DTX5 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction to DTX5 and DTX5 Antibody

DTX5 (Dinophysistoxin-5) is a marine toxin metabolite associated with diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP), a syndrome caused by consuming shellfish contaminated with DSP toxins. These toxins inhibit protein phosphatases, leading to gastrointestinal distress and other systemic effects. DTX5 Antibody refers to immunological reagents designed to detect DTX5 and related DSP metabolites. The most documented example is the 6/50 monoclonal antibody (mAb), which exhibits cross-reactivity with multiple DSP compounds, including dinophysistoxin-4 (DTX-4) and okadaic acid (OA) .

Cross-Reactivity and Specificity

Target ToxinCross-Reactivity Range (nM)Method
Okadaic Acid (OA)10–100Competitive ELISA
Dinophysistoxin-4 (DTX-4)10–100Competitive ELISA
Dinophysistoxin-5 (DTX-5)10–100Competitive ELISA
OA Diol Ester10–100Competitive ELISA

Mechanistic Insight: The antibody’s broad specificity stems from conserved structural motifs among DSP toxins, particularly the carboxylic acid and hydroxyl groups critical for phosphatase inhibition .

Research and Diagnostic Limitations

While effective for DSP detection, the 6/50 mAb’s cross-reactivity may complicate differentiation between toxin subtypes. Further studies are needed to develop subtype-specific antibodies .

Key Study Highlights

  1. Sensitivity and Specificity:

    • The 6/50 mAb achieves 10–100 nM detection limits for DTX5 and related DSP toxins, comparable to OA .

    • No significant cross-reactivity with non-DSP toxins, ensuring specificity .

  2. Comparative Analysis:

    Parameter6/50 mAb
    Target RangeDSP toxins (OA, DTX-4, DTX-5)
    Assay TypeCompetitive ELISA
    Clinical UtilityFood safety, research

Future Directions

Current research focuses on:

  • Antibody Engineering: Developing DTX5-specific antibodies using recombinant techniques to improve subtype differentiation.

  • Multiplex Assays: Integrating DTX5 antibodies into high-throughput platforms for simultaneous detection of multiple DSP toxins.

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 week lead time (made-to-order)
Synonyms
DTX5 antibody; At2g04090 antibody; F3L12.8Protein DETOXIFICATION 5 antibody; AtDTX5 antibody; Multidrug and toxic compound extrusion protein 5 antibody; MATE protein 5 antibody
Target Names
DTX5
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT2G04090

STRING: 3702.AT2G04090.1

UniGene: At.52631

Protein Families
Multi antimicrobial extrusion (MATE) (TC 2.A.66.1) family
Subcellular Location
Membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What are DTX antibodies and what cellular components do they target?

DTX antibodies are immunoglobulin proteins designed to recognize and bind to Deltex family proteins, which function as E3 ubiquitin ligases. Specifically, antibodies like the DTX2 polyclonal antibody detect endogenous levels of total DTX2 protein, which regulates Notch signaling—a pathway involved in cell-cell communications that influences a broad spectrum of cell-fate determinations. These antibodies can recognize various protein aliases including deltex homolog 2, hDTX2, and RING finger protein 58, allowing researchers to study these regulatory proteins in various experimental contexts .

How do DTX family proteins function in cellular pathways?

DTX family proteins act both as positive and negative regulators of Notch signaling, depending on developmental and cellular context. Their primary function is as E3 ubiquitin ligases that mediate protein ubiquitination, targeting specific proteins for degradation. For instance, DTX2 mediates the antineural activity of Notch, possibly by inhibiting transcriptional activation mediated by proteins like MATCH1. This ubiquitin ligase activity suggests that DTX proteins regulate the Notch pathway through selective protein degradation mechanisms .

What is the structural composition of antibodies used in DTX research?

Antibodies used in DTX research, like all antibodies, are glycoproteins with a characteristic Y-shaped structure composed of four peptide chains: two identical heavy chains and two identical light chains. The antigen-binding sites are located in the Fab regions of the antibody, which contain variable domains that determine specificity for DTX proteins. This structural arrangement allows for specific molecular recognition of epitopes on DTX proteins, enabling their detection in experimental settings .

How should researchers validate DTX antibodies for experimental use?

Validation of DTX antibodies requires a multi-step approach:

  • Specificity testing: Confirm binding to target DTX protein versus other family members through Western blotting against recombinant proteins and cell lysates expressing different DTX variants

  • Knockout/knockdown controls: Use cells with genetically silenced DTX expression to verify absence of signal

  • Cross-reactivity assessment: Test antibody against tissues from different species if cross-species reactivity is claimed

  • Application-specific validation: Validate performance in specific applications (Western blot, IHC, IP) separately

  • Lot-to-lot consistency: Compare performance metrics between different production lots
    Successful validation ensures experimental reproducibility and accurate interpretation of results when studying Notch signaling pathways .

