ERF021 belongs to the Ethylene Response Factor (ERF) family in plants, specifically in Arabidopsis thaliana. As a plant transcription factor, it's involved in stress response pathways and developmental processes. The protein contains an ETS domain and functions as part of the plant's transcriptional regulation system. Understanding its role provides insights into plant adaptation mechanisms to environmental stressors and development regulation .
ERF021 antibodies are typically rabbit polyclonal antibodies raised against recombinant Arabidopsis thaliana ERF021 protein. They are supplied in liquid form containing PBS (pH 7.2) with 40-50% glycerol and 0.03% Proclin 300 as a preservative. Most are affinity-purified and designed for research applications including ELISA and Western Blotting. The typical product is purified using antigen affinity methods and is validated for Arabidopsis thaliana reactivity .
ERF021 antibody specifically targets the ERF021 protein in Arabidopsis thaliana, distinguishing it from other ERF family antibodies like ERF003, ERF025, or ERF036. Each antibody in this family is raised against different immunogens corresponding to specific amino acid sequences unique to each ERF protein. For example, commercially available ERF021 antibodies are developed against a recombinant protein corresponding to Arabidopsis thaliana ERF021, while other ERF antibodies target different epitopes specific to their respective proteins .
ERF021 antibody has been validated primarily for ELISA and Western Blotting applications in plant research. For Western Blotting, researchers typically use a dilution range similar to other plant ERF antibodies (typically 1:500-1:2000). The antibody is particularly useful for studying transcription factor expression and localization in Arabidopsis thaliana, making it valuable for research on plant stress responses and developmental biology .
For optimal Western Blotting results with ERF021 antibody:
Prepare protein samples by diluting in Laemmli buffer (with or without mercaptoethanol)
Heat samples at 95°C for 5 minutes
Separate proteins on 8-12% electrophoresis gels (run at 100V for approximately 2 hours)
Transfer proteins to PVDF membrane
Block membrane with PBS-T/1% BSA for 1 hour at 37°C
Incubate with primary ERF021 antibody at recommended dilution (typically 1:500-1:2000) overnight at 4°C
Wash with PBS-T (4 times)
Incubate with secondary antibody (anti-rabbit HRP conjugate) at 1:5000-1:40000 dilution for 1 hour at 37°C
Wash with PBS-T (4 times)
For immunofluorescence optimization with ERF021 antibody:
Fix samples in 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 15-20 minutes
Perform antigen retrieval if needed (particularly for paraffin-embedded sections)
Block non-specific binding with appropriate blocking buffer (3-5% BSA in PBS)
Dilute ERF021 antibody at 1:100-1:1000 in antibody dilution buffer
Incubate at 4°C overnight or at room temperature for 1-2 hours
Wash thoroughly with PBS (3-5 times, 5 minutes each)
Apply appropriate fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody
For nuclear transcription factor visualization, co-stain with DAPI
Include positive controls (Arabidopsis tissues with known ERF021 expression)
Use confocal microscopy for optimal visualization of nuclear localization
Validating ERF021 antibody specificity requires multiple approaches:
Immunoblotting with recombinant protein: Test antibody against purified recombinant ERF021 protein as a positive control
Knockout/knockdown controls: Use ERF021 knockout or knockdown plant lines as negative controls
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate antibody with excess immunizing peptide to confirm signal specificity
Cross-reactivity assessment: Test against related ERF family proteins to confirm specificity
Multiple antibody approach: Compare results with other antibodies targeting different epitopes of ERF021
Mass spectrometry validation: Confirm identity of immunoprecipitated proteins by mass spectrometry
Researchers should document specificity through comparison with published expression patterns and molecular weight verification on Western blots (expected MW can be predicted from the amino acid sequence) .
