The EDIL3 antibody is a specific immunoglobulin designed to detect and study the EGF-like repeats and discoidin I-like domains 3 (EDIL3) protein, a 52 kDa extracellular matrix (ECM) protein critical for endothelial cell function, angiogenesis, and tumor progression. EDIL3 is primarily expressed during embryonic vascular development but is reactivated in pathological conditions such as ischemia, cancer, and osteoarthritis (OA) . The antibody is widely used in research for applications including Western blot (WB), immunohistochemistry (IHC), immunofluorescence (IF), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Detects EDIL3 in lysates of human lung tissue, HeLa cells, and mouse brain tissue .
Recommended dilution: 1:500–1:3000 for AF6046 , 1:500–1:3000 for 12580-1-AP .
Stains EDIL3-positive cells in human pancreas, lung, and liver cancer tissues .
Requires antigen retrieval with TE buffer (pH 9.0) or citrate buffer (pH 6.0) .
EDIL3 promotes angiogenesis via the RGD motif, binding αvβ5 integrin to activate HoxD3 transcription factor .
Overexpression correlates with poor prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), breast cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma .
EDIL3 induces EMT in paclitaxel-resistant breast cancer cells by downregulating E-cadherin and upregulating vimentin .
Knockdown of EDIL3 reverses EMT and restores paclitaxel sensitivity .
EDIL3 disrupts LFA-1–ICAM-1 interactions, impairing T-cell transmigration into tumors .
High EDIL3 levels in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) correlate with TGFβ signaling and immune exclusion .
EDIL3 protects cartilage by inhibiting chondrocyte clustering and reducing IL-1β-induced inflammatory signaling .
Neutralizing EDIL3 exacerbates OA progression in murine models .
EDIL3, also known as DEL1 (Developmental endothelial locus-1), is an extracellular matrix protein secreted primarily by endothelial cells. This protein contains three epidermal growth factor (EGF) domains and two discoidin domains, playing critical roles in various physiological and pathological processes including embryonic development, angiogenesis, inflammation, and immune reactions . EDIL3 has gained significant research interest due to its involvement in cancer progression, where its expression is elevated in multiple cancer types including gastric cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, colorectal cancer, and breast cancer . Its ability to promote endothelial cell adhesion through interactions with integrins, particularly alpha-v/beta-3 integrin receptor, makes it an important target for vascular biology and oncology research . The protein also functions as an endogenous inhibitor of inflammatory cell recruitment, further expanding its research significance in immunology .
When selecting an EDIL3 antibody, consider these key experimental parameters:
Application compatibility: Determine which application you need (Western blot, IHC, ELISA, etc.) and select an antibody validated for that application. For instance, ABIN2784767 is validated for Western blotting, while E-AB-64606 is validated for immunohistochemistry .
Species reactivity: Match the antibody to your experimental model. Some antibodies like ABIN2784767 offer broad species reactivity (human, mouse, rat, cow, dog, guinea pig, rabbit, zebrafish, horse), while others may be more species-restricted .
Epitope recognition: Consider which domain or region of EDIL3 you need to target:
Clonality: Determine whether a polyclonal or monoclonal antibody better suits your needs:
Validation data: Review the validation methods used for the antibody, including predicted reactivity percentages and cross-reactivity testing .
EDIL3 antibodies are utilized across multiple experimental applications, each providing distinct insights into this protein's expression and function:
| Application | Common Usage | Recommended Antibody Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blotting (WB) | Detecting EDIL3 protein expression levels in cell/tissue lysates | ABIN2784767, MAB6046 |
| Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | Visualizing EDIL3 spatial distribution in tissue sections | ab198003, E-AB-64606 |
| ELISA | Quantifying EDIL3 in serum or cell culture supernatants | MAB6046 |
| Immunofluorescence (IF) | Examining subcellular localization | Various anti-DEL1 antibodies (AA 101-199) |
| Flow Cytometry (FACS) | Analyzing EDIL3 expression in specific cell populations | Anti-DEL1 antibody (AA 337-365) |
Each application requires specific optimization parameters including antibody dilution, incubation conditions, and signal detection methods .
