At3g23260 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Components: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
At3g23260 antibody; K14B15.17Putative F-box protein At3g23260 antibody
Target Names
At3g23260
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is At3g23260 and why is it significant in plant molecular biology research?

At3g23260 is a gene locus in Arabidopsis thaliana, a widely used model organism in plant molecular biology research. Based on available research data, this gene appears to be involved in plant reproductive development, particularly in microsporogenesis and pollen formation processes . Understanding At3g23260 function contributes to broader knowledge of reproductive mechanisms in plants. The protein encoded by At3g23260 has been assigned UniProt accession number Q9LTC3 , indicating it has been characterized at the protein level. Expression analysis studies have shown that At3g23260 may be differentially regulated during pollen development with potential fold changes of -1.65 observed in specific developmental contexts . This gene may function within networks of other genes involved in microsporogenesis, making it potentially valuable for understanding reproductive biology in plants.

What are the technical specifications of commercially available At3g23260 Antibodies?

At3g23260 Antibodies are available with the following specifications:

PropertySpecificationNotes
Product CodeCSB-PA881810XA01DOAReference identifier for ordering
Host SpeciesRabbitDetermines secondary antibody selection
ClonalityPolyclonalRecognizes multiple epitopes on target
ImmunogenRecombinant Arabidopsis thaliana At3g23260 proteinDetermines epitope recognition
Species ReactivityArabidopsis thalianaSpecificity for target organism
Validated ApplicationsELISA, Western Blot (WB)Experimentally confirmed methods
FormatLiquidPhysical state of antibody
Storage Buffer0.03% Proclin 300, 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4Formulation for stability
Purification MethodAntigen Affinity PurifiedEnhances specificity
Storage Conditions-20°C or -80°C, avoid repeated freeze-thawPreserves activity
IsotypeIgGAntibody class

These specifications are critical for researchers to consider when designing experiments, as they influence application protocols, storage requirements, and experimental controls.

How does At3g23260 expression change during plant development stages?

Research indicates that At3g23260 exhibits stage-specific expression patterns during plant development. Studies examining microsporogenesis have shown that At3g23260 expression may be differentially regulated between wild-type and mutant plants (such as cdm1 mutants) . Specifically, a fold change of approximately -1.65 (p-value = 0.020889) has been documented in certain developmental contexts , suggesting this gene may be downregulated during specific reproductive stages. This expression pattern places At3g23260 among several genes with altered expression during microspore development, including known developmental regulators like CalS5 and CalS12, which show dramatically reduced expression in cdm1 mutants . The temporal regulation of At3g23260 appears to coincide with important reproductive transitions, suggesting potential involvement in developmental processes. Additional research using quantitative RT-PCR or in situ hybridization would provide higher resolution data regarding the spatial and temporal expression patterns of this gene.

What are the recommended protocols for using At3g23260 Antibody in Western blotting?

When using At3g23260 Antibody for Western blotting in plant research, the following methodological protocol is recommended:

  • Sample Preparation:

    • Extract total protein from Arabidopsis tissue using a standard plant protein extraction buffer (e.g., 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, plant protease inhibitor cocktail)

    • Homogenize tissue thoroughly, particularly when working with reproductive structures

    • Quantify protein concentration using Bradford or BCA assay

    • Prepare samples in Laemmli buffer with reducing agent and heat at 95°C for 5 minutes

  • Gel Electrophoresis and Transfer:

    • Separate 15-30 μg of protein on a 10-12% SDS-PAGE gel

    • Include molecular weight markers appropriate for the expected size of At3g23260

    • Transfer proteins to PVDF or nitrocellulose membrane (0.45 μm pore size recommended)

    • Verify transfer efficiency with Ponceau S staining before proceeding

  • Immunoblotting:

    • Block membrane with 5% non-fat dry milk or BSA in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature

    • Dilute At3g23260 Antibody 1:500 to 1:2000 in blocking buffer (optimize for each experimental system)

    • Incubate membrane with primary antibody overnight at 4°C with gentle agitation

    • Wash 3-4 times with TBST, 10 minutes each

    • Incubate with HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (1:5000-1:10000) for 1 hour at room temperature

    • Wash 3-4 times with TBST, 10 minutes each

    • Develop using ECL substrate and expose to film or digital imager

  • Controls and Optimization:

    • Include positive control (wild-type Arabidopsis extract)

    • Include negative control (knockout/knockdown line if available)

    • Run loading control (anti-actin or anti-tubulin) on the same membrane

    • Optimize antibody concentration through titration experiments

This protocol has been adapted from standard Western blotting procedures for plant proteins and should be further optimized for specific experimental conditions.

