The At5g62660 gene encodes a protein belonging to the F-box protein family, characterized by an N-terminal F-box domain and variable C-terminal domains that mediate interactions with target proteins. F-box proteins function as substrates for the SKP1-CUL1-F-box (SCF) E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, tagging specific proteins for proteasomal degradation.
| Property | Detail |
|---|---|
| Gene ID | At5g62660 |
| Protein Name | F-box and associated interaction domains-containing protein |
| Uniprot ID | Q9LV12 |
| Function | Likely involved in protein degradation via the UPS |
| Domain | F-box (N-terminal); variable C-terminal domains |
This protein is hypothesized to play a role in plant stress responses, development, or signaling pathways, though specific functional studies remain limited.
While direct studies using the At5g62660 Antibody are not extensively documented in the provided literature, its utility can be inferred from related F-box protein research:
Immunofluorescence: To determine subcellular localization (e.g., cytoplasm, nucleus) of the F-box protein.
Western Blot: To assess protein expression levels in response to environmental stressors (e.g., drought, pathogens).
Immunoprecipitation: To identify binding partners of the F-box protein, aiding in the elucidation of its role in SCF complex-mediated degradation.
Gene Knockout/Knockdown Models: Combined with the antibody to validate protein absence in mutant plants.
Specificity Concerns: Cross-reactivity with homologous F-box proteins in Arabidopsis must be validated.
Limited Published Data: Most studies focus on human or animal antibodies (e.g., anti-PfRH5 for malaria, anti-ATG16L1 for autophagy), leaving plant-specific applications underexplored.
The At5g62660 gene encodes a protein belonging to the F-box protein family in Arabidopsis thaliana. This protein is characterized by an N-terminal F-box domain and variable C-terminal domains that facilitate interactions with target proteins. It functions as a substrate recognition component within the SKP1-CUL1-F-box (SCF) E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, which targets specific proteins for proteasomal degradation.
| Property | Detail |
|---|---|
| Gene ID | At5g62660 |
| Protein Name | F-box and associated interaction domains-containing protein |
| Uniprot ID | Q9LV12 |
| Function | Likely involved in protein degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) |
| Domain Structure | F-box (N-terminal); variable C-terminal domains |
The At5g62660 antibody can be utilized in several experimental techniques, though published literature on its specific applications remains limited. Based on applications of similar F-box protein antibodies, the following methodologies represent standard research applications:
Immunofluorescence (IF): Enables determination of subcellular localization of the F-box protein within plant cells, revealing whether it predominantly functions in the cytoplasm, nucleus, or other cellular compartments.
Western Blot (WB): Allows quantitative assessment of protein expression levels, particularly valuable when examining responses to environmental stressors such as drought, pathogen exposure, or hormone treatments.
Immunoprecipitation (IP): Facilitates identification of binding partners, helping elucidate the protein's role in SCF complex formation and target protein interactions.
Validation of antibody specificity is crucial due to potential cross-reactivity with homologous F-box proteins in Arabidopsis. A comprehensive validation approach should include:
Negative controls: Testing the antibody against tissue/cells from At5g62660 knockout mutants to confirm absence of signal.
Peptide competition assays: Pre-incubating the antibody with excess antigenic peptide to block specific binding sites.
Western blot analysis: Confirming the antibody detects a protein of the expected molecular weight (~42-45 kDa for the At5g62660-encoded protein).
Cross-reactivity assessment: Testing against recombinant proteins of related F-box family members to identify potential cross-reactivity.
The SCF complex plays a pivotal role in plant adaptation to environmental stressors through targeted protein degradation. To investigate these dynamics:
Co-immunoprecipitation with SCF components: Utilize the At5g62660 antibody to pull down the F-box protein and associated SCF complex members (SKP1, CUL1, RBX1) under various stress conditions.
