F Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (12-14 weeks)
Synonyms
FFusion glycoprotein F0 [Cleaved into: Fusion glycoprotein F2'; Interchain peptide; Fusion glycoprotein F2; Fusion glycoprotein F1] antibody
Target Names
F
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
The F protein is an inactive precursor that undergoes cleavage at two sites by a furin-like protease, resulting in the formation of mature F1 and F2 fusion glycoproteins. It is classified as a Class I viral fusion protein. Current models suggest that the protein exists in at least three conformational states: a pre-fusion native state, a pre-hairpin intermediate state, and a post-fusion hairpin state. During viral and plasma cell membrane fusion, the coiled coil regions adopt a trimer-of-hairpins structure, bringing the fusion peptide into close proximity to the C-terminal region of the ectodomain. This structural transformation appears to drive the apposition and subsequent fusion of viral and cellular membranes, leading to the delivery of the nucleocapsid into the cytoplasm. Notably, this fusion process is pH-independent and occurs at either the plasma or endosomal membrane. The trimer of F1-F2 (F protein) also facilitates attachment to host cells by binding to host heparan sulfate. The F protein plays a crucial role in host cell entry through its interaction with host IGFR1. This interaction activates PRKCZ/PKCzeta, which in turn recruits host NCL/nucleolin to the apical cell surface, enabling it to bind fusion glycoprotein F1. Later in the infection cycle, F protein expressed at the plasma membrane of infected cells can mediate fusion with adjacent cells to form syncytia, a cytopathic effect that may lead to tissue necrosis. The F protein has been shown to trigger p53-dependent apoptosis.

The F protein is a major determinant of the species specificity of RSV infection. It also facilitates attachment to host cells through the interaction with heparan sulfate. The F protein is involved in host cell entry by interacting with IGFR1, activating PRKCZ/PKCzeta, and recruiting NCL/nucleolin to the apical cell surface, where it binds to F1. Furthermore, the F protein expressed on infected cells can mediate cell-to-cell fusion, forming syncytia, a cytopathic effect associated with tissue necrosis. Finally, the F protein has been shown to induce p53-dependent apoptosis.
Protein Families
Paramyxoviruses fusion glycoprotein family
Subcellular Location
[Fusion glycoprotein F0]: Host Golgi apparatus membrane; Single-pass membrane protein.; [Fusion glycoprotein F1]: Virion membrane; Single-pass type I membrane protein. Host cell membrane; Single-pass membrane protein.; [Fusion glycoprotein F2]: Virion membrane. Host cell membrane.

Q&A

What are F(ab')2 fragments and how are they used in research?

F(ab')2 fragments are antibody fragments that contain two antigen-binding sites connected by disulfide bonds but lack the Fc region of intact antibodies. Methodologically, these fragments are generated through pepsin digestion of whole IgG antibodies.

These fragments offer several experimental advantages:

  • They maintain bivalent binding capabilities while eliminating Fc-mediated effects

  • They reduce non-specific binding compared to whole antibodies

  • They allow for antigen binding studies without triggering Fc-dependent effector functions

For optimal implementation in experiments, researchers should:

  • Use F(ab')2 fragments in immunoprecipitation to reduce background from Fc receptor binding

  • Apply them in flow cytometry to minimize non-specific binding to Fc receptors

  • Incorporate them in functional assays where Fc-mediated effects would complicate interpretation

  • Utilize them in bispecific antibody generation through reduction and reoxidation with Fab' fragments

What controls should I include when working with antibodies?

Rigorous control selection is critical for ensuring reliability in antibody-based experiments:

For Western blotting:

  • Knockout (KO) or knockdown (KD) cell lines serve as essential negative controls

  • Recombinant protein or overexpression systems provide positive controls

  • Isotype controls help detect non-specific binding

  • Blocking peptide competition assays confirm specificity

For immunofluorescence:

Recent studies demonstrated that knockout cell lines provide significantly more reliable controls than other approaches, particularly for Western blots and immunofluorescence imaging . The implementation of CRISPR technologies has made KO cell lines more accessible, though there is currently no centralized repository for sharing these valuable research tools .

