EMB514 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 weeks lead time (made-to-order)
Synonyms
EMB514 antibody; DOM1 antibody; At5g62440 antibody; K19B1.5 antibody; K19B1.6Protein EMBRYO DEFECTIVE 514 antibody; Protein DOMINO 1 antibody
Target Names
EMB514
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody targets a protein potentially involved in ribosome biogenesis and cell cycle regulation. It plays a crucial role in maintaining normal nuclear and nucleolar function.
Gene References Into Functions
  • The DOMINO1 gene encodes a protein essential for nuclear and nucleolar function. GFP fusion protein studies demonstrate its nuclear localization. [DOMINO1] PMID: 15341625
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT5G62440

STRING: 3702.AT5G62440.1

UniGene: At.29048

Subcellular Location
Nucleus.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed in leaves, flowers and embryos at globular stage.

Q&A

What is the target specificity of EMB514 Antibody and how should researchers validate it?

EMB514 Antibody (catalog number CSB-PA921914XA01DOA) targets a specific protein, with validation requiring a multi-step approach . Researchers should:

  • Perform Western blot analysis with positive control samples expressing the target protein

  • Include negative controls (knockout or knockdown cells)

  • Conduct immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry confirmation

  • Use competing peptides to demonstrate binding inhibition
    Similar to approaches used with other research antibodies, such as those against virus proteins, specificity validation should include cross-reactivity testing against closely related proteins . Comparing results with other antibodies targeting the same protein can provide valuable insights into relative performance, as demonstrated in studies of antibody characterization .

What are the optimal storage and handling conditions for maintaining EMB514 Antibody activity?

To preserve antibody function:

  • Store aliquoted antibody at -20°C for long-term storage to minimize freeze-thaw cycles

  • Keep working dilutions at 4°C for up to one month

  • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles which can lead to protein denaturation and loss of binding activity

  • Follow manufacturer recommendations for specific buffer conditions

  • Include carrier proteins (such as BSA) for dilute solutions to prevent adsorption to tube walls

  • Monitor for signs of precipitation or aggregation before use
    These practices align with standard protocols for maintaining antibody integrity in research settings .

How should researchers optimize Western blot protocols for EMB514 Antibody?

Western blot optimization requires systematic evaluation of multiple parameters:

  • Sample preparation:

    • Use appropriate lysis buffers containing protease inhibitors

    • Determine optimal protein loading (typically 20-50 μg total protein)

    • Include proper denaturation conditions

  • Electrophoresis and transfer:

    • Select appropriate gel percentage based on target protein size

    • Optimize transfer conditions (buffer composition, time, current)

  • Antibody incubation:

    • Test different blocking buffers (BSA vs. non-fat dry milk)

    • Determine optimal primary antibody dilution through titration experiments

    • Optimize incubation time and temperature

  • Detection optimization:

    • Select appropriate secondary antibody

    • Determine exposure time for optimal signal-to-noise ratio
      Studies have shown that antibodies targeting the same protein can demonstrate significantly different sensitivities in Western blot applications, highlighting the importance of systematic optimization .

What considerations are critical for using EMB514 Antibody in immunohistochemistry?

For optimal immunohistochemical results:

  • Sample preparation factors:

    • Fixation method affects epitope preservation (formalin, paraformaldehyde)

    • Antigen retrieval methods should be systematically tested (heat-induced vs. enzymatic)

    • Section thickness influences antibody penetration

  • Staining optimization:

    • Titrate antibody concentration

    • Test different incubation times and temperatures

    • Compare detection systems (ABC, polymer-based, tyramine amplification)

  • Validation approaches:

    • Include positive and negative control tissues

    • Perform peptide competition assays

    • Compare with alternative detection methods
      Research with other antibodies has demonstrated that sensitivity in IHC can vary dramatically between antibodies targeting the same protein, with some showing >90% sensitivity while others demonstrate <20% for the same target .

How can researchers determine the binding kinetics and affinity of EMB514 Antibody?

Binding kinetics characterization requires specialized approaches:

  • Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) or Bio-Layer Interferometry (BLI):

    • Measures association rate constant (kon)

    • Determines dissociation rate constant (koff)

    • Calculates equilibrium dissociation constant (KD)

  • Flow cytometry-based methods:

    • Incubate cells expressing the target with varying antibody concentrations

    • Plot mean fluorescence intensity against antibody concentration

    • Calculate KD values through curve fitting

  • ELISA-based measurements:

    • Coat plates with purified antigen at varying concentrations

    • Generate Scatchard plots for affinity determination
      High-affinity antibodies typically show KD values in the nanomolar range (10^-9 M), as demonstrated in studies of other well-characterized antibodies .

How does epitope specificity affect experimental applications of EMB514 Antibody?