Quantitative proteomic analysis: Combine immunoprecipitation with mass spectrometry to identify:
Changes in SCF complex composition
Stress-specific substrate targets
Post-translational modifications of the F-box protein
In vivo ubiquitination assays: Use the antibody to detect ubiquitinated target proteins by:
Immunoprecipitating the F-box protein
Probing for ubiquitin chains on co-precipitated proteins
Comparing ubiquitination patterns under normal versus stress conditions
Successful immunolocalization requires careful optimization of several parameters:
Fixation protocol selection: Different fixatives (paraformaldehyde, glutaraldehyde) may affect epitope accessibility. For F-box proteins like At5g62660, 4% paraformaldehyde typically preserves both structure and epitope accessibility.
Permeabilization optimization: The cell wall presents a significant barrier. Consider:
Enzymatic digestion (cellulase/pectinase cocktails)
Detergent combinations (0.1-0.5% Triton X-100)
Evaluating permeabilization efficiency without compromising cellular architecture
Antigen retrieval techniques: Heat-induced or enzymatic antigen retrieval may be necessary if fixation masks the epitope.
Signal amplification strategies: For low-abundance F-box proteins:
F-box proteins form dynamic interactions with SCF components and target proteins, potentially obscuring antibody epitopes. Consider these approaches:
Epitope mapping: Determine which regions of At5g62660 are recognized by the antibody and evaluate whether these regions overlap with known protein-protein interaction interfaces.
Competitive elution strategies: Use mild detergents or salt gradients to disrupt protein complexes without denaturing the target protein.
Cross-linking immunoprecipitation (CLIP): Apply reversible cross-linking to stabilize complexes before disruption and immunoprecipitation.
Antibody cocktail approach: When available, utilize multiple antibodies recognizing different epitopes to increase detection probability regardless of binding partner orientation.
False negative results may arise from several factors:
Protein expression levels: At5g62660 may be expressed at low levels under certain conditions. Consider:
Increasing protein input (50-100 μg for Western blots)
Using sensitive detection systems (chemiluminescent substrates with extended exposure times)
Employing signal amplification techniques
Buffer incompatibilities: The antibody preservative (0.03% Proclin 300 in 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4) may interact with experimental buffers. To address:
Test alternative buffers
Dilute antibody in recommended buffers
Consider buffer exchange procedures for critical applications
Epitope accessibility: Three-dimensional protein folding may obscure epitopes. Solutions include:
Denaturation protocols for Western blots
Antigen retrieval methods for fixed samples
Testing multiple antibody concentrations and incubation conditions
Discrepancies between protein detection and transcript levels are common in biological systems and require careful interpretation:
Post-transcriptional regulation assessment:
Analyze microRNA targeting of At5g62660 transcripts
Evaluate transcript stability through actinomycin D chase experiments
Investigate alternative splicing patterns using RT-PCR
Post-translational modification analysis:
Determine if modifications affect antibody recognition
Assess protein stability through cycloheximide chase experiments
Examine ubiquitination status of the protein itself (autoregulation)
Methodological validation:
Confirm antibody specificity with genetic knockouts
Validate transcriptomic data with qRT-PCR
Consider creating epitope-tagged transgenic lines for alternative detection methods
Immunofluorescence data interpretation requires careful consideration of:
Subcellular localization dynamics:
F-box proteins may shuttle between cellular compartments
Stress or developmental stage may alter localization patterns
Fixation artifacts may misrepresent native localization
Co-localization analysis:
Pearson's correlation coefficient calculation for quantitative assessment
Manders' overlap coefficient for partial co-localization
Use of appropriate subcellular markers (nuclear, cytoplasmic, membrane)
Signal specificity controls:
Secondary-only controls to assess non-specific binding
Peptide competition controls to confirm epitope specificity
Signal-to-noise ratio optimization through image acquisition parameters
Technical considerations:
The potential role of At5g62660 in auxin signaling pathways can be investigated through:
Hormone treatment time-course:
Expose plant tissues to auxin (IAA or NAA, 0.1-10 μM)
Collect samples at multiple timepoints (0, 15, 30, 60, 120 min)
Analyze At5g62660 protein levels via Western blot
Compare to known auxin-responsive proteins (e.g., Actin-7)
Tissue-specific expression analysis:
Genetic interaction studies:
Analyze At5g62660 protein levels in auxin signaling mutants
Create double mutants with auxin pathway components
Assess phenotypic consequences through microscopy and growth analysis
Complement with protein-protein interaction studies
Plant F-box proteins often function in immune responses. To investigate At5g62660's role:
Pathogen challenge experiments:
Expose plants to diverse pathogens (bacterial, fungal, viral)
Monitor At5g62660 protein dynamics during infection
Compare protein levels in resistant vs. susceptible interactions
Assess co-localization with defense signaling components
Immune signaling crosstalk analysis:
Treat plants with immune elicitors (flg22, chitin, SA, JA)
Determine protein abundance changes via quantitative Western blot
Assess protein modifications (phosphorylation, ubiquitination)
Identify potential defense-related interaction partners
Genetic manipulation approaches:
Generate knockdown/knockout lines
Create overexpression lines
Evaluate altered pathogen susceptibility
Complement with biochemical analysis of SCF complex activity
Identification of F-box protein substrates represents a significant challenge that can be addressed through:
Proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID):
Generate At5g62660-BirA fusion constructs
Express in plant cells and provide biotin
Identify biotinylated proteins via streptavidin pulldown and mass spectrometry
Validate candidates with the At5g62660 antibody
Stable isotope labeling approaches:
Compare proteomes from wild-type and At5g62660 mutant plants
Identify proteins with altered stability/abundance
Confirm direct interactions through co-immunoprecipitation
Assess ubiquitination status of candidate substrates
Degron-based substrate trapping:
Create dominant-negative At5g62660 variants lacking the F-box domain
Express in plants to stabilize substrates
Immunoprecipitate using the At5g62660 antibody
Identify trapped substrates via mass spectrometry
CRISPR-Cas9 technology offers powerful complementary approaches:
Epitope tagging at endogenous loci:
Insert small epitope tags (HA, FLAG, Myc) at the At5g62660 locus
Compare antibody detection with epitope tag detection
Validate protein expression patterns and subcellular localization
Utilize dual detection strategies for enhanced specificity
Domain-specific functional analysis:
Generate precise deletions of functional domains
Assess antibody epitope preservation
Analyze protein-protein interaction consequences
Correlate with phenotypic outcomes
Promoter modification studies:
Replace native promoter with inducible systems
Control protein expression levels
Assess antibody detection sensitivity limits
Enable temporal control of protein expression
Though challenging, dynamically monitoring F-box protein behavior requires:
Antibody fragment preparation:
Generate Fab or scFv fragments from the antibody
Conjugate to cell-permeable peptides
Validate epitope recognition after modification
Optimize delivery protocols
Fluorophore selection and conjugation:
Choose photostable fluorophores compatible with plant autofluorescence
Use direct conjugation or secondary detection strategies
Validate that conjugation doesn't impair epitope recognition
Determine optimal fluorophore-to-antibody ratios
Live cell delivery strategies:
Integrating computational approaches with antibody data can provide mechanistic insights:
Epitope prediction and structural analysis:
Model the At5g62660 protein structure
Predict surface-exposed epitopes
Correlate with experimentally determined antibody binding sites
Assess potential binding interference from protein interactions
Systems biology integration:
Incorporate antibody-derived protein expression data into network models
Predict functional relationships based on correlated expression patterns
Identify potential regulatory hubs connected to At5g62660
Guide hypothesis generation for further experimentation
Machine learning applications:
Develop algorithms to identify subtle patterns in immunofluorescence data
Classify subcellular localization changes under different conditions
Predict protein-protein interactions based on co-localization patterns
Enhance signal detection in noisy experimental datasets