SQE5 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Molecular and Genetic Characteristics

Proline--tRNA ligase 2 (proS2) is encoded by the proS2 gene in Bacillus cereus. Key features include:

  • Gene ID: proS2 (alternative designation: BC0439) .

  • Protein Function: ATP-dependent ligation of proline to tRNA, ensuring translational fidelity .

  • Sequence Homology: Shares structural similarities with proline--tRNA ligases across Bacillus species, including B. anthracis and B. thuringiensis .

Table 1: Recombinant proS2 Variants and Host Systems

Host SystemPurity (%)Molecular Weight (kDa)Source OrganismReference
E. coli BL21(DE3)≥8535B. cereus ATCC 10987
Yeast/Baculovirus≥85Not specifiedB. anthracis
Mammalian Cells≥85Not specifiedB. thuringiensis

Recombinant Production and Purification

The enzyme is typically produced via heterologous expression in E. coli, yeast, or baculovirus systems. Key steps include:

  • Cloning: The proS2 gene is amplified via PCR and ligated into plasmids such as pET28 or pTZ57R/T for expression .

  • Expression: Induced using IPTG or mannose, with optimal yields achieved at 28–30°C .

  • Purification: Affinity chromatography and SDS-PAGE confirm ≥85% purity, with a molecular weight of ~35 kDa .

Critical Production Data

  • Shelf Life: Lyophilized forms remain stable for 12 months at -20°C/-80°C .

  • Amino Acid Sequence: Includes conserved motifs such as MAKEQVQAITKMEEDFAQWYTDIVKKAELV critical for catalytic activity .

Biochemical Properties and Stability

  • Optimal pH: Functions optimally at pH 8.0, similar to other Bacillus ligases .

  • Thermostability: Engineered proline substitutions (e.g., Lys121→Pro, Glu290→Pro) enhance stability, aligning with the "proline rule" for thermophilic enzymes .

  • Inhibitors: Activity is suppressed by FeCl₂, CuCl₂, and ZnCl₂ but enhanced by CoCl₂ .

Table 2: Biochemical Parameters

ParameterValueReference
Specific Activity22.7 units/mg protein
Optimal Temperature30–37°C
Binding Affinity (Mangiferin)Kᵢ = 0.075 mM

Applications in Research and Industry

  • Structural Studies: Used in molecular docking to analyze inhibitor interactions (e.g., mangiferin) with a binding energy of -10.2 kcal/mol .

  • Genetic Engineering: CRISPR/Cas9-modified B. cereus strains enable high-efficiency proS2 mutagenesis for functional studies .

  • Industrial Enzymes: Serves as a model for engineering thermostable ligases via proline substitutions .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 weeks (Made-to-order)
Synonyms
SQE5; SQP1,1; At5g24150; K12G2.2; Squalene epoxidase 5; AtSQE5; Squalene monooxygenase 1,1; SE 1,1
Target Names
SQE5
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody targets squalene epoxidase (SQE), a key enzyme in steroid biosynthesis. SQE catalyzes the stereospecific oxidation of squalene to (S)-2,3-epoxysqualene, a rate-limiting step in this pathway.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT5G24150

STRING: 3702.AT5G24150.1

UniGene: At.411

Protein Families
Squalene monooxygenase family
Subcellular Location
Membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed in seedlings, leaves, stems and inflorescences. Detected in siliques.

Q&A

What is squalene and why is it important in antibody research?

Squalene (SQE) is a naturally occurring organic compound that serves as a precursor in the synthesis of cholesterol and steroid hormones . It plays a crucial role in various biochemical pathways and has garnered interest in immunological research due to its potential as an antigen. Squalene's importance stems from its ubiquitous presence in biological systems and its involvement in fundamental metabolic processes. In the context of antibody research, understanding how the immune system recognizes and responds to squalene provides insights into basic immunological mechanisms. The study of anti-squalene antibodies helps researchers understand the body's response to both endogenous compounds and potential external agents that may contain squalene-like structures .

How does the SQE5 antibody differ from other squalene antibodies?