EDIL3 detection via Western blotting requires careful optimization to ensure specific and sensitive results:
Sample preparation:
Use appropriate lysis buffers containing protease inhibitors to prevent EDIL3 degradation
For secreted EDIL3, consider concentrating cell culture supernatants
Protein loading:
Load 20-50 μg of total protein from cell/tissue lysates
For secreted EDIL3, concentration methods may be necessary
Gel selection:
Antibody dilution:
Incubation conditions:
Primary antibody: Overnight at 4°C for optimal signal-to-noise ratio
Secondary antibody: 1 hour at room temperature
Detection considerations:
Troubleshooting:
If background is high, increase blocking time or try different blocking reagents
If no signal is detected, verify EDIL3 expression in your samples or use a positive control
For effective immunohistochemical detection of EDIL3 in tissue samples:
Tissue preparation:
Use 10% neutral buffered formalin fixation (10-24 hours)
Paraffin embedding with standard protocols
Section tissues at 4-6 μm thickness
Antigen retrieval:
Heat-induced epitope retrieval using citrate buffer (pH 6.0) is typically effective
Pressure cooking for 3-5 minutes or microwave heating for 10-20 minutes
Antibody dilution:
Detection systems:
Use polymer-based HRP detection systems for improved sensitivity
DAB (3,3'-diaminobenzidine) is commonly used as chromogen
Hematoxylin counterstaining for nuclear visualization
Controls:
Interpretation considerations:
Ensuring antibody specificity is crucial for reliable experimental results. Validate your EDIL3 antibody through:
Competing peptide assays:
Pre-incubate the antibody with the immunizing peptide
Compare staining patterns between blocked and unblocked antibody
Specific signals should be significantly reduced or eliminated
Knockout/knockdown controls:
Use EDIL3 knockout tissues/cells or siRNA-mediated knockdown
Compare staining between wild-type and knockout/knockdown samples
Specific antibodies should show reduced or absent signal in knockout/knockdown samples
Multiple antibody approach:
Recombinant protein controls:
Cross-reactivity testing:
EDIL3 has been implicated in various cancer types with context-dependent functions. Here are methodological approaches using antibodies:
Expression profiling across cancer stages:
Use IHC with EDIL3 antibodies on tissue microarrays containing different cancer stages
Correlate expression with clinicopathological parameters and patient outcomes
Apply digital pathology methods for quantitative assessment
Recent studies showed elevated EDIL3 expression in gastric cancer correlating with worse prognosis
Co-localization studies:
Perform dual immunofluorescence with EDIL3 and integrin antibodies (particularly αvβ3 and αvβ5)
Use confocal microscopy to assess spatial relationships
Analyze co-localization coefficients quantitatively
Functional analysis in cancer models:
Combine antibody-based detection with genetic manipulation (overexpression/knockdown)
Assess effects on cancer cell behaviors: migration, invasion, angiogenesis
Use antibody-based protein detection methods (Western blot, ELISA) to confirm manipulation success
Secretome analysis:
Use antibody-based techniques to detect EDIL3 in conditioned media
Compare secretion levels between normal and cancer cells
Correlate with invasive/metastatic potential
Mechanistic investigations:
EDIL3 plays significant roles in angiogenesis through multiple mechanisms. Consider these methodological approaches:
Endothelial cell models:
Tube formation assays:
Signaling pathway analysis:
In vivo angiogenesis models:
Therapeutic investigations:
When facing challenges with EDIL3 antibody-based experiments, consider these methodological solutions:
Weak or no signal in Western blots:
Inconsistent staining in IHC:
Problem: Variability in tissue fixation affecting epitope accessibility
Solution: Optimize antigen retrieval methods (try both citrate and EDTA buffers)
Problem: Batch-to-batch antibody variation
Solution: Use antibodies with consistent production methods, preferably monoclonal
Cross-reactivity issues:
Problem: Antibody recognizing related proteins
Solution: Validate with blocking peptides and in samples lacking EDIL3
Problem: Non-specific binding in certain tissues
Solution: Optimize blocking conditions and consider more stringent washing
Discrepant results between applications:
Problem: Different antibody performance across applications
Solution: Select application-validated antibodies (e.g., MAB6046 for ELISAs, ABIN2784767 for WB)
Problem: Epitope availability differs between native and denatured conditions
Solution: Use conformation-specific antibodies matched to your application
Conflicting experimental outcomes:
Problem: EDIL3 functions differ between tissue/cell types
Solution: Carefully control for cell type-specific effects
Problem: Context-dependent protein interactions
Solution: Use co-immunoprecipitation to verify interaction partners in your specific model
