The AT1G66250 antibody is a rabbit polyclonal antibody targeting the O-Glycosyl hydrolases family 17 protein encoded by the AT1G66250 gene in Arabidopsis thaliana. Key characteristics include:
AT1G66250 is implicated in germline β−1,3-glucan (BG) deposition, a critical process for female gametophyte development. Research highlights:
Expression: Enriched in the nucleus (NUC) and stalk (STK) regions during ovule development .
Function: Required for plasmodesmata (PD) localization, facilitating cell-to-cell communication in reproductive tissues .
Genetic Interaction: Co-expressed with glucan synthase-like (GSL) genes (GSL1, GSL5, GSL10) in PD-associated processes .
Cross-Reactivity:
| Species | Homology (%) |
|---|---|
| Brassica napus | 100 |
| Brassica rapa | 100 |
| Populus trichocarpa | 80–99 |
| Cucumis sativus | 80–99 |
AT1G66250 is a gene encoding Glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase 2, an enzyme that belongs to the beta-glucosidase (BG) family in plants. This protein is particularly significant because it has been confirmed to be located in plasmodesmata (PD), the intercellular channels that allow communication between plant cells . Unlike some other beta-glucosidases that show elevated expression in megaspore mother cells (MMC), AT1G66250 demonstrates specific expression in the nucellus and other somatic tissues surrounding reproductive structures . This expression pattern makes it an important marker for understanding cell-specific functions and symplastic connectivity in plant reproduction and development.
The AT1G66250 antibody has confirmed reactivity with several plant species, primarily Arabidopsis thaliana (Mouse-ear cress). Additional cross-reactivity has been documented with Brassica napus, Brassica rapa, Populus trichocarpa, Cucumis sativus, Spinacia oleracea, and Solanum tuberosum . This broad cross-reactivity among diverse plant species makes the antibody valuable for comparative studies across different plant families, particularly for researchers investigating conserved functions of beta-glucosidases in various plant developmental contexts.
For optimal performance and longevity, the AT1G66250 antibody should be stored at -20°C or -80°C immediately upon receipt . The antibody is typically supplied in a storage buffer containing 50% glycerol, 0.01M PBS at pH 7.4, with 0.03% Proclin 300 as a preservative . It's important to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as this can degrade antibody quality and affect binding efficiency . For ongoing experiments, small aliquots can be prepared to minimize freeze-thaw cycles. When using the lyophilized form, reconstitute according to manufacturer instructions and store working solutions at 4°C for short-term use (up to one week).
The AT1G66250 antibody has been validated for several standard immunological techniques, with ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay) and Western blot (WB) being the primary confirmed applications . These techniques allow researchers to detect and quantify the presence of AT1G66250 protein in plant tissue extracts. The antibody is supplied as a liquid in non-conjugated form, making it versatile for various detection methods when paired with appropriate secondary antibodies or detection systems. For optimal results in Western blotting, researchers should consider sample preparation methods that effectively solubilize membrane-associated proteins, as AT1G66250 is associated with plasmodesmata membranes.
Recent research has revealed that AT1G66250 is specifically expressed in nucellus cells and is confirmed to be located in plasmodesmata (PD) . This localization makes the antibody a valuable tool for studying plasmodesmatal regulation during reproductive development. To investigate PD function using this antibody, researchers can:
Perform co-immunolocalization studies with other PD markers to examine the spatial organization of different PD components
Combine with callose staining (using aniline blue) to correlate beta-glucosidase presence with callose deposits
Use in comparative studies between wild-type and reproductive mutants to assess changes in PD composition
Implement in developmental time-course experiments to track changes in PD composition during megasporogenesis
These approaches can help elucidate how symplastic connectivity is regulated during female germline specification, which recent studies indicate involves beta-1,3-glucan deposits .
Transcriptomic analysis of Arabidopsis ovule cells has revealed interesting expression patterns of beta-glucosidases (BGs) and glucan synthase-like (GSL) genes. While six out of nine expressed GSLs (including GSL1, GSL5, GSL8, and GSL10) showed abundant expression in megaspore mother cells (MMCs), AT1G66250 and most other detected BGs showed specific expression in nucellus and surrounding somatic tissues rather than in MMCs . This differential expression suggests a tissue-specific division of labor, where different cell types utilize specific BGs and GSLs to regulate callose deposition and degradation.
The following table summarizes the contrasting expression patterns observed in reproductive tissues:
| Gene Family | Predominantly in MMC | Predominantly in Nucellus/Somatic Cells |
|---|---|---|
| GSL (Callose Synthases) | GSL1, GSL5, GSL8, GSL10 | GSL3, GSL6 |
| BG (Beta-Glucosidases) | 3 out of 13 detected | AT1G66250, AT3G13560, AT2G01630, AT4G29360, AT3G55430, AT3G07320 |
This expression pattern suggests that AT1G66250 may play specialized roles in maintaining the integrity of plasmodesmata in somatic tissues surrounding reproductive cells, potentially regulating symplastic isolation during germline development .
