At1g10780 encodes an F-box/RNI-like superfamily protein in Arabidopsis thaliana . F-box proteins are components of SCF ubiquitin-ligase complexes that regulate various cellular processes through targeted protein degradation. This particular F-box protein has orthologs in multiple plant species including Solanum lycopersicum and Momordica charantia, suggesting evolutionary conservation . Understanding its function can provide insights into protein degradation pathways and their roles in plant development, stress responses, and signaling networks.
The At1g10780 antibody (CSB-PA890292XA01DOA) is generated against the Q9SAC4 protein in Arabidopsis thaliana . Cross-reactivity testing data indicates high specificity for the target protein in Arabidopsis samples, though researchers should perform validation in their specific experimental systems. When comparing to other commercial plant antibodies, which typically show >80% specificity when properly validated, the At1g10780 antibody performs similarly. Cross-reactivity with homologous proteins in closely related plant species may occur due to sequence conservation and should be experimentally determined before using the antibody in non-Arabidopsis systems.
For rigorous validation, researchers should implement multiple approaches:
Western blot analysis with appropriate controls:
Wild-type Arabidopsis tissue expressing At1g10780
Knockout/knockdown lines (at1g10780 mutants)
Overexpression lines
Recombinant protein as positive control
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Immunolocalization in wild-type versus mutant tissues
Preabsorption test with the immunizing peptide/protein
| Validation Method | Expected Result | Common Pitfalls |
|---|---|---|
| Western blot | Single band at ~42 kDa (predicted MW) | Background bands, non-specific binding |
| IP-MS | Enrichment of At1g10780 peptides | Contamination with abundant proteins |
| Immunolocalization | Specific cellular pattern absent in mutants | High background, fixation artifacts |
| Preabsorption | Signal elimination with specific antigen | Incomplete blocking |
For optimal Western blot results when using the At1g10780 antibody:
Sample preparation:
Extract total protein from Arabidopsis tissues using a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, and protease inhibitor cocktail
Use 20-50 μg of total protein per lane
Electrophoresis and transfer:
Separate proteins on 10-12% SDS-PAGE
Transfer to PVDF membrane (nitrocellulose is less effective for this protein)
Immunoblotting:
Block with 5% non-fat dry milk in TBS-T for 1 hour at room temperature
Incubate with At1g10780 antibody at 1:1000 dilution overnight at 4°C
Wash 4 times with TBS-T, 5 minutes each
Incubate with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5000-1:10000) for 1 hour at room temperature
Develop using ECL reagent
This protocol has been optimized based on approaches similar to those used for other plant F-box proteins and the PsaF antibody methodology described in reference .
While the At1g10780 antibody has not been specifically validated for ChIP, similar approaches to those used for other plant proteins can be adapted. Based on successful ChIP protocols used for LEC1 and BDR proteins in Arabidopsis :
Crosslinking and chromatin preparation:
Crosslink plant tissue with 1% formaldehyde for 10 minutes under vacuum
Quench with 125 mM glycine
Extract and sonicate chromatin to 200-500 bp fragments
Immunoprecipitation:
Pre-clear chromatin with protein A/G beads
Incubate with At1g10780 antibody (5-10 μg) overnight at 4°C
Capture with protein A/G beads
Wash with increasing stringency buffers
Reverse crosslinks and purify DNA
Controls and validation:
Include IgG negative control
Use target gene knockout as biological negative control
Validate enrichment by qPCR of known targets before sequencing
Since F-box proteins primarily function in protein degradation rather than direct DNA binding, researchers should consider whether At1g10780 actually associates with chromatin. If pursuing ChIP experiments, validation experiments are crucial before proceeding to genome-wide analyses.
For effective immunolocalization of At1g10780:
Tissue preparation:
Fix tissue in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 1 hour under vacuum
Embed in paraffin or prepare for cryosectioning
Section to 8-10 μm thickness
Immunostaining:
Deparaffinize or rehydrate sections
Perform antigen retrieval (10 mM sodium citrate, pH 6.0, 95°C for 10 minutes)
Block with 3% BSA, 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS for 1 hour
Incubate with At1g10780 antibody (1:100-1:200) overnight at 4°C
Wash 3 times with PBS
Apply fluorescent secondary antibody (1:200-1:500) for 1-2 hours at room temperature
Counterstain with DAPI for nuclei visualization
Mount with anti-fade mounting medium
Controls:
This protocol draws on approaches used for immunolocalization of other plant proteins, with modifications specific to F-box protein detection.
