The At2g33705 antibody targets the protein product of the At2g33705 locus, a gene of unknown function in Arabidopsis thaliana. This antibody falls under the category of polyclonal antibodies, as indicated by the "PA" prefix in its product code (CSB-PA665592XA01DOA). Its primary use is in molecular biology techniques to study the expression, localization, and interaction of the At2g33705 protein .
While direct studies using this antibody are not documented in peer-reviewed literature, its utility can be extrapolated from analogous antibodies in plant research:
Western Blot (WB): Detection of At2g33705 protein expression under varying physiological conditions .
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Localization of the protein in Arabidopsis tissues .
Protein-Protein Interaction Studies: Co-immunoprecipitation to identify binding partners .
The At2g33705 gene resides on chromosome 2 of Arabidopsis thaliana. Bioinformatics analyses (e.g., TAIR, UniProt) suggest it encodes a hypothetical protein with no conserved domains of known function. Homology searches reveal no direct orthologs in other model organisms, complicating functional predictions .
Antibody Specificity: Commercial antibodies targeting plant proteins often face cross-reactivity issues, as seen in studies of angiotensin II AT2 receptor antibodies . Rigorous validation (e.g., knockout controls) is essential for the At2g33705 antibody.
Epitope Mapping: The antigenic region recognized by this antibody remains uncharacterized, limiting mechanistic insights .
Functional Studies: CRISPR-generated At2g33705 knockout lines could clarify the gene’s role in growth, development, or stress responses.
Omics Integration: Proteomic or transcriptomic profiling in mutants may reveal pathways linked to At2g33705 .
Structural Biology: Cryo-EM or X-ray crystallography could resolve the protein’s 3D structure, aiding functional annotation .
At2g33705 (UniProt accession Q3EBP0) is a protein found in Arabidopsis thaliana (Mouse-ear cress). This protein is still being characterized in current research, with antibodies developed to study its expression patterns and functions in plant cellular processes. When working with the antibody, researchers should be aware that proper validation is essential as antibody specificity issues have been documented for other targets .
At2g33705 Antibody has been validated for Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and Western Blot (WB) applications. These techniques enable researchers to detect and quantify the presence of the target protein in plant tissue extracts. The antibody has been affinity-purified to ensure specific binding to the recombinant Arabidopsis thaliana At2g33705 protein used as the immunogen .
For optimal preservation of antibody function, store At2g33705 Antibody at -20°C or -80°C upon receipt. The antibody is supplied in liquid form containing 50% glycerol and 0.01M PBS (pH 7.4) with 0.03% Proclin 300 as a preservative. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as these can compromise antibody functionality and specificity .
Antibody validation is crucial given the documented problems with antibody specificity in the literature . Recommended validation steps include:
Positive and negative controls: Include wild-type Arabidopsis tissue (positive control) and knockout/knockdown lines lacking At2g33705 expression (negative control)
Multiple detection methods: Validate findings using both Western blot and ELISA
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate the antibody with excess immunizing peptide to confirm binding specificity
Cross-reactivity testing: Test the antibody against closely related proteins to assess potential cross-reactivity
These validation steps are essential as research has shown that commercial antibodies can sometimes bind to proteins other than their intended targets .
A robust experimental design should include the following controls:
| Control Type | Implementation | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Positive Control | Wild-type Arabidopsis tissue | Confirms antibody functionality |
| Negative Control | At2g33705 knockout/RNAi lines | Validates antibody specificity |
| Loading Control | Anti-actin or anti-tubulin antibody | Ensures equal protein loading in Western blots |
| Secondary Antibody Control | Sample incubated with secondary antibody only | Detects non-specific binding |
| Isotype Control | Non-specific rabbit IgG | Assesses background binding |
Implementing these controls addresses the specificity concerns documented with other antibodies, where several antibodies raised against the same protein produced different banding patterns in Western blots .
Based on antibody specifications and general best practices for plant protein analysis:
Sample preparation:
Homogenize plant tissue in extraction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, protease inhibitors)
Centrifuge at 12,000g for 15 minutes at 4°C
Collect supernatant and determine protein concentration
Western blot procedure:
Separate 20-50 μg of protein by SDS-PAGE (10-12% gel)
Transfer to PVDF membrane (100V for 1 hour)
Block with 5% non-fat milk in TBST for 1 hour
Incubate with At2g33705 Antibody (1:1000 dilution) overnight at 4°C
Wash 3× with TBST (10 minutes each)
Incubate with HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:5000) for 1 hour
Wash 3× with TBST
Develop using ECL substrate
Image analysis:
Document results using imaging system
Quantify band intensity using appropriate software
This protocol incorporates quality control measures to address issues of non-specific binding documented with other antibodies .
