EC1.1 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 weeks (Made-to-order)
Synonyms
EC1.1 antibody; At1g76750 antibody; F28O16.12Egg cell-secreted protein 1.1 antibody
Target Names
EC1.1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody targets a protein involved in regulating gamete interactions during double fertilization and preventing multiple pollen tube attraction. It mediates the redistribution of the gamete fusogen HAP2/GCS1 to the cell surface following secretion upon sperm arrival.
Gene References Into Functions
The following publication provides further detail: 1. Egg cell secretion of EC1 proteins upon sperm arrival promotes rapid sperm activation, accelerating gamete fusion and preventing polyspermy. [EC1.1] (PMID: 24384993) [Link to PubMed]
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT1G76750

STRING: 3702.AT1G76750.1

UniGene: At.34618

Protein Families
Plant egg cell-secreted peptide family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasmic vesicle. Secreted. Note=Secreted via vesicle exocytose upon sperm arrival, especially in the apical region of the degenerating synergid cell.
Tissue Specificity
Restricted to female reproductive tissues, specifically accumulating in storage vesicles of the unfertilized egg cell.

Q&A

What is the primary application of EC1.1 antibodies in academic research?

EC1.1 antibodies are typically used to study proteins containing the EC1 (Extracellular Cadherin-like Domain 1) region, such as ECM1 (Extracellular Matrix Protein 1) or desmoglein-2. Applications include:

  • Western blotting: Detection of protein expression levels and post-translational modifications .

  • Immunofluorescence: Localization of EC1-containing proteins in cellular or tissue samples .

  • Epitope mapping: Identifying binding regions for functional studies (e.g., blocking PD-1/PD-L1 interactions) .

Methodological Note: For ECM1 antibodies, validate specificity using recombinant proteins spanning EC1 regions (e.g., GST-fused EC1 constructs) .

How do I validate the specificity of an EC1.1 antibody?

Validation requires a multi-step approach:

  • Immunoblotting: Compare reactivity with lysates from EC1.1-positive/negative cell lines .

  • Epitope Competition: Use peptides or recombinant proteins to block antibody binding .

  • Cross-Reactivity Testing: Screen against homologous proteins (e.g., ECM1 vs. other ECM components) .

Table 1: Validation Strategies for EC1.1 Antibodies

MethodPurposeExample Protocol
ImmunoblottingConfirm target recognitionUse EC1.1-expressing vs. knockout cells
Epitope MappingIdentify binding regionGST-tagged EC1 domain constructs
ImmunofluorescenceVerify subcellular localizationConfocal microscopy with organelle markers

How should I design experiments to resolve conflicting data between EC1.1 antibody applications?

Conflicting results often arise from:

  • Epitope accessibility: Conformational changes in EC1.1 during fixation or denaturation .

  • Cross-reactivity: Binding to homologous domains in other proteins .

Resolution Strategy:

  • Control Experiments:

    • Use isotype-matched controls and EC1.1 knockout samples.

    • Test antibody performance across multiple cell/tissue types.

  • Parameter Optimization:

    • Optimize antibody concentration, incubation time, and blocking buffers.

    • Validate antibody compatibility with fixation methods (e.g., formalin vs. methanol) .

Example: For ECM1 antibodies, compare reactivity with human vs. murine EC1.1 regions to assess species specificity .

What factors influence EC1.1 antibody performance in immunoprecipitation (IP)?

Key parameters include:

  • Target solubility: EC1.1 is often extracellular or membrane-bound; use detergents like Empigen BB for efficient extraction .

  • Antibody affinity: High-affinity clones (e.g., 29F.1A12 for PD-1) outperform low-affinity options in IP .

  • Crosslinking: Optional for transient interactions; validate with non-crosslinked controls.

Design Consideration:

  • Scale-down models: Use microscale IP to optimize buffer composition and incubation conditions .

  • Quality Attributes: Prioritize DAR (Drug Antibody Ratio) and purity metrics if developing therapeutic antibodies .

How do I address cross-reactivity between EC1.1 antibodies and homologous proteins?

Cross-reactivity is common due to conserved EC domains. Mitigation strategies:

  • Sequence Alignment: Identify conserved regions between EC1.1 and homologs (e.g., ECM1 vs. ECM2) .

  • Absorption Tests: Pre-incubate antibodies with immobilized homologous proteins .

  • Epitope-Specific Validation: Use peptides spanning EC1.1’s unique sequences for competition assays .

Case Study: For desmoglein-2 EC1 antibodies, class III antibodies (binding C-terminal EC1) showed no cross-reactivity with proregion-containing constructs, unlike class I/II antibodies .

What statistical methods should I use to analyze EC1.1 antibody data?

For complex datasets (e.g., multi-antibody comparisons):

  • Design of Experiments (DOE): Factorial designs to model interactions between variables (e.g., pH, temperature) .

  • Response Surface Methodology: Identify optimal conditions for antibody performance (e.g., blocking efficiency) .

  • Multivariate Analysis: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to reduce dimensionality in high-throughput screens.

Example: A full factorial DOE with 16 experiments and center points can define a robust design space for antibody conjugation processes .

How do I troubleshoot inconsistent EC1.1 antibody staining in immunofluorescence?

Common issues and solutions:

IssueRoot CauseResolution
Non-specific backgroundSecondary antibody cross-reactivityUse species-specific secondary antibodies
Weak signalInsufficient primary antibodyTitrate antibody concentrations
Localization artifactsFixation-induced epitope maskingCompare paraformaldehyde vs. methanol fixation

Advanced Protocol: Use EC1.1 knockout cells as negative controls and quantify fluorescence intensity via image analysis software.

How can EC1.1 antibodies be integrated into antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) development?

  • Target Validation: Use EC1.1 antibodies to confirm target expression in tumor vs. normal tissues .

  • Conjugation Optimization: Monitor DAR and conjugate stability via SEC and CE-SDS .

  • Functional Studies: Block EC1.1 to assess target dependency in cancer models .

Challenges: EC1.1’s extracellular localization simplifies ADC targeting but requires high-affinity antibodies to achieve therapeutic efficacy .

How should I interpret EC1.1 antibody data that conflicts between Western blotting and immunofluorescence?

Discrepancies often arise from:

  • Epitope accessibility: Denaturation in SDS-PAGE vs. native conformation in IF .

  • Post-translational modifications: Phosphorylation or glycosylation may mask epitopes in one method but not the other .

Resolution:

  • Parallel Controls: Run both techniques on the same sample lysate.

  • Epitope Mapping: Use recombinant EC1.1 fragments to determine method-specific binding preferences .

What metrics should I use to assess EC1.1 antibody performance in in vivo models?

Key parameters include:

  • Target occupancy: % of EC1.1 bound by antibody (quantified via radioligand assays).

  • Pharmacokinetics: Serum half-life and biodistribution.

  • Efficacy markers: Tumor growth inhibition and immune cell infiltration.

Design Consideration: Use DOE to optimize dosing schedules and combination therapies .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.