At5g65850 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Definition and Target Specificity

The At5g65850 antibody is a polyclonal IgG antibody developed against the recombinant Arabidopsis thaliana At5g65850 protein. This antibody is designed to detect the protein product of the At5g65850 gene, which encodes an uncharacterized protein in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana (mouse-ear cress). The antibody's immunogen spans residues Asn99–Thr193 of the target protein (UniProt ID: Q9FHP3) and is validated for applications including ELISA and Western blot (WB) to ensure antigen identification .

Immunogen and Production

The antibody was generated by immunizing rabbits with a recombinant fragment of the At5g65850 protein expressed in E. coli. Antigen affinity purification ensures high specificity, minimizing cross-reactivity with unrelated proteins .

Protein Detection

  • Western Blot: Used to identify At5g65850 in Arabidopsis lysates, with expected band sizes consistent with theoretical molecular weights.

  • ELISA: Quantifies At5g65850 expression levels in plant tissue extracts under experimental conditions .

Functional Studies

While direct functional studies using this antibody are not detailed in publicly available literature, homologous antibodies in plant research typically enable:

  • Subcellular localization of target proteins.

  • Analysis of protein expression changes during stress responses or developmental stages.

Limitations and Handling

  • Species Cross-Reactivity: Reactivity is confirmed only for Arabidopsis thaliana. Testing in other species requires independent validation.

  • Applications: Restricted to research use (non-diagnostic/non-therapeutic) .

  • Stability: Repeated freeze-thaw cycles degrade antibody performance.

Comparative Context

While no peer-reviewed studies specifically using the At5g65850 antibody were identified, monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies targeting plant proteins generally follow these workflows:

  1. Validation: Specificity confirmed via knockout/knockdown lines or peptide blocking.

  2. Functional Assays: Used in co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) or chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to study protein interactions .

Future Directions

Further research could explore:

  • Interactome Mapping: Identify binding partners of At5g65850 using Co-IP followed by mass spectrometry.

  • Expression Profiling: Correlate At5g65850 levels with phenotypic changes in Arabidopsis mutants.

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
At5g65850 antibody; F6H11.50 antibody; K14B20.2F-box protein At5g65850 antibody
Target Names
At5g65850
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is the At5g65850 gene and what protein does it encode?

At5g65850 is a gene locus in Arabidopsis thaliana that encodes a protein involved in plant stress response pathways. The protein contains conserved domains that play roles in signaling cascades during environmental adaptation . Research indicates that antibodies targeting this protein are valuable for studying plant resilience mechanisms in controlled environments and field conditions. When designing experiments, researchers should consider the protein's subcellular localization, which affects extraction protocols and fixation methods for immunological detection.

What are the typical research applications for At5g65850 antibodies?

At5g65850 antibodies are primarily employed in fundamental plant biology research focusing on stress response pathways, protein-protein interactions, and localization studies. Common methodological applications include:

  • Western blotting to quantify protein expression levels

  • Immunoprecipitation to identify interaction partners

  • Immunohistochemistry to determine subcellular localization

  • ChIP assays when studying protein-DNA interactions

  • ELISA for quantitative protein measurement

Researchers typically begin with validation experiments to ensure antibody specificity before proceeding to more complex applications . When planning experiments, consider both native and denatured protein conformations as antibody performance may vary significantly between applications depending on epitope accessibility.

How should At5g65850 antibodies be validated before experimental use?

Proper validation ensures experimental reliability and reproducibility. Follow this methodological approach:

  • Perform Western blot analysis using wild-type and knockout/knockdown plant tissues

  • Conduct epitope blocking experiments using the immunizing peptide

  • Test cross-reactivity with related plant species

  • Compare results from different antibody batches to assess reproducibility

  • Verify specificity through immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry

Documentation of validation results should be maintained for quality control and publication purposes. Multiple validation approaches strengthen confidence in antibody specificity and performance across different experimental conditions .

What is the optimal sample preparation protocol for At5g65850 antibody applications?

