EFM6 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Clarification of Terminology

The term "EFM6" does not appear in:

  • Antibody databases (e.g., UniProt, cAb-Rep )

  • Gene or protein nomenclature resources (e.g., HUGO, NCBI Gene)

  • Therapeutic antibody registries (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA-approved biologics ).

Potential sources of confusion:

  • EphB6 Antibody: A tyrosine kinase receptor antibody with the gene symbol EPHB6 .

  • MUC6 Antibody: Targets gastric mucin 6, a secretory glycoprotein (e.g., MSVA-806R ).

  • MEM-M6/1 Antibody: A monoclonal antibody against CD147 (basigin), used in flow cytometry and Western blotting .

EphB6 Antibody

  • Target: Ephrin type-B receptor 6 (EPHB6), involved in cell adhesion and migration.

  • Applications: Western blotting (WB), immunoprecipitation (IP) .

  • Reactivity: Human-specific .

  • Research Findings:

    ParameterDetail
    Molecular Weight125 kDa
    Host SpeciesRabbit
    Key PathwaysT-cell signaling, tumor suppression

MUC6 Antibody

  • Target: Mucin 6, a gastrointestinal glycoprotein .

  • Applications: Immunohistochemistry (IHC), research on gastric cancer.

  • Reactivity: Human-specific, with staining in mucous glands (stomach, duodenum) .

  • Validation Data:

    TissueStaining Pattern
    Stomach (glands)Strong positivity (+++)
    Pancreatic ductsModerate positivity (++)
    GallbladderVariable surface epithelium

CD147 Antibody (MEM-M6/1)

  • Target: CD147 (basigin), a transmembrane glycoprotein .

  • Applications: Flow cytometry, Western blotting, IP.

  • Key Features:

    • Binds to human cells (A549, Raji, Jurkat) .

    • Observed band size: 55–70 kDa (reducing conditions) .

Hypotheses for "EFM6"

Given the lack of direct matches, potential explanations include:

  1. Typographical Error: "EFM6" may be a misspelling of EphB6, MUC6, or MEM-M6/1.

  2. Proprietary Name: Unpublished or commercial antibody not yet cataloged in public databases.

  3. Obsolete Term: Historical nomenclature no longer in use.

Recommendations for Further Inquiry

  1. Verify the correct spelling or nomenclature with the source material.

  2. Explore antibodies targeting related pathways:

    • Metabolic regulation: MARCH6 antibodies .

    • HIV neutralization: Broadly neutralizing antibodies like N6 .

    • Na+/K+ ATPase: ATP1A1 antibodies (e.g., a6F ).

  3. Consult antibody validation platforms (e.g., YCharOS ) for emerging reagents.

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
EFM6 antibody; YNL024C antibody; N2809Protein-lysine N-methyltransferase EFM6 antibody; EC 2.1.1.- antibody; Elongation factor methyltransferase 6 antibody
Target Names
EFM6
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
EFM6 is an S-adenosyl-L-methionine-dependent protein-lysine N-methyltransferase that catalyzes the methylation of elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF1 and TEF2) at Lysine 390.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. In a comprehensive study, we identified most known oxygen-regulated genes and discovered novel regulated genes. Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis confirmed that the lysine methyltransferase EFM6 and the recombinase DMC1, both conserved in humans, are indeed oxygen-responsive. PMID: 27883312
  2. Ynl024c has been identified as the enzyme responsible for methylation of eEF1A at Lysine 390. Based on its function and similarity to other known enzymes, we propose renaming Ynl024c to Efm6 (Elongation factor MTase 6). PMID: 26115316
Database Links

KEGG: sce:YNL024C

STRING: 4932.YNL024C

Protein Families
Class I-like SAM-binding methyltransferase superfamily, METTL21 family, EFM6 subfamily
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is EphB6 and why is it a significant target for antibody development?

EphB6 is a member of the Eph subfamily of receptor tyrosine kinases, which is the largest subfamily of receptor tyrosine kinases. Despite lacking kinase activity, EphB6 is widely expressed across various tissues and plays a crucial role in cellular homeostasis through interactions with membrane-bound ephrin ligands and other receptors. Its involvement in cancer pathology despite its lack of kinase activity makes it a particularly interesting target for antibody development. Researchers pursue EphB6 antibodies for their potential applications in cancer diagnosis, treatment, and further analysis of EphB6-associated cellular functions .

