At3g19880 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300. Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4.
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 week lead time (made-to-order)
Synonyms
At3g19880 antibody; MPN9.12F-box protein At3g19880 antibody
Target Names
At3g19880
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What approaches should I use to validate the specificity of At3g19880 Antibody?

Western blot analysis using protein extracts from different plant tissues is the primary method for validating antibody specificity. For robust validation, you should:

  • Test the antibody against total protein extracts from multiple tissues (leaves, stems, and inflorescences)

  • Verify that band patterns are consistent with expected molecular weights

  • Compare expression patterns across different tissues to identify tissue specificity

  • Evaluate signal intensity using software like ImageJ to quantify expression levels

This systematic approach will establish the antibody's specificity profile and suitability for downstream applications .

What experimental controls should I include when first testing At3g19880 Antibody?

Proper experimental controls are essential for antibody validation:

  • Include protein extracts from wild-type plants and knockout/knockdown lines (if available)

  • Use pre-immune serum as a negative control for polyclonal antibodies

  • Include an isotype control for monoclonal antibodies

  • Run molecular weight markers to confirm band sizes

  • Include positive controls (tissues known to express the protein of interest)

These controls help distinguish specific from non-specific signals and validate antibody performance before proceeding to more complex experiments .

How do I determine optimal antibody dilutions for different applications?

Determining optimal dilution requires systematic testing:

ApplicationRecommended Starting Dilution RangeOptimization Steps
Western Blot1:1000 - 1:5000Test in 2-fold dilution series
Immunofluorescence1:100 - 1:500Start with manufacturer recommendations
Immunoprecipitation1-5 μg antibody per sampleTitrate to determine minimum effective amount
ELISA1:500 - 1:2000Perform checkerboard titration

Test multiple dilutions in parallel while keeping all other conditions constant. Evaluate signal-to-noise ratio at each dilution to determine optimal concentration that provides clear specific signal with minimal background .

How can I use At3g19880 Antibody for immunofluorescence to determine subcellular localization?

Immunofluorescence with plant tissues requires careful preparation and analysis:

  • Fix tissue samples (typically 4% paraformaldehyde)

  • Prepare thin sections (10-20 μm) using a microtome

  • Perform antigen retrieval if necessary

  • Block with appropriate blocking solution (3-5% BSA)

  • Incubate with primary antibody (At3g19880) at optimized dilution

  • Wash thoroughly and incubate with fluorescently-labeled secondary antibody

  • Counterstain with DAPI to visualize nuclei

  • Image using confocal microscopy with appropriate filter sets

Based on patterns observed in similar Arabidopsis antibodies, you may detect signals in specific structures like vascular bundles, epidermis, or particular cell types within floral tissues. Document and compare the localization patterns across different tissues and developmental stages for comprehensive characterization .

What is the optimal protocol for immunoprecipitation using At3g19880 Antibody?

For successful immunoprecipitation of plant proteins:

  • Extract total proteins from 1-2g of Arabidopsis tissue using a buffer containing:

    • 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)

    • 150 mM NaCl

    • 1% Triton X-100

    • 0.5% sodium deoxycholate

    • Protease inhibitor cocktail

  • Clear lysate by centrifugation (14,000 × g, 15 min, 4°C)

  • Pre-clear with Protein A/G beads (1 hour, 4°C)

  • Incubate cleared lysate with 2-5 μg of At3g19880 antibody overnight at 4°C

  • Add Protein A/G beads and incubate for 2-3 hours at 4°C

  • Wash beads 4-5 times with wash buffer

  • Elute bound proteins by boiling in SDS sample buffer

For downstream identification of precipitated proteins, separate by SDS-PAGE, perform silver staining, excise bands of interest, and analyze by mass spectrometry .

How can I troubleshoot weak or absent signals in Western blots using At3g19880 Antibody?

Several strategies can address weak signals:

  • Increase protein loading (50-100 μg total protein)

  • Decrease antibody dilution (use more concentrated antibody)

  • Extend primary antibody incubation time (overnight at 4°C)

  • Optimize blocking conditions (test different blocking agents)

  • Use enhanced sensitivity detection systems (enhanced chemiluminescence)

  • Consider protein enrichment through subcellular fractionation

If signal remains absent, consider:

  • The target protein may have tissue-specific or developmental stage-specific expression

  • Post-translational modifications may affect epitope recognition

  • The protein might be expressed at very low levels under standard conditions

  • Testing different extraction methods to improve protein solubilization

How can I interpret tissue-specific expression patterns detected by At3g19880 Antibody?

Based on patterns observed with other Arabidopsis antibodies, you might encounter various tissue-specific expression profiles:

Expression PatternInterpretationExamples from Similar Antibodies
Flower-specificPotential role in floral development or reproductionGroup A antibodies (No. 1-4)
Stem-specificMay function in structural support or vascular developmentGroup B antibodies (No. 5-6)
Leaf and flowerCould be involved in photosynthesis and floral functionsGroup C antibodies (No. 7)
Stem and flowerPossible role in reproductive development and structureGroup D antibodies (No. 8-12)
Leaf and stemLikely involved in vegetative growth functionsGroup E antibodies (No. 13-15)
All tissuesHousekeeping functions or fundamental cellular processesGroup F antibodies (No. 9 antibodies)

What approaches can I use to identify the specific protein recognized by At3g19880 Antibody?

