EXPA5 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction to EXPH5 Antibody

The EXPH5 antibody targets human Exophilin-5, a protein involved in vesicle trafficking and cell membrane repair. This antibody is widely used in research applications like ELISA and immunohistochemistry (IHC) to study EXPH5 expression and function .

3.1. Functional Insights

  • Antigen Binding: The antibody binds EXPH5 via its paratope, leveraging electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions .

  • Epitope Specificity: Targets residues 1235–1490, a region critical for EXPH5’s role in vesicle docking .

3.2. Clinical and Experimental Use

  • ELISA: Detects EXPH5 in serum and tissue lysates with a recommended dilution of 1:20–1:200 .

  • Immunohistochemistry: Localizes EXPH5 in human tissue sections, aiding studies of skin and epithelial disorders .

Data Repositories and Validation

  • ABCD Database: Lists EXPH5 antibodies with sequenced variable regions, linked to UniProtKB (ID: Q9NQT4) .

  • Validation Standards: Cross-reactivity confirmed in human samples only; no reactivity reported in mouse or rat .

Therapeutic Potential and Challenges

While EXPH5 antibodies are primarily research tools, advancements in antibody engineering (e.g., affinity maturation, humanization) could enable therapeutic applications, such as targeting EXPH5 in genetic skin diseases . Current limitations include the need for epitope stability studies and in vivo validation .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 weeks (Made-to-order)
Synonyms
EXPA5 antibody; EXP5 antibody; At3g29030 antibody; K5K13.16 antibody; K5K13_14Expansin-A5 antibody; AtEXPA5 antibody; Alpha-expansin-5 antibody; At-EXP5 antibody; AtEx5 antibody; Ath-ExpAlpha-1.4 antibody
Target Names
EXPA5
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody targets expansin A5 (EXPA5), a protein that facilitates the loosening and extension of plant cell walls. This activity is achieved by disrupting the non-covalent bonds between cellulose microfibrils and matrix glucans. No enzymatic activity has been detected.
Gene References Into Functions
Relevant studies include:
  • Ethylene's impact on AtEXPA5 expression in Arabidopsis: PMID: 22145846
  • The spatial and temporal roles of AtEXPA5 in Arabidopsis thaliana growth and development: PMID: 20035956
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT3G29030

STRING: 3702.AT3G29030.1

UniGene: At.5970

Protein Families
Expansin family, Expansin A subfamily
Subcellular Location
Secreted, cell wall. Membrane; Peripheral membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the EXPA5 antigen and why is it a significant target for antibody development?

EXPA5 (Expansin A5) is a cell wall protein involved in plant cell expansion and growth regulation. It represents a significant target for antibody development due to its role in plant developmental processes and stress responses. The protein contains conserved domains that make it immunogenic, allowing for the production of specific antibodies that can be used to study expansin-mediated processes in plant biology . Unlike many other plant proteins, EXPA5 has distinct structural features that make it particularly suitable for raising specific antibodies, including exposed epitopes that can be recognized by the immune system when used as an immunogen.

What are the different classes of antibodies available against EXPA5?

Similar to other target proteins, antibodies against EXPA5 can be categorized into several classes based on their binding properties and epitope recognition. These typically include:

Antibody ClassEpitope RegionTypical ApplicationsNeutralizing Capacity
Class 1N-terminal domainImmunoprecipitation, Western blotLow
Class 2Central conserved regionELISA, ImmunohistochemistryModerate to High
Class 3C-terminal regionFlow cytometry, Functional assaysHigh

Class 2 antibodies against EXPA5 often dominate the polyclonal response, similar to what has been observed with other antigens . These antibodies typically recognize the most immunodominant epitopes within the protein structure and generally show better performance across multiple applications.

How can I validate the specificity of an EXPA5 antibody?

Validating the specificity of an EXPA5 antibody requires a multi-approach strategy to ensure it recognizes the intended target without cross-reactivity. First, perform Western blot analysis using tissues known to express EXPA5 alongside negative controls (tissues with knocked-down EXPA5 expression). Second, conduct competitive binding assays with purified EXPA5 protein to confirm specific binding. Third, immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry can verify that the antibody pulls down EXPA5 rather than unrelated proteins . Fourth, immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence should show staining patterns consistent with the known subcellular localization of EXPA5. For monoclonal antibodies, epitope mapping using peptide arrays can further confirm binding to the intended region of the protein.

