At2g48020 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 week lead time (made-to-order)
Synonyms
At2g48020 antibody; T9J23.17Sugar transporter ERD6-like 7 antibody
Target Names
At2g48020
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody targets a sugar transporter protein.
Gene References Into Functions

Function: This antibody targets a sugar transporter. Further research indicates that alternative splicing may regulate the expression of a zinc-responsive mRNA variant of a related transporter (ZIF2), potentially influencing plant tolerance to zinc ions.

Reference:
1. Alternative splicing controls the levels of a Zn-responsive mRNA variant of the ZIF2 transporter to enhance plant tolerance to the metal ion. [ZIF2] PMID: 24832541

Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT2G48020

STRING: 3702.AT2G48020.1

UniGene: At.13473

Protein Families
Major facilitator superfamily, Sugar transporter (TC 2.A.1.1) family
Subcellular Location
Membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the At2g48020 gene and why develop antibodies against its protein?

At2g48020 (also known as AtZIF2) encodes a Major facilitator superfamily protein in Arabidopsis thaliana located on chromosome 2 . This membrane protein is involved in zinc transport and tolerance mechanisms. Developing antibodies against this protein allows researchers to:

  • Study protein localization via immunofluorescence microscopy

  • Investigate protein-protein interactions through co-immunoprecipitation

  • Examine protein expression levels via Western blotting

  • Perform chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to analyze DNA-protein interactions

The functional characterization of this transporter requires specific antibodies to understand its role in metal homeostasis pathways in plants.

What types of antibodies are suitable for At2g48020 protein detection?

When selecting antibodies for At2g48020 detection, consider these options:

Antibody TypeAdvantagesLimitationsRecommended Applications
Polyclonal- Recognizes multiple epitopes
- Higher chance of successful detection
- Generally provides stronger signals
- Batch-to-batch variation
- Less specificity
Western blot, Immunoprecipitation
Monoclonal- Consistent between batches
- High specificity
- Reduced background
- Recognizes single epitope
- May have reduced sensitivity
Immunofluorescence, ChIP, Flow cytometry
Recombinant- Highly consistent
- Can be engineered for specific properties
- Higher development costs
- Requires advanced expertise
All applications where consistency is critical

For proteins like At2g48020 with potentially low expression levels, polyclonal antibodies might provide better sensitivity, but monoclonals offer greater specificity for discriminating between related transporters .

How should I validate a new At2g48020 antibody for specificity?

Methodical validation is essential for antibody reliability:

  • Genetic controls: Test antibody against tissue from at2g48020 knockout mutants. Absence of signal confirms specificity .

  • Epitope competition assay: Pre-incubate antibody with the peptide used for immunization before applying to samples. Signal reduction indicates epitope-specific binding.

  • Cross-reactivity testing: Test against related proteins (other Major facilitator superfamily members) to assess potential cross-reactivity.

  • Multiple detection methods: Validate across different techniques (Western blot, immunofluorescence, ELISA) to confirm consistent target recognition.

  • Recombinant protein controls: Use purified recombinant At2g48020 protein as positive control.

For membrane proteins like At2g48020, verification using both denatured (Western blot) and native (immunoprecipitation) conditions is particularly important to confirm epitope accessibility .

What are optimal conditions for using At2g48020 antibodies in Western blotting?

Membrane proteins require specialized protocols:

  • Sample preparation:

    • Include membrane solubilization detergents (0.5-1% SDS, Triton X-100, or NP-40)

    • Heat samples at lower temperatures (37°C for 30 minutes rather than 95°C boiling) to prevent aggregation

  • Blocking optimization:

    • Use 2.5% skimmed milk in TBS-T for 2 hours at room temperature

    • For high background, switch to 5% BSA blocking solution

  • Antibody dilution:

    • Primary antibody: Start with 1:1000 dilution in blocking buffer

    • Secondary antibody: 1:5000-1:10000 dilution

  • Incubation parameters:

    • Primary antibody: Overnight at 4°C with gentle agitation

    • Secondary antibody: 1-2 hours at room temperature

  • Membrane washing:

    • 3 × 10 minutes with TBS-T after each antibody incubation

    • Final wash with TBS only to remove detergent

For reproducible results, detailed optimization and documentation of each parameter is critical .

How can I optimize Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) protocols for At2g48020 antibodies?

