DUSP5 antibodies are immunoreagents designed to detect and quantify DUSP5, a phosphatase that dephosphorylates both phosphothreonine and phosphotyrosine residues. DUSP5 primarily regulates ERK1/2 signaling and modulates NF-κB activity, impacting inflammation and oncogenesis . These antibodies are widely used in techniques such as Western blot (WB), immunoprecipitation (IP), immunofluorescence (IF), and ELISA .
ERK/NF-κB Regulation: DUSP5 suppresses ERK1/2 via phosphatase activity and inhibits NF-κB by disrupting TAK1-IKK interactions .
Tumor Suppression: In colorectal cancer, DUSP5 loss correlates with advanced TNM stages and metastasis .
Immune Modulation: Dusp5−/− mice exhibit increased eosinophil survival and reduced helminth burden .
Sample Preparation: Nuclear extraction is critical for detecting DUSP5 due to its nuclear localization .
Validation: Knockout controls (e.g., Dusp5−/− cells) confirm antibody specificity .
Cross-Reactivity: Proteintech’s 18281-1-AP shows reactivity across human, mouse, and rat samples, while others are human-specific .
DUSP5 (dual specificity phosphatase 5) is a nuclear, inducible phosphatase with high affinity and fidelity specifically for ERK1/2. It functions as a critical regulator of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, which controls numerous cellular processes including differentiation, apoptosis, and survival. By dephosphorylating ERK1/2, DUSP5 exerts strong regulatory control over this central cellular pathway, ultimately influencing gene expression and cellular responses to various stimuli .
The human version of DUSP5 has a canonical amino acid length of 384 residues and a protein mass of 42 kilodaltons, and is exclusively localized in the nucleus of cells . DUSP5 is also known by several alternative names including DUSP, HVH3 (VH1-like phosphatase 3), and dual specificity protein phosphatase 5 . This protein plays particularly important roles in immune function, especially in T cell survival and differentiation following infection or immune challenge .
DUSP5 antibodies are available from numerous suppliers in various formats to meet different experimental needs. These antibodies are typically characterized by:
Antibody type: Both monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies are available. Monoclonal antibodies (like the Mouse Anti-DUSP5 Recombinant Antibody clone 44G5) offer high specificity for particular epitopes, while polyclonal antibodies recognize multiple epitopes of DUSP5 .
Species reactivity: While many antibodies target human DUSP5, some offer cross-reactivity with orthologs from other species including mouse, rat, rabbit, bovine, dog, guinea pig, horse, and zebrafish. Some antibodies demonstrate reactivity to multiple species, particularly useful for comparative studies .
Applications: DUSP5 antibodies are validated for various laboratory techniques including Western Blot (WB), ELISA, Immunofluorescence (IF), Immunoprecipitation (IP), and Immunohistochemistry (IHC) .
Conjugation status: Most DUSP5 antibodies are available as unconjugated primary antibodies, though some may be available with specific tags or conjugates for specialized applications .
DUSP5 expression exhibits distinct patterns across different cell types within the immune system and other tissues. DUSP5 is strongly induced in T cells following stress and interleukin signaling, suggesting its critical role in T cell function and survival . Beyond T cells, DUSP5 is induced or highly expressed in several other immune cell populations including B cells, eosinophils, dendritic cells, macrophages, and mast cells .
In neurological contexts, DUSP5 has been reported to regulate hippocampal dentate gyrus plasticity and has been associated with late-onset Alzheimer's disease, indicating its importance in neuronal function and potentially neuroprotection . Additionally, DUSP5 expression and function have been linked to vascular smooth muscle cells, where it influences myogenic reactivity and autoregulation of blood flow in both cerebral and renal circulations .
The expression pattern of DUSP5 can vary significantly under different physiological and pathological conditions, making antibodies against this protein particularly valuable for studying its regulation and role in disease contexts.
For optimal Western blot detection of DUSP5, researchers should follow these methodological guidelines based on published protocols:
Sample preparation: DUSP5 is difficult to detect in unstimulated tissues, so optimal detection requires stimulation with appropriate factors. Studies have shown that IL-2 is the strongest inducer of DUSP5 expression, making high IL-2 conditions ideal for maximizing DUSP5 detection .
Protein extraction and loading: Use Radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer for whole cell lysate preparation. Load approximately 25μg of protein per lane on a 4–20% gradient SDS-PAGE gel for optimal resolution of the 42 kDa DUSP5 protein .
Transfer and blocking conditions: After transferring proteins to PVDF membranes, block in 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in Tween-20 tris-buffered saline (TBST, containing 0.1% Tween-20 in TBS) for 1 hour at room temperature .
