DTX4 (Deltex Homolog 4) is an E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase encoded by the DTX4 gene in humans. It regulates critical cellular processes, including Notch signaling and immune responses, by targeting proteins for proteasomal degradation . Antibodies against DTX4 are widely used to study its role in cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, and immune regulation .
DTX4 antibodies have been used to investigate its role in tumor immunomodulation. Preclinical studies show that DTX4-mediated degradation of TBK1 enhances the efficacy of intratumoral chemotherapy (e.g., LSAM-DTX) by promoting tumor necrosis and macrophage infiltration . In syngeneic murine models, DTX4 inhibition increased CD4+/CD8+ T-cell populations, correlating with reduced tumor growth .
DTX4 antibodies validate its interaction with NLRP4 to suppress type I interferon production, making it a potential target for autoimmune diseases . Flow cytometry studies using DTX4 antibodies (e.g., MAB7157) confirmed cytoplasmic localization in leukemia cells .
Bladder Cancer: Intratumoral DTX4 modulation with LSAM-DTX reduced metastatic spread in preclinical models .
Neurodegeneration: DTX4’s role in protein turnover is being explored in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases .
No validated DTX45-targeting antibodies exist as of March 2025. Researchers should:
Verify gene nomenclature (DTX4 vs. DTX45).
Explore homology between DTX4 and hypothetical DTX45 proteins.
Consider CRISPR screening to identify novel DTX-associated targets.
DTX45 Antibody is an immunological reagent used in research applications related to Deltex family proteins. While specific information about DTX45 is limited in the literature, it likely functions similarly to other DTX family proteins such as DTX4, which regulates Notch signaling pathways involved in cell-cell communications and cell-fate determinations . Primary research applications include western blotting, immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry for detecting DTX45 protein expression in experimental systems.
Most antibodies in this class, including DTX45 Antibody, should be stored at -20°C and protected from repeated freeze-thaw cycles to maintain reactivity and specificity . For short-term storage (1-2 weeks), antibodies can be kept at 4°C. Antibody solutions typically contain preservatives such as sodium azide (0.09%) to prevent microbial contamination during storage . Always refer to the manufacturer's recommendations for specific storage guidelines.
When using DTX45 Antibody, positive controls should be selected based on known expression patterns. For DTX family proteins, human cell lines such as K562 (chronic myelogenous leukemia) and SW13 (adrenal cortex adenocarcinoma) have been demonstrated to express detectable levels of related proteins like DTX1/DTX4 . These cell lines may serve as appropriate positive controls for initial validation studies of DTX45 Antibody, though experimental confirmation is necessary.
Application | Recommended Starting Dilution Range | Optimization Strategy |
---|---|---|
Western Blot | 1:500-1:2000 | Begin with 1:1000 and adjust based on signal-to-noise ratio |
Immunohistochemistry | 1:50-1:200 | Start with 1:100 for paraffin sections |
Flow Cytometry | 1:50-1:100 | Include appropriate isotype control antibody |
Immunofluorescence | 1:100-1:500 | Optimize fixation conditions alongside dilution |
As noted in related antibody documentation, "Optimal dilutions should be determined by each laboratory for each application" . This typically involves performing a dilution series experiment to identify the concentration that provides maximum specific signal with minimal background.
Based on research with related DTX family proteins, different extraction methods are recommended depending on the cellular localization being investigated:
For cytoplasmic DTX45 (similar to DTX4 localization patterns ):
Use non-ionic detergent buffers (e.g., containing 1% Triton X-100)
Maintain samples at 4°C during extraction
Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation
For nuclear fractions:
High-salt extraction buffers are recommended
Consider sonication to improve extraction efficiency
DNase treatment may reduce viscosity and improve protein recovery
For immunofluorescence applications, fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10-15 minutes at room temperature followed by permeabilization with 0.1-0.5% saponin has been effective for related proteins .
Before implementing DTX45 Antibody in a new experimental system, researchers should perform the following validation steps:
Specificity testing using positive and negative control samples
Evaluation of multiple antibody concentrations to determine optimal working dilution
If possible, validation with genetic knockdown/knockout systems
Comparison with alternative detection methods (e.g., mRNA quantification)
Western blot analysis to confirm target specificity by molecular weight
For flow cytometry applications specifically, validation should include comparison with appropriate isotype control antibodies and blocking experiments to confirm specificity, similar to protocols used for DTX1/DTX4 detection .