When investigating ERF021 localization:
Subcellular fractionation: Separate nuclear, cytoplasmic, and membrane fractions before immunoblotting
Co-localization studies: Combine ERF021 antibody with markers for specific subcellular compartments
Time-course experiments: Monitor localization changes following treatment with plant hormones (especially ethylene)
Stress response dynamics: Track localization shifts under various abiotic stresses
Live-cell imaging: Consider creating fluorescent protein fusions to complement antibody studies
ChIP experiments: Use ERF021 antibody for chromatin immunoprecipitation to identify DNA binding sites
Successful localization studies require careful optimization of fixation protocols to preserve nuclear architecture while maintaining epitope accessibility .
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) can significantly impact antibody recognition of ERF021:
Phosphorylation: ERF transcription factors are often regulated by phosphorylation, which may mask or reveal epitopes
Epitope accessibility: Conformational changes due to PTMs may alter antibody binding efficiency
Molecular weight shifts: Researchers should be aware that phosphorylated forms of ERF021 may show higher apparent molecular weights on Western blots
Phosphatase treatment: Compare antibody recognition before and after phosphatase treatment to assess phosphorylation dependence
PTM-specific antibodies: Consider using phospho-specific antibodies if studying activation states
Nuclear translocation: Many ERFs show nuclear translocation following phosphorylation events
Understanding the relationship between PTMs and antibody recognition is critical for accurate interpretation of experimental results, particularly when studying signaling pathways .
| Issue | Possible Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| No signal in Western blot | - Insufficient protein loading - Inefficient transfer - Antibody dilution too high - Degraded protein sample | - Increase protein loading to 20-30 μg - Verify transfer with Ponceau S staining - Optimize antibody concentration (try 1:500) - Add protease inhibitors during extraction |
| High background | - Insufficient blocking - Secondary antibody concentration too high - Contaminated buffers | - Increase blocking time or BSA percentage - Dilute secondary antibody further - Prepare fresh buffers - Add additional washing steps |
| Multiple bands | - Cross-reactivity with related ERFs - Protein degradation - Post-translational modifications | - Use more stringent washing conditions - Add protease inhibitors during extraction - Perform peptide competition assay |
| Inconsistent results | - Antibody storage issues - Sample preparation variability - Plant growth conditions | - Aliquot antibody to avoid freeze-thaw cycles - Standardize extraction protocol - Control growth conditions rigorously |
Proper experimental controls are essential for troubleshooting, including positive control samples with known ERF021 expression and negative controls using pre-immune serum or isotype controls .
To maintain optimal ERF021 antibody activity:
Store at 4°C for short-term use (up to 2 weeks)
For long-term storage, keep at -20°C or -80°C
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles by preparing single-use aliquots
Add carrier protein (BSA, 0.1-1%) if diluting for storage
Include preservatives (0.02-0.03% sodium azide or Proclin 300) for diluted solutions
Store in glycerol buffers (typically 40-50% glycerol) to prevent freezing damage
Never store diluted antibody solutions for extended periods
Monitor pH stability (optimal range: 7.0-7.4)
Keep antibody vials upright and avoid surface contamination
Document all freeze-thaw cycles and storage conditions for reproducibility
When comparing data across different antibody lots:
Lot validation: Test each new lot against a reference sample with known ERF021 expression
Signal quantification: Use densitometry to compare signal intensity between lots
Standard curves: Generate standard curves using recombinant protein for each lot
Internal loading controls: Normalize all data to consistent loading controls
Archival samples: Maintain reference samples for long-term projects
Epitope confirmation: Verify that different lots recognize the same epitope region
Experimental replication: Perform key experiments with both old and new lots in parallel
Documentation: Record lot numbers, dilutions, and performance metrics
Researchers should report antibody lot numbers in publications and be cautious when directly comparing quantitative data obtained with different lots .
To monitor ERF021 phosphorylation:
Phospho-specific antibodies: When available, these directly detect specific phosphorylated residues
Mobility shift assays: Phosphorylated ERFs often show reduced electrophoretic mobility
Phosphatase treatment: Compare antibody recognition before and after phosphatase treatment
Phos-tag™ gels: Use specialized acrylamide gels that enhance separation of phosphorylated proteins
2D gel electrophoresis: Separate phospho-isoforms based on charge differences
Immunoprecipitation followed by phospho-staining: IP with ERF021 antibody followed by Pro-Q Diamond staining
Mass spectrometry analysis: For definitive identification of phosphorylation sites
Phosphorylation analysis is particularly relevant as ERF transcription factors are often regulated by MAPK cascades in response to stress conditions .