How can researchers optimize the immunolocalization of At3g23260 in plant tissues?

For successful immunolocalization of At3g23260 in plant tissues, researchers should consider this optimized protocol:

  • Tissue Preparation and Fixation:

    • Collect fresh tissue samples, with special attention to developmental staging if studying reproductive structures

    • Fix tissues in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.4) for 2-4 hours at room temperature

    • For reproductive tissues, consider shorter fixation times (1-2 hours) to prevent overfixation

    • Dehydrate through an ethanol series (30%, 50%, 70%, 90%, 100%)

    • Embed in paraffin or LR White resin depending on the required resolution

    • Section at 5-8 μm thickness for light microscopy or 1-2 μm for high-resolution analysis

  • Antigen Retrieval and Blocking:

    • Deparaffinize and rehydrate sections (if using paraffin)

    • Perform antigen retrieval using citrate buffer (pH 6.0) at 95°C for 10-20 minutes

    • Cool slides to room temperature and rinse in PBS

    • Block with 5% normal goat serum, 1% BSA, 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS for 1-2 hours

    • For plant tissues, add 0.1% PVPP to reduce background from phenolic compounds

  • Antibody Incubation and Detection:

    • Dilute At3g23260 Antibody 1:100 to 1:250 in blocking solution

    • Incubate sections overnight at 4°C in a humid chamber

    • Wash 3-5 times with PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20

    • Apply fluorescent secondary antibody (e.g., Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG) at 1:500 dilution

    • Incubate for 1-2 hours at room temperature protected from light

    • Wash 3-5 times with PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20

    • Counterstain nuclei with DAPI (1 μg/ml) for 5-10 minutes

    • Mount with anti-fade mounting medium

  • Controls and Analysis:

    • Include primary antibody omission controls

    • Use tissue from At3g23260 mutant or knockdown plants if available

    • Compare staining patterns with in situ hybridization data if available

    • Use confocal microscopy for high-resolution localization and co-localization studies

When studying reproductive tissues, researchers should pay particular attention to the precise developmental staging, as At3g23260 expression appears to be regulated during microsporogenesis .

What approaches can be used to verify the specificity of At3g23260 Antibody?

Verifying antibody specificity is crucial for reliable research results. For At3g23260 Antibody, researchers should implement a multi-level validation strategy:

  • Genetic Validation:

    • Test the antibody in At3g23260 knockout/knockdown lines (T-DNA insertion lines or CRISPR-edited plants)

    • Compare signal between wild-type and mutant tissues using Western blot and immunolocalization

    • Use overexpression lines (35S:At3g23260) as positive controls to confirm signal enhancement

    • Examine allelic series with varying expression levels to confirm signal correlation

  • Biochemical Validation:

    • Perform peptide competition assays by pre-incubating the antibody with excess immunizing peptide

    • Run the competed and non-competed antibody in parallel Western blots

    • Observe signal reduction or elimination in the competed sample

    • Conduct immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to confirm target identity

  • Cross-Reactivity Assessment:

    • Test against recombinant proteins from closely related gene family members

    • Examine signal in heterologous expression systems (e.g., E. coli, yeast) expressing At3g23260

    • Compare results in different Arabidopsis ecotypes

    • Analyze tissues known to differentially express At3g23260 based on transcriptomic data

  • Technical Controls:

    • Include loading controls and transfer controls in Western blots

    • Use multiple dilutions to establish a linear signal response range

    • Compare results from different antibody lots to assess reproducibility

    • Document all validation experiments with appropriate positive and negative controls

This comprehensive validation approach ensures that experimental results using At3g23260 Antibody can be interpreted with confidence and will meet publication standards for antibody validation.

How can At3g23260 Antibody be utilized in protein-protein interaction studies?

