DSF2 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Immunological Profile of DS2-Specific Antibodies

Key findings from preclinical studies:

  • Neutralizing antibody titers: DS2 immunization in mice induced antibodies with IC<sub>50</sub> values as low as 3.3 ng/mL (comparable to clinical benchmarks like Nirsevimab) .

  • Epitope specificity:

    • 41.4% of DS2-specific antibodies targeted site Ø.

    • 25% targeted site II, with cross-reactive potential against RSV subtypes .

  • Binding kinetics: Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) revealed picomolar-affinity interactions for site Ø- and II-specific antibodies .

Table 1: Representative DS2-Specific Neutralizing Antibodies2

AntibodyTarget SiteIC<sub>50</sub> (ng/mL)Heavy Chain (IGHV)Light Chain (IGKV)
mAb60Site II35.6IGHV3-8IGKV6-13
D25Site Ø6.9IGHV14-1IGKV3-10
NirsevimabSite Ø3.3IGHV14-1IGKV3-10

Comparative Performance Against Other Pre-F Designs

DS2 outperforms DS-Cav1 and SC-TM in:

  • Antigenicity: 95–97% positivity for site Ø mAbs vs. 70–85% in comparators .

  • Immunogenicity: Higher IgG titers and bone marrow-resident antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) post-immunization .

  • Protection: Complete prevention of live RSV challenge in murine models .

Mechanisms of Long-Lived Immunity

  • Bone marrow ASCs: DS2 immunization promotes durable antibody production, with 29 DS2-specific ASCs isolated 6 months post-immunization .

  • Genetic diversity: Antibody heavy/light chains derive from diverse germlines (e.g., IGHV14-1, IGKV3-10), reducing escape mutant risks .

Clinical and Therapeutic Implications

  • Vaccine development: DS2 is a leading candidate for maternal/elderly RSV vaccines, with phase III trials demonstrating efficacy .

  • Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy: mAb60 (site II-specific) and D25 analogs show promise for prophylactic use .

Challenges and Future Directions

  • Glycan variability: Fc-region glycosylation impacts effector function and pharmacokinetics .

  • Affinity-activity discordance: Some high-affinity mAbs lack neutralizing potency, necessitating functional screens .

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
DSF2 antibody; YBR007C antibody; YBR0113Protein DSF2 antibody; Deletion suppressor of MPT5 mutation protein 2 antibody
Target Names
DSF2
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is DSF2 protein and why is it significant for yeast research?

DSF2 (Uniprot: P38213) is a protein-coding gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain ATCC 204508/S288c (Baker's yeast) . The protein is part of the yeast proteome that was characterized during the landmark genome sequencing project, as noted in the 1996 publication "Life with 6000 genes" by Goffeau et al. . Its significance lies in understanding fundamental cellular processes in this model organism, which serves as a platform for studying eukaryotic cell biology. When designing experiments with DSF2 antibodies, researchers should consider the evolutionary conservation of this protein and its potential homologs in other fungal species for comparative studies.

How can researchers distinguish between DSF2 Antibody and other similarly abbreviated antibodies in scientific literature?

Researchers must exercise caution as terminology confusion exists between:

  • DSF2 Antibody: Targets the Dsf2p protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

  • DS2 Antibody: Associated with pre-fusion F protein for RSV vaccine research

  • dsDNA (ds) Antibody: Used in autoimmune disease diagnostics, particularly lupus

When reviewing literature or planning experiments, verify the full protein name (Dsf2p), organism context (S. cerevisiae), and UniProt accession number (P38213) to avoid experimental design errors . Additionally, review the methods section of relevant papers for specificity confirmation, including Western blot molecular weight identification.

What validation techniques should be employed before using DSF2 antibodies in yeast research?