Multiple bands in Western blots can result from various biological and technical factors:
| Band Pattern | Possible Interpretation | Validation Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Single band at ~42 kDa | Expected At1g10780 protein | Confirm with knockout/overexpression |
| Additional bands at higher MW | Post-translational modifications (ubiquitination, SUMOylation) | Treatment with deubiquitinating enzymes |
| Bands at lower MW | Degradation products or alternative splice variants | Fresh sample preparation with additional protease inhibitors |
| Multiple bands across various sizes | Non-specific binding | Increase blocking time/concentration, optimize antibody dilution |
For proper interpretation:
Compare with knockout controls to identify specific bands
Consider alternative splicing - analyze RNA-seq data for evidence of splice variants
Test different extraction methods to minimize degradation
If post-translational modifications are suspected, use specific inhibitors to confirm
Since F-box proteins often undergo dynamic regulation and can be involved in complex formation, careful validation is essential to distinguish biologically relevant signals from technical artifacts.
Several factors can significantly impact immunoprecipitation efficiency:
Buffer composition:
Ionic strength affects antibody-antigen interaction
Detergent type and concentration must balance solubilization and epitope preservation
Recommended starting buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 1 mM EDTA with protease inhibitors
Antibody amount and quality:
Optimal antibody:protein ratio must be determined empirically
Typically start with 2-5 μg antibody per 500 μg total protein
Antibody storage conditions affect performance
Crosslinking considerations:
For transient interactions, consider chemical crosslinking with DSP or formaldehyde
Crosslinking may mask epitopes - test different conditions
Bead selection:
Protein A vs. Protein G affinity varies with antibody isotype
Pre-clearing steps reduce non-specific binding
For optimal At1g10780 immunoprecipitation, researchers should systematically optimize these parameters using positive and negative controls to assess specificity and efficiency.
To confirm that observed patterns truly reflect At1g10780 function:
Genetic approaches:
Compare at1g10780 knockout/knockdown lines with wild-type plants
Complement mutant phenotypes with the wild-type gene
Use multiple independent mutant alleles to rule out background effects
Create rescue lines with tagged versions for antibody validation
Biochemical validation:
Perform in vitro ubiquitination assays to confirm F-box protein activity
Identify interaction partners through mass spectrometry
Verify protein stability changes in mutant vs. wild-type plants
Transcriptomic analysis:
Analyze expression changes in mutant lines
Compare with published datasets for related F-box proteins
Look for enrichment of specific pathways
Additional antibody-based validations:
Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes if available
Perform siRNA/CRISPR knockdown followed by antibody testing
This multi-faceted approach provides robust validation of experimental observations and helps distinguish direct effects of At1g10780 from indirect or non-specific effects.
The At1g10780 F-box protein likely functions within SCF (Skp1-Cullin-F-box) ubiquitin ligase complexes. To investigate these interactions:
Co-immunoprecipitation strategies:
Use At1g10780 antibody to pull down the protein complex
Analyze co-precipitated proteins by mass spectrometry
Confirm interactions with reciprocal co-IPs using antibodies against putative partners
Consider gentle extraction conditions to preserve weak interactions
Proximity-based labeling approaches:
Create transgenic plants expressing At1g10780 fused to BioID or TurboID
Identify proteins that become biotinylated when in proximity
Compare with immunoprecipitation results for validation
Yeast two-hybrid screening validation:
Use At1g10780 antibody to confirm expression of identified interactors in planta
Verify subcellular co-localization with interaction partners
In vivo dynamics:
Monitor At1g10780 levels under different conditions
Track substrates using cycloheximide chase assays combined with At1g10780 antibody detection
This comprehensive approach builds on principles of protein interaction studies while leveraging the specificity of the At1g10780 antibody to validate and extend findings in physiologically relevant contexts.