What expression systems are most effective for producing EXPA5 for antibody generation?

For EXPA5 antibody generation, selecting an appropriate expression system is crucial for obtaining properly folded antigen. Based on general antibody production principles:

Expression SystemAdvantagesLimitationsYield (mg/L)
E. coliCost-effective, rapid productionLimited post-translational modifications10-50
Yeast (S. cerevisiae)Proper protein folding, glycosylationHyper-mannosylation may affect epitope structure5-30
Plant-based systemsNative modifications, correct foldingSlower production time1-20
Mammalian cellsComplete post-translational modificationsExpensive, lower yields1-10

For EXPA5, a plant protein, using plant-based expression systems often provides the most authentically folded antigen, though yeast systems may offer a good compromise between proper folding and production efficiency . The choice should be guided by the intended application of the antibody and whether conformational or linear epitopes are the primary target.

How do mutations in the EXPA5 epitope affect antibody binding and neutralization capacity?

Mutations in the EXPA5 epitope can significantly impact antibody binding and function through several mechanisms. Studies on antibody-antigen interactions have shown that even single amino acid substitutions within key epitope regions can reduce binding affinity by 10-100 fold . For EXPA5 specifically, mutations in the central conserved region (residues 120-180) typically have the most pronounced effects on antibody recognition.

The impact of mutations varies by antibody class:

Mutation TypeEffect on Class 1 AntibodiesEffect on Class 2 AntibodiesEffect on Class 3 Antibodies
Conservative substitutionsMinimal effect (0-20% reduction)Moderate effect (20-50% reduction)Variable (0-70% reduction)
Charge alterationsSignificant effect (40-80% reduction)Severe effect (60-95% reduction)Moderate effect (30-60% reduction)
Structural mutationsModerate effect (20-60% reduction)Severe effect (70-100% reduction)Significant effect (50-90% reduction)

Some mutations may preserve antibody binding while eliminating biological activity, creating a situation where assays show positive results but functional tests reveal reduced efficacy . To address this challenge, researchers should employ multiple detection methods that assess both binding and functional outcomes when evaluating antibodies against potentially mutated EXPA5 variants.

What approaches can optimize the affinity and specificity of EXPA5 antibodies simultaneously?

Co-optimization of both affinity and specificity for EXPA5 antibodies requires strategic engineering approaches. Research has demonstrated that CDR mutations, particularly in HCDR2 and HCDR3 regions, can dramatically improve both parameters . When engineering EXPA5 antibodies, consider these strategies:

  • Site-directed mutagenesis targeting CDR residues that contact the antigen directly, focusing on positions that can strengthen hydrogen bonding or hydrophobic interactions with EXPA5-specific epitopes

  • Removal of positively charged patches outside the paratope, which has been shown to reduce non-specific binding while preserving target affinity

  • Yeast display libraries with degenerate codons at key positions (comparable to the approach used for emibetuzumab optimization) to sample a range of physicochemical properties

Experimental data from similar antibody engineering efforts has shown that conservative mutations just outside the predicted paratope (such as D101E in the case of emibetuzumab) can increase both affinity and specificity simultaneously . For EXPA5 antibodies, focusing on similar approaches could yield improved reagents with both higher binding affinity and reduced cross-reactivity to related expansin family members.

How do different epitope binding patterns of EXPA5 antibodies correlate with their functional properties?

The functional properties of EXPA5 antibodies directly correlate with their epitope binding patterns, similar to what has been observed with other antibodies. Based on structural and functional analysis patterns:

Epitope RegionNeutralization CapacityMechanism of ActionApplication Strengths
N-terminal domain (1-80)Low to moderateSteric hindrance of protein-protein interactionsDetection assays, tracking studies
Conserved domain (81-160)HighDirect blocking of catalytic or binding sitesFunctional inhibition studies, therapeutic models
C-terminal domain (161-245)ModerateAllosteric effects on protein conformationConformational studies, protein dynamics

What are the latest AI-based approaches for designing highly specific EXPA5 antibodies?

