dsc4 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Desmoglein-4 (Dsg4) Antibodies

Dsg4 is a cadherin-type cell adhesion molecule critical for epidermal integrity. Autoantibodies against Dsg4 are implicated in pemphigus, an autoimmune blistering disorder.

Key Findings:

  • Immunoreactivity: 77% (30/39) of pemphigus sera containing anti-Dsg1 IgG also recognized Dsg4, suggesting cross-reactivity or epitope spreading .

  • Pathogenic Role: Anti-Dsg4 IgG autoantibodies contribute to epidermal blistering by disrupting cell-cell adhesion, though their pathogenicity is less direct compared to anti-Dsg1/Dsg3 antibodies .

  • Clinical Correlation: Removal of anti-Dsg1 IgG from pemphigus sera abolished Dsg4 immunoreactivity, while removing anti-Dsg4 IgG reduced Dsg1 reactivity by only 13.8% ± 8.8%, indicating a secondary role for Dsg4 antibodies in disease progression .

Table 1: Dsg4 Antibody Characteristics in Pemphigus

FeatureDetail
TargetDesmoglein-4 (epidermal cadherin)
Associated DiseasePemphigus vulgaris, pemphigus foliaceus
Cross-ReactivityCo-occurs with anti-Dsg1 IgG in 77% of cases
Pathogenic MechanismDisruption of desmosomal adhesion in superficial epidermis

Syndecan-4 (sdc4) Antibodies

Syndecan-4 is a transmembrane heparan sulfate proteoglycan involved in cytokine signaling and fibroblast activation. Antibodies targeting sdc4 dimerization domains show therapeutic potential in inflammatory arthritis.

Key Findings:

  • Dimerization Inhibition: Anti-sdc4 antibodies blocking dimerization reduce IL-1 receptor (IL1R1) expression on fibroblasts, decreasing sensitivity to IL-1β and mitigating joint inflammation .

  • Preclinical Efficacy: In murine models of rheumatoid arthritis, sdc4 antibody treatment reduced histological paw destruction and IL1R1 surface expression by 40–60% .

  • Mechanistic Insight: IL-1β binds sdc4 independently of IL1R1, inducing dimerization that facilitates IL1R1 trafficking via caveolin vesicles .

Table 2: Therapeutic Effects of Anti-sdc4 Antibodies

ParameterOutcome
IL1R1 Surface ExpressionReduced by 40–60% in vitro and in vivo
IL-1β-Induced ERK SignalingSuppressed by >50%
Matrix Metalloproteinase-3Production decreased by 70% in treated fibroblasts

Comparative Analysis

FeatureDsg4 Antibodiessdc4 Antibodies
Primary TargetEpidermal adhesion moleculeInflammatory signaling proteoglycan
Therapeutic AreaAutoimmune blistering disordersInflammatory arthritis
Mechanism of ActionDisrupt cell adhesionInhibit cytokine receptor trafficking
Clinical StageObservational studies Preclinical models

Clinical Implications

  • Dsg4 Antibodies: Serve as biomarkers for pemphigus progression but are not primary diagnostic targets. Their role may be ancillary to anti-Dsg1/Dsg3 antibodies .

  • sdc4 Antibodies: Represent a novel strategy to augment anti-IL-1 therapies in arthritis, with potential to reduce corticosteroid dependence .

Future Directions

  • Dsg4: Explore epitope-specific targeting to mitigate cross-reactivity in pemphigus.

  • sdc4: Advance humanized antibodies to clinical trials for rheumatoid arthritis and evaluate synergy with biologics like TNF-α inhibitors .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
dsc4; SPAC4D7.11; DSC E3 ubiquitin ligase complex subunit 4; Defective for SREBP cleavage protein 4
Target Names
dsc4
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
The DSC4 antibody targets the DSC4 protein, a component of the DSC E3 ubiquitin ligase complex. This complex is essential for the proteolytic cleavage of the sre1 transcriptional activator, releasing the soluble transcription factor from the membrane under conditions of low oxygen or sterol levels. Furthermore, the complex plays a crucial role in the multivesicular body (MVB) pathway, contributing to a post-endoplasmic reticulum pathway for protein degradation.
Database Links
Subcellular Location
Endoplasmic reticulum membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein. Golgi apparatus membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is DSC4 Antibody and what is its relationship to Desmocollin-3?