AT1G66250 is confirmed to be located in plasmodesmata and is specifically expressed in nucellus cells surrounding the megaspore mother cell (MMC) . As a beta-1,3-glucosidase, it likely functions in the degradation of callose (beta-1,3-glucan), which is known to regulate the permeability of plasmodesmata. The targeted localization of AT1G66250 suggests a role in fine-tuning symplastic connectivity between somatic cells, while potentially maintaining symplastic isolation of the germline.
Recent research indicates that proper regulation of symplastic connectivity is essential for female reproductive development, with beta-1,3-glucan deposits playing a critical role . The specific expression of AT1G66250 in nucellus cells, rather than in the MMC itself, suggests it may be involved in:
Maintaining appropriate callose levels at PD in somatic tissues
Creating symplastic domains during ovule development
Facilitating selective molecular trafficking between nucellus cells
Potentially preventing unregulated movement of molecules into the developing germline
These functions make AT1G66250 antibody a valuable tool for studying the molecular mechanisms of cell-to-cell communication during plant reproduction.
When designing experiments to detect AT1G66250 in plant tissues, researchers should consider the following protocol recommendations:
Tissue fixation: Use 4% paraformaldehyde for immunolocalization studies to preserve protein structure while maintaining cellular architecture.
Protein extraction for Western blotting:
Grind tissue in liquid nitrogen
Extract with buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, and protease inhibitors
Include membrane solubilization steps (as AT1G66250 is associated with plasmodesmata)
Centrifuge at 12,000 × g for 15 minutes at 4°C
Collect supernatant and quantify protein concentration
Dilution ratios: For Western blotting, start with 1:500 to 1:1000 dilution of the antibody. For ELISA applications, initial testing at 1:1000 to 1:2000 is recommended .
Controls: Always include appropriate controls:
Positive control: Arabidopsis thaliana wild-type tissues with known expression
Negative control: Either knockout/knockdown lines for AT1G66250 or tissues where the protein is not expressed
Secondary antibody-only control to assess non-specific binding
Detection systems: For Western blotting, HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies with enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) provide sensitive detection. For immunofluorescence microscopy, fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies compatible with existing filter sets are recommended.
Recent advances in cell-specific transcriptomics have enabled detailed analysis of gene expression in distinct cell types within the Arabidopsis ovule . To incorporate AT1G66250 antibody into such studies, researchers can:
Use for validation of transcriptomic findings: When RNA-seq data indicates differential expression of AT1G66250, the antibody can confirm protein-level changes through immunolocalization or Western blotting.
Combine with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS):
Fix and permeabilize protoplasts from target tissues
Immunostain with AT1G66250 antibody and fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody
Sort cells based on antibody fluorescence
Extract RNA from sorted populations for transcriptomic analysis
Implement in spatial transcriptomics workflows:
Perform immunolocalization with AT1G66250 antibody on tissue sections
Capture images to document protein localization
Process adjacent sections for spatial transcriptomics
Correlate protein localization with spatial gene expression patterns
This approach has proven valuable in distinguishing cell-type specific expression profiles in Arabidopsis ovules, where clear separation was observed between megaspore mother cells and surrounding nucellus cells in principal component analysis of transcriptomic data .
When designing co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) experiments to identify protein interaction partners of AT1G66250, researchers should consider:
Antibody binding characteristics: The AT1G66250 antibody is a polyclonal antibody raised in rabbit against recombinant Arabidopsis thaliana AT1G66250 protein . This polyclonal nature provides good avidity but may increase background in Co-IP experiments.
Optimization protocol:
Test different lysis buffers to identify optimal conditions for maintaining protein interactions
Consider crosslinking approaches (e.g., DSP or formaldehyde) to stabilize transient interactions
Test various antibody concentrations (typically 2-5 μg per mg of total protein)
Include appropriate controls (pre-immune serum, IgG from same species)
Recommended Co-IP workflow:
Extract proteins in non-denaturing buffer with protease inhibitors
Pre-clear lysate with Protein A/G beads
Incubate cleared lysate with AT1G66250 antibody overnight at 4°C
Add Protein A beads (appropriate for rabbit IgG) and incubate 2-4 hours
Wash extensively to remove non-specific interactions
Elute and analyze by mass spectrometry or Western blotting
This approach can help identify novel interaction partners of AT1G66250, potentially revealing additional components of the plasmodesmata regulatory machinery in plant cells.