ChIP optimization for plant transcription factors requires careful consideration:

  • Cross-linking optimization:

    • Use 1% formaldehyde in 1× PBS for 10 minutes under vacuum infiltration

    • Quench with 0.125 M glycine for 5 minutes

    • Extended vacuum infiltration (2-3 cycles) ensures penetration through plant cell walls

  • Chromatin fragmentation:

    • Optimize sonication parameters: 10-15 cycles of 15 seconds ON/30 seconds OFF

    • Target DNA fragments of 200-1000 bp with peak around 500 bp

    • Verify fragmentation by gel electrophoresis before proceeding

  • Immunoprecipitation parameters:

    • Pre-clearing: 50 μL protein A/G magnetic beads for 2 hours at 4°C

    • Use 3-10 μg antibody per 25 μg chromatin

    • Incubate overnight at 4°C with rotation

  • Washing stringency:

    • Sequential washes with increasing stringency:

      • Low salt buffer (150 mM NaCl)

      • High salt buffer (500 mM NaCl)

      • LiCl buffer (250 mM LiCl)

      • TE buffer

  • Controls:

    • Include at2g48020 mutant tissue as negative control

    • Include known target genomic regions as positive control

    • Use non-target genomic regions as negative control

For transcription factors like AtZIF2, successful ChIP protocols typically require higher antibody amounts and more stringent washing conditions compared to histone modifications .

How can machine learning approaches improve At2g48020 antibody design and functionality?

Advanced computational methods can enhance antibody development:

  • Epitope prediction:

    • Machine learning algorithms can identify immunogenic regions with higher accuracy than traditional methods

    • Structural analysis of At2g48020 transmembrane topology guides accessible epitope selection

  • Affinity optimization:

    • AI tools like AF2Complex can predict antibody-antigen binding interfaces

    • Deep learning models trained on protein structure data can suggest mutations to improve binding affinity

  • Cross-reactivity assessment:

    • Machine learning models can predict potential cross-reactivity with related transporters

    • Polyreactivity prediction tools identify sequence features associated with non-specific binding

  • Structure-guided optimization:

    • AlphaFold-Multimer predicts antibody-antigen complex structures without templates

    • FlexddG calculates binding free energy changes for potential mutations

Recent studies demonstrate that AI-designed antibodies achieved 90% success rates in binding predictions, significantly reducing experimental screening time . For membrane proteins like At2g48020, computational approaches are particularly valuable due to challenges in traditional antibody development against these targets.

How can I resolve high background issues when using At2g48020 antibodies for immunolocalization?

Background reduction strategies:

  • Antibody optimization:

    • Titrate antibody concentration (start with higher dilutions)

    • Pre-adsorb antibody with plant tissue from at2g48020 knockout plants

    • Use affinity-purified antibody fractions

  • Blocking improvements:

    • Extend blocking time to 2-3 hours at room temperature

    • Use alternative blocking agents (5% BSA, 10% normal serum from secondary antibody host species)

    • Add 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 to reduce hydrophobic interactions

  • Sample preparation refinements:

    • Optimize fixation time and concentration

    • Include quenching step for aldehyde fixatives

    • Add additional washing steps between incubations

  • Controls and validation:

    • Always run no-primary antibody control

    • Include at2g48020 mutant tissue as negative control

    • Consider using epitope-tagged At2g48020 expressed in plants as positive control

If non-specific binding persists despite these measures, consider developing a new antibody against a different region of the protein or using CRISPR-tagged endogenous At2g48020.

What strategies can improve antibody performance for poorly immunogenic regions of At2g48020?

For challenging membrane proteins:

  • Peptide design optimization:

    • Select peptides from extracellular or cytosolic domains rather than transmembrane regions

    • Use hydrophilic, surface-exposed regions predicted by structural models

    • Incorporate carrier proteins (KLH, BSA) to enhance immunogenicity

  • Advanced immunization protocols:

    • Employ multi-site, low-volume immunization strategy

    • Use DNA immunization followed by protein boosting

    • Consider longer immunization schedules with carefully timed boosts

  • Alternative expression systems:

    • Express difficult domains as fusion proteins with highly immunogenic partners

    • Use bacterial display systems to present properly folded epitopes

    • Consider synthetic antibody library screening approaches

  • AI-assisted epitope selection:

    • Implement computational models to predict optimal antigenic regions

    • Use structural prediction tools to identify surface-accessible epitopes

    • Apply platform approaches like AbGen which combine machine learning with experimental validation

Recent studies utilizing AI-driven antibody design have shown success rates of 70-90% for target binding compared to 10-30% with traditional methods .

How should I analyze quantitative differences in At2g48020 protein levels across experimental conditions?