What experimental conditions optimize DTX antibody performance in immunoassays?

Optimal conditions for DTX antibody performance in immunoassays include:

ParameterWestern BlottingImmunoprecipitationImmunohistochemistry
Dilution1:500-1:20001:50-1:2001:100-1:500
Blocking Agent5% BSA or non-fat milk1-3% BSA1-5% normal serum
Incubation TimeOvernight at 4°C2-4 hours at 4°C1-2 hours at RT or overnight at 4°C
Washing BufferTBS-T (0.1% Tween-20)PBS-T (0.1% Tween-20)PBS-T (0.1% Tween-20)
Signal EnhancementECL substrates (HRP)N/ADAB or fluorescent secondary antibodies
These parameters should be optimized for each specific antibody and experimental system to ensure maximum signal-to-noise ratio and reproducibility .

How can researchers design phage display experiments for selecting DTX-specific antibodies?

Designing effective phage display experiments for DTX-specific antibodies involves several critical steps:

  • Library construction: Create diverse antibody libraries (naïve, synthetic, or immune) with sufficient sequence diversity

  • Selection strategy: Implement a multi-round biopanning approach with increasing stringency

  • Negative selection: Include pre-adsorption steps against related DTX family members to remove cross-reactive binders

  • Positive selection: Use purified DTX protein immobilized on solid supports with controlled orientation

  • Screening: Evaluate individual clones for binding specificity, affinity, and functionality

  • Sequence analysis: Analyze selected clones to identify consensus binding motifs and potential affinity maturation targets
    This methodological approach enables isolation of antibodies with customized specificity profiles for DTX proteins, supporting precise experimental interventions in Notch signaling studies .

How can DTX antibodies be modified to enhance blood-brain barrier penetration for neuroscience research?

DTX antibodies can be modified to enhance blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration through several advanced engineering approaches:

  • Transferrin receptor (TfR) targeting: Fusion of anti-TfR single-chain variable fragments (scFv) to DTX antibodies can increase brain uptake nearly 100-fold through receptor-mediated transcytosis. Strategic placement of these modifications is crucial; placing two scFvs with short linkers that sterically hinder bivalent binding to the TfR dimer has proven most effective .

  • Reduced antibody size: Creating smaller antibody formats such as Fab fragments, single-domain antibodies, or nanobodies against DTX targets can improve BBB penetration due to their reduced molecular size.

  • Lipidation: Conjugation with lipids can enhance transcellular passage through the BBB endothelium.

  • Glycan modification: Altering glycosylation patterns can influence BBB penetration and pharmacokinetics.
    This enhanced delivery enables investigation of DTX protein roles in neurological contexts and potential therapeutic applications .

How should researchers approach designing antibodies with customized DTX specificity profiles?

Designing antibodies with customized DTX specificity profiles requires a sophisticated computational and experimental approach:

  • Epitope mapping: Identify unique and conserved regions across DTX family proteins through sequence and structural analysis

  • Computational modeling: Use molecular dynamics simulations to predict antibody-antigen interactions and binding energetics

  • Machine learning integration: Train models on existing antibody-antigen interaction data to predict mutations that enhance specificity

  • Directed evolution: Apply iterative cycles of mutation and selection to evolve antibodies with desired specificity profiles

  • Validation through multiple binding assays: Assess specificity using different methodologies (ELISA, SPR, cellular assays)
    This integrated approach enables creation of antibodies that can selectively target specific DTX family members or even particular conformational states of these proteins, enhancing experimental precision in studying ubiquitin ligase functions .

What considerations are important when developing antibody combinations targeting DTX proteins?

When developing antibody combinations targeting DTX proteins, researchers should consider:

How can researchers resolve conflicting data from different DTX antibody clones?

Resolving conflicting data from different DTX antibody clones requires systematic investigation:

  • Epitope characterization: Determine if antibodies recognize different epitopes on the same DTX protein, which may explain different detection patterns if epitopes have differential accessibility in various experimental conditions

  • Specificity verification: Re-validate each antibody's specificity using:

    • Genetic knockdown/knockout controls

    • Competing peptide blocking

    • Mass spectrometry confirmation of immunoprecipitated proteins

  • Context-dependent expression analysis: Investigate whether discrepancies reflect biological differences in:

    • Post-translational modifications

    • Protein interactions

    • Subcellular localization

    • Splice variants

  • Protocol optimization: Systematically vary experimental conditions (fixation methods, antigen retrieval, blocking reagents) to determine if technical factors contribute to discrepancies

  • Independent technique confirmation: Validate findings using orthogonal methods such as RNA analysis, mass spectrometry, or CRISPR-based tagging .

