FAM126B (Family With Sequence Similarity 126 Member B), also known as HYCC2, is a key component of the phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase (PI4K) IIIα complex, which regulates phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PI4P) synthesis at the plasma membrane . FAM126B antibodies are polyclonal or monoclonal tools used to detect and quantify this protein in biological samples via techniques such as Western blot (WB), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and immunofluorescence (ICC/IF) . These antibodies are critical for studying FAM126B’s role in cellular processes, including membrane trafficking, myelination, and cancer biology .
FAM126B partners with FAM126A to stabilize the PI4KIIIα complex, which synthesizes PI4P at the plasma membrane . Loss of FAM126A in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells induces dependency on FAM126B, making it a therapeutic target . Antibodies have been used to:
Confirm FAM126B Expression: WB and IHC validate its presence in CRC cell lines (e.g., RKO, SW48) and normal tissues .
Study Functional Redundancy: FAM126A knockout in CRC cells increases FAM126B dependency, as shown via CRISPR screens and PARP1 cleavage assays .
Cancer Dependency: FAM126B depletion induces apoptosis in FAM126A-low CRC cells but not in FAM126A-high cells .
Myelination: FAM126A deficiency in oligodendrocytes disrupts PI4KIIIα function, impairing myelin synthesis .
Cross-reactivity: Ensure antibodies are tested for specificity (e.g., Sigma-Aldrich’s HPA036166 has been validated against 383 non-specific proteins) .
Stability: Store at −20°C to avoid degradation (e.g., Novus Biologicals’ NBP1-81636) .
FAM126B (Family with sequence similarity 126, member B) functions primarily in the phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase pathway. FAM126B works in a functionally redundant manner with FAM126A to facilitate the recruitment of PI4KIIIα to the plasma membrane for phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PI4P) synthesis . PI4P is a critical determinant of plasma membrane identity and plays essential roles in multiple cellular processes. FAM126B is part of a complex that includes PI4KIIIα and the adaptor proteins TTC7 and EFR3, which collectively regulate phosphoinositide metabolism at the plasma membrane .
The anti-FAM126B antibody has been validated for several research applications:
Immunoblotting (Western blotting): Recommended concentration range of 0.04-0.4 μg/mL
Immunohistochemistry: Recommended dilution range of 1:200-1:500
These applications allow researchers to detect and quantify FAM126B protein expression in various experimental contexts, including tissue samples and cell lysates.
When using FAM126B antibodies, the following controls are recommended:
Positive control: Cell lines or tissues known to express FAM126B (such as DLD1 or HCT116 colorectal cancer cell lines) should be included
Negative control: Consider using samples treated with FAM126B-targeting sgRNAs to create a true negative control
Loading control: Use established housekeeping proteins (e.g., GAPDH, β-actin) for normalization in immunoblotting experiments
Isotype control: Include an irrelevant antibody of the same isotype and concentration to assess non-specific binding
For optimal immunoblotting results with anti-FAM126B antibody:
Sample preparation: Use RIPA or similar lysis buffers with protease inhibitors for effective protein extraction
Protein loading: Load 20-40 μg of total protein per lane for consistent detection
Transfer conditions: Use a wet transfer system with methanol-containing buffer for efficient transfer of FAM126B (~58 kDa)
Blocking: Block with 5% non-fat dry milk or BSA in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Antibody concentration: Start with 0.2 μg/mL and adjust as needed based on signal-to-noise ratio
Incubation: Overnight incubation at 4°C often yields optimal results
Detection system: ECL-based detection systems are generally suitable, though more sensitive systems may be required for low-expressing samples
For successful immunohistochemical detection of FAM126B:
Fixation: 10% neutral buffered formalin fixation for 24-48 hours is generally suitable
Antigen retrieval: Heat-induced epitope retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) or EDTA buffer (pH 9.0)
Blocking: Use 10% normal serum from the same species as the secondary antibody
Primary antibody: Dilute at 1:200-1:500 and incubate overnight at 4°C
Detection system: An appropriate HRP/DAB detection system compatible with rabbit primary antibodies
Counterstaining: Hematoxylin provides good nuclear contrast
Controls: Include both positive and negative controls in each staining run
Validating antibody specificity is crucial for reliable results. For FAM126B antibodies, consider:
Genetic knockdown/knockout: Compare staining between wildtype samples and those with FAM126B depleted via CRISPR-Cas9 or RNAi
Overexpression: Analyze samples with overexpressed FAM126B to confirm increased signal
Peptide competition: Pre-incubate the antibody with the immunizing peptide (PFDAPDSTQEGQKVLKVEVTPTVPRISRTAITTASIRRHRWRREGAEGVNGGEESVNLNDADEGFSSGASLSSQPIGTKPSSSS) to block specific binding
Multiple antibodies: Compare results using different antibodies targeting distinct epitopes
Molecular weight verification: Confirm detection at the expected molecular weight (~58 kDa)
The PI4KIIIα complex represents an important area for investigation using FAM126B antibodies:
Co-immunoprecipitation: Use anti-FAM126B antibodies to pull down the entire PI4KIIIα complex, followed by immunoblotting for other components (PI4KIIIα, TTC7, EFR3)
Proximity ligation assay: Detect in situ interactions between FAM126B and other complex components in cells or tissues
Immunofluorescence co-localization: Examine the subcellular distribution of FAM126B in relation to other complex members
Comparative analysis: Compare complex formation in normal versus disease tissues (particularly colorectal cancer samples)
Fractionation studies: Analyze membrane versus cytosolic distribution of FAM126B and complex components
These approaches can reveal alterations in complex formation, stability, or localization that may contribute to disease pathogenesis.