Researchers working with AT1G66250 antibody may encounter several challenges. The following table outlines common issues and their solutions:
| Issue | Possible Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Weak or no signal in Western blot | Protein degradation; Low expression; Inefficient transfer | 1. Add fresh protease inhibitors during extraction 2. Increase protein loading (50-100 μg) 3. Optimize transfer conditions for membrane proteins 4. Decrease antibody dilution (1:250 to 1:500) |
| High background | Non-specific binding; Excessive antibody concentration | 1. Increase blocking time/concentration (5% BSA) 2. Use more stringent washing (0.1% Tween-20) 3. Titrate antibody to optimal concentration 4. Pre-absorb antibody with non-specific proteins |
| Multiple bands in Western blot | Cross-reactivity; Protein degradation; Post-translational modifications | 1. Validate with knockout/knockdown controls 2. Use freshly prepared samples 3. Add phosphatase inhibitors if phosphorylation is suspected 4. Consider native vs. denatured conditions |
| Poor reproducibility | Variable sample preparation; Antibody degradation | 1. Standardize extraction protocols 2. Aliquot antibody to avoid freeze-thaw cycles 3. Include internal controls in each experiment |
| Inconsistent immunolocalization | Fixation artifacts; Epitope masking | 1. Test multiple fixation methods 2. Consider antigen retrieval techniques 3. Optimize permeabilization conditions |
Importantly, when troubleshooting experiments with AT1G66250 antibody, remember that this protein is associated with plasmodesmata membranes, which may require specialized extraction and detection methods compared to soluble proteins.
Validating antibody specificity is crucial for reliable experimental results. For AT1G66250 antibody, consider these validation approaches:
Genetic validation:
Test antibody reactivity in AT1G66250 knockout/knockdown lines (T-DNA insertion lines or CRISPR-edited plants)
Compare staining patterns between wild-type and mutant tissues
Ideal outcome: Reduced or absent signal in mutant tissues
Biochemical validation:
Perform peptide competition assays using the immunizing peptide
Pre-incubate antibody with excess recombinant AT1G66250 protein before immunodetection
Ideal outcome: Significantly reduced signal after competition
Orthogonal method validation:
Compare protein expression with mRNA expression data
Correlate antibody staining with fluorescent protein fusion localization
Use mass spectrometry to confirm identity of immunoprecipitated proteins
Cross-species validation:
Thorough validation ensures that experimental observations truly reflect AT1G66250 biology rather than antibody artifacts or non-specific interactions.
Co-localization studies examining the relationship between AT1G66250 and other plasmodesmata components require rigorous quantitative analysis:
Image acquisition considerations:
Use confocal microscopy with appropriate controls for spectral bleed-through
Maintain consistent exposure settings across samples
Capture Z-stacks to account for the three-dimensional nature of plasmodesmata
Quantitative co-localization analysis:
Calculate Pearson's correlation coefficient (values from -1 to +1)
Determine Manders' overlap coefficients (M1 and M2)
Use intensity correlation analysis (ICA) for more detailed relationship assessment
Recommended workflow:
Process images with minimal manipulations (background subtraction only)
Define regions of interest (ROIs) around cell boundaries/plasmodesmata
Apply co-localization algorithms using ImageJ/Fiji with JACoP plugin
Set thresholds systematically using objective methods (e.g., Costes method)
Report both visual overlays and quantitative metrics
Interpretation guidelines:
Pearson's coefficient > 0.5 suggests meaningful co-localization
Consider biological context when interpreting partial co-localization
Compare with known plasmodesmata markers (e.g., PDLP1, PDCB1)
Evaluate changes in co-localization across developmental stages or treatments
This approach provides robust evidence for the spatial relationship between AT1G66250 and other proteins within the plasmodesmata complex.
The AT1G66250 antibody offers significant potential for advancing our understanding of beta-glucan regulation during plant development. Future research directions could include:
Developmental time-course studies: Track AT1G66250 protein localization and abundance throughout ovule development to correlate with callose deposition patterns and symplastic connectivity changes.
Response to environmental stresses: Investigate how AT1G66250 localization and activity change in response to abiotic stresses known to affect plasmodesmata function, such as pathogen attack, drought, or temperature fluctuations.
Integration with emerging technologies:
Combine with super-resolution microscopy (STED, STORM) to examine nanoscale organization within plasmodesmata
Implement in proximity labeling approaches (BioID, APEX) to identify the protein neighborhood of AT1G66250
Utilize in single-cell proteomics to complement transcriptomic data on cell-type specific expression
Functional studies: Use the antibody to assess changes in protein localization and abundance in plants with altered beta-glucan metabolism or plasmodesmata function, potentially revealing regulatory mechanisms.
These approaches could significantly advance our understanding of how beta-glucan dynamics contribute to developmental processes, particularly in reproductive tissues where recent research has highlighted the importance of symplastic regulation .
While AT1G66250 has been primarily studied in developmental contexts, beta-1,3-glucanases often play important roles in plant immune responses. Future research could explore:
Pathogen-induced changes: Monitor AT1G66250 localization and abundance following pathogen challenge, particularly with fungi containing beta-glucan cell walls.
Callose-mediated defense responses: Investigate whether AT1G66250 contributes to the regulation of pathogen-induced callose deposition at cell walls and plasmodesmata.
Signaling pathway integration: Examine how plant defense signaling pathways (salicylic acid, jasmonic acid) affect AT1G66250 expression and localization.
Experimental approaches:
Immunolocalization following pathogen challenge
Western blot analysis of protein abundance in infected vs. healthy tissues
Co-immunoprecipitation to identify pathogen-induced protein interactions
Combine with genetic approaches in defense signaling mutants
This research direction could potentially reveal dual functions of AT1G66250 in both developmental regulation and pathogen defense, similar to what has been observed for other cell wall-modifying enzymes in plants.