ESFL10 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Preclinical Research Findings

Key studies demonstrate IMC-EB10's efficacy in ALL models:

In Vitro Activity

  • FLT3 Phosphorylation Inhibition: IMC-EB10 variably inhibits FLT3 activation in cell lines (e.g., MV4-11, SEM) .

  • Paradoxical Activation: In some contexts, IMC-EB10 induces FLT3 dimerization and phosphorylation, suggesting context-dependent agonism .

In Vivo Efficacy

  • Survival Prolongation: NOD/SCID mice injected with ALL cell lines (e.g., REH, RS4;11) showed significant survival improvements (p<0.01) post-IMC-EB10 treatment .

  • Engraftment Reduction: Leukemic engraftment fell below detectable thresholds (<0.001%) in long-term survivors .

Mechanism of Action

IMC-EB10 employs dual pathways:

Direct FLT3 Modulation

  • Competes with FLT3 ligand (FL) for receptor binding .

  • Induces receptor internalization and degradation in ligand-dependent ALL subtypes .

Immune-Mediated Cytotoxicity

Effector MechanismMediating CellsOutcome
ADCCNatural Killer (NK)Target cell lysis via FcγRIIIa
PhagocytosisMacrophagesOpsonization of antibody-coated cells

Clinical Relevance

While IMC-EB10 remains preclinical, its mechanisms align with emerging FLT3-targeted therapies:

  • Resistance Avoidance: Retransplantation assays confirm no selection for IMC-EB10-resistant clones .

  • Combination Potential: Synergy observed with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g., midostaurin) in FLT3-ITD mutant models .

Comparative Antibody Landscape

FLT3-targeting antibodies under development:

Antibody NameDeveloperStageKey Differentiation
IMC-EB10Academic labsPreclinicalNK cell-mediated ADCC dominance
TAK-659TakedaPhase IIDual FLT3/SYK inhibition
CDX-1357CelldexDiscontinuedFc-optimized for enhanced ADCC

Challenges and Future Directions

  • Dosing Optimization: Balancing FLT3 inhibition vs. unintended activation requires pharmacokinetic modeling .

  • Biomarker Development: FLT3 expression levels and mutational status may predict response .

  • Humanization Advances: Next-generation variants with enhanced Fc glycosylation (e.g., afucosylated IgG1) could improve ADCC .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 week lead time (made-to-order)
Synonyms
ESFL10 antibody; At5g61605 antibody; K11J9EMBRYO SURROUNDING FACTOR 1-like protein 10 antibody
Target Names
ESFL10
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is EphA10 and why is it a promising therapeutic target?

EphA10 is a receptor tyrosine kinase belonging to the ephrin receptor family. It represents an ideal therapeutic target because of its differential expression pattern - highly expressed in tumor tissues but undetectable in most normal tissues except the male testis. This unique expression profile correlates with tumor progression and poor prognosis in several malignancies, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), making it a potential target for cancer therapy with likely minimal adverse effects .

Methodologically, researchers identify promising therapeutic targets through expression profiling across normal and diseased tissues. The selective expression of EphA10 in tumor regions of breast, lung, and ovarian cancers, as well as in immunosuppressive myeloid cells in the tumor microenvironment, while being absent in most healthy tissues, makes it particularly suitable for targeted therapy approaches .

How do researchers validate the specificity of anti-EphA10 antibodies?

Researchers validate antibody specificity through multiple complementary approaches. First, plate-based ELISA assays are conducted to assess binding affinity of candidate clones not only to EphA10 but also to other structurally similar EphA family members (EphA1-EphA8). This cross-reactivity testing is crucial to ensure that antibodies bind specifically to EphA10 and not to other isoforms .

Additionally, flow cytometry-based assays are employed to evaluate the antibodies' ability to recognize cell-surface EphA10. This involves comparing fluorescence intensity between cells expressing human EphA10 and mock control cells. Statistical significance in binding compared to isotype controls provides further validation of specificity .

What experimental models are typically used to evaluate EphA10 antibody efficacy?

Researchers primarily employ syngeneic mouse models of triple-negative breast cancer to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of anti-EphA10 antibodies. These models include established cell lines such as 4T1 and EMT6, which allow for assessment of both tumor growth inhibition and immune response in an immunocompetent host .

How does binding affinity analysis inform the selection of optimal anti-EphA10 antibody clones?

Binding affinity analysis serves as a critical determinant in antibody clone selection, requiring robust quantitative assessment protocols. Researchers employ multiple analytical techniques to comprehensively evaluate candidate anti-EphA10 antibody clones. Plate-based ELISA provides initial screening of binding specificity, while flow cytometry offers quantitative assessment of cell-surface binding capacity through fluorescence intensity measurements .

For advanced binding characterization, statistical analysis comparing fluorescence intensity between different clones (e.g., clones #4, #8, and #9) reveals significant variations in binding efficacy. Superior clones such as #4 and #9 demonstrate higher fluorescence intensity than others like clone #8, despite all showing statistical significance compared to isotype controls. This quantitative binding assessment correlates strongly with therapeutic efficacy, as exemplified by clone #4's superior tumor growth inhibition and improved response rates in preclinical models .