Primary antibody incubation: Use DUSP5 antibody at a 1:1000 dilution (for antibodies similar to Abcam's AB200708) and incubate overnight at 4°C for optimal binding and minimal background .
Loading control: Include a β-actin antibody (typically at 1:10,000 dilution) as a loading control, incubating for 1 hour at room temperature .
Confirmation of specificity: Always validate antibody specificity using appropriate positive controls (e.g., cells overexpressing DUSP5) and negative controls (e.g., samples from DUSP5 knockout models) to ensure the detected band is genuine DUSP5 protein.
Optimizing immunohistochemistry (IHC) for DUSP5 detection requires careful attention to several key factors:
Several experimental approaches utilizing DUSP5 antibodies can provide valuable insights into DUSP5 function:
Immunoprecipitation (IP) for protein interaction studies: DUSP5 antibodies can be used to pull down DUSP5 and its binding partners to identify novel interactions within the MAPK signaling pathway or other cellular pathways .
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP): Since DUSP5 is a nuclear protein, antibodies can be employed in ChIP experiments to investigate if DUSP5 associates with chromatin, potentially identifying genomic regions influenced by DUSP5 activity.
Proximity ligation assay (PLA): DUSP5 antibodies can be combined with antibodies against potential interaction partners (e.g., ERK1/2) in PLA experiments to visualize and quantify protein-protein interactions in situ.
Immunofluorescence co-localization studies: DUSP5 antibodies can be used in combination with antibodies against other proteins to study subcellular localization and potential co-localization with substrates or regulators.
Flow cytometry: For immune cell populations, DUSP5 antibodies can be used in intracellular staining protocols for flow cytometry to quantify DUSP5 expression in different cell subsets following various stimuli.
Phospho-ERK quantification: Since DUSP5 specifically dephosphorylates ERK1/2, antibodies against DUSP5 can be used alongside phospho-ERK antibodies to correlate DUSP5 expression levels with its functional impact on ERK phosphorylation status.
Non-specific binding is a common challenge when working with antibodies, including those targeting DUSP5. To address this issue, researchers should implement the following strategies:
Antibody validation: Confirm antibody specificity using positive controls (cells/tissues known to express DUSP5) and negative controls (DUSP5 knockout samples). This validation is crucial since DUSP5 belongs to the DUSP family, which includes multiple members with similar structures .
Blocking optimization: For Western blotting, 5% BSA in TBST has been reported to be effective for DUSP5 antibodies . Test different blocking agents (BSA, non-fat dry milk, commercial blocking buffers) to identify which minimizes background without compromising specific signal.
Antibody dilution: Titrate antibody concentrations to find the optimal dilution that maximizes specific signal while minimizing background. Starting with the manufacturer's recommendation, test both higher and lower concentrations.
Pre-adsorption: For polyclonal antibodies, consider pre-adsorption with related proteins (other DUSP family members) to remove antibodies that might cross-react.
Washing protocol optimization: Increase the number or duration of wash steps to remove unbound or weakly bound antibodies, particularly when performing IHC or immunofluorescence.
Alternative detection systems: If background persists with chromogenic detection in IHC, consider fluorescence-based detection systems which may offer better signal-to-noise ratios for some applications.
Proper validation of DUSP5 antibody specificity requires a comprehensive set of controls:
Knockout/knockdown controls: Samples from DUSP5 knockout mice or cells with DUSP5 knockdown serve as the gold standard negative controls. Research has utilized tissues from Dusp5−/− mice to confirm antibody specificity in Western blots .
Overexpression controls: Cells transfected with DUSP5 expression vectors provide positive controls with high expression levels to confirm antibody binding.
Stimulated vs. unstimulated samples: Since DUSP5 is inducible, particularly in immune cells, comparing stimulated (e.g., with IL-2) and unstimulated samples can verify antibody detection of upregulated protein .
Related protein controls: Testing the antibody against other DUSP family members (especially DUSP6/MKP-3, which also targets ERK) can confirm specificity within the protein family.
Species-specific controls: For antibodies claiming cross-reactivity between species, validation in each species is necessary using appropriate positive and negative controls.
Blocking peptide controls: For antigen-specific validation, pre-incubation of the antibody with the immunizing peptide should abolish specific staining in subsequent applications.
When selecting among different DUSP5 antibody clones, researchers should evaluate:
Epitope location: Antibodies targeting different regions of DUSP5 may perform differently depending on the application. Consider whether the epitope is in the catalytic domain, the kinase interaction motif (KIM), or other regions, as this affects functional studies and may influence accessibility in certain applications .