EDIL3 expression varies significantly across tissues and disease states, requiring careful interpretation:
Developmental context:
Cancer tissue interpretation:
Vascular pathology:
Quantification approaches:
Use digital pathology tools for objective quantification of IHC staining
Consider both staining intensity and percentage of positive cells
Develop standardized scoring systems for cross-study comparability
Subcellular localization:
Researchers face several methodological challenges when attempting to establish EDIL3 as a prognostic biomarker:
Antibody selection effects:
Different antibodies may detect different isoforms or modified forms of EDIL3
Epitope accessibility varies between tissue preparation methods
Standardize antibody selection across cohorts for valid comparisons
Quantification methodology:
Subjective scoring systems introduce inter-observer variability
Digital pathology approaches require validation
Develop clear thresholds for "high" versus "low" expression
Contextual interpretation:
EDIL3 functions differently across cancer types
Expression in tumor cells versus stromal cells may have distinct implications
Consider integrated analysis with other biomarkers
Sample considerations:
Tissue heterogeneity affects expression assessment
Small biopsies may not represent the entire tumor
Consider multiple sampling or tissue microarray approaches
Validation requirements:
Preliminary findings require independent cohort validation
Multi-institutional studies strengthen evidence
Meta-analysis approaches can help resolve conflicting results
EDIL3 antibodies can facilitate therapeutic research through several methodological approaches:
Target validation studies:
Use neutralizing antibodies to block EDIL3 function in preclinical models
Assess effects on tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis
Determine context-specific therapeutic potential
Biomarker development:
Establish standardized EDIL3 detection protocols for patient stratification
Correlate expression with treatment response
Develop companion diagnostic approaches
Monitoring therapeutic response:
Track EDIL3 expression changes during treatment
Correlate with clinical outcomes
Establish whether EDIL3 serves as a resistance mechanism
Therapeutic antibody development:
Use research antibodies to identify optimal epitopes for therapeutic targeting
Develop humanized antibodies against EDIL3 for clinical testing
Explore antibody-drug conjugate approaches
Combination therapy research:
Investigate EDIL3 targeting in combination with:
Anti-angiogenic therapies (given EDIL3's role in angiogenesis)
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (considering EDIL3's immunomodulatory functions)
Conventional chemotherapy or radiation
Future EDIL3 research will benefit from several technological advances:
Single-cell analysis approaches:
Single-cell Western blotting for heterogeneity assessment
Imaging mass cytometry for spatial protein expression analysis
Single-cell secretome analysis for EDIL3 secretion patterns
Advanced imaging techniques:
Super-resolution microscopy for detailed localization studies
Intravital imaging to track EDIL3 dynamics in vivo
Correlative light and electron microscopy for ultrastructural context
Proximity labeling approaches:
BioID or APEX2 fusions with EDIL3 to identify proximal interacting proteins
Combine with antibody-based validation of novel interactions
Map the EDIL3 interactome in different cellular contexts
Spatial transcriptomics integration:
Correlate EDIL3 protein expression with spatial gene expression patterns
Identify co-regulated genes in specific tissue microenvironments
Develop integrated multi-omic analysis approaches
Antibody engineering advances:
Development of recombinant antibody fragments for improved tissue penetration
Bispecific antibodies targeting EDIL3 and its receptors simultaneously
Genetically encoded intrabodies for live-cell EDIL3 tracking
EDIL3 antibody applications are expanding into several cutting-edge research domains:
Liquid biopsy development:
Detection of circulating EDIL3 in patient serum as a non-invasive biomarker
Correlation with disease progression and treatment response
Combination with other circulating biomarkers for improved sensitivity
Extracellular vesicle research:
Investigation of EDIL3 incorporation into exosomes and microvesicles
Analysis of vesicle-mediated EDIL3 transfer between cells
Functional consequences in recipient cells
Tissue engineering applications:
Monitoring EDIL3 expression during vascular network formation
Manipulation of EDIL3 levels to enhance vascularization of engineered tissues
Development of EDIL3-functionalized biomaterials
Immunomodulation research:
Developmental biology:
Investigation of EDIL3's role in embryonic vascular development
Application in stem cell differentiation monitoring
Potential connections to developmental disorders affecting vasculature