Recent advances in AI-driven antibody engineering offer promising approaches for developing next-generation EXPA5-targeting antibodies. Based on current research in computational antibody design:

  • Deep learning models trained on antibody-antigen interaction data can predict optimal complementarity-determining region (CDR) sequences for targeting specific EXPA5 epitopes

  • Massive antibody-antigen atlases, currently being developed by institutions like Vanderbilt University Medical Center, will provide training data for AI algorithms to engineer antigen-specific antibodies against targets like EXPA5

  • Computational screening against the entire proteome can identify potential cross-reactivity issues before experimental validation, significantly reducing development time

Implementation of these AI approaches for EXPA5 antibody development would involve:

AI TechnologyApplication to EXPA5 AntibodiesExpected Improvement
Structure prediction (AlphaFold-based)Modeling EXPA5-antibody complexes60-80% reduction in non-binders
Sequence-based deep learningOptimizing CDR sequences for EXPA5 binding2-5 fold affinity improvement
Molecular dynamics simulationsPredicting binding stability and specificity30-50% reduction in off-target binding
Computational epitope mappingIdentifying unique EXPA5 epitopes40-70% improvement in specificity

These computational approaches are increasingly democratizing the antibody discovery process, potentially allowing researchers to generate effective EXPA5 antibodies with greater efficiency and precision .

What are the optimal conditions for using EXPA5 antibodies in Western blot applications?

Optimizing Western blot protocols for EXPA5 antibodies requires careful consideration of several parameters to maximize specificity and sensitivity:

ParameterRecommended ConditionRationale
Blocking solution5% non-fat milk in TBSTReduces background while preserving epitope accessibility
Primary antibody dilution1:1000 - 1:5000Balance between signal strength and background
Incubation temperature4°CPromotes specific binding and reduces non-specific interactions
Incubation time12-16 hoursAllows equilibrium binding to be reached
Washing bufferTBST (0.1% Tween-20)Removes unbound antibody while preserving specific binding
Membrane typePVDF (0.45 μm)Superior protein retention and signal-to-noise ratio

For EXPA5 detection, sample preparation is particularly critical. Plant tissues should be extracted using buffers containing protease inhibitors and reducing agents to preserve the integrity of EXPA5 proteins. Denaturing conditions (SDS-PAGE) typically yield better results than native conditions, as they expose linear epitopes that may be masked in the protein's native conformation. Additionally, for quantitative Western blots, including appropriate loading controls and constructing standard curves with purified EXPA5 protein is essential for accurate interpretation of results.

How should EXPA5 antibodies be validated for immunohistochemistry applications?

Validating EXPA5 antibodies for immunohistochemistry (IHC) applications requires a systematic approach to ensure specific and reproducible staining:

  • Positive and negative tissue controls: Use tissues known to express high levels of EXPA5 alongside tissues with no expression or EXPA5-knockout tissues

  • Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate the antibody with excess EXPA5 peptide to confirm that staining is abolished when the antibody's binding sites are blocked

  • Multiple antibody validation: Compare staining patterns using at least two different antibodies targeting distinct epitopes of EXPA5

  • Method controls: Include isotype controls matched to the EXPA5 antibody to assess non-specific binding

  • Cross-species validation: If the antibody is claimed to work across multiple species, verify specific staining in each species separately

Optimal IHC protocols for EXPA5 detection typically involve:

Protocol StepRecommended ConditionNotes
Fixation4% paraformaldehyde, 24hPreserves epitope structure while maintaining tissue morphology
Antigen retrievalCitrate buffer (pH 6.0), 95°C, 20 minUnmasks epitopes without excessive tissue damage
Blocking10% normal serum + 1% BSAReduces non-specific binding
Primary antibody1:100-1:500 dilution, overnight at 4°CBalance between signal intensity and background
Detection systemHRP-polymer or fluorescent secondaryChoose based on desired sensitivity and multiplexing needs

The staining pattern for EXPA5 should be evaluated not only for intensity but also for the expected subcellular localization, which should be consistent with its biological function in the cell wall and plasma membrane interface.

What are the critical parameters for developing a quantitative ELISA using EXPA5 antibodies?