When encountering non-specific binding with DTX45 Antibody, consider these methodological interventions:
Increase blocking stringency (try 5% BSA or 5% non-fat dry milk in TBS-T)
Add 0.1-0.5% Tween-20 to washing buffers
Pre-adsorb the antibody with non-relevant tissue lysates
For immunohistochemistry, include an avidin/biotin blocking step if using biotin-based detection systems
Titrate secondary antibody to minimize non-specific interactions
Consider using more stringent antigen retrieval methods for fixed tissue samples
These approaches should be systematically tested and documented to determine the optimal conditions for specific DTX45 detection.
For multi-color flow cytometry applications with DTX45 Antibody:
Select fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap or ensure proper compensation
For intracellular detection, optimize fixation and permeabilization conditions (paraformaldehyde fixation followed by saponin permeabilization has been effective for related DTX proteins )
Include appropriate FMO (Fluorescence Minus One) controls
If using indirect detection, select secondary antibodies with minimal cross-reactivity
Consider sequential staining for complex panels (surface markers first, followed by fixation/permeabilization and intracellular DTX45 staining)
Validate antibody performance in single-color experiments before combining into multi-color panels
Different sample preparation methods can significantly impact DTX45 epitope preservation:
Fixation effects:
Formaldehyde-based fixatives (2-4%) generally preserve DTX family protein epitopes while maintaining cellular morphology
Methanol fixation may enhance detection of certain conformational epitopes but can disrupt membrane structures
Extended fixation times (>24 hours) may reduce epitope accessibility
Antigen retrieval considerations:
Heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER) using citrate buffer (pH 6.0) or EDTA buffer (pH 9.0) can recover epitopes masked during fixation
Enzymatic retrieval methods should be optimized empirically, starting with proteinase K at low concentrations
Buffer composition effects:
Detergent concentration affects membrane permeabilization and accessibility to intracellular targets
Ionic strength influences antibody-antigen binding kinetics
pH optimization may be necessary for maximum detection sensitivity
For accurate quantification and normalization of DTX45 expression:
Western blot quantification:
Use internal loading controls (β-actin, GAPDH, or total protein staining)
Apply densitometric analysis with linear dynamic range validation
Express results as relative expression (DTX45/loading control ratio)
Flow cytometry quantification:
Report mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values
Calculate fold change relative to negative controls
Consider using calibration beads for absolute quantification
Immunohistochemistry quantification:
Use digital image analysis with appropriate algorithms
Score both staining intensity and percentage of positive cells
Employ double-blind assessment for subjective scoring methods
qPCR correlation:
When possible, correlate protein expression with mRNA levels
Normalize to appropriate reference genes validated for your experimental system
For robust statistical analysis of DTX45 expression data:
For simple comparisons between two groups:
Student's t-test (parametric data)
Mann-Whitney U test (non-parametric data)
For multiple experimental groups:
One-way ANOVA with appropriate post-hoc tests (Tukey, Bonferroni)
Kruskal-Wallis test for non-parametric data
For longitudinal studies:
Repeated measures ANOVA
Mixed-effects models for handling missing data points
For correlation analysis:
Pearson's correlation (linear relationships)
Spearman's rank correlation (non-linear relationships)
Power analysis considerations:
Perform a priori power analysis to determine appropriate sample sizes
Report effect sizes alongside p-values for better interpretation
To differentiate specific DTX45 signal from background artifacts:
Essential controls:
Include isotype control antibodies processed identically to DTX45 samples
Prepare secondary-only controls to assess non-specific binding
When possible, include known positive and negative control samples
Advanced validation approaches:
Peptide competition assays to demonstrate specificity
Signal colocalization with independent markers of the expected subcellular compartment
Comparison of staining patterns with different antibody clones targeting the same protein
Imaging best practices:
Standardize image acquisition parameters across experimental groups
Acquire images with identical exposure settings
Implement background subtraction algorithms consistently
Consider spectral unmixing for multi-color applications with overlapping fluorophores
Based on knowledge of DTX family proteins, the following experimental systems are recommended for investigating DTX45 function in Notch signaling:
Cell culture models:
Genetic modification approaches:
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout or knockin models
