The At5g65850 antibody is a polyclonal IgG antibody developed against the recombinant Arabidopsis thaliana At5g65850 protein. This antibody is designed to detect the protein product of the At5g65850 gene, which encodes an uncharacterized protein in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana (mouse-ear cress). The antibody's immunogen spans residues Asn99–Thr193 of the target protein (UniProt ID: Q9FHP3) and is validated for applications including ELISA and Western blot (WB) to ensure antigen identification .
The antibody was generated by immunizing rabbits with a recombinant fragment of the At5g65850 protein expressed in E. coli. Antigen affinity purification ensures high specificity, minimizing cross-reactivity with unrelated proteins .
Western Blot: Used to identify At5g65850 in Arabidopsis lysates, with expected band sizes consistent with theoretical molecular weights.
ELISA: Quantifies At5g65850 expression levels in plant tissue extracts under experimental conditions .
While direct functional studies using this antibody are not detailed in publicly available literature, homologous antibodies in plant research typically enable:
Subcellular localization of target proteins.
Analysis of protein expression changes during stress responses or developmental stages.
Species Cross-Reactivity: Reactivity is confirmed only for Arabidopsis thaliana. Testing in other species requires independent validation.
Applications: Restricted to research use (non-diagnostic/non-therapeutic) .
Stability: Repeated freeze-thaw cycles degrade antibody performance.
While no peer-reviewed studies specifically using the At5g65850 antibody were identified, monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies targeting plant proteins generally follow these workflows:
Validation: Specificity confirmed via knockout/knockdown lines or peptide blocking.
Functional Assays: Used in co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) or chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to study protein interactions .
Further research could explore:
Interactome Mapping: Identify binding partners of At5g65850 using Co-IP followed by mass spectrometry.
Expression Profiling: Correlate At5g65850 levels with phenotypic changes in Arabidopsis mutants.
At5g65850 is a gene locus in Arabidopsis thaliana that encodes a protein involved in plant stress response pathways. The protein contains conserved domains that play roles in signaling cascades during environmental adaptation . Research indicates that antibodies targeting this protein are valuable for studying plant resilience mechanisms in controlled environments and field conditions. When designing experiments, researchers should consider the protein's subcellular localization, which affects extraction protocols and fixation methods for immunological detection.
At5g65850 antibodies are primarily employed in fundamental plant biology research focusing on stress response pathways, protein-protein interactions, and localization studies. Common methodological applications include:
Western blotting to quantify protein expression levels
Immunoprecipitation to identify interaction partners
Immunohistochemistry to determine subcellular localization
ChIP assays when studying protein-DNA interactions
ELISA for quantitative protein measurement
Researchers typically begin with validation experiments to ensure antibody specificity before proceeding to more complex applications . When planning experiments, consider both native and denatured protein conformations as antibody performance may vary significantly between applications depending on epitope accessibility.
Proper validation ensures experimental reliability and reproducibility. Follow this methodological approach:
Perform Western blot analysis using wild-type and knockout/knockdown plant tissues
Conduct epitope blocking experiments using the immunizing peptide
Test cross-reactivity with related plant species
Compare results from different antibody batches to assess reproducibility
Verify specificity through immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Documentation of validation results should be maintained for quality control and publication purposes. Multiple validation approaches strengthen confidence in antibody specificity and performance across different experimental conditions .
Sample preparation significantly impacts antibody performance. For optimal results with At5g65850 antibody:
Extraction buffer selection:
For soluble protein fractions: Use phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) with 150mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100
For membrane-associated fractions: Include 0.5% sodium deoxycholate
Always add protease inhibitors (PMSF, leupeptin, pepstatin A)
Plant tissue disruption:
Fresh tissue: Liquid nitrogen grinding followed by buffer extraction
Fixed tissue: Crosslinking optimization (1-2% formaldehyde, 10-15 minutes)
Protein denaturation considerations:
For Western blotting: Standard heat denaturation (95°C, 5 minutes)
For immunoprecipitation: Gentler conditions to preserve protein interactions (4°C overnight incubation)
Researchers should perform pilot experiments to optimize conditions for their specific plant materials and experimental objectives .
Enhancing binding specificity requires methodological optimization:
Blocking optimization:
Test different blocking agents (BSA, milk, plant-specific blockers)
Determine optimal blocking time (1-3 hours at room temperature)
Antibody dilution series:
Perform systematic titration (1:500 to 1:5000)
Document signal-to-noise ratio at each dilution
Washing stringency:
Adjust salt concentration (150-500mM NaCl)
Test detergent types and concentrations (0.05-0.1% Tween-20)
Implementing competition assays:
Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide
Compare signal with and without competition
Recent developments in antibody engineering have shown that multi-epitope targeting approaches can significantly enhance specificity and reduce cross-reactivity, similar to the AMETA platform described for viral antigens .