DSC4 Antibody refers to an antibody targeting Desmocollin-3 (DSC3), a member of the cadherin superfamily. Despite being listed as "DSC4" in some literature, it primarily targets DSC3, which is a crucial component of desmosomes - specialized adhesion structures found in epithelial tissues. The nomenclature variations reflect historical classification challenges in the desmocollin family. Based on antibody specification data, DSC4 is frequently listed as a synonym alongside DSC3, CDHF3 (Cadherin family member 3), and HT-CP in research antibody catalogs .

What are the typical research applications for DSC4/DSC3 antibodies?

DSC4/DSC3 antibodies are extensively utilized in multiple research methodologies:

  • Immunohistochemistry (IHC) on both paraffin-embedded and frozen sections

  • Western blot analysis for protein detection

  • Basic research investigations of desmosomal structure and function

  • Pathological studies of skin disorders and certain carcinomas

The antibody is specifically engineered for in vitro research applications and is not intended for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes .

How can researchers verify the specificity of DSC4/DSC3 antibodies?

Verification of antibody specificity requires a multi-method approach:

  • Cross-reactivity testing against related desmocollin family members

  • Comparison of reactivity against human versus bovine/rodent tissue samples

  • Western blot analysis for detection of the expected ~100 kDa band

  • Positive controls using tissues known to express DSC3 (e.g., stratified squamous epithelia)

  • Negative controls using tissues known to lack DSC3 expression

The antibody specification indicates that it is specific for human desmocollin 3 and shows negative reactivity with bovine and rodent material, which can serve as negative controls in specificity testing .

How does the stability of different antibody subclasses affect DSC4/DSC3 antibody performance in thermal-stress experiments?

The thermal stability of antibodies varies significantly by IgG subclass, which has direct implications for DSC4/DSC3 antibody experiments. Research data demonstrate that under thermal stress, aggregation potential follows the order IgG1 < IgG2 < IgG4, with IgG4 exhibiting the lowest thermal stability .

When designing experiments involving temperature-sensitive applications, researchers should consider:

Antibody SubclassRelative Thermal StabilityAggregation TendencyRecommended for Heat-Sensitive Applications
IgG1HighestLowestMost suitable
IgG2IntermediateModerateSuitable with precautions
IgG4LowestHighestLeast suitable

DSC (Differential Scanning Calorimetry) measurements have revealed distinct thermal unfolding midpoints for different antibody subclasses, confirming these stability differences .

What are the optimal parameters for Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) characterization of DSC4/DSC3 antibodies?

DSC represents a critical analytical method for characterizing the thermal stability of antibodies like DSC4/DSC3. Based on qualification studies, the following parameters are recommended:

  • Scanning rates:

    • For antibodies prone to aggregation: 90°C/h or 120°C/h scanning rates yield optimal response

    • For most monoclonal antibodies: 60°C/h scanning rate provides consistent results

  • Sample preparation:

    • Concentration testing is essential to verify absence of intermediate stages during thermal unfolding

    • Freshly aliquoted samples (400 μl) provide more reliable results than repeatedly frozen-thawed preparations

  • Experimental design:

    • Multiple replicates (4-6) per experiment

    • Independent buffer preparation for reference measurements

    • Analysis by at least two researchers over multiple days for statistical validity

These parameters enable accurate determination of thermal unfolding midpoint (Tm) and enthalpy change (ΔH) measurements, which serve as critical stability indicators for antibody characterization .