While specific information about the SQE5 antibody designation is not directly provided in the available search results, research indicates that antibodies against squalene can vary significantly in their binding specificity and reactivity . Some antibodies developed through immunization with squalene-containing formulations may recognize not only squalene but also related compounds like squalane (SQA), which is the fully hydrogenated form of squalene . The specificity of an antibody to squalene depends on the immunization protocol, the formulation used, and the presence of potential carrier molecules or adjuvants. Monoclonal antibodies have been identified that react specifically with squalene on PVDF membranes without recognizing either squalane or liposomal phospholipid, demonstrating that highly specific anti-squalene antibodies can be developed .

What are the primary applications of SQE5 antibody in research settings?

In research settings, antibodies against squalene, including potentially SQE5 antibody, serve multiple critical functions. They are valuable tools for detecting and quantifying squalene in biological samples through techniques like ELISA . These antibodies enable researchers to investigate the distribution and metabolism of squalene in different tissues and organisms. Additionally, they facilitate studies on potential immune responses to squalene-containing formulations, which has implications for understanding certain adverse reactions to vaccines or other medical products. The detection capabilities provided by anti-squalene antibodies also support research into lipid metabolism disorders, steroid hormone synthesis pathways, and related biochemical processes. Furthermore, these antibodies may serve as controls in assay development and validation studies focused on lipid detection methodologies .

How are antibodies to squalene typically induced in laboratory settings?

Induction of antibodies to squalene in laboratory settings requires careful consideration of the immunization formulation due to squalene's weak antigenicity. Research has shown that among various immunization strategies, liposomes containing lipid A and high concentrations of squalene (71% SQE) have demonstrated the highest efficacy in inducing anti-squalene antibodies . The successful formulations typically incorporate an immunostimulatory component like lipid A that serves as an adjuvant to enhance the immune response. Progressive immunization protocols with multiple boosting injections over time have been shown to increase antibody titers significantly, particularly for IgM antibodies specific to squalene . Additionally, the route of administration affects the antibody response, with intravenous injections being utilized in some experimental protocols. Other formulations, such as emulsions containing squalene with surfactants like Tween 80 and Span 85, have shown limited efficacy in inducing anti-squalene antibodies .

What are the most effective methods for detecting SQE5 antibody in experimental samples?

Detection of antibodies against squalene, which would apply to SQE5 antibody, requires specialized methodologies due to the hydrophobic nature of the antigen. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) utilizing hydrophobic polyvinyldiene fluoride (PVDF) membranes has proven to be an effective method for detecting anti-squalene antibodies . This approach overcomes the limitations of conventional polystyrene plates, which may exhibit nonspecific binding and experimental variation when coating hydrophobic antigens. The ELISA protocol typically involves coating the PVDF membranes with squalene dissolved in ethanol, followed by blocking, incubation with test samples, and detection using appropriate secondary antibodies. For increased specificity, researchers may employ competitive inhibition assays or use structurally related molecules like squalane as controls to distinguish true anti-squalene antibodies from cross-reactive antibodies . Additionally, when developing detection methods, it's crucial to include validated positive controls, such as monoclonal antibodies with confirmed specificity for squalene .

How can researchers optimize ELISA protocols for highly specific detection of anti-squalene antibodies?

Optimizing ELISA protocols for highly specific detection of anti-squalene antibodies requires careful attention to several critical parameters. First, the choice of solid phase is crucial, with hydrophobic PVDF membranes demonstrating superior performance compared to conventional polystyrene plates for capturing the hydrophobic squalene molecule . Researchers should optimize the concentration of squalene used for coating (typically around 10 μg per well) and ensure complete evaporation of the ethanol solvent before proceeding with the assay. The blocking solution composition is particularly important to minimize nonspecific binding; typically, protein-based blockers such as bovine serum albumin are effective, but optimization may be required depending on the specific application. Inclusion of appropriate controls is essential, including wells coated with structurally related molecules like squalane to identify cross-reactive antibodies . Additionally, dilution series of validated monoclonal antibodies should be included as positive controls to establish assay performance parameters. For polyclonal samples, pre-absorption steps with related lipids may be necessary to improve specificity .

What computational approaches are being developed for antibody library design that might apply to SQE5 antibody research?

