EXO70A1 is a component of the exocyst complex, crucial for docking exocytic vesicles to plasma membrane fusion sites during regulated or polarized secretion. It plays a vital role in polarized cell growth and organ morphogenesis. Specifically, during cytokinesis, EXO70A1 participates in cell plate initiation and maturation, and the formation of the new primary cell wall. Further, it is involved in the polarized delivery of pectin, essential for the development of mucilage-producing volcano cells in seed coats. Its function extends to the recycling and localization of auxin efflux carriers PIN1 and PIN2, thereby regulating polar auxin transport. Finally, EXO70A1 is involved in vesicle trafficking within tracheary elements, regulating the patterned thickening of secondary cell walls.
Key Research Findings on EXO70A1 Function:
EXO70A1 is a conserved subunit of the exocyst complex, an octameric protein assembly that tethers secretory vesicles to the plasma membrane during exocytosis. In plants, EXO70A1 plays a crucial role in conventional exocytosis, polar cell growth, and cell wall biogenesis . Unlike its mammalian counterparts (like EXO70/EXOC7), plant EXO70A1 belongs to a greatly expanded gene family that has evolved specialized functions, making it a valuable subject for studying evolutionary adaptation of fundamental cellular machinery . EXO70A1 is particularly important for developmental processes, as demonstrated by the severe phenotypes in exo70a1 mutants which include reduced hypocotyl elongation and compromised cell wall formation .
Based on the literature, several types of EXO70A1 antibodies have been successfully employed in plant research:
Polyclonal antibodies raised against specific peptide regions of Arabidopsis EXO70A1
Antibodies recognizing conserved epitopes that work across multiple plant species
Anti-tag antibodies (anti-GFP, anti-HA) used with tagged versions of EXO70A1 for immunoprecipitation and localization studies
The type of antibody selected should depend on experimental goals, with polyclonal antibodies generally providing higher sensitivity but potentially lower specificity than monoclonal options.
For optimal Western blotting of plant samples with EXO70A1 antibodies:
Sample preparation: Extract proteins from plant tissues using a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, protease inhibitor cocktail, and 1 mM PMSF. Fresh tissue yields better results than frozen samples.
Protein amount: Load 20-30 μg of total protein per lane with appropriate controls.
Detection parameters:
Controls:
For successful immunoprecipitation of EXO70A1 and associated exocyst components:
Pre-clearing step: Incubate plant lysate with protein A/G beads for 1 hour at 4°C to reduce non-specific binding.
Antibody binding:
Use 2-5 μg of anti-EXO70A1 antibody per 500 μg of protein extract
Incubate overnight at 4°C with gentle rotation
Add pre-washed protein A/G beads and incubate for additional 3-4 hours
Washing conditions: Perform 4-5 washes with decreasing salt concentrations to maintain specific interactions while removing non-specific binding.
Validation approach: As demonstrated in multiple studies, co-immunoprecipitation of EXO70A1 should pull down other exocyst subunits such as SEC6, SEC8, and SEC15b that can be detected by mass spectrometry or specific antibodies .
Critical considerations:
Several complementary techniques have been successfully used to validate EXO70A1 interactions:
DARTS (Drug Affinity Responsive Target Stability): This approach has been used to test the interaction between small molecules like Endosidin2 (ES2) and EXO70A1. The technique works on the principle that protein-ligand binding can protect against protease degradation .
Saturation-Transfer Difference NMR (STD-NMR): Successfully employed to demonstrate direct binding between EXO70A1 and small molecules, this technique can detect interactions with affinity in the micromolar range .
Microscale Thermophoresis (MST): Used to measure binding affinities between EXO70A1 and its ligands with Kd values in the micromolar range (approximately 253 ± 63.5 μM for interaction with ES2) .
Yeast Two-Hybrid (Y2H) assays: Effective for mapping interaction domains, as demonstrated by truncation studies showing that the ABC- variant of EXO70A1 strongly interacts with SEC3a and EXO84b-N, while the AB– variant interacts only weakly with EXO84b-N .