siRNA or shRNA-mediated knockdown experiments
Overexpression systems with tagged constructs for localization studies
In vivo models:
Conditional knockout mouse models for tissue-specific analysis
Zebrafish models for developmental studies
Drosophila models for evolutionary conservation analysis
When working with DTX45 Antibody across different species:
Cross-reactivity considerations:
Sequence homology analysis should be performed to predict cross-reactivity
The antibody may recognize related DTX family proteins with high sequence conservation
Empirical validation is essential when working with new species
Species-specific optimization:
Antibody dilution may need adjustment for different species
Fixation protocols should be optimized for each tissue type
Blocking reagents may need to be species-matched to reduce background
Validation approaches for cross-species applications:
Western blot analysis to confirm molecular weight
Comparison with species-specific antibodies when available
Genetic knockdown validation in the target species
For investigating DTX45 protein interactions in the ubiquitin ligase pathway:
Co-immunoprecipitation strategies:
Use DTX45 Antibody for pulldown experiments followed by mass spectrometry
Perform reciprocal co-IP with antibodies against predicted interacting proteins
Include appropriate controls to distinguish specific from non-specific interactions
Proximity-based methods:
BioID or TurboID proximity labeling
FRET or BRET assays for direct interaction studies
PLA (Proximity Ligation Assay) for visualizing protein interactions in situ
Functional validation approaches:
Ubiquitination assays to assess E3 ligase activity
Protein stability measurements following overexpression or knockdown
Domain mapping experiments to identify critical interaction interfaces
Data integration:
Correlation of protein interaction data with functional outcomes
Network analysis to identify key nodes in the pathway
Integration with publicly available datasets for comprehensive pathway mapping
Common Issue | Potential Causes | Solutions |
---|---|---|
Weak or no signal | Insufficient antibody concentration | Increase antibody concentration; extend incubation time |
Target protein degradation | Add fresh protease inhibitors; keep samples cold | |
Epitope masking during fixation | Optimize antigen retrieval methods | |
High background | Excessive antibody concentration | Titrate antibody to optimal concentration |
Insufficient blocking | Increase blocking time/concentration; change blocking reagent | |
Cross-reactivity | Pre-adsorb antibody; use more stringent washing | |
Multiple bands in Western blot | Post-translational modifications | Confirm with phosphatase/glycosidase treatment |
Cross-reactivity with related proteins | Validate with knockout controls; use peptide competition | |
Inconsistent results | Antibody degradation | Aliquot antibody to avoid freeze-thaw cycles |
Sample variability | Standardize sample collection and processing |
For challenging sample types, consider these methodological adaptations:
For fixed tissue samples:
Extend antigen retrieval times incrementally
Test multiple retrieval buffers systematically
Consider dual retrieval approaches (enzymatic followed by heat-induced)
Reduce section thickness to improve antibody penetration
For highly autofluorescent samples:
Pre-treat with sodium borohydride to reduce aldehyde-induced autofluorescence
Use confocal microscopy with narrow bandpass filters
Consider alternative detection methods (chromogenic IHC)
Employ spectral unmixing during image acquisition
For limited sample quantities:
Adapt to microfluidic western blot platforms
Implement signal amplification techniques (tyramide signal amplification)
Consider single-cell analysis approaches
Use carrier proteins during sample preparation to reduce loss
When facing contradictory results from different antibody clones:
Technical validation:
Compare epitope regions targeted by different antibodies
Validate each antibody independently with positive and negative controls
Test across multiple applications to identify context-dependent performance
Biological validation:
Correlate with mRNA expression data
Validate with genetic knockdown/knockout approaches
Consider potential isoform-specific recognition
Resolution strategies:
Use orthogonal methods to confirm findings (mass spectrometry)
Evaluate antibodies under identical experimental conditions
Consider generating new validation tools if discrepancies persist
Document and report all validation efforts for research transparency
For adapting DTX45 Antibody to high-throughput screening:
Automation considerations:
Optimize protocols for robotic liquid handling systems
Standardize plate formats and reagent volumes
Develop quality control metrics for batch processing
Multiplexing strategies:
Combine with additional antibodies against pathway components
Utilize barcoded antibodies for multiplexed detection
Integrate with high-content imaging platforms for phenotypic analysis