Validation data quality: Examine the validation data provided by manufacturers, looking for clear evidence of specificity such as single bands in Western blots at the expected molecular weight (42 kDa), appropriate subcellular localization (nuclear), and proper controls.
Application-specific performance: An antibody that works well for Western blotting may not be optimal for IHC or IP. Review validation data for your specific application of interest .
Clone type: Monoclonal antibodies (like the Mouse Anti-DUSP5 Recombinant Antibody clone 44G5) offer consistent lot-to-lot reproducibility but recognize single epitopes, while polyclonal antibodies may provide signal amplification by recognizing multiple epitopes but with potential batch variation .
Citation record: Antibodies with established publication records in your application of interest provide greater confidence in their performance and specificity.
Cross-reactivity profile: For studies involving multiple species, consider antibodies with validated cross-reactivity to your species of interest, particularly those with broad reactivity profiles (e.g., human, mouse, rat, etc.) .
DUSP5 antibodies offer powerful tools for investigating T cell survival mechanisms, as DUSP5 has been identified as a critical regulator in this process:
Correlation of DUSP5 expression with T cell survival: DUSP5 antibodies can be used in flow cytometry or immunofluorescence to quantify DUSP5 expression in different T cell subsets (naive, effector, memory) and correlate expression levels with survival rates under various stimulation conditions .
Mechanistic studies of DUSP5 in apoptosis regulation: Research has shown that DUSP5 knockout T cells display increased apoptosis, suggesting a pro-survival role. Antibodies can be used to study DUSP5 expression in relation to apoptotic markers (Annexin V, cleaved caspase-3) to elucidate this relationship .
DUSP5-ERK interaction dynamics: Co-immunoprecipitation using DUSP5 antibodies can reveal how DUSP5 interacts with ERK1/2 in T cells under different activation states, providing insights into the molecular regulation of survival signaling.
Metabolic regulation by DUSP5: DUSP5 knockout T cells show altered metabolic profiles that may influence survival. DUSP5 antibodies can be combined with metabolic profiling to correlate DUSP5 expression with metabolic state changes during T cell activation and differentiation .
Single-cell analysis: DUSP5 antibodies can be employed in single-cell technologies to examine heterogeneity in DUSP5 expression within T cell populations and correlate this with survival outcomes.
In vivo tracking: Using DUSP5 antibodies in adoptive transfer experiments can help track DUSP5 expression in T cells responding to infection, linking expression levels to cell fate decisions between short-lived effector cells (SLECs) and memory precursor effector cells (MPECs) .
Investigating DUSP5's role in disease models requires strategic application of DUSP5 antibodies:
Neurodegenerative disease models: Since DUSP5 has been associated with late-onset Alzheimer's disease and hippocampal plasticity, antibodies can be used to examine DUSP5 expression in brain regions affected by neurodegenerative processes and correlate with disease progression markers .
Vascular disease investigation: Research indicates DUSP5 knockout enhances cerebral and renal hemodynamics. DUSP5 antibodies can be used to study expression in vascular smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells in hypertension and stroke models, correlating with functional vascular parameters .
Cancer progression studies: DUSP5 antibodies can be employed in tumor tissue microarrays to assess expression patterns across different cancer types and stages, correlating with patient outcomes to determine prognostic value.
Immune-mediated disease models: In models of inflammatory or autoimmune conditions, DUSP5 antibodies can track expression in relevant immune cell populations to understand how DUSP5 regulation influences disease pathogenesis.
Therapeutic response monitoring: DUSP5 antibodies can monitor changes in DUSP5 expression following treatment with various therapeutics, potentially identifying it as a biomarker for treatment response.
Phospho-ERK/DUSP5 balance assessment: Dual staining with DUSP5 and phospho-ERK antibodies in disease tissues can reveal dysregulation of this signaling axis, providing mechanistic insights into disease processes .
To investigate DUSP5's specific role in MAPK signaling regulation, researchers can design comprehensive experimental approaches using antibodies:
Temporal dynamics analysis: Use DUSP5 antibodies alongside phospho-ERK1/2 antibodies in time-course experiments following cellular stimulation to track the temporal relationship between DUSP5 induction and ERK dephosphorylation.
Subcellular localization studies: Since DUSP5 is nuclear-localized, use immunofluorescence with DUSP5 antibodies to track nuclear translocation of phospho-ERK following stimulation, comparing wild-type cells with DUSP5 knockdown/knockout cells .
Substrate specificity investigation: Although DUSP5 primarily targets ERK1/2, use co-immunoprecipitation with DUSP5 antibodies followed by mass spectrometry to identify other potential substrates or interaction partners within the MAPK cascade.
