The At3g22940 antibody targets a putative F-box protein (At3g22940) in Arabidopsis thaliana, a model organism for plant biology. F-box proteins are critical components of the Skp1-Cullin-F-box (SCF) E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, which regulates protein degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome system . This antibody is a rabbit-derived polyclonal reagent validated for applications such as Western blot (WB) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) .
Ubiquitination Pathways: At3g22940 is implicated in substrate recognition for ubiquitination, a process critical for stress responses and developmental regulation .
Gene Regulation: Transcriptomic data from Arabidopsis mutants show At3g22940 is differentially regulated under biotic stress, with a fold change of 2.46 in pathogen-inoculated plants .
| AGI ID | Fold Change | Gene Description |
|---|---|---|
| At3g22940 | 2.46 | F-box associated ubiquitination effector |
While antibodies like anti-alpha tubulin (Invitrogen) or anti-LC3 (Cell Signaling Technology) focus on conserved mammalian proteins , the At3g22940 antibody is specialized for plant-specific studies. Its design avoids cross-reactivity with non-plant homologs, a feature critical for accurate Arabidopsis research .
Emerging antibody databases like PLAbDab and AbDb could enhance validation frameworks for plant-specific reagents like the At3g22940 antibody by integrating structural and functional data . Additionally, advances in antigen microarray technology may enable high-throughput profiling of its binding specificity .
At3g22940 encodes a putative F-box protein in Arabidopsis thaliana (Mouse-ear cress) that functions as part of the F-box associated ubiquitination effector family. This protein plays a potential role in protein degradation pathways through the ubiquitin-proteasome system, which is critical for various cellular processes including hormone signaling, development, and stress responses in plants. Studying this protein contributes to our understanding of protein turnover regulation in plant cells, particularly in relation to nuclear functions and immunity responses. The protein is sometimes referenced as At3g22940 F5N5.12 in literature, indicating its genomic location and clone identifier .
Currently, polyclonal antibodies raised in rabbits against Arabidopsis thaliana At3g22940 protein are commercially available. These antibodies are produced through antigen-affinity purification methods and are primarily of the IgG isotype. These polyclonal preparations recognize epitopes of the putative F-box protein encoded by the At3g22940 gene. The specificity of these antibodies makes them suitable for detecting the native protein in plant tissues as well as recombinant versions of the protein in experimental systems .
At3g22940 antibodies have been validated for several experimental applications:
Western Blot (WB): For detecting the protein in denatured samples and determining protein expression levels
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA): For quantitative measurement of the protein in solution
Immunoprecipitation: Though not explicitly mentioned in the search results, polyclonal antibodies of this nature are often suitable for pulling down the target protein and associated complexes
Each application requires specific optimization of antibody concentration, buffer conditions, and detection methods for reliable results. Validation typically includes confirmation of specificity through detection of bands at the expected molecular weight and absence of signal in negative controls .
For optimal preservation of antibody activity:
Store antibodies at -20°C for long-term storage or at 4°C for short-term use
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles by preparing working aliquots
Use sterile techniques when handling antibody solutions
Follow manufacturer recommendations for buffer compositions when diluting
Check for precipitation before use and gently mix without vortexing
Monitor expiration dates and perform validation tests if using antibodies close to expiration
These storage and handling practices help maintain the binding capacity and specificity of the antibody, particularly important for quantitative applications like Western blotting where consistent performance is essential for reliable data interpretation .
Optimizing Western blot protocols for At3g22940 detection in nuclear extracts requires several specialized considerations:
Nuclear Extraction Protocol:
Use a nuclear isolation buffer containing 50mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150mM NaCl, with protease inhibitors
Perform subcellular fractionation with appropriate centrifugation steps to ensure nuclear purity
Validate nuclear fraction purity using markers like histone H3 antibodies as positive controls
Sample Preparation:
Load 5-10μg of nuclear protein extract per lane
Use gradient SDS-PAGE (4-20%) for better resolution of F-box proteins
Transfer to nitrocellulose membranes using wet transfer methods at 30V overnight for high molecular weight proteins
Antibody Incubation:
Block membranes with 3-5% fat-free dry milk in TBS
Use At3g22940 antibody at 1:1000 to 1:2000 dilution (optimize empirically)
Incubate with secondary anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated antibody at 1:5000 dilution
Detection Optimization:
Use high-sensitivity chemiluminescent substrates like SuperSignal™ West Femto
Capture images with a CCD camera system capable of 16-bit resolution
Perform exposure series to ensure signal is within linear range
This method has been successfully applied to detect nuclear proteins in Arabidopsis, though protocol adjustments may be necessary based on tissue type and developmental stage .