Data analysis approaches:
Implement machine learning algorithms for pattern recognition
Develop robust normalization methods for plate-to-plate variation
Establish clear criteria for hit identification and validation
Validation pipeline:
Create tiered validation strategies for primary hits
Incorporate dose-response analysis for quantitative assessment
Combine with orthogonal assays for mechanism confirmation
For single-cell applications with DTX45 Antibody:
Flow cytometry optimization:
Titrate antibody to minimize background at the single-cell level
Optimize fixation and permeabilization for intracellular detection
Consider index sorting for downstream analysis correlation
Mass cytometry (CyTOF) adaptation:
Metal-conjugated antibodies require validation compared to fluorescent counterparts
Signal spillover considerations differ from conventional flow cytometry
Carefully design panels to avoid signal interference
Single-cell imaging considerations:
Optimize signal-to-noise ratio for individual cell visualization
Implement automated cell segmentation algorithms
Consider microfluidic approaches for controlled cell manipulation
Integration with genomic approaches:
Protocols for combined protein and RNA analysis at single-cell resolution
Computational methods for multimodal data integration
Strategies for linking protein expression with genetic variants
For quantitative analysis of DTX45 dynamics in live cells:
Fluorescent tagging strategies:
Design fusion proteins that preserve DTX45 function
Consider split fluorescent protein approaches for interaction studies
Validate localization pattern compared to endogenous protein
Advanced microscopy techniques:
FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching) for mobility analysis
FLIM (Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging) for interaction studies
Lattice light-sheet microscopy for reduced phototoxicity in long-term imaging
Quantification approaches:
Track individual particles for trafficking analysis
Measure intensity changes in specific subcellular compartments
Implement ratiometric imaging for normalized quantification
Computational analysis:
Develop automated tracking algorithms for dynamic processes
Apply mathematical modeling to extract kinetic parameters
Implement machine learning for pattern recognition in complex datasets
Integrating DTX45 Antibody into multi-omics research:
Proteogenomic approaches:
Correlate DTX45 protein levels with genomic and transcriptomic data
Investigate post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms
Identify genetic variants affecting DTX45 expression or function
Spatial omics integration:
Combine with spatial transcriptomics for contextualized analysis
Implement multiplexed imaging with additional protein markers
Correlate protein localization with local transcriptional environments
Functional relationship mapping:
Integrate protein interaction data with metabolomic profiles
Connect DTX45 activity to downstream signaling cascades
Develop network models incorporating multiple data types
Clinical translation:
Correlate multi-omics profiles with patient outcomes
Identify biomarker signatures incorporating DTX45 status
Develop precision medicine approaches based on integrated analyses
Advanced methods for studying DTX45 post-translational modifications:
Mass spectrometry approaches:
Targeted MS/MS for specific modification sites
SILAC labeling for quantitative comparison across conditions
Top-down proteomics for intact protein analysis
Site-specific antibody development:
Generate modification-specific antibodies (phospho, ubiquitin, etc.)
Validate specificity with synthetic peptides
Combine with proximity labeling for modification-dependent interactions
Live-cell monitoring:
Biosensors for real-time visualization of modification events
FRET-based reporters for conformation changes
Targeted degradation approaches for functional studies
Computational prediction:
Machine learning algorithms to predict modification sites
Systems biology approaches to model modification dynamics
Integration with structural biology for functional impact assessment
Researchers can advance DTX45 Antibody validation standards by:
Implementing comprehensive validation:
Follow multi-pillar validation approaches (genetic, orthogonal, independent antibody)
Document all validation experiments in publications
Share detailed protocols and reagent information
Contributing to community resources:
Submit validation data to antibody validation databases
Participate in multi-laboratory validation initiatives
Share negative results and validation failures
Developing new validation technologies:
Create engineered cell lines for antibody validation
Develop multiplexed validation platforms
Implement artificial intelligence for antibody performance prediction
Advocating for reporting standards:
Adopt minimum information guidelines for antibody experiments
Include detailed methods sections in publications
Make validation data available through repositories or supplementary materials