negative controls for each experiment

    • Validate findings with multiple antibody clones when possible

Research has shown that "75 vectors taken from the position-sensitive biophysical property matrix are necessary to properly split the [polyreactive and non-polyreactive] groups," highlighting the complexity of antibody-antigen interactions that must be considered in experimental design.

What are the methodological differences between traditional antibody approaches and rapid generation methods for human recombinant monoclonal antibodies?

The methodological differences between traditional and rapid generation approaches include:

  • Cell source and processing:

    • Traditional: Often relies on immortalized B cells or hybridomas

    • Rapid: Directly isolates antigen-specific antibody secreting cells (ASCs) using technologies like ferrofluid-based separation

  • Gene isolation and expression:

    • Traditional: Requires cloning procedures and stable cell line generation

    • Rapid: Utilizes RT-PCR to generate linear Ig heavy and light chain gene expression "minigenes" for immediate expression

  • Screening and selection:

    • Traditional: Time-intensive functional screening of multiple clones

    • Rapid: Allows "screening for effector function prior to recombinant antibody cloning, enabling the selection of mAbs with desired characteristics"

The rapid approach "rapidly generates recombinant monoclonal antibodies from single antigen-specific ASCs... in less than 10 days," compared to traditional methods requiring weeks to months . This acceleration enables timely responses to emerging infectious diseases and comprehensive analysis of antibody dynamics during immune responses.

How should researchers approach optimization of antibody-based flow cytometry protocols?

Optimization of antibody-based flow cytometry protocols requires systematic attention to multiple parameters:

  • Sample preparation and cellular integrity:

    • For cell surface markers, stain prior to fixation since "some fixatives can adversely affect antibody binding sites"

    • For combined surface/intracellular detection, stain surface markers before fixing and permeabilizing

  • Blocking optimization:

    • Implement both general blocking and Fc receptor blocking to prevent non-specific binding

    • "An effective blocking agent will show minimal affinity for the target, exhibit high binding to non-target sites, and will also function to stabilize cellular morphology"

  • Antibody titration and panel design:

    • Titrate each antibody independently to determine optimal concentration

    • Consider spectral overlap and compensation requirements when designing multicolor panels

    • Test for antibody compatibility in multiplexed formats

  • Validation controls:

    • Include fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls

    • Use isotype controls appropriate to the primary antibody

    • Implement biological controls (positive and negative samples)

Flow cytometry wash buffers should be carefully formulated, typically consisting of "a low concentration of the blocking agent in PBS, which may also include the permeabilizing agent used for detecting intracellular targets, as well as EDTA to prevent cells from clumping" .

How can researchers address non-specific binding in immunohistochemical applications?

Non-specific binding in immunohistochemical applications can be addressed through:

  • Optimized blocking protocols:

    • Test different blocking agents (BSA, normal serum, commercial blockers)

    • Extend blocking time for tissues with high background

    • Consider dual blocking with protein and Fc receptor blockers

  • Antibody dilution optimization:

    • Perform serial dilutions to identify optimal concentration

    • Balance signal strength with background reduction

    • Consider longer incubation times with more dilute antibody solutions

  • Washing optimization:

    • Increase number and duration of washing steps

    • Use detergent-containing buffers for balanced permeabilization

    • Implement temperature-controlled washing for consistent results

  • Tissue-specific pretreatments:

    • Test different antigen retrieval methods if applicable

    • Consider autofluorescence quenching treatments

    • Evaluate tissue-specific blocking needs (e.g., lipid-rich tissues)

What quality control measures are essential when working with newly synthesized recombinant antibodies?

Essential quality control measures for newly synthesized recombinant antibodies include:

  • Structural integrity assessment:

    • SDS-PAGE analysis for size verification

    • Mass spectrometry for sequence confirmation

    • Circular dichroism for secondary structure evaluation

  • Binding characteristics verification:

    • ELISA against target antigen

    • Surface plasmon resonance for affinity determination

    • Competitive binding assays against reference antibodies

  • Functional activity testing:

    • Application-specific validation in relevant biological systems

    • Cross-reactivity testing against similar antigens

    • Stability testing under experimental conditions

  • Batch consistency evaluation:

    • Lot-to-lot comparison of binding properties

    • Standardized activity assays

    • Long-term stability monitoring

For recombinant antibodies specifically, it is crucial to implement "comprehensive analysis of variable region repertoires in combination with functional assays to evaluate the specificity and function of the generated antigen-specific antibodies" .

What strategies can overcome epitope masking in fixed tissue samples?