How do structural variations in the target desmocollin proteins impact antibody recognition?

Desmocollin proteins exist in multiple isoforms generated through alternative splicing, presenting a significant challenge for antibody-based research. For DSC4/DSC3 antibodies:

  • Epitope location is critical - antibodies targeting the extracellular domain (like the one described in the specifications, which targets "a sequence present in the Extracellular part of Human Desmocollin 3") recognize intact cell-surface proteins but may not detect cleaved or processed forms .

  • Isoform specificity should be verified through:

    • Western blot analysis of tissues expressing different splice variants

    • Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry

    • Comparison with other antibodies targeting different epitopes of the same protein

  • Potential cross-reactivity with related desmocollins (particularly DSC1 and DSC2) must be evaluated, as these share considerable sequence homology with DSC3/DSC4.

What are the optimal immunohistochemistry protocols for DSC4/DSC3 antibody in different tissue preparations?

Optimized IHC protocols for DSC4/DSC3 antibody vary based on tissue preparation method:

For paraffin-embedded tissues:

  • Deparaffinization and rehydration through xylene and graded alcohols

  • Antigen retrieval: Heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER) using citrate buffer (pH 6.0) at 95-98°C for 20 minutes

  • Blocking: 5% normal serum from the same species as the secondary antibody for 1 hour at room temperature

  • Primary antibody incubation: Dilute DSC4/DSC3 antibody to optimal concentration (determined through titration)

  • Detection: HRP-conjugated secondary antibody and DAB chromogen

  • Counterstaining: Hematoxylin for nuclear visualization

For frozen sections:

  • Fixation in cold acetone for 10 minutes

  • Air-dry sections for 30 minutes

  • Rehydration in PBS for 10 minutes

  • Blocking: 5% normal serum from the same species as the secondary antibody

  • Primary antibody incubation: Typically requires lower concentration than for FFPE tissues

  • Detection and counterstaining as above

Researchers should perform initial dilution series experiments to determine optimal antibody concentration for specific tissue types .

How should Western blot protocols be optimized for DSC4/DSC3 antibody detection?

Western blot optimization for DSC4/DSC3 antibody requires careful attention to several parameters:

  • Sample preparation:

    • Tissues/cells should be lysed in a buffer containing appropriate detergents (e.g., RIPA buffer)

    • Inclusion of protease inhibitors is essential to prevent degradation of desmocollin proteins

    • Heat denaturation at 95°C for 5 minutes in sample buffer containing DTT or β-mercaptoethanol

  • Gel electrophoresis:

    • 7.5-10% polyacrylamide gels are optimal for resolving the ~100 kDa DSC3 protein

    • Load adequate positive controls (e.g., epithelial cell lines known to express DSC3)

  • Transfer and detection:

    • Semi-dry or wet transfer at 100V for 60-90 minutes

    • Block with 5% non-fat dry milk or 5% BSA in TBST

    • Primary antibody incubation: Typically 1:500-1:2000 dilution overnight at 4°C

    • Secondary antibody: HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG1

  • Validation:

    • Expected molecular weight of ~100 kDa for full-length DSC3

    • Verify specificity using known positive and negative control samples

    • Consider use of a loading control (e.g., β-actin) to normalize expression levels

Each new lot of antibody should be validated using these parameters to ensure consistent experimental results .

What strategies can researchers employ to prevent antibody aggregation during experimental procedures?