Analysis of At3g22940 protein expression during pattern-triggered immunity requires careful experimental design:
Experimental Setup:
Grow Arabidopsis cell cultures under controlled conditions
Treat samples with immunity elicitors such as flg22 and nlp20 for specified time points (typically 15, 30, 60 minutes)
Include untreated controls for baseline comparison
Prepare nuclear fractions using subcellular fractionation techniques
Analytical Approach:
Perform quantitative Western blot analysis or LC-MS based proteomics
Calculate enrichment scores based on relative abundance compared to cytoplasmic markers
Monitor protein translocation between cellular compartments, particularly nuclear import
Compare protein levels across treatment conditions using statistical analysis
Current research on nuclear proteome changes during PTI has identified hundreds of proteins that undergo translocation or abundance changes upon immune elicitation. While specific data on At3g22940 is not directly presented in the search results, similar F-box proteins have shown altered nuclear localization during immune responses, suggesting potential regulatory roles in plant defense mechanisms .
Detecting low-abundance F-box proteins like At3g22940 presents several technical challenges:
Sensitivity Limitations:
F-box proteins often exist at low copy numbers per cell
Standard detection methods may be insufficient for reliable quantification
Signal-to-noise ratio can be problematic in complex plant extracts
Enhanced Detection Strategies:
Implement protein enrichment techniques prior to analysis
Use high-sensitivity mass spectrometry approaches with Data-Dependent Acquisition (DDA)
Consider targeted proteomics methods like Selected Reaction Monitoring (SRM)
Employ Q Exactive Plus mass spectrometer systems with nanoLC separation
Sample Preparation Optimization:
Use specialized extraction buffers to solubilize membrane-associated F-box proteins
Implement two-step digestion protocols with Lys-C followed by trypsin
Fractionate samples using strong cation exchange or high-pH reversed-phase chromatography
Consider peptide clean-up using solid-phase extraction techniques
Data Analysis Considerations:
Apply advanced normalization methods to account for sample heterogeneity
Use stringent criteria for protein identification (multiple peptides)
Implement appropriate statistical models for low-count data
Consider specialized software packages designed for low-abundance protein detection
Modern LC-MS approaches have successfully identified more than 3,000 nuclear proteins in Arabidopsis, including low-abundance transcription factors and regulatory proteins, suggesting these methods could be adapted for At3g22940 detection .
Validating antibody specificity for At3g22940 requires a multi-faceted approach:
Positive Controls:
Express recombinant At3g22940 protein in heterologous systems (e.g., E. coli, Expi293 cells)
Use At3g22940 overexpression lines in Arabidopsis
Include wild-type Arabidopsis samples from tissues known to express the protein
Negative Controls:
Test antibody reactivity in At3g22940 knockout mutants
Use pre-immune serum or isotype control antibodies
Include non-plant samples where cross-reactivity is not expected
Specificity Tests:
Perform peptide competition assays with the immunizing antigen
Conduct Western blots to confirm detection at the expected molecular weight
Assess cross-reactivity with related F-box proteins through sequence analysis
Advanced Validation Methods:
Implement immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry (IP-MS)
Perform immunofluorescence with co-localization studies
Consider using multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of the same protein
Antibody validation is critical for ensuring experimental reproducibility and data reliability. Documentation of validation experiments should be maintained and included in method sections of publications .
Several cutting-edge approaches could be employed to develop enhanced At3g22940 antibodies:
Computational Design Approaches:
Novel Screening Strategies:
Affinity Maturation Technologies:
Design synthetic antibody libraries focusing on CDR diversity
Apply in silico maturation methods prior to experimental validation
Use deep learning approaches for predicting affinity-enhancing mutations
Implement high-throughput characterization of binding kinetics using surface plasmon resonance (SPR)
Production Optimization:
Express antibodies in optimized mammalian expression systems (e.g., Expi293)
Implement affinity purification methods using protein A/G or antigen-based columns
Characterize antibody stability and functionality across different buffer conditions
Develop quality control metrics specific to plant protein detection applications
The implementation of these advanced methods could yield antibodies with superior specificity, affinity, and performance characteristics for At3g22940 detection in challenging experimental contexts .