For cross-species applications:
Sequence homology assessment:
Analyze epitope conservation across species
Perform sequence alignment of At1g10780 orthologs
Create a phylogenetic tree to understand evolutionary relationships
Cross-reactivity testing:
Perform Western blots with protein extracts from multiple species
Include positive (Arabidopsis) and negative controls
Consider dot blots with recombinant proteins from different species
Optimization strategies for non-Arabidopsis species:
Adjust extraction buffers based on tissue composition
Modify antibody concentration and incubation conditions
Test different blocking agents to reduce background
Data interpretation across species:
Account for differences in protein size due to sequence variations
Consider differences in post-translational modifications
Analyze expression patterns in the context of species-specific physiology
Based on homologs identified in Solanum lycopersicum and Momordica charantia , the At1g10780 antibody might be applicable for comparative studies in these species after proper validation.
To investigate At1g10780 dynamics:
Developmental profiling:
Collect tissues at defined developmental stages
Quantify At1g10780 protein levels by Western blot
Normalize to appropriate loading controls
Create protein expression maps across developmental stages
Stress response analysis:
Subject plants to various stresses (drought, salt, pathogen, temperature)
Monitor At1g10780 protein levels at defined time points
Compare with transcriptional changes using RT-qPCR
Analyze post-translational modifications induced by stress
Subcellular localization changes:
Perform immunolocalization under different conditions
Track potential nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling
Use subcellular fractionation followed by Western blot
Protein stability assessment:
Measure protein half-life using cycloheximide chase assays
Compare stability under different conditions
Investigate proteasome-dependent degradation with inhibitors like MG132
This systematic approach provides comprehensive insights into how At1g10780 function is regulated in response to developmental and environmental signals.
For integrative studies combining antibody-based detection with other -omics approaches:
Correlation of protein and transcript levels:
Compare Western blot quantification with RNA-seq or microarray data
Identify conditions where post-transcriptional regulation occurs
Calculate protein-mRNA correlation coefficients across conditions
Integration with ChIP-seq data:
If At1g10780 affects transcription factors (direct or indirect)
Compare binding profiles of transcription factors in wild-type vs. at1g10780 mutants
Analyze chromatin accessibility changes using ATAC-seq
Network analysis:
Place At1g10780 in functional modules based on protein interaction data
Correlate with co-expression networks derived from transcriptomics
Identify regulatory hubs affected by At1g10780 function
Phenomic integration:
Connect At1g10780 protein levels to phenotypic data using supervised machine learning
Build predictive models of plant phenotypes based on protein abundance
Validate with targeted genetic manipulations
This integrative approach, drawing on concepts from systems biology as described in reference , provides a comprehensive understanding of At1g10780 function within the broader context of plant biology.
Several cutting-edge approaches hold promise for expanding At1g10780 antibody applications:
Single-cell proteomics:
Adapting At1g10780 antibody for use in mass cytometry (CyTOF)
Integration with single-cell transcriptomics
Spatial proteomics in tissue sections
Advanced microscopy techniques:
Super-resolution microscopy for precise localization
Live-cell imaging with nanobody derivatives
Correlative light and electron microscopy
Proteoform-specific detection:
Development of antibodies specific to post-translationally modified variants
Multiplexed detection of different At1g10780 states
Synthetic biology approaches:
Engineering sensor systems based on At1g10780 antibody fragments
Creating optogenetic tools to manipulate At1g10780 function
These emerging technologies will expand our understanding of At1g10780 function at unprecedented resolution and in novel contexts.
When designing experiments across tissues and developmental stages:
Sampling considerations:
Standardize harvesting times to control for circadian effects
Consider tissue-specific extraction protocols
Account for developmental heterogeneity within samples
Normalization strategies:
Select appropriate reference proteins for each tissue/stage
Consider absolute quantification with recombinant protein standards
Implement statistical approaches to handle tissue-specific variability
Experimental controls:
Include developmental series from multiple independent plants
Consider genetic background effects when using mutants
Account for environmental variables
Data integration framework:
Develop consistent data collection and analysis pipelines
Establish clear metadata standards
Create visualization tools for complex developmental datasets