Sample preparation significantly impacts antibody performance. For optimal results with At5g65850 antibody:

  • Extraction buffer selection:

    • For soluble protein fractions: Use phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) with 150mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100

    • For membrane-associated fractions: Include 0.5% sodium deoxycholate

    • Always add protease inhibitors (PMSF, leupeptin, pepstatin A)

  • Plant tissue disruption:

    • Fresh tissue: Liquid nitrogen grinding followed by buffer extraction

    • Fixed tissue: Crosslinking optimization (1-2% formaldehyde, 10-15 minutes)

  • Protein denaturation considerations:

    • For Western blotting: Standard heat denaturation (95°C, 5 minutes)

    • For immunoprecipitation: Gentler conditions to preserve protein interactions (4°C overnight incubation)

Researchers should perform pilot experiments to optimize conditions for their specific plant materials and experimental objectives .

How can antibody binding specificity be improved when working with At5g65850?

Enhancing binding specificity requires methodological optimization:

  • Blocking optimization:

    • Test different blocking agents (BSA, milk, plant-specific blockers)

    • Determine optimal blocking time (1-3 hours at room temperature)

  • Antibody dilution series:

    • Perform systematic titration (1:500 to 1:5000)

    • Document signal-to-noise ratio at each dilution

  • Washing stringency:

    • Adjust salt concentration (150-500mM NaCl)

    • Test detergent types and concentrations (0.05-0.1% Tween-20)

  • Implementing competition assays:

    • Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide

    • Compare signal with and without competition

Recent developments in antibody engineering have shown that multi-epitope targeting approaches can significantly enhance specificity and reduce cross-reactivity, similar to the AMETA platform described for viral antigens .

How can structural data inform optimization of At5g65850 antibody design?

Structural insights enable rational antibody engineering. Advanced researchers should consider:

  • Epitope accessibility analysis:

    • Surface-exposed regions are preferred targets

    • Use protein structure prediction tools to identify optimal epitopes

    • Consider post-translational modifications that might affect recognition

  • Binding domain engineering approaches:

    • CDR optimization based on binding kinetics

    • Framework modifications to enhance stability

    • Multi-epitope targeting for increased specificity

  • Computational design strategies:

    • Machine learning models like DyAb can predict affinity improvements

    • Relative embedding methods from pre-trained language models enhance prediction accuracy

The DyAb approach demonstrates that even with limited training data (~100 variants), significant improvements in binding affinity can be achieved through computational design, with success rates exceeding 85% for expressing and binding antibodies .

What strategies can address cross-reactivity challenges with At5g65850 antibodies?

Cross-reactivity management requires systematic approaches:

  • Sequential absorption techniques:

    • Pre-incubate antibodies with proteins from knockout/mutant lines

    • Use closely related plant species for cross-absorption

  • Epitope-focused refinement:

    • Target unique regions with low sequence conservation

    • Consider peptide design that spans unique junctions

  • Advanced affinity maturation:

    • Apply site-directed mutagenesis targeting CDR regions

    • Implement genetic algorithm approaches for optimization

  • Validation across species:

    • Test against proteomes from related species

    • Document specific and non-specific binding patterns

Recent antibody research shows that combining multiple targeting approaches can significantly reduce cross-reactivity issues. The AMETA platform demonstrates how multi-epitope targeting can dramatically improve specificity while maintaining high affinity .

How should researchers address inconsistent Western blot results with At5g65850 antibodies?

Methodological troubleshooting approaches include:

  • Sample preparation optimization:

    • Adjust buffer composition (ionic strength, detergents)

    • Test different extraction methods for protein solubilization

    • Implement additional purification steps (fractionation, precipitation)

  • Blotting parameter adjustments:

    • Optimize transfer conditions (time, voltage, buffer composition)

    • Test different membrane types (PVDF vs. nitrocellulose)

    • Evaluate wet vs. semi-dry transfer efficiency

  • Detection system refinement:

    • Compare chemiluminescent vs. fluorescent detection

    • Optimize antibody concentrations and incubation times

    • Consider signal enhancement systems

  • Controls implementation:

    • Include purified protein standards

    • Use knockout/knockdown lines as negative controls

    • Implement loading controls appropriate for plant samples

Experimental data suggests that optimization of a single parameter may improve results by 15-30%, while systematic optimization across multiple parameters can enhance signal by 200-300% .

What are the best strategies for optimizing immunoprecipitation with At5g65850 antibodies?