While the antibody specifications primarily list ELISA and Western blot applications , researchers may wish to adapt it for immunohistochemistry:
Tissue fixation and embedding:
Fix tissue in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 hours
Dehydrate through ethanol series
Embed in paraffin or freeze in OCT compound
Antibody optimization steps:
Test multiple antibody concentrations (1:100, 1:250, 1:500, 1:1000)
Compare antigen retrieval methods (citrate buffer pH 6.0 vs. EDTA buffer pH 9.0)
Optimize incubation times (1-hour room temperature vs. overnight at 4°C)
Test detection systems (fluorescent vs. HRP-based)
Validation controls:
Include peptide competition control
Test on confirmed At2g33705 knockout tissue
This methodical approach is essential since antibody cross-reactivity can lead to misidentification of target proteins, as documented in other research systems .
Distinguishing specific from non-specific signals requires systematic analysis:
Expected molecular weight: The predicted molecular weight of At2g33705 should be confirmed through bioinformatic analysis. Post-translational modifications may alter the observed molecular weight.
Pattern analysis: Compare observed banding patterns with published results. Multiple bands could indicate:
Protein isoforms
Post-translational modifications
Degradation products
Non-specific binding
Decisive validation tests:
Genetic knockout controls (signal should disappear)
Peptide competition assay (signal should be blocked)
Signal comparison across different tissues (should correlate with known expression patterns)
This approach addresses the challenges observed in research where different antibodies targeting the same protein produced vastly different banding patterns .
| Issue | Potential Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| False Positives | - Cross-reactivity with similar epitopes - Non-specific secondary antibody binding - Excessive antibody concentration | - Increase washing stringency - Optimize blocking conditions - Use knockout controls - Titrate antibody concentration |
| False Negatives | - Protein denaturation affecting epitope - Insufficient antigen retrieval - Antibody degradation - Low target protein expression | - Try different extraction methods - Optimize antigen retrieval - Use fresh antibody aliquots - Increase protein loading - Try signal amplification methods |
| Inconsistent Results | - Batch-to-batch antibody variation - Changing experimental conditions - Sample degradation | - Document lot numbers - Standardize protocols - Include positive controls - Prepare fresh samples |
This troubleshooting guide addresses issues similar to those documented in studies showing that antibodies can produce inconsistent results even when targeting the same epitope .
Advanced protein-protein interaction studies can be conducted using the following approaches:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Lyse plant tissues in non-denaturing buffer
Pre-clear lysate with Protein A/G beads
Incubate with At2g33705 Antibody (5 μg per 1 mg protein)
Capture complexes with Protein A/G beads
Wash extensively
Elute and analyze by mass spectrometry or Western blot
Proximity ligation assay (PLA):
Fix plant tissues or cells
Incubate with At2g33705 Antibody and antibody against potential interactor
Apply PLA probes and ligase
Amplify signal and visualize interaction sites
FRET-based approaches:
Label At2g33705 Antibody with donor fluorophore
Label second antibody with acceptor fluorophore
Analyze energy transfer indicating proximity
These methodologies should be validated with appropriate controls to ensure specificity, which is a critical concern based on antibody specificity studies .
Integrating computational methods with antibody-based experiments can enhance research outcomes:
Epitope prediction and analysis:
Analyze the immunogen sequence used to generate the antibody
Predict potential cross-reactive epitopes in the proteome
Map epitopes to protein structures when available
Deep learning for antibody imaging analysis:
Structural modeling of antibody-antigen interactions:
This integration of computational and experimental approaches addresses challenges similar to those being tackled in de novo antibody design research .
For large-scale studies across multiple plant samples or conditions:
Antibody microarray development:
Spot At2g33705 Antibody on activated glass slides
Incubate with fluorescently labeled protein extracts
Scan and quantify signal intensities
Automated Western blot analysis:
Utilize capillary-based automated Western systems
Optimize antibody concentration for the system
Develop standardized analysis protocols
High-content imaging:
Combine At2g33705 Antibody with other markers
Utilize automated microscopy platforms
Apply machine learning for image analysis
These high-throughput approaches should incorporate appropriate controls and validation steps to address specificity concerns similar to those documented in the literature .
Emerging technologies hold promise for advancing At2g33705 research:
Single-domain antibodies (nanobodies):
Development of camelid-derived nanobodies against At2g33705
Enhanced penetration into plant tissues
Improved access to conformational epitopes
Generative AI for antibody optimization:
Structural biology integration:
These approaches represent the cutting edge of antibody technology, integrating computational design with experimental validation .
When combining CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing with antibody-based detection:
Knockout validation strategy:
Design guide RNAs targeting At2g33705
Generate multiple independent knockout lines
Confirm editing by sequencing
Validate absence of protein using the At2g33705 Antibody
Epitope tagging considerations:
Use CRISPR to introduce epitope tags (HA, FLAG, etc.)
Compare detection using At2g33705 Antibody vs. tag-specific antibodies
Assess whether tagging affects protein function
Spatial and temporal expression studies:
Generate promoter-reporter fusions using CRISPR
Compare reporter expression with antibody-based detection
Create conditional knockout lines to study dynamic protein expression