The At5g38390 antibody (Product Code: CSB-PA880713XA01DOA) is designed to detect the Arabidopsis thaliana protein encoded by the At5g38390 gene (UniProt ID: Q9FF23) . This antibody is raised in rabbits using a recombinant protein immunogen and exhibits specificity for Arabidopsis thaliana-derived antigens .
While the exact biological role of the At5g38390 protein remains uncharacterized in the provided sources, antibodies like this are typically used to:
Localize proteins in cellular compartments via immunohistochemistry (IHC).
Quantify expression levels in transgenic plant models using WB or ELISA .
Study protein-protein interactions in autophagy or stress-response pathways (inferred from homologous systems) .
The antibody has been validated for antigen identification in WB and ELISA, though experimental conditions (e.g., dilution ratios) require optimization by end users .
No cross-reactivity data for non-Arabidopsis species is provided.
Peer-reviewed studies explicitly using this antibody are not cited in the available sources, highlighting the need for independent validation.
Antibody validation requires a multi-method approach to ensure specificity. Begin with western blotting against wild-type Arabidopsis samples alongside At5g38390 knockout/knockdown lines. A specific antibody will show reduced or absent signal in mutant lines compared to wild-type. Additionally, employ immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to confirm binding to the target protein. Pre-adsorption tests using recombinant At5g38390 protein can further verify specificity by demonstrating signal reduction when the antibody is pre-incubated with the purified antigen.
For comprehensive validation, perform immunohistochemistry comparing wild-type and knockout tissues, as this reveals proper subcellular localization consistent with predicted protein function. Document all validation experiments thoroughly, including positive and negative controls, to establish confidence in antibody specificity.
When selecting antibodies against At5g38390, the epitope selection is crucial for experimental success. Consider whether the epitope is located in functionally important domains, as this affects whether the antibody will disrupt protein-protein interactions or enzymatic activity in functional assays. Analyze the protein sequence for post-translational modifications that might interfere with antibody binding.
For membrane-associated or transmembrane proteins, select antibodies targeting extracellular domains for live cell experiments. The immunoglobulin-like domain targeting approach has been effective in neuronal proteins like IgLON5, where patients' antibodies specifically react with immunoglobulin-like domain 2 . Additionally, consider glycosylation status, as some epitopes may be glycosylation-dependent, affecting antibody recognition under different experimental conditions.
Cross-reactivity can significantly confound experimental results, especially with plant proteins that often belong to gene families with high sequence homology. To address this issue, perform detailed sequence alignments between At5g38390 and related proteins to identify unique regions suitable for specific antibody generation.
When cross-reactivity is suspected, validate using tissue from species lacking At5g38390 homologs or test against recombinant proteins from the same family. Document all observed cross-reactions in a systematic format as shown below:
| Protein | Sequence Homology (%) | Cross-reactivity Observed | Recommended Controls |
|---|---|---|---|
| At5g38390 | 100% | Strong positive signal | Wild-type vs. knockout |
| Homolog 1 | 78% | Weak positive signal | Pre-absorption control |
| Homolog 2 | 65% | No detectable signal | N/A |
Cross-reactivity data should be incorporated into experimental design, particularly when working with complex plant extracts where multiple homologs may be present.
Successful western blot detection of At5g38390 requires optimization of several parameters. Begin with protein extraction using a buffer containing 50mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, and protease inhibitor cocktail. For membrane-associated proteins, include 0.5% sodium deoxycholate to improve solubilization.
For SDS-PAGE, use 10-12% polyacrylamide gels for optimal resolution of the At5g38390 protein. Transfer to PVDF membranes at 100V for 90 minutes in cold transfer buffer containing 20% methanol. Block membranes with 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature.
The primary antibody incubation should be optimized through titration experiments, typically starting at 1:1000 dilution in blocking buffer overnight at 4°C. For signal development, HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies followed by enhanced chemiluminescence provide sensitive detection. Include positive controls (recombinant protein) and negative controls (knockout samples) in all experiments to validate results.