For investigating protein-protein interactions involving At3g23260, several methodological approaches can be employed:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):

    • Prepare plant lysates under native conditions using non-denaturing buffers

    • Add protease inhibitors, phosphatase inhibitors, and mild detergents to preserve interactions

    • Pre-clear lysates with Protein A/G beads to reduce non-specific binding

    • Incubate pre-cleared lysates with At3g23260 Antibody (2-5 μg per mg of total protein)

    • Capture antibody-protein complexes using Protein A/G magnetic beads

    • Wash extensively with buffers of decreasing stringency

    • Elute bound proteins and analyze by SDS-PAGE followed by silver staining or mass spectrometry

    • Confirm specific interactions by reciprocal Co-IP and Western blotting

  • Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA):

    • Fix and permeabilize plant tissues as for immunolocalization

    • Incubate with At3g23260 Antibody and antibodies against candidate interacting proteins

    • Apply species-specific PLA probes with attached oligonucleotides

    • Perform ligation when probes are in close proximity (<40 nm)

    • Conduct rolling circle amplification and detect amplification products by fluorescence

    • This approach provides spatial information about interactions within cellular compartments

  • Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP):

    • If At3g23260 is suspected to interact with DNA or chromatin-associated proteins

    • Cross-link proteins to DNA using formaldehyde (1% for 10 minutes)

    • Extract and sonicate chromatin to generate fragments of 200-500 bp

    • Immunoprecipitate with At3g23260 Antibody

    • Reverse cross-links and analyze co-precipitated DNA by qPCR or sequencing

    • Map potential binding sites or identify associations with specific genomic regions

  • Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET):

    • While not directly using the antibody, FRET results can complement antibody-based studies

    • Compare FRET interaction sites with immunolocalization using At3g23260 Antibody

    • Validate protein proximity detected in FRET with co-IP using the antibody

These approaches should be complemented with appropriate controls and validation strategies to ensure specificity and reliability of the detected interactions.

What strategies can researchers employ to study the expression of At3g23260 during stress responses?

Investigating At3g23260 expression during plant stress responses requires a multi-faceted approach:

  • Quantitative Protein Analysis:

    • Use At3g23260 Antibody for Western blot analysis across stress time courses

    • Apply standardized sampling protocols to minimize variation

    • Include multiple stress conditions (drought, salt, temperature, pathogen)

    • Quantify protein levels using densitometry with appropriate normalization

    • Create quantitative expression profiles using technical and biological replicates

  • Spatial Expression Analysis:

    • Perform immunolocalization with At3g23260 Antibody in tissues from stress-treated plants

    • Compare subcellular localization patterns between control and stressed conditions

    • Document potential relocalization or compartmentalization changes

    • Combine with cell-type specific markers to identify responding cell populations

  • Proteomic Integration:

    • Immunoprecipitate At3g23260 from control and stressed tissues

    • Identify stress-specific post-translational modifications by mass spectrometry

    • Compare changes in interaction partners under different stress conditions

    • Correlate protein-level changes with transcriptomic data for At3g23260

  • Functional Analysis:

    • Generate reporter constructs (e.g., At3g23260 promoter:GUS) to complement antibody studies

    • Compare stress responses in wild-type vs. At3g23260 mutant/overexpression lines

    • Measure standard stress response parameters (ROS production, stress hormone levels)

    • Use the antibody to determine if altered At3g23260 levels affect other stress-related proteins

Stress TypeSampling Time PointsKey Parameters to MeasureComplementary Approaches
Drought0, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hoursWater loss, ABA content, stomatal conductanceqRT-PCR, RNA-seq
Salt stress0, 1, 3, 6, 24, 48 hoursNa+/K+ ratio, proline content, membrane integrityMetabolomics, phosphoproteomics
Cold stress0, 1, 3, 12, 24, 72 hoursMembrane fluidity, ice nucleation activityTranscription factor binding assays
Pathogen infection0, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hoursSA/JA levels, callose deposition, ROS burstPathogen growth assays

This comprehensive approach will provide insights into the potential role of At3g23260 in plant stress responses across multiple levels of regulation.

How can researchers utilize At3g23260 Antibody to study post-translational modifications?