What are anti-F(ab')2 antibodies and what is their role in immunoregulation?

Anti-F(ab')2 antibodies are naturally occurring autoantibodies that specifically recognize the F(ab')2 region of other antibodies. These antibodies serve important immunoregulatory functions through several mechanisms:

  • They modulate B cell responses by crosslinking membrane immunoglobulins with Fc receptors

  • They suppress autoantibody-producing B cells in certain autoimmune conditions

  • They can induce a state of dormancy in B cells through anti-Ig binding

Clinical significance has been demonstrated in multiple conditions:

  • In cold agglutination disease, patients with high anti-F(ab')2 titers show significantly lower levels of pathogenic anti-erythrocyte autoantibodies

  • These antibodies play documented roles in kidney graft rejection, AIDS pathogenesis, and systemic lupus erythematosus

  • Very low IgG-anti-F(ab')2 antibody titers appear to correlate with increased autoantibody production

Molecular characterization through phage display technology has revealed that:

  • Human IgG-anti-F(ab')2 autoantibodies bind specifically to F(ab')2 fragments but not to Fab, Fc, or intact IgG

  • They demonstrate relatively high binding affinity (Ka = 2.8 × 10^7 M^-1)

  • Their heavy chains belong to the VH3 gene family and light chains to the Vκ2 gene family

How can I validate antibody specificity for my target protein?

Comprehensive antibody validation requires multiple orthogonal approaches:

Validation StrategyMethodsConsiderations
GeneticKO/KD cells, CRISPR editingGold standard for specificity
OrthogonalMass spectrometry correlation, mRNA expressionIndependent verification
Independent antibodyMultiple antibodies to different epitopesCross-validation
Application-specificTechnique-appropriate controlsDifferent for each method

For Western blots, validation should confirm:

  • Correct molecular weight of detected bands

  • Absence of signal in KO samples

  • Appropriate expression pattern across tissues

For immunoprecipitation:

  • Mass spectrometry identification of pulled-down proteins is essential

  • Comparison with known protein interactors provides additional validation

Recent large-scale validation efforts by YCharOS found that 50-75% of their protein set was covered by at least one high-performing commercial antibody, suggesting commercial catalogs contain specific antibodies for more than half of the human proteome . Alarmingly, this study also revealed an average of ~12 publications per protein target included data from antibodies that failed to recognize their target proteins .

What new technologies are transforming antibody design and engineering?

Recent technological breakthroughs are revolutionizing antibody research:

AI-driven antibody design:

  • RFdiffusion, a fine-tuned AI model, now enables the design of human-like antibodies with atomic precision

  • This technology specifically addresses the challenge of designing antibody loops—the intricate, flexible regions responsible for binding

  • Recent advances have enabled generation of more complete human-like antibodies, including single chain variable fragments (scFvs)

  • The model produces entirely novel antibody blueprints that can bind user-specified targets

Beyond computational approaches, experimental advances include:

  • Enhanced phage display technologies with improved library diversity

  • High-throughput screening methods using microfluidic systems

  • Single-cell sequencing of B cells for native antibody pair discovery

  • Rapid in vitro methodologies for simultaneous target discovery and antibody generation

These technologies have been successfully applied to identify antibodies against clinically relevant targets such as influenza hemagglutinin, Clostridium difficile toxins, and cancer-initiating cell markers including integrin α7 (ITGA7), HLA-A1, and integrin β6 (ITGB6) .

How should I design experiments to characterize novel antibodies?

Characterizing novel antibodies requires systematic evaluation of specificity, affinity, and functionality:

Step 1: Binding specificity characterization

  • ELISA against purified target and related proteins

  • Western blot analysis with positive and negative control samples

  • Flow cytometry with cells expressing or lacking the target

Step 2: Affinity and kinetics determination using Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR)

  • Measure association (kon) and dissociation (koff) rate constants

  • Calculate affinity constants (Ka = kon/koff)

For example, SPR analysis of anti-F(ab')2 scFv antibodies revealed:

Antibody Clonekon (Association Rate)koff (Dissociation Rate)Ka (Affinity Constant)
scFv2Higher rateSimilar rate2.78 × 10^7 M^-1
scFv6Lower rateSimilar rate0.79 × 10^7 M^-1

These values indicated relatively high affinity compared to previously described intact anti-IgG autoantibodies from rheumatoid patients .