Immunoprecipitation (IP) of At5g38390 protein complexes requires careful optimization to maintain native interactions. Begin with a gentle lysis buffer (25mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150mM NaCl, 1mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, 5% glycerol, protease inhibitors) to preserve protein-protein interactions. Pre-clear lysates with protein A/G beads to reduce non-specific binding.
For antibody coupling, use 2-5μg of At5g38390 antibody per 500μg of total protein lysate. Incubate antibody with lysate overnight at 4°C with gentle rotation, followed by addition of pre-washed protein A/G beads for 2-3 hours. Perform stringent washing steps (at least 5 washes) with decreasing salt concentrations to remove non-specific interactions while preserving specific complexes.
For analysis of interaction partners, elute complexes with SDS sample buffer for western blotting or with a gentler elution buffer (glycine pH 2.8) for mass spectrometry analysis. Cross-linking the antibody to beads using dimethyl pimelimidate can reduce antibody contamination in subsequent analysis. This approach parallels methods used in other antibody studies where immunoprecipitation has successfully isolated protein complexes .
Immunohistochemistry with At5g38390 antibodies requires rigorous controls to ensure reliable localization data. Essential controls include:
Genetic controls: Compare wild-type tissues with At5g38390 knockout or knockdown lines. The specific signal should be absent or significantly reduced in mutant lines.
Antibody controls: Include sections treated with pre-immune serum or secondary antibody alone to assess background and non-specific binding. Pre-absorption with recombinant At5g38390 protein should eliminate specific staining.
Tissue processing controls: Compare different fixation methods (paraformaldehyde vs. glutaraldehyde) as they can significantly affect epitope accessibility.
Cross-validation: Confirm immunohistochemistry results with fluorescent protein fusions or in situ hybridization to verify that protein localization correlates with mRNA expression patterns.
Specificity verification: Similar to approaches used in neurological antibody research, absorption tests can be conducted using cell extracts expressing the target protein to confirm antibody specificity .
Document all controls systematically, with image acquisition settings kept identical between experimental and control samples for valid comparisons.
Inconsistent western blot results with At5g38390 antibody can stem from multiple factors. First, consider protein extraction efficiency, which can vary due to plant growth conditions, tissue type, or developmental stage. The expression level of At5g38390 may naturally fluctuate across these variables, affecting detection consistency.
Technical variables to examine include:
Sample preparation: Incomplete protein denaturation or protein degradation during extraction can affect epitope availability. Ensure samples are completely denatured and include protease inhibitors.
Transfer efficiency: Inconsistent protein transfer can cause variable results. Verify transfer using reversible Ponceau S staining of membranes.
Antibody quality: Antibody degradation or variation between lots can impact results. Store antibodies according to manufacturer recommendations and consider testing multiple lots.
Post-translational modifications: These can affect antibody binding. If modification-dependent binding is suspected, treat samples with appropriate enzymes (like phosphatases or glycosidases) to determine if epitope recognition is affected, similar to glycosylation studies performed in IgLON5 antibody research .
Implement a systematic approach to identify the source of variability by changing one parameter at a time and documenting outcomes.
High background in immunofluorescence is a common challenge that can obscure specific signals. To minimize background:
Optimize fixation: Test different fixation protocols, as overfixation can create artificial epitopes leading to non-specific binding. Compare 2% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes versus 4% for 10 minutes to determine optimal conditions.
Blocking optimization: Increase blocking stringency by using a combination of 5% normal serum (matching the secondary antibody species) with 3% BSA. Adding 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 can improve antibody penetration while reducing non-specific binding.
Antibody dilution: Perform titration experiments to determine the optimal antibody concentration that maximizes specific signal while minimizing background. Start with a range from 1:100 to 1:1000.
Washing stringency: Increase the number and duration of washes using PBS with 0.1% Tween-20 to remove unbound antibodies effectively.