Research exploring FAM126B as a therapeutic target should consider:
Expression profiling: Characterize FAM126A and FAM126B expression across cancer types and normal tissues using immunohistochemistry and western blotting
Functional validation: Employ genetic depletion approaches (CRISPR-Cas9, shRNA) to confirm FAM126B dependency in FAM126A-low cancer cell lines
In vivo models: Test FAM126B depletion in xenograft models derived from FAM126A-low versus FAM126A-high cell lines
Mechanism studies: Investigate how FAM126B depletion leads to cell death in FAM126A-low contexts, focusing on PI4P synthesis disruption
Biomarker development: Establish FAM126A expression as a biomarker for potential FAM126B-targeted therapies
To explore the functional relationship between FAM126A and FAM126B:
Rescue experiments: Express FAM126A in FAM126A-low/FAM126B-dependent cell lines to test if this rescues FAM126B dependency
Double depletion studies: Compare the effects of individual versus combined depletion of FAM126A and FAM126B on PI4P levels and cell viability
Domain analysis: Create chimeric proteins or domain deletion constructs to identify regions mediating functional redundancy
Quantitative PI4P assays: Measure PI4P levels after FAM126A and/or FAM126B manipulation
Protein stability analysis: Investigate whether FAM126A and FAM126B stabilize each other or other complex components
Common challenges and solutions include:
High background:
Increase blocking time/concentration
Reduce primary antibody concentration
Include additional washing steps
Ensure secondary antibody compatibility
Weak or no signal:
Increase antibody concentration
Optimize antigen retrieval (for IHC)
Extend primary antibody incubation time
Consider protein degradation issues during sample preparation
Non-specific bands:
Increase washing stringency
Optimize blocking conditions
Verify antibody specificity using knockout controls
Consider using a different detection system
Inconsistent results:
Standardize lysate preparation
Maintain consistent antibody lots
Control for experimental variables (cell density, passage number)
Implement rigorous quantification methods
When analyzing FAM126B expression:
Always assess FAM126A expression in parallel to provide context for FAM126B data
Consider the relative abundance of both proteins, as their functional redundancy means that low FAM126A may increase reliance on FAM126B
Use appropriate cell line models representing different FAM126A/FAM126B expression patterns (e.g., RKO and SW48 for FAM126A-low; DLD1 and HCT116 for FAM126A-high)
When possible, quantify absolute protein levels rather than relying solely on relative measures
Interpret functional studies in light of the compensatory relationship between these proteins
When selecting appropriate controls:
Characterize FAM126A and FAM126B expression levels in candidate cell lines
For colorectal cancer research, consider using:
Generate isogenic cell line pairs through genetic manipulation:
Consider tissue of origin when selecting control lines
Account for other PI4KIIIα complex components that might influence FAM126B function
FAM126B antibodies can advance PI4P research through:
Super-resolution microscopy to visualize FAM126B localization at plasma membrane microdomains
Time-lapse imaging combined with FAM126B immunostaining to track dynamic changes in PI4P synthesis
Correlative light and electron microscopy to examine FAM126B localization at ultrastructural level
Investigating FAM126B redistribution during cellular processes requiring membrane remodeling
Exploring potential non-canonical functions of FAM126B beyond the PI4KIIIα complex
To investigate FAM126B post-translational modifications:
Phospho-specific antibodies: Develop antibodies recognizing phosphorylated forms of FAM126B
Mass spectrometry: Perform immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to identify modification sites
Mutagenesis studies: Create point mutations at predicted modification sites to assess functional impacts
Treatment studies: Examine how various signaling pathway modulators affect FAM126B modification status
In vitro kinase assays: Identify kinases responsible for FAM126B phosphorylation
To explore structural aspects of FAM126B function:
Cross-linking mass spectrometry: Map interaction interfaces between FAM126B and other complex components
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange: Identify regions of FAM126B that undergo conformational changes upon complex formation
Cryo-electron microscopy: Visualize the entire PI4KIIIα complex including FAM126B
Structure-guided mutagenesis: Create point mutations in conserved residues to disrupt specific interactions
Comparative modeling: Build on the FAM126A-TTC7 co-crystal structure to predict FAM126B structural features