Rigorous quantification methodology:

  • Sample normalization strategies:

    • Use multiple reference proteins (actin, tubulin, GAPDH) rather than a single loading control

    • Consider tissue-specific reference proteins for comparing different plant organs

    • Implement total protein normalization methods (Stain-Free technology, Ponceau S)

  • Technical considerations:

    • Run biological replicates (n≥3) on separate blots with identical exposure conditions

    • Include a dilution series of reference sample for calibration curve

    • Use digital image acquisition with unsaturated signals

  • Quantification methods:

    • Apply densitometry software with consistent region-of-interest selection

    • Subtract local background from each measurement

    • Normalize to multiple reference proteins or total protein

  • Statistical analysis:

    • Use appropriate statistical tests for experimental design (ANOVA, t-test)

    • Report confidence intervals alongside p-values

    • Consider power analysis to determine adequate sample size

  • Biological validation:

    • Correlate protein levels with transcript abundance (qRT-PCR)

    • Confirm changes with alternative methods (mass spectrometry)

    • Examine functional consequences of altered expression

Changes in membrane protein abundance like At2g48020 should be interpreted considering potential redistribution between membrane compartments rather than just total protein changes.

How can I differentiate between specific and non-specific signals when studying low-abundance At2g48020 protein?

Advanced discrimination strategies:

  • Control implementation:

    • Genetic controls: Compare wild-type to at2g48020 knockout lines

    • Competitive blocking: Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide

    • Secondary-only controls: Identify non-specific secondary antibody binding

  • Signal enhancement methods:

    • Use high-sensitivity detection systems (enhanced chemiluminescence)

    • Implement signal amplification technologies (tyramide signal amplification)

    • Consider proximity ligation assays for improved specificity

  • Antibody validation criteria:

    • Test across multiple experimental methods

    • Verify size of detected protein matches predicted molecular weight

    • Confirm subcellular localization matches predicted patterns

  • Alternative confirmation approaches:

    • Generate transgenic lines expressing epitope-tagged At2g48020

    • Use multiple antibodies targeting different regions of the protein

    • Combine with mass spectrometry validation of immunoprecipitated protein

For membrane proteins like At2g48020, signal specificity should be confirmed using both biochemical (Western blot) and localization (immunofluorescence) approaches to build confidence in antibody reliability.

How might next-generation antibody technologies enhance At2g48020 research?

Cutting-edge approaches:

  • Nanobody development:

    • Single-domain antibodies offer improved access to sterically restricted epitopes in membrane proteins

    • Enhanced tissue penetration for in vivo imaging applications

    • Potential for intracellular expression as research tools

  • CRISPR-based endogenous tagging:

    • Direct tagging of At2g48020 with epitope or fluorescent tags

    • Preserves native expression patterns and regulation

    • Eliminates concerns about antibody specificity

  • Proximity-dependent labeling:

    • Antibody-enzyme fusions for identifying interacting partners

    • BioID or APEX2 systems reveal transient interaction networks

    • Map protein neighborhoods within membrane microdomains

  • Ultra-specific recombinant antibodies:

    • AI-designed antibodies with minimal cross-reactivity to related transporters

    • Species-specific variants for comparative plant biology

    • Conformation-specific antibodies to detect functional states

Studies utilizing deep learning approaches for antibody design have demonstrated significant improvements in specificity and affinity compared to traditional methods, with computational prediction success rates of over 80% .

What considerations are important when designing experiments to study At2g48020 protein-protein interactions?

Methodological framework:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation optimization:

    • Membrane solubilization conditions are critical (detergent type, concentration)

    • Crosslinking may be necessary to capture transient interactions

    • Use reciprocal co-IP with both bait and prey antibodies

    • Include appropriate negative controls (IgG, knockout lines)

  • Proximity-based interaction methods:

    • Split-protein complementation assays (BiFC, split-luciferase)

    • FRET-FLIM for live-cell interaction detection

    • Proximity ligation assays for endogenous protein interactions

  • Mass spectrometry workflows:

    • Label-free quantitative approaches

    • Stable isotope labeling (SILAC, TMT) for comparative studies

    • Targeted proteomics for validation of specific interactions

  • Validation strategies:

    • Functional assays to assess biological relevance

    • Mutational analysis of interaction interfaces

    • In vitro binding assays with purified components

    • Genetic interaction studies

  • Bioinformatic integration:

    • Network analysis to identify functional clusters

    • Structural modeling of interaction interfaces

    • Orthologous interactions across species

For membrane proteins like At2g48020, consider membrane-specific interactome techniques such as membrane yeast two-hybrid or split-ubiquitin systems that are specifically designed for transmembrane proteins.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.