Studying post-translational modifications (PTMs) of At3g23260 requires specialized methodologies:

  • Phosphorylation Analysis:

    • Immunoprecipitate At3g23260 using the specific antibody under non-denaturing conditions

    • Split the immunoprecipitated sample and treat half with phosphatase

    • Compare mobility on Phos-tag™ acrylamide gels to detect phosphorylated forms

    • For precise site identification, analyze tryptic digests by mass spectrometry with phosphopeptide enrichment

    • Develop phospho-specific antibodies for major phosphorylation sites identified

    • Compare phosphorylation status across developmental stages or stress conditions

  • Ubiquitination Detection:

    • Perform immunoprecipitation under denaturing conditions (1% SDS, 5mM DTT) to preserve ubiquitin linkages

    • Heat samples at 95°C before dilution for immunoprecipitation

    • Use At3g23260 Antibody for pull-down, then probe with anti-ubiquitin antibodies

    • Look for higher molecular weight bands or smears indicating ubiquitinated forms

    • Treat samples with deubiquitinating enzymes as controls

    • For in vivo studies, combine with proteasome inhibitors (e.g., MG132)

  • Glycosylation Assessment:

    • Immunoprecipitate At3g23260 and treat with various glycosidases (PNGase F, Endo H, O-glycosidase)

    • Analyze mobility shifts on Western blots using At3g23260 Antibody

    • Compare glycosylation patterns in different tissues or developmental stages

    • For detailed glycan characterization, perform lectin blotting or mass spectrometry

  • Redox Modification Analysis:

    • Extract proteins under non-reducing conditions to preserve disulfide bonds

    • Compare electrophoretic mobility under reducing vs. non-reducing conditions

    • For sulfenylation, use dimedone-based probes followed by immunoprecipitation

    • For S-nitrosylation, use the biotin-switch technique before antibody detection

The table below summarizes key methodological considerations for studying different PTMs:

PTM TypeDetection MethodKey ReagentsControlsExpected Observation
PhosphorylationPhos-tag™ gels, LC-MS/MSLambda phosphatase, phospho-enrichment columnsPhosphatase treatmentMobility shift, phosphopeptides
UbiquitinationWestern blotAnti-ubiquitin antibodies, MG132DUB treatmentHigh MW ladder/smear
GlycosylationEnzyme digestion, lectin blottingPNGase F, Endo H, lectinsTunicamycin treatmentMobility shift
Redox modificationsNon-reducing SDS-PAGE, biotin-switchNEM, iodoacetamide, dimedoneReducing agentsMobility differences, labeling

These approaches will provide insights into the regulatory mechanisms controlling At3g23260 function through post-translational modifications.

What are common technical issues when using At3g23260 Antibody in plant tissue analyses?

When working with At3g23260 Antibody in plant tissues, researchers frequently encounter these challenges and solutions:

  • High Background in Immunostaining:

    • Problem: Non-specific background staining in plant tissues, particularly in vascular tissues

    • Solution: Pre-absorb antibody with plant extract from negative control tissue

    • Methodology: Incubate diluted antibody with acetone powder prepared from Arabidopsis knockout tissue for 2 hours at 4°C, then centrifuge and use the supernatant

    • Alternative: Use plant-specific blocking reagents containing 1% PVPP to absorb phenolic compounds

    • Validation: Always run parallel negative controls (primary antibody omission and pre-immune serum)

  • Variable Western Blot Results:

    • Problem: Inconsistent band intensity or multiple bands of unexpected sizes

    • Solution: Optimize extraction buffers for plant tissues containing high levels of proteases

    • Methodology: Add multiple protease inhibitors (PMSF, E-64, pepstatin A, leupeptin)

    • Alternative: Extract proteins in buffer containing 2% SDS followed by TCA precipitation

    • Validation: Verify protein integrity by Coomassie staining of a parallel gel

  • Poor Immunoprecipitation Efficiency:

    • Problem: Low recovery of At3g23260 in immunoprecipitation experiments

    • Solution: Optimize detergent types and concentrations in lysis buffers

    • Methodology: Test different detergents (CHAPS, digitonin, NP-40) at various concentrations

    • Alternative: Cross-link antibody to beads to prevent co-elution of IgG with target

    • Validation: Confirm precipitation efficiency by analyzing unbound fractions

  • Developmental Stage Variability:

    • Problem: Variable signal depending on plant developmental stage

    • Solution: Implement precise developmental staging protocols

    • Methodology: Use flower bud length or anther developmental stage as standardized markers