What statistical approaches are recommended for analyzing DTX antibody binding data?

When analyzing DTX antibody binding data, researchers should employ these statistical approaches:

  • Affinity measurements:

    • Calculate equilibrium dissociation constants (KD) using appropriate binding models

    • Employ Scatchard analysis for linear relationships

    • Use non-linear regression for complex binding relationships

  • Comparative analysis:

    • ANOVA with post-hoc tests for comparing multiple antibodies or conditions

    • t-tests with appropriate corrections for pairwise comparisons

    • Non-parametric alternatives when normality assumptions are violated

  • Reproducibility assessment:

    • Calculate coefficient of variation (CV) across replicates (aim for <15%)

    • Implement Bland-Altman plots for method comparison

    • Use intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability testing

  • Epitope binning analysis:

    • Apply clustering algorithms to group antibodies by epitope recognition patterns

    • Employ competition matrices with appropriate normalization

  • Batch effects correction:

    • Implement mixed-effects models to account for experimental variability

    • Use appropriate normalization methods for cross-experiment comparisons .

How should researchers interpret changes in DTX protein detection in complex disease models?

Interpreting changes in DTX protein detection in complex disease models requires careful consideration of multiple factors:

  • Establish baseline expression patterns: Thoroughly characterize DTX protein expression in normal tissues using multiple detection methods before interpreting disease-related changes

  • Consider microenvironmental influences: Evaluate how disease-specific factors (inflammation, pH changes, hypoxia) might affect antibody binding or DTX protein expression

  • Discriminate between mechanisms: Differentiate between:

    • Altered protein expression levels

    • Post-translational modifications affecting epitope recognition

    • Changed subcellular localization

    • Protein-protein interactions masking epitopes

  • Use appropriate controls:

    • Include tissues from multiple stages of disease progression

    • Employ genetic models with controlled DTX expression

    • Implement tissue-matched controls with similar processing

  • Validate with functional assays: Correlate observed changes in DTX detection with functional outcomes in Notch signaling pathways to establish biological relevance
    This comprehensive approach ensures accurate interpretation of complex data patterns when using DTX antibodies in disease research contexts .

What emerging technologies are enhancing the development of next-generation DTX antibodies?

Emerging technologies revolutionizing DTX antibody development include:

  • Single B-cell sequencing: Enables rapid isolation of naturally occurring antibody sequences from immunized animals or humans, accelerating discovery of DTX-targeting antibodies

  • CRISPR-based epitope tagging: Allows precise validation of antibody specificity by modifying endogenous DTX proteins

  • AI-driven antibody design: Machine learning algorithms predict optimal antibody sequences for specific DTX epitopes, reducing development timelines

  • Synthetic antibody libraries: Rationally designed libraries encompass greater diversity than natural repertoires, enhancing discovery of antibodies with unique binding properties

  • Cell-free display systems: Novel display platforms overcome limitations of traditional phage display for selecting DTX-specific antibodies
    These technological advances promise to yield DTX antibodies with enhanced specificity, affinity, and functionality for research applications .

How might DTX antibodies contribute to understanding cross-talk between ubiquitination and other post-translational modifications?

DTX antibodies offer unique opportunities to investigate cross-talk between ubiquitination and other post-translational modifications (PTMs):

  • PTM-specific DTX antibodies: Development of antibodies recognizing specific DTX PTM states (phosphorylation, SUMOylation, etc.) enables investigation of how these modifications regulate ubiquitin ligase activity

  • Proximity-based studies: DTX antibodies can be used in proximity ligation assays to visualize interactions between DTX proteins and substrates under different cellular conditions

  • Temporal dynamics analysis: Using DTX antibodies in time-course experiments can reveal sequences of PTM events regulating ubiquitination pathways

  • Context-dependent substrate recognition: Antibodies recognizing DTX-substrate complexes can help elucidate how PTMs influence substrate selection and specificity

  • Structural studies: DTX antibody fragments can facilitate crystallization of DTX proteins in different modification states, providing structural insights into PTM-dependent regulation
    These approaches collectively advance understanding of how PTM networks orchestrate ubiquitin-dependent signaling pathways in health and disease .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.