What mechanisms underlie the antitumor effects of anti-EphA10 antibodies in the tumor microenvironment?

The antitumor effects of anti-EphA10 antibodies in the tumor microenvironment involve complex immunological mechanisms beyond simple antigen binding. Anti-EphA10 antibodies, particularly clone #4, have been demonstrated to enhance T cell-mediated antitumor immunity in syngeneic TNBC mouse models. This suggests the antibodies may function through immune activation rather than just direct tumor cell targeting .

From a methodological perspective, researchers investigate these mechanisms by evaluating changes in immune cell populations and activity within the tumor microenvironment following antibody treatment. The presence of EphA10 in immunosuppressive myeloid cells within the tumor microenvironment suggests that antibody binding may modulate myeloid cell function, potentially converting immunosuppressive myeloid cells to antitumor phenotypes. This modulation could release T cells from immunosuppression, allowing for improved antitumor immune responses .

How does dose-response relation affect the therapeutic efficacy of anti-EphA10 antibodies?

Dose-response relationships for anti-EphA10 antibodies reveal complex pharmacodynamic profiles that inform optimal therapeutic regimens. Comparative analysis of different dosing schemes (e.g., 150 μg/mouse versus 300 μg/mouse) demonstrates dose-dependent inhibition of tumor progression with anti-EphA10 clone #4, allowing researchers to establish minimum effective doses and therapeutic windows .

What computational approaches can enhance EphA10 antibody design and optimization?

Advanced computational modeling represents a frontier in antibody engineering, offering predictive capabilities for binding affinity and functional properties. For EphA10 antibody optimization, researchers can employ multiple generative model architectures including LLM-style, diffusion-based, and graph-based models. Current evidence suggests log-likelihood scores from these generative models correlate strongly with experimentally measured binding affinities, providing a reliable metric for ranking antibody sequence designs .

Methodologically, researchers can scale diffusion-based models by training them on large, diverse synthetic datasets supplemented with experimentally determined antibody structures. This approach significantly enhances the model's ability to predict and rank antibody designs based on binding affinities. Implementation of log-likelihood-based ranking streamlines experimental efforts by prioritizing high-affinity candidates, thereby accelerating the discovery and development of next-generation therapeutic antibodies targeting EphA10 .

How do EphA10-specific CAR-T cells compare to monoclonal antibodies in therapeutic efficacy?

EphA10-specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor T (CAR-T) cells represent an alternative therapeutic modality that leverages the same target recognition but differs in mechanism of action and potential efficacy profile. CAR-T cells derived from anti-EphA10 antibody clone #4 have demonstrated significant inhibition of TNBC cell viability in vitro and tumor growth in vivo, suggesting potentially complementary or enhanced efficacy compared to monoclonal antibodies alone .

From a methodological perspective, researchers develop these CAR-T cells by incorporating the antigen-binding domain from validated antibody clones (such as clone #4) into chimeric receptor constructs. The resulting CAR-T cells combine the target specificity of antibodies with the cytotoxic potential and persistence of T cells. Comparative studies evaluating monoclonal antibodies versus CAR-T cells typically assess parameters including tumor cell killing in vitro, tumor growth inhibition in vivo, and survival outcomes in preclinical models. Such analyses help determine whether these approaches should be pursued independently or as complementary therapeutic strategies for EphA10-positive tumors .

What strategies can address cross-reactivity concerns in anti-EphA10 antibody development?

Cross-reactivity assessment represents a critical safety and specificity checkpoint in therapeutic antibody development. For anti-EphA10 antibodies, robust methodological approaches include comprehensive binding assays against all structurally related EphA family members (EphA1-EphA8), which share similar architecture with EphA10. Researchers have validated that their developed antibody clones specifically bind to EphA10 without cross-reactivity to other isoforms .

Beyond in vitro binding assays, biodistribution studies provide essential in vivo validation of targeting specificity. Anti-EphA10 monoclonal antibodies have demonstrated precise targeting of tumor regions in vivo with no apparent accumulation in other organs, further confirming their specificity. This selective biodistribution is particularly important given the restricted expression pattern of EphA10 in normal tissues, primarily limited to male testis .

How can exploratory factor analysis enhance biomarker discovery for EphA10 antibody therapy?

Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) offers a sophisticated statistical approach for uncovering latent constructs underlying observed variables, with promising applications in biomarker discovery for EphA10 antibody therapy. Though traditionally employed in psychological research, EFA can identify latent factors that may influence response to EphA10-targeted therapies .

Methodologically, researchers can apply EFA to antibody therapy datasets by collecting comprehensive patient data including EphA10 expression levels across multiple tissue types, immune cell populations in the tumor microenvironment, and treatment response metrics. Factor extraction through EFA could potentially identify distinct patient subgroups with varying likelihood of response to anti-EphA10 therapy. This approach has proven valuable in other diseases; for example, in Guillain–Barré syndrome research, EFA successfully extracted four factors related to neuroantigens and one potentially suppressive factor from glycolipid antibody titers . Applied to EphA10 antibody therapy, such unsupervised statistical methods could reveal previously unrecognized patient stratification markers, enabling more personalized treatment approaches.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.