How does the Cell-Based Immunization and Screening (CBIS) method improve antibody development for challenging targets like EphB6?

The CBIS method represents a significant advancement for generating antibodies against difficult targets. In the case of EphB6, the CBIS method enabled the development of Eb6Mab-3, a novel specific and sensitive anti-human EphB6 mAb (mouse IgG1, kappa). This approach uses intact cells expressing the target protein in its native conformation during both immunization and screening processes. The method preserves complex epitopes and post-translational modifications, resulting in antibodies with superior specificity and sensitivity. For EphB6 specifically, this resulted in an antibody with moderate binding affinity for overexpressed EphB6 (KD: 2.6 ± 1.0 × 10⁻⁸ M) and high binding affinity for endogenously expressed EphB6 in cancer cells (KD: 3.4 ± 1.3 × 10⁻⁹ M) .

What are the primary experimental applications for EphB6 antibodies in basic research?

EphB6 antibodies serve multiple experimental purposes in fundamental research:

  • Flow cytometry for detecting EphB6 expression in various cell types and tissues

  • Western blot analysis for protein detection and quantification

  • Immunohistochemistry for tissue localization studies

  • Investigation of EphB6-associated cellular functions and signaling pathways

  • Exploration of EphB6's role in cancer biology and progression

  • Potential diagnostic and therapeutic applications targeting EphB6-expressing cancer cells

The established Eb6Mab-3 antibody has demonstrated capabilities in flow cytometry, detecting both overexpressed EphB6 in CHO-K1 cells and endogenously expressed EphB6 in DLD-1 colorectal cancer cells, as well as detecting EphB6 protein in Western blot applications .

How can computational approaches be integrated with experimental methods to design EphB6 antibodies with customized specificity profiles?

Advanced computational approaches can significantly enhance EphB6 antibody design. Biophysics-informed models trained on experimentally selected antibodies can identify distinct binding modes associated with specific ligands, enabling prediction and generation of antibody variants with customized specificity profiles. This approach involves:

  • High-throughput sequencing of selected antibody libraries

  • Computational analysis to identify binding modes associated with specific ligands

  • Predictive modeling to design antibodies with desired specificity characteristics

  • Experimental validation of computationally designed antibodies

This integration can generate antibodies with either highly specific binding to EphB6 while excluding related receptors, or cross-specific binding to multiple predetermined targets. The approach has been successfully demonstrated with other antibodies where researchers used phage display experiments to select antibodies against various ligand combinations, built computational models to identify binding modes, and subsequently designed novel antibody sequences with predefined binding profiles .

What are the key considerations when developing bispecific antibodies that target EphB6 alongside other cancer-relevant molecules?

Developing bispecific antibodies that include EphB6 as one of the targets requires several sophisticated considerations:

  • Target selection compatibility: Determine if EphB6 pairing with another target (e.g., CD3, CD19) creates synergistic therapeutic effects.

  • Structural design optimization: Engineer appropriate linkers and domain arrangements to maintain proper folding and binding functionality of both targeting moieties.

  • Binding kinetics balancing: Ensure balanced affinity between the two binding domains to achieve optimal therapeutic efficacy.

  • Expression and stability assessment: Evaluate protein expression levels, stability during purification, and shelf-life characteristics.

  • Functional validation: Test for specific cellular responses including cytotoxicity, signaling pathway modulation, and potential off-target effects.

Researchers have successfully developed various bispecific antibody formats, such as tetravalent bispecific anti-CD19/CD3 T and Ab tandem diabodies with enhanced potency due to bivalent binding to both target cells. Similar approaches could be applied to EphB6-targeting bispecifics .

What challenges exist in isolating and amplifying broadly reactive antibodies that might recognize both EphB6 and related Eph receptors?

Isolating broadly reactive antibodies that recognize multiple Eph receptors, including EphB6, presents several significant challenges:

  • Rarity of cross-reactive antibodies: Naturally occurring antibodies that recognize multiple targets while maintaining specificity within a family are exceptionally rare within the antibody repertoire.