Autofluorescence reduction: Plant tissues often exhibit significant autofluorescence. Pre-treat sections with 0.1% sodium borohydride or 100mM glycine to reduce autofluorescence from aldehydes. Additionally, adjust imaging parameters to spectrally separate autofluorescence from specific signals.
Document the effects of each optimization step with consistent imaging parameters to identify the most effective approach.
When faced with weak or absent signals in At5g38390 protein detection, implement these strategies to enhance sensitivity:
Protein enrichment: If At5g38390 is expressed at low levels, concentrate the protein by immunoprecipitation prior to western blotting or use subcellular fractionation to enrich for compartments where the protein is localized.
Signal amplification: Utilize enhanced detection methods such as tyramide signal amplification for immunohistochemistry, which can increase sensitivity 10-100 fold. For western blots, consider high-sensitivity ECL substrates or fluorescent detection methods.
Epitope retrieval: For fixed tissues, employ antigen retrieval methods such as heat-induced epitope retrieval (citrate buffer, pH 6.0 at 95°C for 20 minutes) or enzymatic retrieval (proteinase K treatment) to expose masked epitopes.
Alternative antibody formats: If polyclonal antibodies yield weak signals, try monoclonal antibodies targeting different epitopes or consider generating new antibodies against different regions of the protein.
Sample preparation optimization: Evaluate different protein extraction methods, including those specifically designed for membrane-associated or nuclear proteins, depending on the predicted localization of At5g38390.
Systematic testing of these approaches, combined with appropriate positive controls, can help identify the most effective method for your specific experimental system.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) can reveal genome-wide binding sites of At5g38390 if it functions as a transcription factor or chromatin-associated protein. For successful ChIP-seq:
Crosslinking optimization: Test different formaldehyde concentrations (0.75-1.5%) and incubation times (10-20 minutes) to achieve optimal crosslinking without overfixation, which can reduce epitope accessibility.
Sonication parameters: Optimize sonication conditions to generate DNA fragments of 200-500bp, which is ideal for high-resolution mapping of binding sites. Verify fragment size by agarose gel electrophoresis.
Antibody qualification: Before proceeding with full ChIP-seq, perform ChIP-qPCR on predicted binding sites to confirm antibody efficiency in the ChIP context. An effective ChIP-grade antibody should enrich target regions at least 8-10 fold over control regions.
Controls: Include input DNA (pre-immunoprecipitation), IgG control precipitations, and if possible, samples from At5g38390 knockout/knockdown plants as essential controls for data interpretation.
Data analysis: Apply rigorous peak calling algorithms with appropriate false discovery rate thresholds. Validate key binding sites using ChIP-qPCR with independent biological replicates.
This approach parallels strategies used in antibody-based studies of protein-DNA interactions in other systems, where careful optimization of each parameter is essential for reliable results.
Co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) using At5g38390 antibodies can reveal protein interaction networks, but requires careful consideration of several factors:
Document interaction data in a comprehensive format showing enrichment values and statistical significance for each potential interacting protein, similar to how relationships between antibody levels and clinical outcomes are analyzed in medical antibody studies .
At5g38390 antibodies can serve as valuable tools in high-throughput proteomics studies through several approaches:
Antibody-based protein arrays: Immobilize At5g38390 antibodies on microarray surfaces to capture the target protein from complex samples. This allows for quantitative measurement across multiple samples or conditions simultaneously.
Immunoaffinity enrichment before mass spectrometry: Use At5g38390 antibodies conjugated to beads for specific enrichment of the target protein and its complexes prior to mass spectrometry analysis. This approach can significantly increase detection sensitivity for low-abundance proteins.
Reverse-phase protein arrays (RPPA): Apply minute amounts of cellular lysates from different experimental conditions to arrays, then probe with At5g38390 antibodies to quantitatively assess protein levels across numerous samples simultaneously.
Proximity ligation assays: Combine At5g38390 antibodies with antibodies against potential interacting proteins to detect specific protein-protein interactions in situ, allowing for high-throughput screening of interaction networks across different conditions.
