A DUX4 antibody is a recombinant monoclonal antibody designed to detect the human DUX4 protein, a transcription factor implicated in FSHD. DUX4 is encoded by a gene within the D4Z4 repeat array on chromosome 4q35 and is expressed in skeletal muscle, where its dysregulation triggers progressive muscle degeneration . These antibodies are engineered to bind specific epitopes of the DUX4 protein, enabling its detection via methods such as Western blot, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and Simple Western™ .
Specificity: Targets the N-terminus or C-terminus of DUX4, distinguishing it from homologs like DUX4c .
Applications: Used in FSHD research to study DUX4 expression, toxicity, and subcellular localization .
Formats: Available as rabbit or mouse monoclonal IgG (e.g., Clone #2142A for rabbit, P4H2 for mouse) .
DUX4 antibodies have been validated in multiple experimental models, including transfected cell lines and primary human muscle cells.
Toxicity: Full-length DUX4 induces apoptosis in human myoblasts, while shorter splice variants (e.g., lacking C-terminal domains) show reduced toxicity .
Localization: DUX4 localizes to nuclei, consistent with its role as a transcription factor .
DUX4 antibodies are designed to avoid cross-reactivity with closely related proteins like DUX4c, which shares >66% sequence identity with DUX4 .
| Antibody Clone | Target Region | Species | Cross-Reactivity | Applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2142A (MAB9535) | C-terminus | Rabbit | None reported | WB, IHC, Simple Western |
| P4H2 (MA5-16147) | C-terminus | Mouse | None | WB, IF |
| E14-3 | N-terminus | Rabbit | None | WB, IF |
C-Terminal Antibodies (e.g., 2142A, P4H2): Detect full-length DUX4 but not shorter splice variants lacking the C-terminal domain .
N-Terminal Antibodies (e.g., E14-3): Recognize both full-length and truncated DUX4 isoforms .
DUX4 antibodies are pivotal for studying FSHD pathogenesis and testing therapeutic interventions.
DUX4 Expression: In FSHD, epigenetic suppression of DUX4 is incomplete, leading to aberrant protein expression in skeletal muscle. Antibodies enable quantification of DUX4 levels in muscle biopsies or cell models .
Toxicity Mechanisms: DUX4 overexpression triggers oxidative stress, DNA damage, and apoptosis in muscle cells, as shown through co-staining with markers of cell death (e.g., caspase-3) .
KEGG: ath:AT2G46840
UniGene: At.36448
DUX4 (Double Homeobox 4) is a transcription factor encoded by the DUX4 gene in humans. It has gained significant research attention as a candidate disease gene for facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD), one of the most common muscular dystrophies characterized by progressive skeletal muscle degeneration . More recently, DUX4 expression has been identified as a common feature in metastatic tumors, with approximately 10-50% of advanced bladder, breast, kidney, prostate, and skin cancers showing DUX4 expression, suggesting its role in immune evasion and immunotherapy failure in cancer . The protein has a reported molecular mass of 44.9 kilodaltons .
Researchers have developed multiple monoclonal antibodies targeting different regions of the DUX4 protein. Specifically, five monoclonal antibodies have been created that target the N- and C-termini of human DUX4 . Commercial suppliers currently offer at least 266 DUX4 antibodies across 23 different suppliers . These include mouse monoclonal antibodies like the P4H2 clone that specifically targets the C-terminus of human DUX4 (corresponding to Swiss-Prot: Q9UBX2) . Both conjugated and unconjugated forms are available depending on the intended application.
DUX4 antibodies have been validated for multiple experimental techniques including:
Western Blot (recommended concentration: 0.5-2.0 μg/ml)
Simple Western (dilution 1:10)
ELISA
Immunohistochemistry (dilution 1:100-1:200)
Immunocytochemistry/Immunofluorescence (dilution 1:100-1:200)
Immunohistochemistry-Paraffin (dilution 1:100-1:200)
Immunohistochemistry-Frozen (dilution 1:100-1:200)
Immunofluorescence analysis demonstrates strong nuclear staining in cells expressing DUX4, consistent with its function as a transcription factor that binds to DNA sequences via its homeodomains to regulate target gene expression .
For short-term storage, DUX4 antibodies should be kept at 4°C. For long-term storage, it is recommended to aliquot the antibody and store at -20°C to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles that can degrade antibody performance . Most commercial DUX4 antibodies are supplied in PBS buffer, and proper handling includes minimizing exposure to light and avoiding contamination. When working with these antibodies, researchers should follow supplier-specific instructions regarding reconstitution if provided in lyophilized form.
When validating the specificity of DUX4 antibodies, researchers should include:
Positive controls: Cells transfected with DUX4 expression constructs
Negative controls: Non-transfected neighboring cells that do not express DUX4
Secondary antibody-only controls: To assess background staining
Loading controls: For Western blot applications, such as anti-α-tubulin antibody
Multiple antibody validation: Using different antibodies targeting distinct epitopes of DUX4 for confirmation
Published studies have demonstrated that proper validation includes confirming nuclear localization in a punctate, granular pattern when using immunofluorescence techniques .
