EFNA5 (ephrin A5) is a membrane-bound ligand that belongs to the ephrin family and interacts with Eph receptors, particularly of the EphA class. The protein is involved in critical cellular processes including:
Cell adhesion and cytoskeletal remodeling
Cell proliferation regulation
Migration and invasion processes
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)
The protein's molecular weight is approximately 26 kDa, and it consists of 228 amino acids in its mature form .
EFNA5 antibodies have been validated for multiple research applications:
| Application | Validation Status | Common Sample Types |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot (WB) | Primary validation | Cell lysates, tissue homogenates |
| Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | Primary validation | FFPE tissue sections, frozen sections |
| Immunofluorescence (IF) | Primary validation | Fixed cells, tissue sections |
| ELISA | Secondary validation | Purified protein, serum |
| Immunocytochemistry (ICC) | Secondary validation | Cultured cells |
For IHC applications, EFNA5 antibodies have been successfully used on various tissues including brain, melanoma, and hepatoma samples . Validation studies typically show cytoplasmic and/or membrane staining patterns depending on the tissue type and antibody used .
For Western blot applications, EFNA5 antibodies can detect both endogenous and recombinant EFNA5 proteins, with successful detection reported in multiple cell lines including HeLa, HepG2, and LM3 .
Based on published research protocols, the following optimized conditions are recommended for EFNA5 detection:
For immunohistochemistry:
Antigen retrieval: Citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 10 minutes at 95°C
Blocking: 3% hydrogen peroxide (10 minutes) followed by 5% BSA (30 minutes at 37°C)
Primary antibody: Mouse anti-EFNA5 mAb (1:50 dilution) or rabbit polyclonal (1:500 dilution)
Incubation: Overnight at 4°C
For Western blotting:
Protein extraction: RIPA buffer with protease inhibitors
Loading: 25-50 μg protein per lane
Transfer: Constant current 350 mA for 2 hours in ice water bath
Blocking: 5% skim milk for 1 hour at room temperature
Primary antibody: Dilute according to manufacturer specifications (typical range 1:500-1:1000)
Secondary antibody: HRP-conjugated, species-appropriate (typically 1:10000 dilution)
These conditions should be optimized for specific experimental systems and antibodies.
The choice between polyclonal and monoclonal EFNA5 antibodies significantly impacts experimental outcomes:
Polyclonal EFNA5 antibodies:
Recognize multiple epitopes across the EFNA5 protein
Typically produced in rabbits or goats
Examples: Rabbit polyclonal antibody from Proteintech (17735-1-AP), Rabbit polyclonal from Absin (abs130417a)
Advantages: Higher sensitivity due to multiple epitope binding; better for detecting native proteins
Best applications: Western blotting, IHC of fixed tissues
Monoclonal EFNA5 antibodies:
Target a single specific epitope
Typically produced in mice
Example: Mouse anti-Efna5 mAb (ab60705)
Advantages: Higher specificity, reduced batch-to-batch variation, better for distinguishing between related proteins
Best applications: Flow cytometry, applications requiring absolute specificity
For comprehensive studies, using both antibody types provides complementary data. Western blot validation should precede other applications to confirm specificity for the target protein.
EFNA5 expression shows significant variability across cancer types, which has important implications for experimental design and interpretation:
Hepatocellular carcinoma:
EFNA5 is significantly downregulated compared to normal hepatocytes
Expression analysis using qRT-PCR showed markedly reduced levels in HepG2, LM3, Huh7, and PLC/PRF5 cell lines
Functions as a tumor suppressor
Overexpression experiments demonstrated inhibition of proliferation, migration, and invasion
Ovarian cancer:
These contrasting expression patterns highlight the context-dependent role of EFNA5 in different tumor microenvironments and emphasize the importance of appropriate controls when using EFNA5 antibodies in cancer research.
Research using validated EFNA5 antibodies has revealed several key molecular pathways through which EFNA5 influences cancer progression:
In hepatocellular carcinoma:
EFNA5 inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)
Western blot analysis reveals that EFNA5 overexpression:
Increases E-cadherin expression (epithelial marker)
Decreases N-cadherin and Vimentin expression (mesenchymal markers)
Reduces c-Myc and c-Jun levels (oncogenic transcription factors)
Suppresses EGFR expression (growth factor receptor)
These molecular changes correlate with reduced cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in functional assays
In ovarian cancer:
EFNA5 demonstrates atypical signaling compared to other ephrin family members
While canonical ephrins like EFNA1 induce robust EphA2 tyrosine phosphorylation and receptor degradation, EFNA5 shows:
Limited EphA2-Y588 phosphorylation
Minimal receptor internalization and degradation
Potential to maintain oncogenic EphA2-S897 phosphorylation
These unique signaling properties may contribute to EFNA5's association with aggressive disease
Understanding these mechanistic differences is essential for researchers using EFNA5 antibodies to investigate cancer biology.
Comprehensive validation of EFNA5 antibodies should include multiple approaches:
Western blot validation:
Use recombinant EFNA5 protein as positive control
Include EFNA5 knockdown samples as negative controls
Verify band appears at expected molecular weight (26 kDa)
Check for cross-reactivity with other ephrin family members
Genetic validation approaches:
Peptide competition assays:
Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide
Observe elimination of specific signal
Include graded concentrations of competing peptide
Cross-reactivity assessment:
Multi-method verification:
Compare results across different detection methods (IHC, WB, IF)
Use antibodies targeting different epitopes of EFNA5
Correlate protein detection with mRNA expression data
Appropriate validation is particularly critical when studying EFNA5 due to its homology with other ephrin family members and its context-dependent functions.
