SPBC1539.07c Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
SPBC1539.07cProbable S-(hydroxymethyl)glutathione dehydrogenase 1 antibody; EC 1.1.1.284 antibody; Glutathione-dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase 1 antibody; FALDH 1 antibody; FDH 1 antibody; FLD 1 antibody; GSH-FDH 1 antibody; EC 1.1.1.- antibody
Target Names
SPBC1539.07c
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is SPBC1539.07c and why is it studied in fungal research?

Based on the gene identifier format, SPBC1539.07c is likely a gene in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission yeast). While specific information about this gene isn't available in the provided materials, fungal genes are studied as part of broader genomic research. As noted in the search results, fungi have become increasingly important model organisms for studying eukaryotic molecular biology, with genome sequences for various fungal species becoming available in recent years .

How does research on fungal genes like SPBC1539.07c compare to research on Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes?

S. cerevisiae (baker's yeast) serves as a primary model eukaryote due to its well-defined genetic system and the conservation of basic biological mechanisms between yeast and higher eukaryotes . Research approaches developed for S. cerevisiae, including functional genomics and systems biology methods, would likely be applicable to studies of S. pombe genes like SPBC1539.07c. Both yeasts offer advantages such as rapid growth, simple cultivation methods, and facile genetic manipulation techniques .

What are the optimal growth conditions for studying S. pombe when conducting SPBC1539.07c antibody experiments?

While specific conditions for SPBC1539.07c aren't mentioned, fungal research typically benefits from controlled cultivation conditions. For yeast studies generally, factors such as medium composition, temperature, pH, and oxygenation are critical. As noted for S. cerevisiae research, "the utilization of well-defined model systems under controlled conditions is of central importance in the drive towards an integrative systems biology perspective of the cell" . Similar principles would apply to S. pombe studies.

What metabolomic approaches would be most suitable for studying the function of SPBC1539.07c?

Based on approaches used in S. cerevisiae research, metabolomic studies could potentially help elucidate the function of SPBC1539.07c. The search results indicate that metabolomics is a key component of comprehensive post-genomic studies and systems biology approaches in yeast . Techniques might include analyzing metabolic networks and investigating the participation of metabolites in regulatory processes, though specific protocols would need to be adapted for S. pombe studies.

How can functional genomics approaches be applied to characterize SPBC1539.07c?

Functional genomics involves studying genes at different regulatory levels. As described for S. cerevisiae research, this includes analyzing "the genome (DNA), transcriptome (messenger RNA), proteome (proteins) and metabolome (metabolites)" . A similar multi-level approach could be applied to characterize SPBC1539.07c, potentially including genome sequencing, transcriptomic analysis, proteomic studies, and investigation of metabolic pathways affected by the gene.

What are the challenges in developing specific antibodies against SPBC1539.07c protein products?

While the search results don't specifically address antibody development, general challenges in fungal research might apply. Fungal proteins can have complex structures and post-translational modifications. Additionally, the specificity of antibodies is crucial, especially when studying proteins that may have homologs or similar domains in related species. Validating antibody specificity would be essential for reliable experimental results.

What are the recommended protocols for validating SPBC1539.07c antibody specificity?

Antibody validation typically requires multiple approaches to confirm specificity. Though not specifically mentioned for SPBC1539.07c, standard validation methods would include Western blotting with positive and negative controls, immunoprecipitation, immunofluorescence, and testing in knockout/knockdown systems. For fungal studies, comparing wildtype strains with gene deletion mutants would be particularly valuable for validation.

How can systems biology approaches incorporate SPBC1539.07c antibody data?

Systems biology aims to integrate different types of biological data to understand cellular functions as a whole. As noted in the search results, this approach in yeast involves "comprehensive modelling strategies" and "a fundamental framework in quantitative modelling and metabolic control" . Antibody-based data on SPBC1539.07c protein levels, localization, or interactions could potentially be integrated with transcriptomic and metabolomic data to build comprehensive models of cellular processes involving this protein.

How does the function of SPBC1539.07c compare across different fungal species?

Comparative genomics across fungal species can provide insights into gene function and evolution. The search results mention genome evolution studies in yeasts and note that fungal genomics has revealed "a wealth of invaluable data about the evolution, life cycles, cell biology, and virulence" of various fungi . Similar comparative approaches could potentially reveal whether SPBC1539.07c has homologs in other fungi and what their functions might be.

What can we learn about human cell biology from studying SPBC1539.07c?

Yeast has long served as a model organism for understanding basic eukaryotic processes. As noted in the search results, "the basic mechanisms of DNA replication, chromosomal recombination, cell division, gene expression, and metabolism are generally conserved between yeast and higher eukaryotes (i.e. mammals)" . If SPBC1539.07c is involved in such conserved processes, studying it could potentially provide insights relevant to human cell biology.

What are common sources of experimental variability when working with SPBC1539.07c antibodies?

While not specifically addressed for this antibody, sources of variability in antibody-based experiments typically include antibody lot-to-lot differences, variations in experimental conditions, and differences in sample preparation. In fungal research specifically, variables such as culture conditions, growth phase, and extraction methods can significantly impact results.

How can researchers address non-specific binding issues with SPBC1539.07c antibodies?

Non-specific binding is a common challenge in antibody-based research. Standard approaches to address this include optimizing blocking conditions, adjusting antibody concentrations, increasing washing stringency, and pre-absorbing antibodies with non-specific proteins. For fungal studies specifically, careful preparation of cell extracts and selection of appropriate extraction buffers can help reduce non-specific interactions.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.