Phosphatase activity correlation: Combine DUSP5 immunoprecipitation using specific antibodies with in vitro phosphatase assays to directly correlate DUSP5 protein levels with enzymatic activity under different cellular conditions.
Feedback regulation analysis: Use DUSP5 antibodies in systems where MAPK pathway feedback regulation is disturbed (e.g., RAF inhibitor treatment) to understand how DUSP5 contributes to pathway reactivation mechanisms.
Cross-talk with other signaling pathways: Research indicates DUSP5 knockout amplifies myogenic reactivity with elevated levels of pERK1/2 and pPKC. Use DUSP5 antibodies alongside antibodies for components of other signaling pathways (PKC, PI3K/AKT) to investigate potential cross-talk mechanisms .
Discrepancies in DUSP5 detection between different antibodies are not uncommon and require systematic evaluation:
Epitope accessibility differences: Antibodies targeting different regions of DUSP5 may show discrepant results due to epitope masking in certain applications or experimental conditions. Map the epitope locations of different antibodies and consider how protein conformation, post-translational modifications, or protein-protein interactions might affect accessibility.
Isoform specificity: Check if the discrepant antibodies target different isoforms or splice variants of DUSP5. Some antibodies may detect all isoforms while others might be isoform-specific.
Antibody format influence: Monoclonal antibodies (like Mouse Anti-DUSP5 clone 44G5) detect single epitopes with high specificity but may fail if that epitope is modified or masked. Polyclonal antibodies detect multiple epitopes, potentially providing more robust detection but with increased risk of cross-reactivity .
Application-specific performance: An antibody performing well in Western blot may show poor results in IHC due to differences in protein conformation in fixed tissues versus denatured proteins. Validate each antibody in your specific application.
Control-based validation: When facing discrepancies, prioritize results from antibodies validated with the most rigorous controls, particularly those tested in DUSP5 knockout models .
Confirmation strategy: For critical findings, use multiple antibodies targeting different DUSP5 epitopes and complementary techniques (e.g., mass spectrometry) to confirm results.
To validate functional observations in DUSP5 studies, researchers should employ multiple complementary approaches:
Genetic models with antibody validation: Utilize DUSP5 knockout models alongside antibody-based detection to confirm complete protein absence, as demonstrated in studies examining T cell populations and vascular function .
Rescue experiments: After observing phenotypes in DUSP5 knockout/knockdown systems, perform rescue experiments by reintroducing wild-type DUSP5 or catalytically inactive mutants, then use antibodies to confirm expression and localization.
Substrate phosphorylation assessment: Since DUSP5 specifically dephosphorylates ERK1/2, confirm functional effects by measuring phospho-ERK levels using phospho-specific antibodies, as observed in studies showing elevated pERK1/2 in DUSP5 knockout models .
Pharmacological validation: Complement genetic approaches with small molecule inhibitors of the MAPK pathway (e.g., ERK inhibitors) to confirm the pathway specificity of observed phenotypes, as demonstrated in vascular studies .
Cell-specific conditional models: For complex in vivo phenotypes, use conditional DUSP5 knockout models restricted to specific cell types (e.g., T cell-specific knockout) and validate with antibodies to ensure cell type-specific deletion, as shown in bone marrow chimera models .
Dose-response relationships: In overexpression or knockdown studies, establish dose-response relationships between DUSP5 levels (quantified using calibrated antibody-based methods) and functional outcomes to strengthen causality claims.
For robust quantification of DUSP5 expression in comparative studies, researchers should follow these best practices:
Standardized sample processing: Ensure all samples undergo identical processing protocols, as DUSP5 is inducible and sensitive to stimulation conditions. Studies have shown IL-2 is the strongest inducer of DUSP5 expression, so standardize stimulation protocols when applicable .
Loading control selection: For Western blot quantification, select appropriate loading controls. β-actin at 1:10,000 dilution has been successfully used for DUSP5 normalization . For nuclear proteins like DUSP5, consider nuclear-specific loading controls (e.g., Lamin B1) for more accurate normalization.
Calibration standards: Include a concentration gradient of recombinant DUSP5 protein as a calibration standard to enable absolute quantification rather than just relative comparisons.
Digital image analysis: Use validated image analysis software with appropriate background subtraction and region-of-interest selection for quantifying immunofluorescence or IHC staining, ensuring analysis parameters remain consistent across all samples.
Multiple detection methods: When possible, quantify DUSP5 using complementary methods (e.g., Western blot, qPCR for mRNA, and immunofluorescence) to ensure concordance of results.
Statistical rigor: Apply appropriate statistical analyses for comparing DUSP5 expression across experimental groups, including tests for normal distribution and selection of parametric or non-parametric methods accordingly.