Advanced computational approaches for antibody library design have recently emerged that could significantly enhance SQE5 antibody research. Novel methodologies combining deep learning with multi-objective linear programming incorporating diversity constraints represent the cutting edge of antibody engineering . These approaches leverage structure-based deep learning models to predict the effects of mutations on antibody properties without requiring iterative feedback from wet laboratory experiments . For potential application to SQE5 antibody research, these computational frameworks could optimize the antibody's binding affinity to squalene while simultaneously maintaining other desired properties such as thermostability and manufacturability. The integer linear programming component allows researchers to explicitly balance multiple objectives while ensuring sufficient diversity in the generated antibody library, facilitating comprehensive experimental evaluation . Furthermore, these methods enable researchers to impose constraints on sequence identity, humanness, and other parameters to ensure the resulting antibodies meet specific research requirements .

How does the structure-function relationship of SQE5 antibody inform epitope targeting strategies?

Understanding the structure-function relationship of antibodies to squalene provides critical insights for epitope targeting strategies. Research has shown that squalene's chemical structure presents unique challenges for antibody recognition due to its predominantly hydrophobic character . The strategic targeting of specific epitopes on the squalene molecule requires consideration of its limited polar regions that could potentially interact with antibody binding sites. Unlike molecules such as cholesterol, which contains a 3-β-hydroxy group that serves as an immunodominant epitope, squalene lacks such distinctive polar features, making epitope targeting more challenging . Advanced structure-based computational methods can predict how mutations in the complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) of the antibody might affect binding to specific regions of the squalene molecule . When designing antibodies against squalene, researchers must consider not only the direct antibody-antigen interaction but also the presentation context, as squalene in biological systems is typically associated with membranes or carrier proteins . The optimization of antibody binding sites through computational approaches like deep mutational scanning analysis can lead to enhanced specificity and affinity for particular epitopes on the squalene molecule .

What are the challenges in balancing specificity, affinity, and developability in SQE5 antibody engineering?

Engineering antibodies against squalene, including SQE5, presents multiple complex challenges that require sophisticated balancing of competing properties. First, achieving high specificity for squalene over structurally related compounds like squalane necessitates precise epitope targeting, which is complicated by squalene's predominantly hydrophobic structure . Second, enhancing binding affinity without compromising other critical properties requires careful optimization of the complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) . Recent research frames antibody engineering as a multi-objective optimization problem where extrinsic fitness (binding quality) must be balanced with intrinsic fitness (thermostability, developability, and stability) . Engineers must avoid overfitting to in silico prediction tools, which could lead to experimental failure despite promising computational results. Advanced computational approaches utilizing multi-objective linear programming can help navigate these trade-offs by generating diverse libraries of antibody candidates with varying balances of desired properties . Additionally, the hydrophobic nature of squalene may lead to antibodies with hydrophobic binding pockets, potentially causing problems with aggregation or poor solubility that must be addressed through careful engineering of the antibody framework regions .

What factors contribute to false positive or false negative results in anti-squalene antibody detection assays?

Several factors can contribute to false positive or false negative results when detecting antibodies against squalene. False positives may occur due to non-specific binding of serum components to the assay solid phase, particularly when using conventional polystyrene plates with hydrophobic antigens like squalene . Cross-reactivity with structurally related compounds such as squalane or other lipids present in biological samples can also lead to false positive results, as demonstrated in studies where antisera to squalene-containing liposomes recognized both squalene and squalane . Insufficient blocking or inappropriate blocking agents may fail to prevent non-specific interactions, further contributing to false positive readings. Conversely, false negatives can result from poor coating efficiency of squalene onto the solid phase, as its hydrophobic nature makes consistent and stable immobilization challenging on conventional surfaces . Degradation of squalene during storage or assay preparation may alter its antigenic properties, reducing antibody recognition. Additionally, if the antibodies being tested have low affinity for squalene, they may be washed away during assay procedures, particularly under high-stringency conditions .

How can researchers validate the specificity of anti-squalene antibodies in complex biological samples?

