FAM234A antibodies are primarily polyclonal, produced in rabbits, and validated for techniques such as Western blot (WB) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Key features include:
Role in Glucose Metabolism: Rare protein-truncating variants in FAM234A are associated with lower fasting glucose levels (P = 2.0 × 10⁻¹²) and reduced type 2 diabetes risk (OR = 0.64, P = 10⁻⁴) .
Cellular Regulation: FAM234A is implicated in cell proliferation and survival, though its exact mechanisms remain under investigation .
Western Blot Validation: Detects bands at ~67 kDa in human cell lines (SGC-7901, HepG2, OVCAR3) .
Epitope Specificity: Antibodies target hydrophilic regions (e.g., residues 70–400) with minimal cross-reactivity due to stringent affinity purification .
Limited Functional Data: FAM234A's biological roles are poorly characterized, necessitating further studies on its interaction networks and signaling pathways .
Antibody Optimization: Current reagents show variability in observed vs. predicted molecular weights (e.g., 67 kDa vs. 59.5 kDa), likely due to post-translational modifications .
FAM234A (Family with sequence similarity 234 member A) is a protein with multiple cellular functions that are still being elucidated. It is also known by several synonyms including C16orf9, ITFG3 (integrin alpha FG-GAP repeat containing 3), and gs19 . The protein is of research interest due to its potential roles in cellular regulation and signaling pathways that influence cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival . Studying FAM234A may provide insights into fundamental cellular processes and potentially reveal new therapeutic targets for various diseases.
Current research tools include both polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies against FAM234A. Polyclonal options such as rabbit-derived antibodies (e.g., CAB16580) offer broad epitope recognition . Monoclonal antibodies like LS-C787713, ABIN395938, and CF505567 provide more specific target binding . The selection between polyclonal and monoclonal depends on the experimental context, with polyclonals offering higher sensitivity but potentially lower specificity compared to monoclonals.
FAM234A antibodies have been validated primarily for Western blot (WB) applications . Some antibodies also demonstrate utility in immunohistochemistry (IHC) and ELISA techniques . The validated applications vary by manufacturer and specific product, with comprehensive validation data available through resources like Antibodypedia, which lists 153 antibodies from 23 providers with varying degrees of validation .
When selecting a FAM234A antibody, consider these methodological factors:
Application compatibility: Verify that the antibody has been validated for your specific application (WB, IHC, ELISA)
Epitope recognition: Most commonly used antibodies target the region corresponding to amino acids 70-400 of human FAM234A (NP_114428.1)
Species reactivity: Confirm reactivity with your experimental species (most FAM234A antibodies are validated for human samples)
Clonality requirements: Choose between polyclonal (broader epitope recognition) or monoclonal (higher specificity) based on your experimental needs
Detection system compatibility: Ensure compatibility with your visualization method (fluorescent, chemiluminescent, etc.)
To preserve antibody functionality:
Storage temperature: Store at -20°C as recommended by manufacturers
Aliquoting strategy: Divide into single-use aliquots to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles, which can degrade antibody performance
Buffer conditions: Most FAM234A antibodies are supplied in PBS with stabilizers such as glycerol (50%) and preservatives like sodium azide (0.02%)
Dilution preparation: Prepare working dilutions immediately before use and maintain at 4°C while handling
Transportation: When moving between laboratories, transport on ice and minimize time at room temperature
A rigorous validation approach should include:
Positive controls:
Negative controls:
Application-specific dilution guidelines:
Western blot: Typical working dilutions range from 1:500 to 1:2000
ELISA: Follow manufacturer recommendations, generally starting at 1:1000
Immunohistochemistry: For antibodies validated for IHC, ranges typically start at 1:100
Always perform a dilution series experiment to determine optimal concentration for your specific experimental conditions, as the optimal dilution may vary based on:
Sample type and preparation method
Detection system sensitivity
Incubation time and temperature
Expression level of FAM234A in your samples
For optimal Western blot results with FAM234A antibodies:
Sample preparation:
Use RIPA or similar lysis buffers with protease inhibitors
Determine appropriate protein loading (20-50 µg total protein per lane)
Electrophoresis considerations:
Transfer parameters:
Transfer to PVDF or nitrocellulose membranes
Optimize transfer time based on protein size (typically 60-90 minutes at 100V)
Blocking optimization:
Test both BSA and non-fat dry milk blocking solutions (3-5%)
Block for 1 hour at room temperature or overnight at 4°C
Antibody incubation:
Signal detection:
Use enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection reagents