    • Alternative: Pool samples from multiple plants at the same developmental stage

    • Validation: Document plant growth conditions and developmental markers meticulously

  • Fixation Artifacts in Immunohistochemistry:

    • Problem: Loss of antigenicity or altered localization due to harsh fixation

    • Solution: Test multiple fixation protocols with varying fixative concentrations

    • Methodology: Compare 4% PFA, 2% PFA, and 0.5% glutaraldehyde + 1.5% PFA

    • Alternative: Consider cryo-fixation methods for sensitive epitopes

    • Validation: Compare localization patterns with fluorescent protein fusions if available

Each of these troubleshooting approaches should be documented systematically to establish reliable protocols for At3g23260 detection in different experimental contexts.

How can researchers reconcile contradictory results between transcript and protein levels of At3g23260?

When faced with discrepancies between At3g23260 transcript and protein levels, researchers should consider these analytical approaches:

  • Temporal Relationship Analysis:

    • Problem: Apparent discordance between mRNA and protein abundance

    • Methodological Approach: Perform time-course sampling with overlapping timepoints

    • Analysis: Calculate time-lag correlation coefficients between transcript and protein

    • Interpretation: Determine whether discrepancies reflect temporal delays in translation

    • Validation: Use transcription or translation inhibitors to trace the relationship

  • Post-transcriptional Regulation Assessment:

    • Problem: High transcript levels with low protein abundance

    • Methodological Approach: Analyze mRNA association with polysomes using polysome profiling

    • Analysis: Extract RNA from polysomal fractions and quantify At3g23260 mRNA

    • Interpretation: Determine if mRNA is inefficiently translated despite high abundance

    • Validation: Screen for potential regulatory RNA-binding proteins or miRNAs

  • Protein Stability Investigation:

    • Problem: Stable transcript levels with fluctuating protein levels

    • Methodological Approach: Perform cycloheximide chase experiments

    • Analysis: Track At3g23260 protein degradation rates after blocking translation

    • Interpretation: Calculate protein half-life under different conditions

    • Validation: Test effects of proteasome inhibitors (MG132) and autophagy inhibitors

  • Spatial Distribution Considerations:

    • Problem: Whole-tissue analysis masks cell-type specific regulation

    • Methodological Approach: Compare cell-type specific transcriptomics with immunolocalization

    • Analysis: Microdissect specific tissues for parallel RNA and protein analysis

    • Interpretation: Identify cell types with concordant versus discordant expression

    • Validation: Use cell-type specific promoters to drive fluorescent reporters

  • Technical Validation:

    • Problem: Potential technical artifacts in either RNA or protein measurement

    • Methodological Approach: Use multiple independent methods for quantification

    • Analysis: Compare qRT-PCR, RNA-seq, Northern blotting for RNA; Western blot, ELISA, mass spectrometry for protein

    • Interpretation: Determine if discrepancies are method-dependent

    • Validation: Spike-in controls and standard curves for both RNA and protein assays

Observation PatternPotential Biological ExplanationInvestigation MethodExpected Outcome if Hypothesis Correct
Transcript ↑, Protein →Translational repressionPolysome profilingReduced polysome association of mRNA
Transcript →, Protein ↓Enhanced protein degradationCycloheximide chase + MG132Stabilization of protein with MG132
Transcript ↑, Protein ↓Opposing regulatory mechanismsTime-course analysisTime-dependent inverse correlation
Tissue-specific discordanceCell-type specific regulationIn situ hybridization + immunostainingCell-type specific patterns

This systematic approach allows researchers to determine whether discrepancies reflect biological regulation or technical limitations.

What considerations are important when using At3g23260 Antibody across different plant species or ecotypes?