Validating the specificity of anti-squalene antibodies in complex biological samples requires a multi-faceted approach. Competitive inhibition assays represent a powerful validation method, where pre-incubation of the antibody with purified squalene should significantly reduce binding signals in the detection assay if the antibody is truly specific . Researchers should also test against a panel of structurally related compounds, particularly squalane, to assess cross-reactivity patterns and ensure the observed signal is specific to squalene . Fractionation of complex biological samples through techniques such as thin-layer chromatography or high-performance liquid chromatography prior to antibody testing can help identify which components are actually being recognized. Western blotting using PVDF membranes with various lipid standards can provide visual confirmation of binding specificity . Additionally, comparison of results using multiple detection methods with different principles (e.g., ELISA versus immunoprecipitation) can increase confidence in specificity. For monoclonal antibodies, epitope mapping through techniques such as hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry may provide definitive evidence of binding to specific regions of the squalene molecule .

What are the stability considerations for storage and handling of SQE5 antibody preparations?

Stability considerations for antibody preparations, including those against squalene like SQE5, encompass multiple factors essential for maintaining functionality over time. Temperature management is critical; most antibody preparations should be stored at -20°C for long-term storage or at 4°C for short periods, with repeated freeze-thaw cycles potentially leading to degradation and loss of activity . Proper buffer composition significantly impacts stability, with neutral pH (typically 7.2-7.4) and the inclusion of stabilizing proteins like bovine serum albumin (0.1-1%) helping to prevent denaturation and non-specific adsorption to storage containers. Antibodies specific to hydrophobic molecules like squalene may have special considerations, as they often contain hydrophobic binding pockets that can make them more prone to aggregation . Addition of glycerol (typically 50%) to storage buffers can help prevent freeze-thaw damage and maintain antibody conformation. Protection from light is advisable, particularly for antibody preparations containing light-sensitive components like fluorescent labels. Sterile filtration and the addition of antimicrobial agents such as sodium azide (0.02-0.05%) can prevent microbial contamination during storage, though compatibility with downstream applications must be considered .

How might advanced antibody library design methods enhance the development of next-generation anti-squalene antibodies?

Advanced antibody library design methods hold tremendous potential for enhancing the development of next-generation anti-squalene antibodies with improved properties. The integration of deep learning approaches with multi-objective optimization frameworks enables researchers to simultaneously optimize for multiple desired antibody characteristics without requiring extensive experimental data . These computational methods can generate diverse libraries of antibody candidates with varying trade-offs between binding affinity, specificity, stability, and manufacturability, significantly accelerating the discovery process . By predicting the effects of mutations on antibody properties in silico, researchers can rapidly iterate through design possibilities before committing to experimental validation, reducing time and resource requirements. The ability to explicitly consider diversity constraints ensures that the generated libraries thoroughly explore the relevant sequence space, increasing the likelihood of identifying antibodies with novel or improved properties . Future anti-squalene antibodies could benefit from structure-based optimization targeting specific epitopes on the squalene molecule, potentially leading to greater specificity than current antibodies . Additionally, the cold-start capability of modern computational approaches allows for initial library design without requiring pre-existing experimental data, making them applicable even in relatively under-explored areas of antibody research .

What potential roles might anti-squalene antibodies play in studying metabolic disorders or immune responses?

Anti-squalene antibodies have significant potential to advance research in metabolic disorders and immune responses through several mechanisms. In metabolic research, these antibodies could serve as crucial tools for tracking squalene distribution and metabolism in tissues, particularly in disorders affecting the cholesterol synthesis pathway where squalene serves as a precursor . Quantitative immunoassays using anti-squalene antibodies could help identify abnormal accumulation or depletion of squalene in various organs, potentially serving as biomarkers for specific metabolic conditions. In immunological research, these antibodies may help elucidate potential autoimmune responses involving squalene, which could be relevant to certain inflammatory conditions . The presence of anti-squalene antibodies in patient samples might correlate with specific pathologies or responses to treatments, particularly those involving lipid metabolism. Furthermore, in vaccine research, anti-squalene antibodies could help track the biodistribution and processing of squalene-containing adjuvants, providing insights into adjuvant mechanisms and potential adverse reactions . The development of more specific anti-squalene antibodies through advanced computational design approaches could significantly enhance their utility in these applications by reducing cross-reactivity with other lipids and improving detection sensitivity .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.