Structural insights enable rational antibody engineering. Advanced researchers should consider:
Epitope accessibility analysis:
Surface-exposed regions are preferred targets
Use protein structure prediction tools to identify optimal epitopes
Consider post-translational modifications that might affect recognition
Binding domain engineering approaches:
CDR optimization based on binding kinetics
Framework modifications to enhance stability
Multi-epitope targeting for increased specificity
Computational design strategies:
Machine learning models like DyAb can predict affinity improvements
Relative embedding methods from pre-trained language models enhance prediction accuracy
The DyAb approach demonstrates that even with limited training data (~100 variants), significant improvements in binding affinity can be achieved through computational design, with success rates exceeding 85% for expressing and binding antibodies .
Cross-reactivity management requires systematic approaches:
Sequential absorption techniques:
Pre-incubate antibodies with proteins from knockout/mutant lines
Use closely related plant species for cross-absorption
Epitope-focused refinement:
Target unique regions with low sequence conservation
Consider peptide design that spans unique junctions
Advanced affinity maturation:
Apply site-directed mutagenesis targeting CDR regions
Implement genetic algorithm approaches for optimization
Validation across species:
Test against proteomes from related species
Document specific and non-specific binding patterns
Recent antibody research shows that combining multiple targeting approaches can significantly reduce cross-reactivity issues. The AMETA platform demonstrates how multi-epitope targeting can dramatically improve specificity while maintaining high affinity .
Methodological troubleshooting approaches include:
Sample preparation optimization:
Adjust buffer composition (ionic strength, detergents)
Test different extraction methods for protein solubilization
Implement additional purification steps (fractionation, precipitation)
Blotting parameter adjustments:
Optimize transfer conditions (time, voltage, buffer composition)
Test different membrane types (PVDF vs. nitrocellulose)
Evaluate wet vs. semi-dry transfer efficiency
Detection system refinement:
Compare chemiluminescent vs. fluorescent detection
Optimize antibody concentrations and incubation times
Consider signal enhancement systems
Controls implementation:
Include purified protein standards
Use knockout/knockdown lines as negative controls
Implement loading controls appropriate for plant samples
Experimental data suggests that optimization of a single parameter may improve results by 15-30%, while systematic optimization across multiple parameters can enhance signal by 200-300% .
Effective immunoprecipitation requires methodical optimization:
Antibody coupling approaches:
Direct coupling to beads vs. protein A/G systems
Covalent vs. non-covalent immobilization
Orientation-specific coupling techniques
Binding condition adjustments:
Buffer ionic strength (100-500mM salt)
Detergent types and concentrations
Incubation temperature and duration (4°C, 1-16 hours)
Washing stringency balance:
Sequential washes with increasing stringency
Monitor target retention vs. background reduction
Consider detergent combinations for complex samples
Elution method selection:
PH-based elution (pH 2.5-3.0)
Competitive elution with immunizing peptide
SDS-based elution for complete recovery
When specifically targeting At5g65850, researchers should consider crosslinking approaches that can stabilize transient interactions in plant signaling pathways, potentially revealing novel interaction partners that may be missed with standard IP protocols .
Recent advancements in computational antibody engineering offer significant benefits:
Sequence-based design optimization:
DyAb and similar models can predict antibody properties from limited data
Enhanced prediction capabilities using pre-trained language models
High success rates (>85%) for expressing antibodies with improved binding
Performance metrics for comparative analysis:
| Model Type | Pearson Correlation | Spearman Correlation | Success Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| AntiBERTy | 0.84 | 0.84 | 85 |
| ESM-2 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 80 |
| LBSTER | 0.81 | 0.82 | 89 |
Mutation combination strategies:
Identify individual mutations that improve binding
Combine 3-4 mutations for optimal enhancement
Use genetic algorithms to explore sequence space
Implementation approaches:
Start with 100+ characterized variants
Generate prediction models for binding affinity
Apply to novel design contexts for optimization
The DyAb approach has demonstrated that even with limited training data, significant improvements in antibody performance can be achieved through computational design strategies .
Integration of cutting-edge imaging with antibody applications enhances research capabilities:
Super-resolution microscopy applications:
STORM/PALM techniques for nanoscale localization
Optimal fluorophore selection for plant autofluorescence compensation
Sample preparation modifications for enhanced resolution
Live-cell imaging strategies:
Antibody fragment adaptation for cellular penetration
Conjugation with cell-permeable peptides
Microinjection techniques for direct antibody delivery
Multiplexed detection systems:
Sequential antibody labeling and stripping
Spectral unmixing for simultaneous detection
Cyclic immunofluorescence for comprehensive protein interaction mapping
Correlative microscopy approaches:
Antibody-based fluorescence combined with electron microscopy
Sample preparation protocols for structural preservation
Fiducial marker systems for precise correlation
Recent advances in microscopy technologies have enabled visualization of protein complexes at unprecedented resolution, providing new insights into protein function in plant cellular contexts .