Single-cell proteomics: Utilize At5g38390 antibodies in mass cytometry (CyTOF) or imaging mass cytometry to analyze protein expression at the single-cell level, revealing cell-to-cell heterogeneity within plant tissues.
These approaches require high-specificity antibodies and appropriate controls to ensure reliable data interpretation, similar to the rigorous validation methods used in clinical antibody studies .
Loading control selection: Choose appropriate loading controls based on experimental conditions. Traditional controls like actin or tubulin may vary under certain treatments. Consider multiple loading controls or total protein normalization using stain-free technology or Ponceau S staining.
Linear dynamic range: Verify that both At5g38390 and loading control signals fall within the linear dynamic range of detection. Generate standard curves using recombinant protein or dilution series of samples to confirm linearity.
Normalization approach: Calculate relative abundance by dividing the At5g38390 signal intensity by the loading control signal. For total protein normalization, divide by the total lane intensity from a protein stain.
Statistical analysis: Apply appropriate statistical tests based on your experimental design:
For comparing two groups: Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test (for non-normally distributed data)
For multiple groups: ANOVA followed by post-hoc tests like Tukey's HSD
For time-course experiments: repeated measures ANOVA or mixed-effects models
Visualization: Present data using box plots or bar graphs showing individual data points to demonstrate data distribution. Include error bars representing standard deviation or standard error of the mean.
When antibody-based approaches (e.g., immunolocalization, immunoprecipitation) yield results that contradict genetic approaches (e.g., mutant phenotypes, GFP fusions), systematic evaluation is necessary:
Antibody specificity reassessment: Rigorously re-validate antibody specificity using multiple approaches, including western blots on knockout/knockdown lines, pre-absorption controls, and if possible, testing alternative antibodies targeting different epitopes.
Post-translational modification considerations: Determine if discrepancies might result from post-translational modifications affecting antibody recognition but not genetic function. Analyze the protein for potential modifications using phospho-specific antibodies or mass spectrometry.
Protein complex context: Assess whether the protein functions differently in various protein complexes, where epitopes might be masked in certain interactions but function preserved.
Technical limitations evaluation: Consider inherent limitations of each method:
Antibody techniques may have specificity issues or fail to detect certain protein forms
GFP fusions might alter protein localization or function
Genetic knockouts might trigger compensatory mechanisms
Resolution strategies: Apply orthogonal techniques such as proximity labeling (BioID), CRISPR-based tagging at endogenous loci, or cell fractionation followed by mass spectrometry to resolve contradictions.
Document these evaluations systematically, noting the strengths and limitations of each approach, to provide a balanced interpretation of contradictory results.
Integrating antibody-derived protein data with transcriptomic and metabolomic datasets provides a comprehensive understanding of At5g38390 function:
Multi-omics data collection: Design experiments where samples for protein, transcript, and metabolite analyses are collected from the same biological material to minimize variation. Ensure appropriate technical and biological replicates for statistical robustness.
Correlation analyses: Perform Pearson or Spearman correlation analyses between At5g38390 protein levels (quantified by western blot or immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry) and its transcript levels across conditions or time points. Divergence may indicate post-transcriptional regulation.
Pathway mapping: Map At5g38390 to relevant biochemical pathways and analyze correlations between protein levels and pathway-specific metabolites. Use metabolic flux analysis to determine if changes in At5g38390 levels affect metabolic flux through associated pathways.
Network analysis: Apply network analysis tools to integrate protein, transcript, and metabolite data. Construct protein-centric networks where edges represent statistically significant correlations between molecular entities.
Visualization approaches: Develop integrated visualizations such as:
| Data Type | Visualization Method | Software Tools |
|---|---|---|
| Protein-transcript correlations | Scatter plots with regression lines | R (ggplot2), Python (matplotlib) |
| Temporal patterns | Heatmaps with hierarchical clustering | ClustVis, MeV |
| Multi-omics integration | Network graphs | Cytoscape, OmicsNet |
| Pathway context | Overlay on pathway maps | MapMan, PathVisio |
This integration approach provides a systems-level understanding of At5g38390 function, similar to multi-modal analyses performed in antibody-based disease studies .