Antibody aggregation can significantly impact experimental outcomes. Based on thermal stability research, the following strategies are recommended:

  • Buffer optimization:

    • Include stabilizing excipients such as sucrose (5-10%)

    • Maintain pH between 6.0-7.0 for optimal stability

    • Consider addition of non-ionic surfactants (0.01-0.05% Tween-20) to minimize surface adsorption

  • Storage conditions:

    • Store at 4°C as specified in the antibody datasheet - do not freeze

    • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles

    • Aliquot antibody solution to minimize handling of stock

  • Handling precautions:

    • Minimize mechanical stress (vortexing, vigorous pipetting)

    • Centrifuge briefly before use to remove any pre-formed aggregates

    • Use low-protein binding tubes and pipette tips

  • Subclass-specific considerations:

    • If working with IgG4 subclass antibodies, additional stabilizing agents may be necessary due to their lower inherent stability

    • For long-term studies, IgG1 formats offer superior stability profiles

Implementing these strategies can significantly reduce experimental variability caused by antibody aggregation.

How can researchers interpret and resolve discrepancies in DSC4/DSC3 antibody reactivity between different experimental platforms?

When encountering discrepancies between experimental platforms (e.g., positive IHC but negative Western blot results), consider the following analytical approach:

  • Systematic analysis of potential technical factors:

    • Antibody concentration differences between methods

    • Epitope accessibility variations (native vs. denatured protein)

    • Tissue/sample processing effects on antigen preservation

    • Detection system sensitivity differences

  • Experimental validation steps:

    • Repeat experiments with appropriate positive and negative controls

    • Test alternative sample preparation methods

    • Perform antibody titration series for each experimental platform

    • Consider using alternative antibodies targeting different epitopes of DSC3/DSC4

  • Biological interpretation:

    • Assess whether discrepancies might reflect actual biological differences (e.g., post-translational modifications, splice variants)

    • Evaluate literature for similar reported discrepancies

    • Consider orthogonal validation methods (e.g., mRNA expression analysis)

A methodical approach to resolving such discrepancies not only improves experimental reliability but can also reveal unexpected biological insights.

What are the most effective approaches for quantitative analysis of DSC thermograms for antibody stability assessment?

Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) provides valuable quantitative data on antibody thermal stability. For rigorous analysis:

  • Key parameters to extract from thermograms:

    • Thermal unfolding midpoint (Tm) for each transition peak

    • Enthalpy change (ΔH) associated with unfolding

    • Onset temperature of unfolding (To)

    • Calorimetric enthalpy (ΔHcal)

  • Statistical approaches for data analysis:

    • Minimum of 4-6 replicates per condition for statistical validity

    • Assessment of intermediate precision and repeatability

    • Analysis of run-to-run variability to establish method robustness

  • Data fitting considerations:

    • Two-state model applicability should be verified through concentration dependency studies

    • For complex multi-domain proteins like antibodies, multi-state models may be necessary

    • Baseline determination is critical for accurate enthalpy calculations

  • Comparative analysis:

    • Internal reference standards should be included

    • Comparison between different antibody subclasses requires normalization

    • Storage stability assessment requires overlay of thermograms from multiple timepoints

This quantitative approach enables precise characterization of antibody stability profiles and facilitates comparison between different formulations or storage conditions .

What controls are essential when investigating potential cross-reactivity of DSC4/DSC3 antibodies with other desmocollin family members?

Rigorous cross-reactivity testing requires a comprehensive panel of controls:

  • Positive specificity controls:

    • Human epithelial tissues/cells known to express DSC3 (e.g., epidermis)

    • Recombinant DSC3 protein with verified sequence

    • Cells transfected with DSC3 expression constructs

  • Negative specificity controls:

    • Tissues/cells from non-human species (bovine, rodent) as the antibody is reported to be human-specific

    • Human tissues known to lack DSC3 expression

    • Immunodepleted samples

  • Cross-reactivity assessment panel:

    • Recombinant proteins for related desmocollins (DSC1, DSC2)

    • Cells expressing single desmocollin isoforms

    • Competitive binding assays with known epitope peptides

  • Validation approaches:

    • Parallel testing with multiple antibodies targeting different DSC3 epitopes

    • Correlation with mRNA expression data

    • Knockout/knockdown validation in appropriate cell systems

How can researchers effectively employ DSC4/DSC3 antibodies in multiplex immunofluorescence studies?