Some tissues present challenges for EFNA5 immunodetection. Researchers have developed specialized protocols:
For brain and neural tissues:
Extended fixation (24-48 hours in 4% PFA) followed by sucrose cryoprotection
Enhanced antigen retrieval: Citrate buffer pH 6.0 at 95°C for 15-20 minutes
Signal amplification using tyramide signal amplification (TSA) systems
For retinal tissue:
As described in published protocols: Antigen retrieval in citrate buffer followed by hydrogen peroxide treatment
Careful blocking with 5% BSA at 37°C for 30 minutes
For heavily fibrotic tissues:
Enzymatic pretreatment: Brief proteinase K or hyaluronidase digestion
Enhanced permeabilization: 0.3-0.5% Triton X-100 for 30-60 minutes
Polymer-based detection systems like DAKO EnVision
Multiple antibody application cycles with extended incubation times
Critical controls:
Include positive control tissues with known EFNA5 expression
Test multiple antibody concentrations and incubation times
Compare chromogenic versus fluorescent detection methods
Include no-primary-antibody controls to assess background
These optimizations should be systematically tested and documented for reproducible results.
EFNA5, like other ephrins, exists in both membrane-bound and soluble forms, creating technical challenges for antibody-based detection:
Recommended protocols for distinguishing forms:
Subcellular fractionation:
Separate membrane and cytosolic fractions before Western blotting
Use validated markers to confirm fraction purity (Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase for membrane, GAPDH for cytosolic)
Analyze EFNA5 distribution between fractions
Flow cytometry for cell surface detection:
Non-permeabilized cells: Detects only membrane-bound EFNA5
Permeabilized cells: Detects total EFNA5
The difference between signals represents intracellular pools
Specialized extraction methods:
Membrane protein extraction requires detergent-containing buffers
RIPA buffer efficiently extracts both forms
Phase separation using Triton X-114 can segregate membrane-bound proteins
Immunostaining optimization:
For membrane-bound EFNA5: Minimal or no permeabilization
For total EFNA5: Standard permeabilization protocols
Compare patterns to distinguish localization
Enzymatic release:
Treatment with PI-PLC (phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C) cleaves GPI anchors
Analyze release of EFNA5 into supernatant after treatment
Understanding the distribution between these forms provides crucial insights into EFNA5 function in normal and pathological contexts.
Based on hepatoma research, EFNA5 regulates EMT, making this a valuable application for EFNA5 antibodies:
Experimental workflow for studying EFNA5 in EMT:
Baseline expression analysis:
Use Western blotting with validated EFNA5 antibodies (1:500 dilution)
Analyze alongside EMT markers:
E-cadherin (epithelial)
N-cadherin, Vimentin (mesenchymal)
c-Myc, c-Jun (transcription factors)
Functional studies with EFNA5 modulation:
Transfect cells with EFNA5 expression plasmids
Perform knockdown using siRNA/shRNA
Analyze EMT marker changes by Western blot and qRT-PCR
Migration and invasion assays:
Transwell migration assays
Boyden chamber invasion assays with Matrigel coating
Document and quantify cell numbers per field
Signaling pathway investigation:
Analyze EGFR pathway components
Examine AKT and ERK phosphorylation status
Use phospho-specific antibodies in Western blotting
Key findings from published research:
EFNA5 overexpression in HepG2 and LM3 cells significantly inhibited migration (p<0.01) and invasion (p<0.01)
EFNA5 overexpression increased E-cadherin and decreased N-cadherin, Vimentin, c-Myc, and c-Jun levels
These molecular changes correlated with reduced cell migration and invasion in functional assays
These approaches provide a comprehensive framework for studying EFNA5's role in EMT using validated antibodies.
For researchers conducting advanced multiplexed imaging studies with EFNA5 antibodies:
Antibody selection for multiplexing:
Choose antibodies raised in different host species to avoid secondary antibody cross-reactivity
Select antibodies recognizing different epitopes if using multiple EFNA5 antibodies
Validate each antibody individually before multiplexing
Sequential staining protocols:
Apply tyramide signal amplification (TSA) for sequential staining
Between rounds, strip primary-secondary complexes while preserving fluorophores
Validate that stripping doesn't affect tissue integrity or previously deposited signals
Spectral considerations:
Select fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap
Include appropriate single-stain controls for spectral unmixing
Consider photobleaching characteristics when designing imaging sequence
Controls specific for EFNA5 multiplexing:
Include EFNA5 knockdown/overexpression controls
Perform staining with individual antibodies as reference
Include absorption controls with recombinant EFNA5 protein
Data analysis approaches:
Quantify colocalization using Pearson or Manders coefficients
Apply machine learning algorithms for pattern recognition
Use nuclear counterstains as references for cell segmentation
These considerations will ensure robust results when incorporating EFNA5 antibodies into complex multiplexed imaging studies.
EFNA5 undergoes several post-translational modifications that can affect antibody recognition:
GPI anchoring:
EFNA5 is attached to the cell membrane via a GPI anchor
Some antibodies may have differential access to epitopes near the anchor
PI-PLC treatment can be used to release GPI-anchored proteins for detection
Glycosylation:
N-linked and O-linked glycosylation affects apparent molecular weight
Western blots may show heterogeneous banding patterns (28-35 kDa range)
Deglycosylation treatments:
PNGase F for N-linked glycans
O-glycosidase for O-linked glycans
Compare before/after treatment to assess glycosylation impact
Proteolytic processing:
EFNA5 can be cleaved to generate soluble forms
Antibodies targeting different regions may detect different processed forms
Use antibodies against N-terminal and C-terminal regions to identify processing events
Technical approaches to address these challenges:
Include appropriate protease inhibitors in all extraction buffers
Compare reducing vs. non-reducing conditions in Western blotting
Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Analyze band patterns carefully, considering potential modified forms
Include controls with enzymatic modification/demodification