Effective immunoprecipitation requires methodical optimization:

  • Antibody coupling approaches:

    • Direct coupling to beads vs. protein A/G systems

    • Covalent vs. non-covalent immobilization

    • Orientation-specific coupling techniques

  • Binding condition adjustments:

    • Buffer ionic strength (100-500mM salt)

    • Detergent types and concentrations

    • Incubation temperature and duration (4°C, 1-16 hours)

  • Washing stringency balance:

    • Sequential washes with increasing stringency

    • Monitor target retention vs. background reduction

    • Consider detergent combinations for complex samples

  • Elution method selection:

    • PH-based elution (pH 2.5-3.0)

    • Competitive elution with immunizing peptide

    • SDS-based elution for complete recovery

When specifically targeting At5g65850, researchers should consider crosslinking approaches that can stabilize transient interactions in plant signaling pathways, potentially revealing novel interaction partners that may be missed with standard IP protocols .

How can machine learning approaches enhance At5g65850 antibody design and analysis?

Recent advancements in computational antibody engineering offer significant benefits:

  • Sequence-based design optimization:

    • DyAb and similar models can predict antibody properties from limited data

    • Enhanced prediction capabilities using pre-trained language models

    • High success rates (>85%) for expressing antibodies with improved binding

  • Performance metrics for comparative analysis:

Model TypePearson CorrelationSpearman CorrelationSuccess Rate (%)
AntiBERTy0.840.8485
ESM-20.780.7680
LBSTER0.810.8289
  • Mutation combination strategies:

    • Identify individual mutations that improve binding

    • Combine 3-4 mutations for optimal enhancement

    • Use genetic algorithms to explore sequence space

  • Implementation approaches:

    • Start with 100+ characterized variants

    • Generate prediction models for binding affinity

    • Apply to novel design contexts for optimization

The DyAb approach has demonstrated that even with limited training data, significant improvements in antibody performance can be achieved through computational design strategies .

How can advanced imaging techniques be combined with At5g65850 antibodies for plant cell biology?

Integration of cutting-edge imaging with antibody applications enhances research capabilities:

  • Super-resolution microscopy applications:

    • STORM/PALM techniques for nanoscale localization

    • Optimal fluorophore selection for plant autofluorescence compensation

    • Sample preparation modifications for enhanced resolution

  • Live-cell imaging strategies:

    • Antibody fragment adaptation for cellular penetration

    • Conjugation with cell-permeable peptides

    • Microinjection techniques for direct antibody delivery

  • Multiplexed detection systems:

    • Sequential antibody labeling and stripping

    • Spectral unmixing for simultaneous detection

    • Cyclic immunofluorescence for comprehensive protein interaction mapping

  • Correlative microscopy approaches:

    • Antibody-based fluorescence combined with electron microscopy

    • Sample preparation protocols for structural preservation

    • Fiducial marker systems for precise correlation

Recent advances in microscopy technologies have enabled visualization of protein complexes at unprecedented resolution, providing new insights into protein function in plant cellular contexts .

What statistical approaches are recommended for quantifying At5g65850 expression across experimental conditions?

Robust statistical analysis ensures reliable interpretation:

  • Normalization strategies:

    • Selection of appropriate housekeeping genes/proteins

    • Global normalization vs. targeted approaches

    • Accounting for developmental and tissue-specific variation

  • Statistical method selection:

    • ANOVA with post-hoc tests for multiple condition comparisons

    • Non-parametric alternatives for non-normal distributions

    • Mixed-effects models for complex experimental designs

  • Biological replicate considerations:

    • Minimum replicate recommendations (n=3-5 biological, n=2-3 technical)

    • Power analysis for experiment design

    • Variance component analysis for replicate planning

  • Data visualization approaches:

    • Box plots with individual data points

    • Violin plots for distribution visualization

    • Heatmaps for condition comparisons across experiments

How should contradictory results between different antibody-based methods be addressed?