When extending At3g23260 Antibody use beyond its validated Arabidopsis thaliana target, researchers should consider:

  • Sequence Conservation Analysis:

    • Methodological Approach: Perform sequence alignment of At3g23260 orthologs across species

    • Analysis Tool: Use BLASTP and multiple sequence alignment programs

    • Key Parameters: Calculate percent identity and similarity in epitope regions

    • Interpretation: Higher conservation in immunogen region suggests better cross-reactivity

    • Validation: Test synthetic peptides from orthologous regions for antibody binding

  • Cross-Reactivity Testing Protocol:

    • Methodological Approach: Perform Western blots on protein extracts from multiple species

    • Technical Considerations: Standardize protein loading based on total protein rather than housekeeping genes

    • Controls: Include Arabidopsis samples as positive controls on the same membrane

    • Analysis: Compare band patterns, molecular weights, and signal intensities

    • Validation: Perform peptide competition assays in each species to confirm specificity

  • Optimization for Different Species:

    • Sample Preparation: Adjust extraction buffers for species-specific components

    • Detection Parameters: Optimize antibody concentration for each species (typically higher for less conserved orthologs)

    • Incubation Conditions: Consider longer primary antibody incubation times for cross-species applications

    • Signal Development: Adjust exposure times or use more sensitive detection systems

    • Validation: Include genetic controls (knockouts, knockdowns) when available in non-model species

  • Ecotype Variation Considerations:

    • Methodological Approach: Compare antibody performance across Arabidopsis ecotypes

    • Key Parameters: Document any variations in signal intensity or molecular weight

    • Interpretation: Correlate variations with known sequence polymorphisms

    • Validation: Sequence the At3g23260 gene from different ecotypes to identify variations

The table below summarizes predicted cross-reactivity based on sequence conservation:

Plant Species/GroupPredicted Cross-ReactivitySequence Identity to A. thalianaRecommended Antibody DilutionValidation Method
Arabidopsis speciesHigh90-100%1:1000Western blot, IP
Brassicaceae familyModerate to High70-90%1:500Western blot, peptide competition
Other dicotsVariable40-70%1:250Western blot + sequencing
MonocotsLow<40%1:100Western blot, epitope mapping

These considerations are essential for extending At3g23260 Antibody applications beyond its validated target organism while maintaining experimental rigor and reproducibility.

How might At3g23260 Antibody be integrated into high-throughput proteomics workflows?

Integrating At3g23260 Antibody into advanced proteomics workflows presents several innovative research opportunities:

  • Immunoaffinity Proteomics:

    • Methodological Approach: Conjugate At3g23260 Antibody to resin for affinity purification

    • Technical Implementation: Create columns for isolating At3g23260 and interacting proteins

    • Analysis: Combine with LC-MS/MS for identification of interaction partners

    • Advantages: Enriches low-abundance complexes containing At3g23260

    • Validation: Compare results with traditional co-immunoprecipitation approaches

  • Reverse Phase Protein Arrays (RPPA):

    • Methodological Approach: Spot protein extracts from multiple experimental conditions

    • Technical Implementation: Probe arrays with At3g23260 Antibody

    • Analysis: Quantify signal across hundreds of samples simultaneously

    • Advantages: Enables large-scale analysis of At3g23260 across developmental stages, stress conditions, or mutant collections

    • Validation: Include calibration curves with recombinant protein standards

  • Protein Correlation Profiling:

    • Methodological Approach: Fractionate cellular components by density or size

    • Technical Implementation: Probe fractions with At3g23260 Antibody via Western blotting

    • Analysis: Compare At3g23260 distribution profile with known organelle markers

    • Advantages: Defines subcellular compartmentalization without requiring cell disruption

    • Validation: Confirm with fluorescence microscopy or immunogold EM

  • Spatial Proteomics Integration:

    • Methodological Approach: Combine cell-specific isolation with antibody-based detection

    • Technical Implementation: Use laser capture microdissection followed by protein extraction

    • Analysis: Quantify At3g23260 levels in specific cell types

    • Advantages: Reveals cell-type specific regulation not detectable in whole-tissue analysis

    • Validation: Compare with reporter gene expression patterns

  • Temporal Proteomics Analysis:

    • Methodological Approach: Sample across developmental time course or stress response

    • Technical Implementation: Multiplex samples using isobaric labeling for mass spectrometry

    • Analysis: Compare At3g23260 antibody-based quantification with global proteome changes

    • Advantages: Places At3g23260 regulation in context of proteome-wide responses

    • Validation: Confirm key timepoints with traditional Western blotting

These integrative approaches position At3g23260 Antibody as a valuable tool in systems-level analysis of plant development and stress responses.

What role might At3g23260 play in plant reproductive development based on current evidence?