To definitively identify the antigen:

  • Perform immunoprecipitation using optimized conditions

  • Separate precipitated proteins by SDS-PAGE

  • Perform silver staining to visualize protein bands

  • Excise the band corresponding to the expected molecular weight

  • Process for mass spectrometry analysis using:

    • Tryptic digestion

    • LC-MS/MS analysis

    • Database searching against Arabidopsis proteome

When analyzing MS results, consider:

  • Peptide coverage (aim for >20% coverage)

  • Number of unique peptides (more is better)

  • Molecular weight consistency with Western blot results

  • Known expression pattern of candidate proteins

This approach has successfully identified antigens for multiple Arabidopsis antibodies, including FtsH protease 11 (No. 9 antibody) and glycine cleavage T-protein (No. 18 antibody) .

How can I use At3g19880 Antibody to study protein modifications and interactions?

For studying protein modifications:

  • Compare migration patterns across different conditions that may induce modifications

  • Use phosphatase treatment to identify phosphorylation-dependent mobility shifts

  • Perform 2D gel electrophoresis to separate protein isoforms

  • Consider using phospho-specific antibodies in parallel if available

For protein interactions:

  • Perform co-immunoprecipitation followed by Western blot with antibodies against suspected interaction partners

  • Use gentle lysis conditions to preserve protein complexes

  • Consider crosslinking to stabilize transient interactions

  • Validate interactions using reciprocal co-IP or alternative methods

These approaches can reveal dynamic regulation and functional contexts of your protein of interest .

What strategies should I use when comparing antibody signals across mutant and wild-type plants?

When comparing genotypes:

  • Always load equal amounts of total protein (confirm with loading controls)

  • Process all samples simultaneously under identical conditions

  • Include multiple biological replicates (minimum 3)

  • Quantify signal intensity using software like ImageJ

  • Normalize to appropriate housekeeping proteins

  • Perform statistical analysis to determine significance of differences

When interpreting differences:

  • Reduced signal in mutants may confirm antibody specificity

  • Altered molecular weight may indicate processing defects

  • Changes in tissue-specific patterns may reveal regulatory mechanisms

How can I integrate immunofluorescence data with other localization methods for At3g19880 protein?

For comprehensive localization studies:

  • Compare immunofluorescence patterns with:

    • Subcellular prediction algorithms

    • GFP fusion protein localization

    • Published proteomics data from subcellular fractions

  • Consider cell-type specific analysis:

    • In anthers, examine localization in specific structures (epidermis, vascular bundles)

    • In sepals, note distribution patterns (veins vs. other tissues)

    • Document developmental stage-specific changes

  • Validate with complementary approaches:

    • Subcellular fractionation followed by Western blot

    • Immunogold labeling for electron microscopy

    • Super-resolution microscopy for detailed localization

The integration of multiple localization methods provides stronger evidence for the true subcellular residence of your protein of interest .

What criteria should I use to evaluate the quality of At3g19880 Antibody preparations?

Antibody quality assessment should include:

  • Specificity validation:

    • Single band of expected molecular weight on Western blot

    • Absence of signal in knockout/knockdown lines

    • Consistent results across different tissue types

  • Sensitivity assessment:

    • Detection limit with purified protein (if available)

    • Minimum amount of total protein extract needed for detection

    • Signal-to-noise ratio at optimal dilution

  • Reproducibility testing:

    • Consistency across different antibody lots

    • Stability over time and storage conditions

    • Concordance with independent methods of detection

Document these quality metrics systematically to ensure reliable experimental results and facilitate troubleshooting if issues arise .

How do monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against At3g19880 differ in research applications?

CharacteristicMonoclonal AntibodiesPolyclonal AntibodiesApplication Considerations
SpecificityRecognizes single epitopeRecognizes multiple epitopesMonoclonals offer higher specificity but may be affected by epitope modifications
SensitivityGenerally lowerGenerally higherPolyclonals may detect lower abundance proteins
Batch-to-batch variationMinimalSignificantMonoclonals provide better reproducibility across experiments
Production complexityHigher (hybridoma technology)Lower (immunization of animals)Availability and cost considerations
ApplicationsBetter for specific detectionBetter for robust detectionChoose based on experimental requirements

When working with Arabidopsis proteins, consider that monoclonal antibodies like those described in search result may offer advantages for distinguishing between closely related proteins or isoforms, while polyclonal antibodies may provide more robust detection across different experimental conditions .

These FAQs provide a comprehensive framework for researchers working with At3g19880 Antibody or other antibodies targeting Arabidopsis proteins, covering fundamental validation through advanced applications with an emphasis on methodological approaches to ensure reliable and reproducible results.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.