When faced with contradictory results using At3g22940 antibodies across different experimental systems, consider the following systematic troubleshooting approach:
Comprehensive Experimental Documentation:
Create a detailed table comparing all experimental variables:
| Variable | System A | System B | System C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antibody lot | [details] | [details] | [details] |
| Antibody dilution | [details] | [details] | [details] |
| Sample preparation | [details] | [details] | [details] |
| Detection method | [details] | [details] | [details] |
| Controls used | [details] | [details] | [details] |
| Buffer composition | [details] | [details] | [details] |
Systematic Validation Tests:
Repeat experiments with standardized protocols across systems
Exchange samples between laboratories for blind testing
Implement alternative detection methods (e.g., mass spectrometry) for orthogonal validation
Test multiple antibody lots and sources if available
Technical Considerations:
Evaluate epitope accessibility in different sample preparations
Consider post-translational modifications that might affect antibody recognition
Assess potential interference from sample components or buffer ingredients
Investigate protein complex formation that might mask antibody binding sites
Biological Variables Analysis:
Document developmental stages, tissue types, and growth conditions
Consider stress responses that might alter protein expression or localization
Evaluate gene expression data to correlate with protein detection results
Investigate potential protein isoforms or degradation products
Statistical Approach:
Apply appropriate statistical tests to determine significance of observed differences
Calculate coefficients of variation within and between experimental systems
Perform power analysis to ensure adequate sample sizes
Consider meta-analysis approaches if multiple datasets are available
This structured approach helps identify sources of variability and determine whether contradictions stem from technical issues or represent true biological differences .
Integrating immunological detection with mass spectrometry provides powerful complementary approaches for At3g22940 characterization:
Immunoprecipitation-Mass Spectrometry (IP-MS) Workflow:
Use At3g22940 antibodies for immunoprecipitation from plant extracts
Process immunoprecipitated samples for LC-MS/MS analysis:
Perform on-bead or in-solution digestion with trypsin
Separate peptides using nanoLC with a gradient of 5-40% acetonitrile
Analyze using Q Exactive Plus mass spectrometer with DDA acquisition
Sample Preparation Optimization:
Crosslink antibodies to solid support (e.g., protein A/G beads)
Include appropriate controls (IgG control, input samples)
Optimize washing conditions to reduce background
Consider native versus denaturing conditions based on research questions
Data Analysis Integration:
Identify At3g22940 interacting proteins from MS data
Validate key interactions using reciprocal IP or proximity labeling
Map post-translational modifications identified by MS
Quantify relative abundance of protein complexes
Advanced Applications:
Use parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) for targeted quantification
Apply SILAC or TMT labeling for quantitative comparison across conditions
Implement crosslinking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) to map protein interaction interfaces
Consider hydrogen-deuterium exchange MS to probe structural features
This integrated approach has been successfully applied to nuclear proteins in Arabidopsis and could reveal functional aspects of At3g22940 including protein interactions, modifications, and dynamic changes during cellular responses .
While At3g22940 is an F-box protein rather than a transcription factor, it may still associate with chromatin as part of protein degradation complexes. If investigating its chromatin association:
ChIP Protocol Adaptation:
Use appropriate crosslinking conditions (1% formaldehyde for 10 minutes)
Optimize sonication parameters for consistent chromatin fragmentation
Implement stringent washing conditions to reduce background
Include positive controls (e.g., histone H3 antibody) and negative controls (IgG)
Antibody Selection and Validation:
Test multiple antibody lots for ChIP efficiency
Validate antibody specificity using knockout lines
Determine optimal antibody concentration through titration experiments
Consider using epitope-tagged versions of At3g22940 with well-validated tag antibodies
Data Analysis Considerations:
Design appropriate primers for qPCR validation of enriched regions
Consider genome-wide approaches (ChIP-seq) to identify all binding sites
Implement rigorous statistical analysis of enrichment data
Correlate binding sites with transcriptional data for functional insights
Troubleshooting Strategies:
Address high background issues through blocking optimization
Test different fixation methods if standard protocols fail
Consider native ChIP for proteins sensitive to crosslinking
Implement sequential ChIP for protein complex analysis
While not directly addressed in the search results, these ChIP recommendations represent best practices adaptable to studying chromatin associations of regulatory proteins in plant systems .