For optimal immunofluorescence detection of DUX4:
Fix cells using appropriate fixative (paraformaldehyde is commonly used)
Permeabilize cells to allow antibody access to nuclear DUX4
Block with suitable blocking buffer to reduce non-specific binding
Incubate with primary DUX4 antibody at recommended dilution (typically 1:100-1:200)
Wash thoroughly to remove unbound primary antibody
Incubate with fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody
Counterstain nuclei with DAPI or similar nuclear stain
Mount and visualize using fluorescence microscopy
Research has shown that cells expressing DUX4 display distinct nuclear staining not seen in neighboring cells that do not express DUX4. A punctate, granular pattern may indicate chromatin condensation and possible pre-apoptotic state .
For studying FSHD pathogenesis using DUX4 antibodies, researchers should consider:
Detecting native DUX4 expression in muscle biopsies from FSHD patients versus controls
Analyzing the temporal dynamics of DUX4 expression in differentiated muscle cells
Investigating alternatively spliced DUX4 isoforms using antibodies targeting different regions
Performing co-immunoprecipitation experiments to identify DUX4 protein interaction partners
Utilizing chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to identify DUX4 binding sites on genomic DNA
Research has demonstrated that alternatively spliced transcripts from DUX4 exist in both FSHD and wild-type muscle cells, including the canonical full-length DUX4 and shorter splice forms that remove more than two-thirds of the coding region . Multiple antibody labeling experiments and combination methods such as immunoprecipitation followed by Western blot can be performed with anti-DUX4 antibodies produced from different species .
Detecting low levels of endogenous DUX4 expression presents significant challenges that can be addressed through:
Using highly sensitive detection methods such as immunoprecipitation followed by Western blot
Employing signal amplification techniques like tyramide signal amplification for immunohistochemistry
Utilizing more sensitive secondary detection systems (e.g., polymeric detection systems)
Optimizing antibody concentration through careful titration experiments
Considering cell fractionation to concentrate nuclear proteins before detection
Using multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes to confirm weak signals
Full-length DUX4 expression has been associated with cellular toxicity, making detection challenging in living cell systems. Additionally, the expression of different DUX4 isoforms may require isoform-specific antibodies for accurate detection .
Recent findings demonstrating DUX4 expression in metastatic tumors suggest several applications for DUX4 antibodies in cancer research:
Screening tissue microarrays from various cancer types to quantify DUX4 expression prevalence
Correlating DUX4 expression with immune cell infiltration markers
Exploring the relationship between DUX4 expression and immunotherapy response
Investigating DUX4 as a potential biomarker for cancer progression and treatment resistance
Studying the mechanisms by which DUX4 may contribute to immune evasion in cancer
Research has shown that DUX4 expression is a common feature of metastatic tumors, with approximately 10-50% of advanced bladder, breast, kidney, prostate, and skin cancers expressing DUX4. This expression has been associated with features of immune evasion and may impact clinical outcomes in patients with advanced urothelial cancer .
Common challenges and their solutions include:
| Challenge | Possible Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| High background | Non-specific binding | Optimize blocking conditions, increase blocking time, use more stringent washing steps |
| Weak or no signal | Low antibody concentration or protein expression | Increase antibody concentration, use signal amplification methods, extend primary antibody incubation time |
| Non-specific bands on Western blot | Cross-reactivity | Use more specific antibody clones, optimize antibody dilution, include proper controls |
| Variable results between experiments | Antibody degradation | Aliquot antibodies to avoid freeze-thaw cycles, follow storage recommendations |
| Inconsistent staining patterns | Fixation or permeabilization issues | Optimize fixation protocol, adjust permeabilization conditions |
The selection of appropriate antibodies significantly impacts experimental outcomes in DUX4 research:
Multiple antibody targets may generate a huge computational cost for algorithms searching for the best model for the data
For more than 5 antibody targets, brute-force approaches become computationally infeasible
Data analysis strategies typically involve an antibody or feature selection stage followed by a predictive stage
Parametric strategies can be employed for antibody selection, combining transformed and dichotomized antibody data
Simpler strategies include initially dichotomizing antibody data using optimal cut-off points based on maximizing chi-square test statistics
The positive correlation among different antibodies (average Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.312) should be considered when interpreting results from multiple antibodies
When choosing between monoclonal and polyclonal DUX4 antibodies:
Emerging antibody technologies poised to advance DUX4 research include:
Single-domain antibodies (nanobodies) for enhanced tissue penetration and epitope accessibility
Recombinant antibody fragments with improved specificity
Proximity ligation assays for detecting protein-protein interactions involving DUX4
Mass cytometry (CyTOF) using metal-conjugated antibodies for single-cell analysis
Super-resolution microscopy compatible antibody conjugates for detailed spatial localization studies
Multiplexed antibody-based imaging to simultaneously detect DUX4 and downstream targets
These technologies could significantly enhance sensitivity and specificity for detecting low levels of endogenous DUX4 expression, which remains a significant challenge in FSHD research.
Several key knowledge gaps could be addressed with improved DUX4 antibodies:
The spatial and temporal expression patterns of DUX4 during normal development
The prevalence and function of DUX4 isoforms in healthy tissues
The mechanisms by which DUX4 contributes to immune evasion in cancers
The post-translational modifications of DUX4 and their functional significance
The protein interaction network of DUX4 in different cellular contexts
The relationship between DUX4 expression levels and disease severity in FSHD Improved antibodies with higher sensitivity and specificity would enable more detailed investigations into these aspects of DUX4 biology and pathology.