Robust statistical analysis ensures reliable interpretation:
Normalization strategies:
Selection of appropriate housekeeping genes/proteins
Global normalization vs. targeted approaches
Accounting for developmental and tissue-specific variation
Statistical method selection:
ANOVA with post-hoc tests for multiple condition comparisons
Non-parametric alternatives for non-normal distributions
Mixed-effects models for complex experimental designs
Biological replicate considerations:
Minimum replicate recommendations (n=3-5 biological, n=2-3 technical)
Power analysis for experiment design
Variance component analysis for replicate planning
Data visualization approaches:
Box plots with individual data points
Violin plots for distribution visualization
Heatmaps for condition comparisons across experiments
Methodological reconciliation strategies include:
Systematic method comparison:
Document protocol differences (buffers, temperatures, incubation times)
Evaluate epitope accessibility in different methods
Consider protein complex formation effects on detection
Orthogonal validation approaches:
Implement non-antibody-based detection methods
Use genetic approaches (overexpression, knockout lines)
Apply targeted proteomics for quantification
Root cause analysis framework:
Evaluate technical vs. biological variability
Consider post-translational modifications
Assess protein conformation differences between methods
Integrated data interpretation:
Develop weighted evidence approaches
Document method-specific limitations
Provide transparent reporting of contradictions
Research suggests that contradictory results often stem from differences in protein conformation or complexation state between methods. A systematic approach to method comparison can help identify the underlying causes and resolve apparent contradictions .
Emerging technologies offer promising research applications:
Multi-epitope targeting approaches:
AMETA-like platforms for enhanced specificity
Simultaneous targeting of multiple conserved regions
Application to plant protein families with high homology
Nanobody adaptations for plant research:
Single-domain antibody development for At5g65850
Enhanced penetration of plant cell walls
Stability improvements for diverse experimental conditions
Structural biology integration:
Cryo-EM applications with antibody complexes
Structure-guided epitope mapping
Conformational state-specific antibody development
Therapeutic translation potential:
Plant stress response pathway manipulation
Crop improvement applications
Biosensor development for environmental monitoring
The AMETA platform demonstrates how innovative antibody engineering can dramatically improve specificity and binding properties. Similar approaches could revolutionize plant antibody research by addressing longstanding challenges in specificity and cross-reactivity .
Cutting-edge computational approaches are transforming antibody development:
Machine learning integration:
Sequence-based prediction models like DyAb
Structure prediction for epitope accessibility
Property prediction from limited datasets
Design strategy evolution:
Genetic algorithm approaches for sequence optimization
Edit distance limitations to maintain stability (ED ≤ 7-8)
Incorporation of pre-trained language model likelihoods
Performance enhancement metrics:
| Optimization Strategy | Affinity Improvement | Expression Rate (%) | Success Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single point mutations | 1.5-2x | 59 | 50-60 |
| Combined mutations | 3-10x | 85-89 | 75-85 |
| ML-guided design | 10-50x | >85 | >80 |
Implementation pathways:
Generate training data (~100 variants)
Apply computational models for prediction
Experimental validation with focused libraries
The emerging field of computational antibody engineering demonstrates that even with limited training data, significant improvements in binding properties can be achieved, with success rates exceeding traditional approaches .
Cross-disciplinary collaboration creates new research possibilities:
Structural biology integration:
Cryo-EM analysis of antibody-antigen complexes
X-ray crystallography for epitope mapping
Molecular dynamics simulations for binding optimization
Systems biology connections:
Network analysis of At5g65850 interaction partners
Multi-omics integration with antibody-based validation
Modeling of protein function in stress response networks
Synthetic biology applications:
Engineer plant lines with modified At5g65850 variants
Develop antibody-based biosensors for protein activity
Create optogenetic tools with antibody components
Computational biology enhancements:
Machine learning prediction of antibody properties
Structure-based design optimization
Deep mutational scanning analysis
Collaborative approaches that combine antibody engineering with structural biology and computational design have demonstrated remarkable success in other fields, suggesting similar potential for plant antibody research .
Community-based initiatives strengthen research reproducibility:
Standardized validation protocols:
Implement consistent testing methodologies
Document performance across applications
Share positive and negative control samples
Data repository contributions:
Submit validation data to specialized databases
Include detailed methods and conditions
Provide raw data alongside processed results
Collaborative benchmarking:
Compare antibody performance across laboratories
Implement round-robin testing approaches
Develop consensus quality metrics
Open science practices:
Share detailed protocols on platforms like protocols.io
Contribute to reagent repositories
Implement transparent reporting of limitations
Community-based antibody validation has proven effective in mammalian research contexts and offers similar benefits for plant antibody research, particularly for challenging targets like At5g65850 .