  • Traditional screening limitations: Conventional methods typically select for high specificity to individual targets rather than controlled cross-reactivity.

  • Epitope identification complexity: Identifying conserved epitopes across Eph family members that allow for specific cross-reactivity while avoiding off-target binding.

  • Validation across multiple targets: Confirming binding characteristics across numerous related proteins requires extensive analysis.

Recent advances include techniques like LIBRA-seq (Linking B-cell Receptor to Antigen Specificity through sequencing), which can map unique antibody sequences to their antigen specificity. Vanderbilt researchers have developed methods to isolate and amplify rare antibodies with controlled broad reactivity profiles. These approaches could potentially be applied to identify antibodies recognizing multiple Eph family members including EphB6 .

What are the optimal experimental conditions for validating EphB6 antibody specificity across multiple assay platforms?

Comprehensive validation of EphB6 antibody specificity requires rigorous testing across multiple platforms with optimized conditions:

  • Flow Cytometry:

    • Use paired cell lines: EphB6-overexpressing (e.g., CHO/EphB6) and wild-type controls

    • Include cells with endogenous EphB6 expression (e.g., DLD-1)

    • Optimal antibody concentration: Typically 1-10 μg/mL based on titration experiments

    • Incubation conditions: 30-60 minutes at 4°C to minimize internalization

  • Western Blot:

    • Sample preparation: Complete cell lysis in RIPA buffer with protease inhibitors

    • Gel percentage: 7.5-10% SDS-PAGE for optimal separation

    • Transfer conditions: 100V for 60-90 minutes using PVDF membrane

    • Blocking: 5% non-fat milk or BSA for 1 hour at room temperature

    • Primary antibody: 1:500-1:2000 dilution, incubate overnight at 4°C

  • Cross-reactivity Testing:

    • Panel of related Eph receptors (EphB1-B4, EphA family)

    • Testing across species if relevant (human, mouse, rat)

    • Inclusion of appropriate positive and negative controls

  • Binding Kinetics Assessment:

    • Surface Plasmon Resonance to determine KD values

    • Compare binding to recombinant protein vs. cell-expressed EphB6

    • Analyze association and dissociation rates separately

For Eb6Mab-3 specifically, validation has confirmed reactivity with EphB6-overexpressed CHO-K1 cells and endogenously EphB6-expressing DLD-1 cells, with binding affinities of KD: 2.6 ± 1.0 × 10⁻⁸ M and KD: 3.4 ± 1.3 × 10⁻⁹ M respectively .

How can AI and high-throughput experimentation accelerate the discovery and optimization of novel EphB6 antibodies?

AI and high-throughput technologies are revolutionizing antibody discovery through several integrated approaches:

  • High-throughput Screening Platforms:

    • Automated cell culture and screening systems

    • Microfluidic droplet technologies for single-cell analysis

    • Parallel processing of thousands of candidate antibodies

  • Machine Learning Applications:

    • Prediction of antibody-antigen binding characteristics

    • Identification of optimal complementarity-determining regions (CDRs)

    • Sequence-structure-function relationship modeling

    • Antibody humanization and optimization algorithms

  • Integrated Workflow Components:

    • Automated sample preparation and handling

    • Robotic liquid handling systems

    • High-content imaging and analysis

    • Data management and analysis pipelines

Companies like LabGenius are pioneering these approaches with platforms such as EVA™, which combines machine learning with high-throughput experimentation for antibody discovery. These systems can rapidly evaluate complex antibody designs through iterative cycles of computational prediction and experimental validation .

What techniques are most effective for analyzing the functional consequences of EphB6 antibody binding in cancer cell models?