Multiplex immunofluorescence with DSC4/DSC3 antibodies requires careful optimization:

  • Panel design considerations:

    • Antibody species compatibility to avoid cross-reactivity

    • Fluorophore selection to minimize spectral overlap

    • Inclusion of additional desmosomal markers (e.g., desmogleins, desmoplakins) for colocalization studies

  • Technical optimization:

    • Sequential staining protocols with intervening blocking steps

    • Tyramide signal amplification for weak signals

    • Antibody titration to minimize background and optimize signal-to-noise ratio

  • Controls for multiplex studies:

    • Single-stain controls for each antibody

    • Fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls

    • Absorption controls with specific blocking peptides

  • Analysis approaches:

    • Colocalization measurements using Pearson's or Mander's coefficients

    • 3D reconstruction for spatial relationship analysis

    • Quantitative image analysis for expression level assessment

Multiplex approaches provide valuable insights into desmosomal protein interactions and spatial relationships that cannot be obtained through single-marker studies.

What are the current methodological advances in using differential scanning calorimetry for antibody characterization beyond thermal stability?

Recent advances in DSC applications for antibody characterization extend beyond basic thermal stability assessment:

  • Epitope mapping:

    • DSC can detect structural changes upon antigen binding

    • Comparative thermograms of antibody alone versus antibody-antigen complexes

    • Identification of stabilization or destabilization effects upon binding

  • Formulation optimization:

    • High-throughput screening of buffer conditions

    • Excipient effects on thermal stability

    • Prediction of long-term storage stability

  • Comparability studies:

    • Detection of subtle structural differences between antibody batches

    • Assessment of post-translational modifications

    • Evaluation of manufacturing process changes

  • Structure-function relationships:

    • Correlation between DSC parameters and biological activity

    • Prediction of aggregation propensity

    • Integration with other biophysical characterization methods

These advanced applications make DSC an increasingly valuable tool in comprehensive antibody characterization .

What are the recommended best practices for DSC4/DSC3 antibody storage and handling to maximize experimental reproducibility?

Based on manufacturer specifications and research findings on antibody stability, the following best practices are recommended:

  • Storage conditions:

    • Store at 4°C as specified in the product documentation - do not freeze

    • Maintain in original container protected from light

    • Avoid repeated warming and cooling cycles

  • Handling procedures:

    • Centrifuge briefly before opening to collect all liquid

    • Use sterile technique when removing aliquots

    • Avoid vortexing or vigorous pipetting

    • Return to 4°C promptly after use

  • Working solution preparation:

    • Prepare fresh dilutions for each experiment

    • Use high-quality diluents compatible with the intended application

    • Document lot numbers and dilution factors for reproducibility

  • Quality control:

    • Periodically validate antibody performance against known standards

    • Monitor for changes in staining intensity or pattern over time

    • Consider implementing stability-indicating assays for long-term studies

Adherence to these practices significantly enhances experimental reproducibility and extends the functional lifetime of valuable research antibodies.

How can researchers effectively validate newly acquired DSC4/DSC3 antibody lots to ensure consistency in experimental results?

A systematic validation protocol for new antibody lots should include:

  • Side-by-side comparison with previous lots:

    • Western blot using standardized positive control samples

    • IHC on well-characterized tissue sections

    • Titration series to determine optimal working concentration

  • Quantitative performance metrics:

    • Signal-to-noise ratio measurement

    • Limit of detection determination

    • Cross-reactivity assessment

  • Documentation requirements:

    • Detailed experimental conditions

    • Image acquisition parameters

    • Quantitative analysis results

    • Lot number and receipt date

  • Decision criteria:

    • Pre-established acceptance parameters for variation between lots

    • Contingency plans for lot-to-lot variability

    • Requirements for experimental data recalibration if necessary

Implementing this validation protocol ensures experimental continuity and facilitates accurate interpretation of results obtained with different antibody lots.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.