A methodical validation approach should include:

  • Specificity Assessment:

    • Western blot using wild-type and DSF2 knockout yeast strains

    • Preabsorption testing with recombinant DSF2 protein

    • Cross-reactivity testing with closely related yeast proteins

  • Sensitivity Determination:

    • Serial dilution testing with known quantities of recombinant DSF2

    • Comparison across different detection methods (chemiluminescence vs. fluorescence)

  • Application-Specific Validation:

    • For immunoprecipitation: Verify pull-down efficiency with mass spectrometry

    • For immunofluorescence: Compare with GFP-tagged DSF2 localization patterns

    • For ChIP applications: Include appropriate IgG controls

Rather than merely confirming antibody binding, this systematic approach ensures reliable research outcomes and enhances reproducibility across laboratories.

What are the optimal sample preparation protocols for DSF2 detection in different experimental contexts?

Sample preparation varies by application:

For Western Blotting:

  • Cell lysis using glass bead disruption in buffer containing protease inhibitors

  • Centrifugation at 13,000×g (4°C, 15 minutes) to separate debris

  • Protein quantification using Bradford assay

  • Denaturation at 95°C for 5 minutes in Laemmli buffer

  • Loading 20-40 μg total protein per lane

For Immunofluorescence:

  • Fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde (15 minutes, room temperature)

  • Cell wall digestion with zymolyase (30 minutes, 30°C)

  • Permeabilization with 0.1% Triton X-100

  • Blocking with 3% BSA in PBS (1 hour, room temperature)

  • Overnight primary antibody incubation at 4°C (typical dilution 1:500-1:1000)

These protocols address the unique challenges of yeast cell wall structures and ensure optimal epitope accessibility for antibody binding.

How can DSF2 antibodies be employed in studying protein-protein interactions within yeast cellular networks?

DSF2 antibodies can be strategically utilized to map protein interaction networks through:

  • Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):

    • Capture DSF2 complexes using antibody-conjugated magnetic beads

    • Identify interacting partners via mass spectrometry

    • Verify interactions with reciprocal Co-IP using antibodies against potential partners

  • Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA):

    • Combine DSF2 antibody with antibodies against suspected interaction partners

    • Visualize protein proximity (<40 nm) through rolling circle amplification

    • Quantify interaction frequency in different cellular compartments or conditions

  • Integrative Analysis Approach:

    • Correlate DSF2 interaction data with:

      • Genetic interaction screens (synthetic lethality, synthetic growth defects)

      • Transcriptomic profiles under various conditions

      • Phenotypic analyses of DSF2 mutants

This multi-faceted approach provides robust evidence of functional relationships beyond simple binary interactions, positioning the research within broader cellular pathway contexts.

What considerations should researchers make when using DSF2 antibodies for chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) studies?

When adapting DSF2 antibodies for ChIP applications, researchers should consider:

  • Antibody Suitability Assessment:

    • Verify the antibody recognizes native (non-denatured) epitopes

    • Test multiple antibody clones if available

    • Consider using epitope-tagged DSF2 strains as controls

  • Protocol Optimization:

    • Crosslinking: Test both formaldehyde (protein-DNA) and disuccinimidyl glutarate (protein-protein) crosslinkers

    • Sonication: Optimize fragmentation to 200-500 bp DNA fragments

    • Antibody concentration: Titrate to determine minimal effective concentration

    • Washing stringency: Balance between reducing background and maintaining specific interactions

  • Controls Implementation:

    • Input DNA (pre-immunoprecipitation sample)

    • IgG control (non-specific antibody)

    • ChIP in DSF2 knockout strain (specificity control)

    • Spike-in normalization with foreign DNA

  • Data Analysis Considerations:

    • Use appropriate peak calling algorithms based on expected binding patterns

    • Perform motif analysis on enriched regions

    • Integrate with existing chromatin accessibility data

These methodological considerations address the technical challenges of ChIP while ensuring data reliability and biological relevance.

How do commercially available DSF2 antibodies compare in terms of specificity and sensitivity?