Adjust exposure times based on signal intensity
When troubleshooting signal problems:
For weak signals:
Increase antibody concentration (decrease dilution)
Extend primary antibody incubation time (overnight at 4°C)
Use signal enhancement systems (biotin-streptavidin amplification)
Increase protein loading (up to 50-75 µg)
Optimize antigen retrieval methods for fixed samples
For nonspecific signals:
Increase blocking stringency (5% BSA or milk)
Add 0.1-0.3% Tween-20 to washing and antibody dilution buffers
Increase washing duration and frequency
Decrease antibody concentration (increase dilution)
Pre-absorb antibody with recombinant protein to remove cross-reactive antibodies
For investigating protein-protein interactions involving FAM234A:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) approach:
Use FAM234A antibodies conjugated to agarose or magnetic beads
Cross-link antibody to beads to prevent heavy/light chain interference
Prepare lysates under non-denaturing conditions to preserve protein-protein interactions
Analyze precipitates for potential binding partners by mass spectrometry or Western blot
Proximity ligation assay (PLA) methodology:
Combine FAM234A antibody with antibodies against suspected interaction partners
Use species-specific secondary antibodies with complementary oligonucleotides
Analyze fluorescent signals indicating proteins within 40 nm proximity
Immunofluorescence colocalization:
Perform dual immunofluorescence with FAM234A antibody and antibodies against potential interacting proteins
Analyze subcellular distribution patterns and overlap coefficients
When facing inconsistent results:
Epitope mapping analysis:
Validation with orthogonal techniques:
Complement antibody detection with mRNA expression analysis
Use recombinant expression systems with tagged FAM234A
Employ CRISPR-mediated tagging of endogenous FAM234A
Cross-validation with multiple antibodies:
Test multiple antibodies recognizing different epitopes
Compare monoclonal and polyclonal antibody results
Develop a scoring system based on consensus detection
Post-translational modification considerations:
Evaluate if discrepancies relate to detection of differentially modified forms
Use phosphatase or deglycosylation treatments before detection
For advanced spatiotemporal analysis:
Live-cell imaging approaches:
Combine with cell-permeable fluorescent antibody fragments
Use in conjunction with fluorescently tagged FAM234A constructs for validation
Super-resolution microscopy methods:
Employ antibodies with bright, photostable fluorophores
Optimize fixation and permeabilization for epitope accessibility
Use STORM, PALM, or STED microscopy for nanoscale resolution
FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching) analysis:
Combine antibody-based detection with photobleaching techniques
Measure protein turnover rates in different cellular compartments
Intracellular tracking:
Use pulse-chase experiments with temporal antibody labeling
Track FAM234A movement through cellular compartments over time
When analyzing apparent molecular weight discrepancies:
Expected molecular weight: The predicted molecular weight of FAM234A is approximately 59.5 kDa
Factors contributing to migration differences:
Post-translational modifications (phosphorylation, glycosylation)
Protein isoforms resulting from alternative splicing
Sample preparation conditions (reducing vs. non-reducing)
Gel percentage and buffer system variations
Verification approaches:
Compare with recombinant FAM234A protein standards
Perform phosphatase or glycosidase treatments to identify modifications
Analyze with mass spectrometry to confirm identity
Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
For accurate localization analysis:
Fixation and permeabilization effects:
Compare results from different fixation methods (paraformaldehyde, methanol, acetone)
Evaluate different permeabilization agents (Triton X-100, saponin, digitonin)
Antibody validation controls:
Include peptide competition controls
Compare with GFP-tagged FAM234A localization
Use cellular fractionation followed by Western blot to confirm subcellular distribution
Co-localization markers:
Use established organelle markers (ER, Golgi, mitochondria, plasma membrane)
Calculate quantitative co-localization metrics (Pearson's coefficient, Manders' overlap)
Perform z-stack analysis for three-dimensional distribution assessment
Physiological state considerations:
Evaluate localization under different cell cycle phases
Compare stressed vs. unstressed conditions
Assess before and after relevant stimuli
Critical limitations to consider:
Cross-reactivity potential:
Conformational epitope accessibility:
Epitope masking in protein complexes
Differential accessibility under various fixation conditions
Limited detection of certain protein states or conformations
Expression threshold detection:
Low sensitivity for detecting low abundance expression
Need for signal amplification in tissues with minimal expression
Quantification limitations at extremely high or low expression levels
Technical variability sources:
Lot-to-lot variation between antibody preparations
Differential performance in various buffer systems
Time-dependent degradation affecting long-term studies