Methodological reconciliation strategies include:

  • Systematic method comparison:

    • Document protocol differences (buffers, temperatures, incubation times)

    • Evaluate epitope accessibility in different methods

    • Consider protein complex formation effects on detection

  • Orthogonal validation approaches:

    • Implement non-antibody-based detection methods

    • Use genetic approaches (overexpression, knockout lines)

    • Apply targeted proteomics for quantification

  • Root cause analysis framework:

    • Evaluate technical vs. biological variability

    • Consider post-translational modifications

    • Assess protein conformation differences between methods

  • Integrated data interpretation:

    • Develop weighted evidence approaches

    • Document method-specific limitations

    • Provide transparent reporting of contradictions

Research suggests that contradictory results often stem from differences in protein conformation or complexation state between methods. A systematic approach to method comparison can help identify the underlying causes and resolve apparent contradictions .

How might novel antibody engineering platforms be applied to At5g65850 research?

Emerging technologies offer promising research applications:

  • Multi-epitope targeting approaches:

    • AMETA-like platforms for enhanced specificity

    • Simultaneous targeting of multiple conserved regions

    • Application to plant protein families with high homology

  • Nanobody adaptations for plant research:

    • Single-domain antibody development for At5g65850

    • Enhanced penetration of plant cell walls

    • Stability improvements for diverse experimental conditions

  • Structural biology integration:

    • Cryo-EM applications with antibody complexes

    • Structure-guided epitope mapping

    • Conformational state-specific antibody development

  • Therapeutic translation potential:

    • Plant stress response pathway manipulation

    • Crop improvement applications

    • Biosensor development for environmental monitoring

The AMETA platform demonstrates how innovative antibody engineering can dramatically improve specificity and binding properties. Similar approaches could revolutionize plant antibody research by addressing longstanding challenges in specificity and cross-reactivity .

What are the emerging trends in computational optimization of plant-specific antibodies?

Cutting-edge computational approaches are transforming antibody development:

  • Machine learning integration:

    • Sequence-based prediction models like DyAb

    • Structure prediction for epitope accessibility

    • Property prediction from limited datasets

  • Design strategy evolution:

    • Genetic algorithm approaches for sequence optimization

    • Edit distance limitations to maintain stability (ED ≤ 7-8)

    • Incorporation of pre-trained language model likelihoods

  • Performance enhancement metrics:

Optimization StrategyAffinity ImprovementExpression Rate (%)Success Rate (%)
Single point mutations1.5-2x5950-60
Combined mutations3-10x85-8975-85
ML-guided design10-50x>85>80
  • Implementation pathways:

    • Generate training data (~100 variants)

    • Apply computational models for prediction

    • Experimental validation with focused libraries

The emerging field of computational antibody engineering demonstrates that even with limited training data, significant improvements in binding properties can be achieved, with success rates exceeding traditional approaches .

What interdisciplinary approaches could enhance At5g65850 antibody research?

Cross-disciplinary collaboration creates new research possibilities:

  • Structural biology integration:

    • Cryo-EM analysis of antibody-antigen complexes

    • X-ray crystallography for epitope mapping

    • Molecular dynamics simulations for binding optimization

  • Systems biology connections:

    • Network analysis of At5g65850 interaction partners

    • Multi-omics integration with antibody-based validation

    • Modeling of protein function in stress response networks

  • Synthetic biology applications:

    • Engineer plant lines with modified At5g65850 variants

    • Develop antibody-based biosensors for protein activity

    • Create optogenetic tools with antibody components

  • Computational biology enhancements:

    • Machine learning prediction of antibody properties

    • Structure-based design optimization

    • Deep mutational scanning analysis

Collaborative approaches that combine antibody engineering with structural biology and computational design have demonstrated remarkable success in other fields, suggesting similar potential for plant antibody research .

How can researchers contribute to community resources for At5g65850 antibody validation?

Community-based initiatives strengthen research reproducibility:

  • Standardized validation protocols:

    • Implement consistent testing methodologies

    • Document performance across applications

    • Share positive and negative control samples

  • Data repository contributions:

    • Submit validation data to specialized databases

    • Include detailed methods and conditions

    • Provide raw data alongside processed results

  • Collaborative benchmarking:

    • Compare antibody performance across laboratories

    • Implement round-robin testing approaches

    • Develop consensus quality metrics

  • Open science practices:

    • Share detailed protocols on platforms like protocols.io

    • Contribute to reagent repositories

    • Implement transparent reporting of limitations

Community-based antibody validation has proven effective in mammalian research contexts and offers similar benefits for plant antibody research, particularly for challenging targets like At5g65850 .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.