Epitope recognition significantly impacts experimental outcomes:

  • Conformational vs. linear epitopes:

    • Affects performance in native vs. denatured conditions

    • Influences application suitability across different techniques

    • Impacts cross-reactivity with related proteins

  • Epitope accessibility factors:

    • Protein folding effects

    • Post-translational modifications

    • Protein-protein interactions

  • Mapping approaches:

    • Peptide arrays for linear epitope identification

    • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry for conformational epitopes

    • Mutational analysis for critical binding residues
      Recent research on virus-specific antibodies demonstrates that epitope specificity can significantly affect both binding properties and functional outcomes in experimental systems .

What are best practices for validating EMB514 Antibody specificity using genetic approaches?

Genetic validation represents the gold standard for antibody specificity:

  • Generate appropriate control samples:

    • CRISPR/Cas9 knockout cell lines

    • siRNA/shRNA knockdown systems

    • Overexpression systems for positive controls

  • Perform comprehensive validation:

    • Western blot comparing wild-type vs. knockout samples

    • Immunostaining to assess signal specificity

    • Flow cytometry for applicable targets

  • Address potential pitfalls:

    • Compensate for developmental adaptations in knockout systems

    • Assess knockdown efficiency quantitatively

    • Consider protein half-life in transient systems
      This rigorous approach aligns with validation principles used in characterizing antibodies for both research and clinical applications .

How should researchers interpret and troubleshoot unexpected results with EMB514 Antibody?

When encountering unexpected results, implement a systematic approach:

  • Verify antibody integrity:

    • Check storage conditions and freeze-thaw history

    • Confirm antibody concentration

    • Test with positive control samples

  • Evaluate protocol variables:

    • Blocking conditions

    • Antibody dilution and incubation parameters

    • Buffer compositions and pH

    • Detection system performance

  • Consider biological variables:

    • Post-translational modifications affecting epitope recognition

    • Protein-protein interactions masking binding sites

    • Developmental changes in target expression

    • Splice variants lacking the epitope

  • Design validation experiments:

    • Use alternative antibodies targeting different epitopes

    • Employ complementary detection methods (mRNA analysis, mass spectrometry)

    • Test in different biological systems or conditions
      Such systematic troubleshooting reflects the scientific rigor demonstrated in studies characterizing antibody performance across different experimental contexts .

How does EMB514 Antibody compare with other antibodies targeting the same protein?

Comparative analysis requires:

  • Side-by-side testing:

    • Perform parallel experiments under identical conditions

    • Compare signal-to-noise ratio

    • Evaluate detection sensitivity limits

    • Assess specificity in complex samples

  • Application-specific comparison:

    • Western blot performance (sensitivity, background)

    • Immunohistochemistry results (specificity, staining intensity)

    • Flow cytometry (binding affinity, separation index)

  • Documentation of differences:

    • Epitope recognition regions

    • Isotype and species of origin

    • Clonality (monoclonal vs polyclonal)
      Studies comparing antibodies against the same target have demonstrated substantial variations in sensitivity, specificity, and application performance, highlighting the importance of selecting the optimal antibody for each experimental context .

What considerations apply when using EMB514 Antibody in multiplexed immunoassays?

Multiplexed detection requires additional validation:

  • Antibody compatibility:

    • Test for interference between antibodies

    • Ensure secondary antibody specificity

    • Validate signal separation

  • Protocol modifications:

    • Adjust antibody concentrations for balanced signals

    • Determine optimal application sequence

    • Modify blocking to minimize background

  • Implement controls:

    • Single-stain controls to establish baseline signals

    • Fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls

    • Absorption controls to verify specificity
      This approach reflects methods used in complex epitope-specific antibody profiling studies, where multiple antibodies must function reliably in a single assay system .

Data Table: Typical Performance Parameters for Research-Grade Antibodies

ParameterOptimal RangeSuboptimal IndicatorsValidation Method
Western Blot Sensitivity0.1-10 ng proteinMultiple bands, high backgroundTitration with purified protein
IHC Dilution Range1:100-1:1000Non-specific staining, weak signalDilution series on positive controls
Flow Cytometry Separation Index>2.0Poor separation from negative populationComparison with isotype control
Binding Affinity (KD)10^-9 to 10^-10 M>10^-7 MSPR or cell-based binding assays
Cross-Reactivity<10% with related proteins>25% binding to non-targetsTesting against protein family members
Reproducibility (CV%)<15%>25% variation between experimentsRepeated testing under standardized conditions
This comprehensive FAQ guide provides researchers with methodological approaches for optimizing EMB514 Antibody use across various experimental applications while emphasizing the critical importance of thorough validation and systematic troubleshooting in antibody-based research.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.