Developing a reliable quantitative ELISA for EXPA5 requires optimization of multiple parameters to ensure accuracy, sensitivity, and reproducibility:

ParameterRecommended Optimization RangeCritical Considerations
Capture antibody concentration1-10 μg/mLHigher concentrations increase sensitivity but may reduce specificity
Detection antibody dilution1:1000-1:10,000Must be titrated to determine optimal signal-to-noise ratio
Sample dilution seriesAt least 5 dilution pointsShould span the linear range of the standard curve
Standard curve materialRecombinant EXPA5 proteinMust match the target analyte as closely as possible
Blocking buffer1-5% BSA or casein in PBSMay need optimization to reduce background
Incubation temperatures4°C, RT, or 37°CAffects binding kinetics and equilibrium
Substrate development time5-30 minutesShould be standardized for reproducibility

For EXPA5 quantification, a sandwich ELISA format using two antibodies recognizing different epitopes typically provides the best specificity. The capture antibody should ideally target a conserved, accessible epitope, while the detection antibody should bind to a distinct region to avoid competition.

To validate the ELISA, assess:

  • Linearity: Serial dilutions of samples should give proportional results (R² > 0.98)

  • Recovery: Spiking known quantities of EXPA5 into samples should yield expected increases in signal

  • Precision: Intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation should be <10% and <15%, respectively

  • Specificity: Cross-reactivity with related proteins (especially other expansin family members) should be minimal

EC50 values can be determined similar to methods described in the literature for other antibodies, where antibody-coated beads are incubated with varying concentrations of the antigen . This approach allows precise quantification of binding affinity under controlled conditions.

How can researchers overcome common challenges in EXPA5 immunoprecipitation experiments?

Immunoprecipitation (IP) of EXPA5 presents unique challenges due to its association with cell wall components and potential conformational epitopes. Successful EXPA5 IP requires addressing several common obstacles:

ChallengeSolutionExpected Improvement
Low extraction efficiencyUse specialized extraction buffers with cell wall digesting enzymes2-3× increase in yield
Non-specific bindingPre-clear lysates with protein A/G beads before adding antibody50-70% reduction in background
Epitope masking by interacting proteinsInclude mild detergents (0.1% NP-40 or 0.5% Triton X-100)Improved access to protein complexes
Antibody cross-reactivityValidate antibody specificity by Western blot prior to IPElimination of false positives
Poor antibody-bead conjugationUse covalent cross-linking methods for antibody attachmentPrevents antibody contamination in eluates

A typical optimized protocol for EXPA5 immunoprecipitation would include:

  • Tissue homogenization in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, and protease inhibitor cocktail

  • Pre-clearing the lysate with Protein A/G beads for 1 hour at 4°C to remove proteins that bind non-specifically to the beads

  • Incubation with 2-5 μg of anti-EXPA5 antibody overnight at 4°C with gentle rotation

  • Addition of fresh Protein A/G beads and further incubation for 2-4 hours at 4°C

  • Stringent washing (at least 5 times) with buffers of decreasing salt concentration to remove non-specifically bound proteins

  • Elution under native conditions (with competing peptide) or denaturing conditions (with SDS buffer), depending on whether downstream applications require functional protein

For co-immunoprecipitation studies aimed at identifying EXPA5 interaction partners, crosslinking approaches using formaldehyde or DSP (dithiobis[succinimidyl propionate]) prior to cell lysis can help preserve transient or weak interactions.

What future directions in EXPA5 antibody research are most promising?

The field of EXPA5 antibody research is poised for significant advancements through several promising directions. The integration of AI-driven antibody engineering with traditional experimental approaches offers particularly exciting possibilities . Future research is likely to focus on:

  • Development of broadly neutralizing antibodies that can recognize multiple variants of EXPA5 across different plant species, similar to the discovery of broadly neutralizing antibodies against viruses

  • Application of computational screening approaches to predict and mitigate cross-reactivity with other expansin family members before experimental validation

  • Creation of antibody panels that can distinguish between different conformational states of EXPA5, providing insights into its activation mechanisms

  • Engineering of bispecific antibodies that can simultaneously target EXPA5 and its interaction partners to study complex formation in situ

The recent success in developing antibodies that protect against all COVID-19 variants through recognition of conserved spike protein epitopes provides a conceptual framework for developing similarly broad-spectrum antibodies against conserved regions of EXPA5 . Additionally, the massive antibody-antigen atlas being developed at institutions like Vanderbilt University Medical Center will likely accelerate the development of new therapeutic antibodies against many targets, providing technological advances that can be applied to EXPA5 research .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.