Step 3: Functional characterization

  • Cell-based assays to evaluate effects on signaling

  • Competitive inhibition assays to confirm specificity (as demonstrated with serum anti-F(ab')2 activity)

  • Epitope mapping to determine binding sites

What are common pitfalls in antibody-based experiments?

Several critical issues compromise antibody experiment reliability:

Specificity concerns:

  • Approximately 50% of commercial antibodies fail to meet basic characterization standards

  • This inadequate characterization results in estimated financial losses of $0.4–1.8 billion annually in the US alone

Documentation problems:

  • Insufficient reporting of antibody details (catalog numbers, clone IDs, lot numbers)

  • Incomplete methodological details in publications

  • Lack of standardized identifiers for reagents

Technical issues:

  • Inappropriate antibody concentration or incubation conditions

  • Epitope masking due to improper fixation or preparation

  • Inadequate controls leading to misinterpretation

The scope of this problem is substantial—a YCharOS study found an average of ~12 publications per protein target included data from antibodies that failed to recognize their intended targets .

How can I improve reproducibility in antibody-based research?

Addressing the "antibody characterization crisis" requires systematic approaches:

For individual researchers:

  • Always independently validate antibodies in your specific experimental system

  • Use knockout or knockdown controls whenever possible

  • Document detailed antibody information using Research Resource Identifiers (RRIDs)

  • Consider recombinant antibodies, which generally outperform both monoclonal and polyclonal varieties

For collaborative improvement:

  • Participate in antibody validation initiatives

  • Share cell lines, particularly knockout lines

  • Contribute validation data to community resources

Institutional initiatives like YCharOS demonstrate the value of systematic validation—after testing 614 antibodies targeting 65 proteins, vendors proactively removed ~20% of antibodies that failed expectations and modified proposed applications for ~40% . This collaborative approach between researchers and industry represents a promising path forward for improving antibody reliability.

How should I analyze binding kinetics data for antibodies?

Binding kinetics analysis provides crucial insights into antibody-antigen interactions:

Key parameters to analyze:

Analytical approaches:

  • Model fitting:

    • 1:1 Langmuir binding model for simple interactions

    • Heterogeneous ligand model for multiple binding sites

    • Mass transport models when diffusion limits binding

  • Interpretation guidelines:

    • Fast kon (>10^5 M^-1s^-1): Efficient target capture

    • Slow koff (<10^-4 s^-1): Stable binding, longer residence time

    • Ka > 10^7 M^-1: High-affinity binding

As demonstrated in search result , the association kinetics of anti-F(ab')2 scFv antibodies fit perfectly to a homogeneous kinetic model, indicating a single-site interaction between the antibody and the immobilized antigen. One antibody (scFv2) bound three times faster to F(ab')2 than another (scFv6), while their dissociation constants remained similar, resulting in a 4-fold difference in affinity constants .

How can I compare the performance of different antibodies against the same target?

Systematic comparison of antibodies requires multifaceted evaluation:

Analytical performance metrics:

  • Specificity: Signal in positive vs. negative samples

  • Sensitivity: Limit of detection and quantification

  • Dynamic range: Linear range of detection

  • Signal-to-noise ratio: Specific signal relative to background

  • Precision: Inter- and intra-assay variability

A structured decision matrix approach helps objectively compare antibodies:

CriterionWeightAntibody AAntibody BAntibody C
Specificity0.30543
Sensitivity0.25354
Reproducibility0.20435
Application versatility0.15532
Cost-effectiveness0.10245
Weighted Total1.004.03.953.8

Based on extensive testing, recombinant antibodies consistently outperform both monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies across multiple assays . Consider prioritizing recombinant antibodies when available for your target.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.