For comparative ERF family studies:
Multiple antibody immunoblotting: Probe identical samples with different ERF-specific antibodies
Cross-reactivity testing: Determine if ERF021 antibody recognizes related family members
Expression correlation analysis: Compare expression patterns across different conditions
Co-immunoprecipitation: Investigate protein-protein interactions between ERF family members
ChIP-seq comparison: Identify shared and unique DNA binding sites between ERF proteins
Phylogenetic analysis: Map antibody epitope conservation across the ERF family
Knockout/knockdown phenotyping: Compare phenotypes of different ERF mutants
This approach helps establish functional redundancy or specialization among ERF family members and places ERF021 in the broader context of plant transcriptional regulation .
When antibody detection and transcript data conflict:
Post-transcriptional regulation: Investigate miRNA targeting or transcript stability
Translational control: Examine polysome association of ERF021 mRNA
Protein stability: Assess proteasome-dependent degradation rates
Epitope masking: Consider if protein interactions or modifications mask antibody epitopes
Antibody specificity: Re-validate antibody specificity with appropriate controls
Subcellular localization changes: Determine if protein redistribution affects extraction efficiency
Temporal dynamics: Implement time-course studies to capture expression/translation delays
Such discrepancies often reveal important regulatory mechanisms and should be investigated thoroughly rather than dismissed as technical errors. Protein-transcript correlation analysis across multiple conditions can provide valuable insights into ERF021 regulation .
For successful ChIP experiments with ERF021 antibody:
Crosslinking optimization: Test different formaldehyde concentrations (typically 1-3%) and incubation times
Sonication parameters: Optimize sonication to generate 200-500 bp DNA fragments
Antibody amount: Use 5-10 μg of ERF021 antibody per immunoprecipitation
Chromatin amount: Start with approximately 10 μg of chromatin per IP
Pre-clearing step: Include pre-clearing with protein A/G beads to reduce background
Controls: Include no-antibody controls and preferably IgG controls
Positive control regions: Target known ERF-binding promoters as positive controls
Elution conditions: Optimize elution buffer composition and incubation times
qPCR validation: Validate enrichment at candidate loci before proceeding to sequencing
The optimal antibody:chromatin ratio may require empirical determination for each experimental system. For whole-genome approaches, ChIP-seq library preparation should be optimized for the typically small amounts of immunoprecipitated DNA .
For plant stress response studies:
Timing is critical: Establish a detailed time-course to capture transient ERF021 expression/activation
Tissue specificity: Different plant tissues may show distinct ERF021 responses
Stress intensity standardization: Carefully control stress conditions for reproducibility
Multiple stress types: Compare ERF021 response across different abiotic stressors
Hormone interactions: Consider ethylene, jasmonate, and ABA crosstalk in experimental design
Subcellular fractionation: Monitor potential translocation between cellular compartments
Protein-protein interactions: Investigate stress-induced changes in interaction partners
Post-translational modifications: Assess changes in phosphorylation status during stress response
Researchers should also consider developmental stage effects, as stress responses often vary based on plant age and developmental phase .
For integrated antibody-proteomics approaches:
Immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry (IP-MS): Use ERF021 antibody to pull down protein complexes for MS analysis
Proximity labeling: Combine with BioID or APEX2 approaches to identify neighboring proteins
Crosslinking-IP (CLIP): Identify RNA interactions of ERF021 protein
Selected reaction monitoring (SRM): Develop targeted MS assays for ERF021 quantification
Parallel reaction monitoring (PRM): Enhance sensitivity for ERF021 detection in complex samples
Post-translational modification mapping: Identify specific modified residues by MS after IP
Comparison with total proteomics data: Contextualize ERF021 behavior within the global proteome
This integration allows researchers to move beyond simple detection toward understanding ERF021's place in complex regulatory networks and identifying novel interaction partners that may mediate its biological functions .