In vitro lipid binding assays: Protein-lipid overlay and cosedimentation with large unilamellar vesicles have demonstrated that EXO70A1 binds to phospholipids like PA, PI4P, and PIP2 .
For optimal immunohistochemistry with EXO70A1 antibodies:
Fixation protocol:
For plant tissues: 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 1-2 hours at room temperature or 2% paraformaldehyde with 0.1% glutaraldehyde for better ultrastructural preservation
Avoid over-fixation as it can mask epitopes
Permeabilization:
Use 0.1-0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 15-30 minutes
For thick sections, consider vacuum infiltration to enhance antibody penetration
Blocking and antibody dilutions:
Block with 3-5% BSA or normal serum for 1 hour
Primary antibody: 1:100 to 1:250 dilution, incubate overnight at 4°C
Secondary antibody: Fluorophore-conjugated (Alexa Fluor 488/594/647) at 1:200-1:400 dilution
Controls and validation:
Imaging parameters:
Use confocal microscopy with appropriate resolution for subcellular structures
When studying dynamic processes, consider spinning disk confocal for faster acquisition
To investigate functional specialization among EXO70 paralogs:
Comparative immunoprecipitation:
Perform parallel immunoprecipitations with antibodies against different EXO70 paralogs
Compare interacting partners through mass spectrometry to identify unique and shared interactions
This approach revealed different exocyst subcomplex formations, such as EXO70B1 associating with EXO84b and SEC5a in a complex distinct from EXO70A1-containing complexes
Paralog-specific expression analysis:
Use tissue and cell-type specific analysis to compare expression patterns of different EXO70 paralogs
For example, comparing EXO70A1, EXO70B1, and EXO70B2 expression patterns under pathogen challenge revealed that EXO70B2 is significantly upregulated at 4 hours post-inoculation while EXO70A1 levels slightly decreased
Cross-complementation studies:
Express different EXO70 paralogs under the same promoter in mutant backgrounds
Analysis revealed that EXO70A1 was functionally substituted only by its closest paralog, EXO70A2, while none of the tested EXO70 isoforms (including A1, A2, B2, C1, D2, F1, and H7) could substitute for EXO70B1
| Paralog Expressed | Can Complement exo70a1? | Can Complement exo70b1? |
|---|---|---|
| EXO70A1 | Yes | No |
| EXO70A2 | Yes | No |
| EXO70B1 | No | Yes |
| EXO70B2 | No | No |
| EXO70C1 | No | No |
| EXO70D2 | No | No |
| EXO70F1 | No | No |
| EXO70H7 | No | No |
Domain-specific functions of EXO70A1 can be studied through:
Domain truncation combined with antibody detection:
Create truncated variants of EXO70A1 lacking specific domains (A, B, C, or D)
Express these variants in exo70a1 mutant background
Use anti-EXO70A1 antibodies or epitope-tag antibodies to analyze localization and function
This approach revealed that while the ABC- variant strongly interacts with SEC3a and EXO84b-N, it fails to localize to the plasma membrane
Domain-specific antibodies:
Develop antibodies targeting specific domains of EXO70A1
Use these to study differential exposure of domains in various cellular contexts
This could provide insights into conformational changes associated with activation
Protection/accessibility assays:
Similar to DARTS (Drug Affinity Responsive Target Stability), use limited proteolysis with domain-specific antibody protection
Areas bound by antibodies will be protected from proteolysis
This can reveal which domains are accessible in different cellular contexts or protein states
Structure-function correlation:
To study exocyst complex dynamics during stress responses:
Quantitative immunoprecipitation:
Perform immunoprecipitation with anti-EXO70A1 antibodies from control and stressed plants
Quantify co-precipitated exocyst subunits by western blot or mass spectrometry
Changes in the stoichiometry of co-precipitated subunits may indicate stress-induced complex remodeling
Stress-induced localization changes:
Use immunofluorescence with anti-EXO70A1 antibodies to track localization changes under stress
Examples include pathogen challenge, where studies showed EXO70B2 is specifically upregulated in early hours after fungal attack and accumulates at attack/papillae sites, while EXO70A1 levels slightly decrease
Phosphorylation state analysis:
Immunoprecipitate EXO70A1 from control and stressed plants
Analyze phosphorylation status by phospho-specific antibodies or mass spectrometry
Changes in phosphorylation may indicate altered regulation under stress
Comparative recovery after photobleaching:
In systems using fluorescently-tagged EXO70A1, measure FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching) parameters
Compare recovery rates between control and stress conditions
Validate findings using antibody-based approaches in fixed cells
To investigate EXO70A1's role in recruiting exocyst components:
Sequential immunoprecipitation:
First precipitate with anti-EXO70A1 antibodies
Elute under mild conditions
Perform second immunoprecipitation with antibodies against other exocyst subunits
This can identify subcomplexes and assembly intermediates
In vitro reconstitution assays:
Purify recombinant EXO70A1 and other exocyst components
Use fluorescently labeled artificial membranes containing specific phospholipids
Add EXO70A1 followed by other components to observe sequential recruitment
This approach revealed that EXO70A1 binds to phospholipids PA, PI4P, and PIP2 with 80-90% of the input protein binding to large unilamellar vesicles containing these lipids
Domain swapping experiments:
Create chimeric proteins with domains swapped between different EXO70 paralogs
Express in exo70a1 background and use antibodies to track localization
This can identify which domains are necessary for membrane recruitment versus protein-protein interactions
Temporal analysis of assembly:
Use rapid fixation methods after cellular stimulation
Perform sequential immunofluorescence with antibodies against different exocyst components
This can reveal the order of recruitment to specific cellular locations
To differentiate between specific and non-specific signals:
Essential controls:
Genetic negative control: Use exo70a1 knockout/knockdown tissues (note that some truncated proteins may still be detected depending on the mutant allele and antibody epitope)
Technical negative control: Omit primary antibody or use pre-immune serum
Peptide competition: Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide to block specific binding
Signal validation approaches:
Compare signals from multiple independently generated antibodies targeting different epitopes
Correlate antibody signals with fluorescently tagged EXO70A1 in transgenic lines
Verify predicted molecular weight (approximately 76 kDa for Arabidopsis EXO70A1)
Challenging cases:
Analysis strategies:
When faced with discrepancies between antibody staining and fluorescent protein localization:
Common causes of discrepancy:
Epitope masking: The antibody epitope may be obscured in certain cellular contexts
Fixation artifacts: Some localization patterns may be sensitive to fixation methods
Overexpression effects: Fluorescent fusion proteins may mislocalize if overexpressed
Tag interference: The fluorescent tag may interfere with protein interactions or localization
Resolution strategies:
Test multiple fixation and permeabilization protocols
Compare N- and C-terminal fluorescent protein fusions
Use different promoters to achieve more native expression levels
Perform antibody staining on tissues expressing the fluorescent fusion to directly compare patterns
Validation approaches:
Functional complementation: Verify that fluorescent fusion proteins rescue mutant phenotypes
Biochemical fractionation: Compare distribution of native protein (by antibody) and fusion protein
Super-resolution microscopy: Higher resolution may resolve apparent discrepancies in localization patterns
Interpretation framework:
Consider that different detection methods may reveal different subpopulations of the protein
Temporal dynamics may explain some discrepancies (antibody staining provides a snapshot while live imaging shows dynamics)
Both methods may be correct but revealing different aspects of protein biology
When analyzing EXO70A1 expression levels:
Tissue-specific considerations:
EXO70 genes show highly specific expression patterns; none of the 22 EXO70 genes examined were constitutively expressed
EXO70A1 is primarily expressed in exocytosis-active cells, including root tips, developing xylem, and expanding cells
Always consider the appropriate tissue controls based on known expression patterns