Overcoming epitope masking in fixed tissues requires strategic approaches:

  • Antigen retrieval optimization:

    • Test heat-induced epitope retrieval at various pH levels

    • Evaluate enzymatic retrieval methods (proteinase K, trypsin)

    • Consider combination approaches for complex epitopes

  • Fixation protocol modification:

    • Reduce fixation time to minimize crosslinking

    • Test alternative fixatives (e.g., zinc-based instead of formaldehyde)

    • Implement post-fixation quenching of reactive groups

  • Alternative antibody selection:

    • Choose antibodies targeting different epitopes of the same protein

    • Consider using multiple antibodies simultaneously

    • Test antibodies specifically validated for fixed tissues

  • Signal amplification methods:

    • Implement tyramide signal amplification

    • Use polymer-based detection systems

    • Consider proximity ligation assays for challenging targets

Research with dopamine receptor antibodies has demonstrated that epitope accessibility can vary dramatically between applications, with only select antibodies maintaining functionality across both fresh-frozen and fixed tissues .

How are next-generation antibody technologies expanding research capabilities for neuroreceptor studies?

Next-generation antibody technologies are revolutionizing neuroreceptor research through:

  • Single-domain antibodies (nanobodies):

    • Smaller size enables access to sterically restricted epitopes

    • Improved tissue penetration for in vivo imaging

    • Potential for crossing the blood-brain barrier

  • Intrabodies for live-cell targeting:

    • Genetically encoded antibody fragments expression in specific subcellular compartments

    • Real-time visualization of receptor trafficking

    • Manipulation of receptor function in defined neuronal populations

  • Bivalent and bispecific formats:

    • Target multiple receptor epitopes simultaneously

    • Enable conditional activation based on epitope co-expression

    • Create novel synthetic biology tools for receptor modulation

  • Conformation-specific antibodies:

    • Distinguish between active and inactive receptor states

    • Report on receptor activation in real-time

    • Freeze receptors in specific conformational states for structural studies

Recent research indicates that "a combination (cocktail) of two antibodies that recognize different non-competing epitopes" can provide superior experimental outcomes, particularly for complex targets like neuroreceptors .

What role do recombinant antibodies play in developing therapeutic strategies for neurological disorders?

Recombinant antibodies are instrumental in developing therapeutic strategies for neurological disorders through:

  • Target validation and mechanism elucidation:

    • Precise modulation of specific receptor subtypes

    • Temporal control of receptor signaling

    • Isolation of specific signaling pathways downstream of receptor activation

  • Novel therapeutic modalities:

    • Blood-brain barrier penetrating antibody fragments

    • Gene therapy approaches using intrabodies

    • Conformation-selective modulators of receptor function

  • Precision medicine approaches:

    • Patient-derived antibodies for personalized therapy

    • Targeting of disease-specific receptor conformations

    • Combination approaches addressing multiple targets simultaneously

The development of "renewable and recombinant antibodies as valuable tools to control ion channel function" provides researchers with unprecedented precision in manipulating neuroreceptor systems for both basic research and therapeutic development.

How is antibody engineering being used to create genetically-encoded sensors for dopamine receptor activation?

Antibody engineering is enabling the creation of sophisticated genetically-encoded sensors for dopamine receptor activation through:

  • FRET-based biosensors:

    • Antibody fragments labeled with donor and acceptor fluorophores

    • Conformational changes upon receptor activation alter FRET efficiency

    • Real-time monitoring of receptor activation in living cells

  • Split-protein complementation systems:

    • Antibody fragments fused to complementary fragments of reporter proteins

    • Receptor activation brings fragments together to reconstitute functional reporter

    • Allows for amplification of detection signal

  • Allosteric sensing approaches:

    • Antibodies that preferentially bind activated receptor conformations

    • Coupled to fluorescent proteins for optical readout

    • Enables spatial mapping of receptor activation in complex tissues

These approaches leverage the understanding that "antibodies that recognize an epitope overlapping with the ACE2-binding site" can be repurposed as sensing elements for receptor-ligand interactions , providing new tools for investigating dopamine receptor pharmacology and physiology.

What considerations are important when developing antibodies for multiplexed imaging of neuroreceptor systems?

Developing antibodies for multiplexed imaging of neuroreceptor systems requires attention to:

  • Spectral compatibility:

    • Select fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap

    • Consider brightness matching for equivalent detection sensitivity

    • Implement spectral unmixing for closely related fluorophores

  • Target abundance harmonization:

    • Match antibody affinity to target abundance

    • Implement signal amplification for low-abundance targets

    • Balance exposure times for targets with different expression levels

  • Cross-reactivity elimination:

    • Ensure antibodies from different species for sequential detection

    • Validate absence of cross-reactivity between detection systems

    • Consider tyramide signal amplification for sequential labeling

  • Sample preparation optimization:

    • Develop compatible fixation protocols for all targets

    • Optimize permeabilization for consistent antibody penetration

    • Test epitope retrieval methods that preserve all antigens of interest

Flow cytometry guidelines note that "many flow cytometry experiments are designed to detect both cell surface and intracellular markers" and recommend a "conventional approach... to stain for cell surface markers before fixing and permeabilizing the cells for detection of intracellular targets" , principles that apply equally to multiplexed imaging of neuroreceptor systems.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.