Single-domain antibodies (sdAbs) or nanobodies offer advantages over conventional antibodies for certain applications due to their small size, stability, and ability to recognize unique epitopes:
Generation approaches: Develop At5g38390-specific nanobodies through:
Immunization of camelids (alpacas or llamas) with purified At5g38390 protein
Construction of synthetic or naive nanobody libraries followed by phage display selection
Rational design based on structural information about At5g38390
Screening strategies: Implement rigorous screening using:
ELISA against immobilized At5g38390 protein
Surface plasmon resonance to determine binding kinetics
Competition assays to identify nanobodies recognizing different epitopes
Validation for plant applications: Verify nanobody functionality in plant cellular environments through:
Transient expression as GFP fusions to confirm target binding in vivo
Pull-down assays from plant extracts to confirm specificity
Comparison with conventional antibodies in standard applications
Advanced applications: Apply validated nanobodies for:
Intrabody expression for real-time protein tracking in living plant cells
Super-resolution microscopy due to the nanobodies' small size (approximately 15 kDa)
Targeted protein degradation using nanobody-based degrons
Modulation of protein activity in specific cellular compartments
Similar approaches have been successfully implemented in other fields to create highly specific recognition molecules for research and therapeutic applications, as documented in antibody database resources .
CRISPR-based endogenous tagging offers an alternative approach to studying At5g38390 without relying on antibodies:
Tag selection considerations:
Size impact: Smaller tags (FLAG, HA, V5) typically cause less functional interference than larger ones (GFP, mCherry)
Detection sensitivity: Fluorescent proteins enable live imaging but may have lower sensitivity than epitope tags detected by high-affinity antibodies
Position effects: N-terminal, internal, and C-terminal tags may differentially affect protein function based on domain organization
Design strategy:
Analyze protein structure to identify optimal tag insertion sites that minimize functional disruption
Design guide RNAs with high specificity and efficiency using validated algorithms
Include selection markers that can be subsequently removed (e.g., Cre-loxP systems) to minimize additional genetic material
Functional validation:
Verify tag expression through western blotting with tag-specific antibodies
Confirm proper localization pattern compared to antibody-based immunolocalization
Perform complementation tests in At5g38390 mutant backgrounds to ensure tagged protein retains functionality
Comparative analysis with antibody methods:
Systematically compare results from tagged lines versus antibody-based detection across applications
Document concordance and discrepancies to build confidence in either approach
This strategy builds on methodologies similar to those used in established cell-based antibody studies but adapted for plant systems .
Emerging proteomic technologies will significantly influence At5g38390 antibody applications:
Single-cell proteomics: As single-cell proteomics advances, antibody-based techniques like imaging mass cytometry will enable spatial mapping of At5g38390 expression across different cell types within plant tissues, providing unprecedented resolution of protein distribution patterns.
Proximity labeling techniques: Integration of antibodies with proximity labeling methods (BioID, APEX) will enable mapping of dynamic protein interaction networks surrounding At5g38390 in specific subcellular compartments under various conditions.
Structural proteomics: Combining crosslinking mass spectrometry with antibody-based purification will reveal structural details of At5g38390-containing complexes, providing insights into functional mechanisms.
Degradation profiling: Antibody-based techniques coupled with targeted protein degradation (dTAG, AID systems) will allow temporal control over At5g38390 levels, enabling precise dissection of its function through rapid depletion studies.
Spatial transcriptomics integration: Co-registration of antibody-based protein localization with spatial transcriptomics will create comprehensive maps correlating At5g38390 protein levels with local transcriptional environments.
These advances will transform antibody applications from primarily detection tools to sophisticated probes for dynamic, spatially-resolved, and functionally-oriented protein analysis, similar to how antibody technologies have evolved in biomedical research .