While specific comparison data for DSF2 antibodies is limited, researchers should evaluate available options such as the CSB-PA334388XA01SVG antibody from Cusabio against the following criteria:

PropertyMonoclonal AntibodiesPolyclonal AntibodiesRecommendation
Epitope RecognitionSingle epitopeMultiple epitopesSelect based on experimental needs; polyclonals for detection, monoclonals for specificity
Batch-to-Batch VariabilityLowModerate to highRequest COA with lot-specific validation data
Background in S. cerevisiaeVariableVariablePerform pre-absorption with knockout lysates
Applications VersatilityOften application-specificGenerally more versatileValidate for each specific application
Cross-reactivity with Related SpeciesTypically lowerPotentially higherTest with related yeast species if cross-species comparisons are planned

When selecting an antibody, request validation data specific to your intended application and consider generating your own validation data before proceeding with critical experiments.

What are the most common pitfalls in DSF2 antibody-based experiments and how can they be addressed?

Researchers frequently encounter these challenges when working with yeast proteins like DSF2:

  • False Negative Results:

    • Cause: Epitope masking due to protein interactions or post-translational modifications

    • Solution: Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes; try native vs. denaturing conditions

  • Non-specific Binding:

    • Cause: Cross-reactivity with similar yeast proteins

    • Solution: Increase washing stringency; pre-absorb with knockout lysates; use monoclonal antibodies

  • Poor Signal-to-Noise Ratio:

    • Cause: Low DSF2 expression levels; inefficient extraction

    • Solution: Optimize lysis conditions; consider concentration methods; use signal amplification systems

  • Inconsistent Results Between Experiments:

    • Cause: Variation in yeast growth phase; strain-specific differences

    • Solution: Standardize culture conditions; use internal loading controls; document strain background

  • Detection Issues in Complex Samples:

    • Cause: Interference from abundant proteins; protein degradation

    • Solution: Consider subcellular fractionation; add protease inhibitors; optimize antibody concentration

Implementing these troubleshooting strategies can significantly improve experimental outcomes and increase confidence in DSF2-related findings.

How might emerging antibody technologies enhance DSF2 protein research?

Advanced antibody technologies can overcome current limitations in DSF2 research:

  • Nanobodies/Single-Domain Antibodies:

    • Smaller size allows access to structurally hindered epitopes

    • Superior penetration of yeast cell wall in live-cell imaging

    • Potential for direct expression within yeast cells as intrabodies

  • Recombinant Antibody Engineering:

    • Creation of DSF2-specific single-chain variable fragments (scFvs)

    • Site-specific conjugation for precise labeling

    • Engineering bifunctional antibodies for proximity studies

  • Microfluidic Antibody Screening:

    • Rapid identification of optimal DSF2 antibody clones

    • Single-cell resolution for heterogeneity studies

    • Combining with droplet-based assays for high-throughput phenotyping

  • Photoswitchable Antibody Conjugates:

    • Super-resolution microscopy of DSF2 subcellular localization

    • Optogenetic manipulation of DSF2 interactions

    • Temporal control of DSF2 function in living cells

These technologies represent significant opportunities to advance our understanding of DSF2 biology beyond current methodological constraints.

What integrative approaches can maximize the value of DSF2 antibody-based research?

To position DSF2 antibody research within broader research contexts:

  • Multi-omics Integration:

    • Correlate DSF2 protein levels/interactions with transcriptomic data

    • Integrate with metabolomics to understand downstream effects

    • Combine with genetic interaction mapping for pathway positioning

  • Systems Biology Modeling:

    • Use quantitative DSF2 antibody data to parameterize mathematical models

    • Develop predictive models of DSF2 function in cellular networks

    • Simulate perturbations to identify key regulatory nodes

  • Evolutionary Comparative Studies:

    • Deploy DSF2 antibodies across related fungal species

    • Correlate functional conservation with structural conservation

    • Identify species-specific adaptations in DSF2 function

  • Interdisciplinary Applications:

    • Apply findings to industrial yeast strains for biotechnology

    • Translate mechanisms to pathogenic fungi for potential therapeutic targets

    • Explore relevance to fundamental eukaryotic biology

This integrative framework contextualizes DSF2 research within the broader scientific landscape, enhancing its impact and applications.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.