Analysis of available data suggests several potential functions for At3g23260 in plant reproduction:

  • Microsporogenesis Regulation:

    • Experimental Evidence: At3g23260 shows differential expression (fold change of -1.65) in developmental contexts related to pollen formation

    • Functional Hypothesis: May contribute to regulation of cell division or differentiation during male gametophyte development

    • Associated Phenotypes: Potentially linked to callose deposition or dissolution, based on co-regulation with callose synthase genes

    • Research Approach: Analyze T-DNA insertion mutants for pollen development defects using microscopy and At3g23260 Antibody for protein localization

  • Potential Regulatory Network:

    • Experimental Evidence: Expression changes coincide with other reproductive development genes including CalS5 and CalS12

    • Functional Hypothesis: May function in a gene regulatory network controlling cell wall remodeling during pollen development

    • Associated Processes: Could influence microspore release or pollen wall formation based on expression timing

    • Research Approach: Use At3g23260 Antibody for chromatin immunoprecipitation if nuclear localization is detected

  • Cell Wall Metabolism Connection:

    • Experimental Evidence: Co-regulation with β-1,3-glucanases and callose synthases suggests involvement in cell wall modifications

    • Functional Hypothesis: May regulate enzymes involved in cell wall remodeling during reproductive development

    • Associated Structures: Potentially influences callose walls surrounding developing microspores

    • Research Approach: Examine cell wall composition in At3g23260 mutants using histochemical staining and immunolocalization

  • Stress Response Integration:

    • Experimental Evidence: Many reproductive development genes are also regulated during stress responses

    • Functional Hypothesis: At3g23260 might integrate environmental signals with developmental progression

    • Associated Phenomena: Could explain reproductive failure under stress conditions

    • Research Approach: Analyze At3g23260 expression and protein levels under various stresses using the antibody

Based on these hypotheses, researchers could design targeted experiments using At3g23260 Antibody to elucidate its precise role in plant reproductive development and potential applications in crop improvement strategies focused on reproductive resilience.

How might advanced antibody technologies enhance At3g23260 research in the future?

Emerging antibody technologies offer promising avenues to advance At3g23260 research:

  • Single-Domain Antibodies (Nanobodies):

    • Technological Advance: Development of camelid-derived single-domain antibodies against At3g23260

    • Advantages: Smaller size allows better tissue penetration and access to cryptic epitopes

    • Application: In vivo tracking of At3g23260 in living plant cells

    • Implementation: Expression of fluorescently-tagged nanobodies in plants for real-time protein tracking

    • Future Potential: Could reveal dynamic changes in protein localization during development

  • Antibody-Based Proximity Labeling:

    • Technological Advance: Fusion of At3g23260 Antibody with promiscuous biotin ligases (BioID, TurboID)

    • Advantages: Labels proteins in proximity to At3g23260 in their native environment

    • Application: Mapping protein interaction neighborhoods in specific tissues or conditions

    • Implementation: Apply antibody-enzyme conjugates to fixed tissue sections

    • Future Potential: Could reveal tissue-specific protein interaction networks around At3g23260

  • Intrabodies for Functional Manipulation:

    • Technological Advance: Engineered antibody fragments that function inside living cells

    • Advantages: Can block specific protein domains or interactions

    • Application: Disrupt At3g23260 function in specific tissues without genetic modification

    • Implementation: Express domain-specific antibody fragments in plants

    • Future Potential: Could create tissue-specific functional knockdowns with temporal control

  • AI-Designed Antibodies:

    • Technological Advance: Computational design of antibodies with enhanced specificity

    • Advantages: Improved specificity for At3g23260 orthologs across species

    • Application: Comparative studies of At3g23260 function across plant species

    • Implementation: Use of LLM protein models to design optimized antibodies

    • Future Potential: Could enable evolutionary studies of At3g23260 function

  • Antibody-Drug Conjugates for Plant Research:

    • Technological Advance: Conjugation of At3g23260 Antibody with small molecule inhibitors

    • Advantages: Targeted delivery of inhibitors to cells expressing At3g23260

    • Application: Cell-type specific inhibition of pathways interacting with At3g23260

    • Implementation: Apply to plant tissues for localized pathway inhibition

    • Future Potential: Could enable precise manipulation of At3g23260-associated pathways

These emerging technologies represent the frontier of plant molecular biology research tools that could significantly advance our understanding of At3g23260 function in plant development and stress responses.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.