Developmental timing:
Environmental factors:
Stress responses can alter EXO70 paralog expression patterns
When comparing treatments, ensure consistent growth and sampling conditions
Consider circadian effects on expression levels
Quantification methods:
For Western blots, use appropriate normalization controls (e.g., actin, GAPDH)
For qPCR, validate reference genes for stability under your experimental conditions
When possible, use multiple detection methods (protein and mRNA levels)
For cross-species studies with EXO70A1 antibodies:
Epitope conservation analysis:
Perform sequence alignment of the antibody epitope region across target species
The QR motif near the C-terminus is highly conserved and may be a good target for cross-species antibodies
Structural conservation may be more important than sequence identity; the EXO70A1 structure revealed high structural similarity with mouse EXO70 despite low sequence identity (32% in middle C-terminal domains)
Validation requirements:
Always validate antibodies in each new species with appropriate positive and negative controls
Western blot should show bands of the expected molecular weight
Consider producing species-specific antibodies for critical experiments
Cross-reactivity considerations:
Alternative approaches:
For new species, consider creating epitope-tagged versions of EXO70A1
Use conserved antibodies against other exocyst subunits as complementary markers
When possible, combine antibody approaches with genomic and transcriptomic data
To investigate exocyst roles in cell wall formation:
Co-localization with cell wall synthesis machinery:
Use dual immunolabeling with anti-EXO70A1 and antibodies against cellulose synthase complex (CSC) components
Recent research showed EXO70A1 is crucial for tethering CSCs to the plasma membrane; exo70a1 mutants exhibited decreased crystalline cellulose content and reduced density of functional CSCs in the plasma membrane
Temporal analysis during cell wall regeneration:
Use systems like protoplast cell wall regeneration
Track EXO70A1 localization during different phases of wall formation
Correlate with deposition of different cell wall components
Stress response analysis:
Examine EXO70A1 localization during cell wall stress (e.g., isoxaben treatment)
Analyze how exocyst components redistribute during adaptive responses
Trafficking analysis:
Use vesicle purification followed by immunoblotting to identify EXO70A1-positive vesicle populations
Compare vesicle cargoes between wild-type and exo70a1 mutants to identify specific trafficking defects
Future methodological advances may include:
EXO70A1 antibodies can contribute to evolutionary studies by:
Comparative localization studies:
Apply validated antibodies across diverse plant lineages
Compare with mammalian and fungal systems using homologous antibodies
This could reveal conserved and divergent aspects of exocyst localization and function
Functional conservation analysis:
Subcomplex composition comparison:
Immunoprecipitate EXO70A1 from diverse species
Analyze associated proteins to determine if exocyst subcomplexes are conserved
This could reveal evolutionary pressure points in exocyst complex assembly
Paralog specialization mapping:
Strategies for studying EXO70A1 post-translational modifications include:
Modification-specific antibodies:
Develop antibodies specific to phosphorylated, ubiquitinated, or otherwise modified EXO70A1
Use phospho-proteomic data to identify key modification sites
These could reveal how modifications regulate EXO70A1 function or localization
Sequential immunoprecipitation:
First immunoprecipitate with general anti-EXO70A1 antibodies
Then probe with modification-specific antibodies (anti-phospho, anti-ubiquitin)
Alternatively, re-immunoprecipitate with modification-specific antibodies
Mass spectrometry validation:
Immunoprecipitate EXO70A1 from tissues under different conditions
Analyze by mass spectrometry to identify condition-specific modifications
Use this data to guide development of modification-specific antibodies
Functional correlation:
Compare modification patterns in wild-type plants versus mutants with altered exocytosis
Correlate modifications with specific cellular processes or stress responses
This could reveal regulatory mechanisms controlling EXO70A1 activity