Evaluating functional outcomes of EphB6 antibody binding requires comprehensive analytical approaches:

  • Cell Signaling Analysis:

    • Phosphorylation state assessment of downstream mediators

    • Protein-protein interaction studies (co-immunoprecipitation)

    • Real-time signaling dynamics using FRET-based biosensors

    • Pathway analysis using phospho-specific antibody arrays

  • Cellular Behavior Assessment:

    • Migration and invasion assays (transwell, wound healing)

    • Proliferation studies (MTT, BrdU incorporation)

    • Apoptosis quantification (Annexin V, caspase activation)

    • Spheroid formation for 3D culture models

  • Molecular Response Profiling:

    • Transcriptomics to identify gene expression changes

    • Proteomics to evaluate altered protein expression patterns

    • Time-course studies to distinguish primary from secondary effects

  • Combination Studies:

    • Synergy assessment with standard chemotherapeutics

    • Evaluation with immune checkpoint inhibitors

    • Effects on sensitivity to targeted therapies

These methodologies provide comprehensive insights into how EphB6 antibodies modulate cancer cell biology and can guide the development of therapeutic strategies by identifying mechanisms of action and potential resistance pathways.

How do EphB6 antibodies compare with other Eph receptor antibodies in terms of research applications and clinical potential?

EphB6 antibodies possess distinct characteristics compared to antibodies targeting other Eph receptors:

FeatureEphB6 AntibodiesOther Eph Receptor Antibodies
Target kinase activityTarget kinase-deficient receptorTypically target kinase-active receptors
Mechanism of actionSignal modulation through protein interactionsOften direct inhibition of kinase activity
Expression patternWidely expressed in multiple tissuesVariable expression patterns
Cancer relevanceInvolved in cancer despite lacking kinase activityDirect oncogenic drivers through kinase signaling
Research applicationsUnderstanding non-kinase mechanismsStudying classical RTK signaling
Therapeutic potentialDiagnostic and potential immunotherapy componentDirect inhibitors of oncogenic signaling

EphB6 antibodies offer unique research value for studying non-kinase-dependent signaling mechanisms. The Eb6Mab-3 antibody specifically demonstrates high sensitivity and affinity for endogenous EphB6 in cancer cells, suggesting potential diagnostic applications . While other Eph receptor antibodies might directly block oncogenic kinase activity, EphB6 antibodies could be valuable for identifying EphB6-expressing tumors and potentially for antibody-drug conjugate development.

What are the key considerations when designing an experiment to evaluate potential cross-reactivity between EphB6 antibodies and other members of the Eph receptor family?

A comprehensive cross-reactivity assessment should include:

  • Target Selection:

    • All human Eph receptors (EphA1-10, EphB1-6)

    • Focus on most closely related receptors first (EphB1-4)

    • Include truncated and splice variants where relevant

  • Expression System Design:

    • Transiently transfected cells expressing individual Eph receptors

    • Stable cell lines with controlled expression levels

    • Native cell lines with endogenous expression profiles

  • Analytical Methods:

    • Flow cytometry with quantitative binding assessment

    • Western blotting under reducing and non-reducing conditions

    • ELISA using recombinant receptor extracellular domains

    • Surface plasmon resonance for binding kinetics

    • Immunoprecipitation studies

  • Controls and Standards:

    • Known pan-Eph antibodies as positive controls

    • Isotype-matched irrelevant antibodies as negative controls

    • Receptor-specific validated antibodies as standards

  • Data Analysis Approach:

    • Quantitative binding ratios between target and non-target receptors

    • Statistical significance testing across multiple experiments

    • Binding affinity comparisons (KD values)

Proper experimental design would ensure reliable data on antibody specificity, particularly important for EphB6 where structural similarities with other family members could lead to unintended cross-reactivity .

How might one design clinical translational experiments to evaluate the potential of EphB6 antibodies in cancer diagnosis or therapy?

Translating EphB6 antibodies to clinical applications requires carefully designed experiments:

  • Diagnostic Development Path:

    • Tissue microarray analysis across multiple cancer types

    • Correlation of EphB6 expression with clinical outcomes

    • Comparison with standard diagnostic markers

    • Development of companion diagnostic protocols

    • Sensitivity and specificity assessment in clinical samples

  • Therapeutic Evaluation Strategy:

    • Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) assessment

    • Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) development and testing

    • Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model studies

    • Combination therapy approaches with standard treatments

    • Toxicity profiling in relevant preclinical models

  • Patient Selection Biomarker Development:

    • Quantitative thresholds for EphB6 expression

    • Multiplex biomarker panels including EphB6

    • Liquid biopsy approaches for EphB6 detection

    • Correlation with response to EphB6-targeted therapies

  • Clinical Trial Design Considerations:

    • Phase 0 microdosing studies for pharmacokinetics

    • Basket trial approaches across EphB6-expressing tumors

    • Adaptive design with biomarker-guided cohort expansion

    • Appropriate endpoints based on mechanism of action

The Eb6Mab-3 antibody, with its high binding affinity for endogenously expressed EphB6 in cancer cells, represents a promising candidate for such translational development .

What emerging technologies might enhance the development of next-generation EphB6 antibodies with improved specificity and functional properties?

Several cutting-edge technologies show promise for next-generation EphB6 antibody development:

  • AI-Driven Design Platforms:

    • Deep learning algorithms for antibody structure prediction

    • Neural networks trained on antibody-antigen crystal structures

    • In silico affinity maturation and optimization

    • Computational epitope mapping and antibody engineering

  • Advanced Display Technologies:

    • Mammalian display systems for complex epitope recognition

    • Synthetic antibody libraries with tailored frameworks

    • Mixed-format display systems (phage, yeast, mammalian)

    • Microfluidic-based single-cell screening platforms

  • Bispecific and Multispecific Formats:

    • Novel scaffolds beyond traditional IgG architecture

    • Site-specific conjugation technologies

    • Conditionally active bispecific antibodies

    • Modular antibody design platforms

  • Molecular Evolution Approaches:

    • Directed evolution with ultra-high-throughput screening

    • Continuous evolution systems (e.g., PACE)

    • Computationally guided evolution strategies

    • Accelerated affinity maturation protocols

These technologies can be leveraged specifically for EphB6 antibodies to address challenges such as distinguishing between closely related family members, optimizing binding to native conformations, and engineering desired functional properties such as internalization or immune recruitment .

How might secondary antibody deficiency considerations impact the clinical development of EphB6-targeting therapeutic antibodies?

Understanding secondary antibody deficiency is crucial when developing EphB6 therapeutic antibodies:

  • Risk Assessment Factors:

    • Patient population characteristics (age, comorbidities)

    • Duration and frequency of antibody therapy

    • Mechanism of action (depletion vs. signaling modulation)

    • Combination with other immunosuppressive therapies

  • Monitoring Strategies:

    • Baseline immunoglobulin level assessment

    • Periodic monitoring of IgG, IgA, and IgM levels

    • Specific antibody response testing to vaccines

    • Vigilance for infection events

  • Risk Mitigation Approaches:

    • Pre-treatment vaccination protocols

    • Prophylactic antibiotics for high-risk patients

    • Immunoglobulin replacement therapy when indicated

    • Treatment interruption strategies if deficiency develops

  • Clinical Trial Design Implications:

    • Exclusion criteria based on baseline immune status

    • Antibody level monitoring as secondary endpoint

    • Infection rate tracking and analysis

    • Long-term follow-up for delayed deficiency

While EphB6 antibodies without effector functions may carry lower risk, those engineered for ADCC or CDC activity could potentially contribute to secondary antibody deficiency, particularly in combination regimens or during extended treatment periods .

How can bispecific antibody approaches be optimized to leverage EphB6 as a tumor-targeting component?

Optimizing bispecific antibodies incorporating EphB6 binding requires systematic engineering:

  • Format Selection Considerations:

    • Fab-based versus scFv-based architectures

    • Symmetric versus asymmetric designs

    • Fragment-based versus IgG-like structures

    • Molecular weight and tissue penetration requirements

  • Effector Arm Engineering:

    • T cell engagement (anti-CD3) optimization

    • NK cell recruitment (anti-CD16) parameters

    • Checkpoint inhibitor incorporation

    • Payload delivery mechanisms

  • Affinity Balancing Strategies:

    • Higher affinity for EphB6 tumor target

    • Modulated affinity for effector cells

    • Conditional activation mechanisms

    • Avidity effects through multivalent binding

  • Manufacturing Optimization:

    • Expression system selection

    • Purification strategy development

    • Stability and storage formulation

    • Quality control and batch consistency

Bispecific antibodies are increasingly important therapeutic modalities, with examples like tetravalent bispecific anti-CD19/CD3 T and Ab tandem diabodies showing enhanced potency through bivalent binding. Similar principles could be applied to create EphB6-targeting bispecifics for cancer immunotherapy approaches .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.