RMF Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction to RMF Antibody

The RMF antibody is a monoclonal or bispecific antibody engineered to recognize the RMF peptide, a WT1-derived epitope presented by HLA-A*02:01 on cancer cells. WT1 is overexpressed in AML and other malignancies, making it a validated target for immunotherapy . Current variants include ESK1, ESKM (an Fc-enhanced version), and WT1-TCB (a T-cell bispecific antibody) .

Mechanism of Action

  • Target Binding: The antibody binds the RMF–HLA-A*02:01 complex with high avidity (Kd < 0.2 nM) . Critical residues for binding include Arg1, Phe3, Asn5, and Ala6, as identified through alanine scanning and structural studies .

  • T-Cell Engagement: WT1-TCB incorporates a CD3ε-binding domain to recruit T cells, enabling cytotoxicity independent of T-cell receptor specificity .

  • Fc Engineering: ESKM, an afucosylated variant, enhances antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) by increasing affinity for activating FcγRIIIa (158V variant by 80%) and reducing binding to inhibitory FcγRIIb .

In Vitro and Ex Vivo Efficacy

  • Primary AML Cells: WT1-TCB induced 67 ± 6% specific lysis with allogeneic T cells and 54 ± 12% with autologous T cells in ex vivo assays .

  • Synergy with Lenalidomide: Combining WT1-TCB with lenalidomide increased specific lysis from 45.4% to 70.8% (P = 0.015) .

  • ADCC Potency: ESKM showed 5–10-fold greater in vitro potency than ESK1 against mesothelioma and leukemia cell lines .

In Vivo Studies

  • Tumor Growth Reduction: WT1-TCB significantly suppressed SKM-1 tumor growth in humanized mice .

  • Efficacy in Xenografts: ESKM eliminated SET2 AML cells and fresh ALL xenografts at doses as low as 10 μg .

Clinical Development

A phase 1 trial (#NCT04580121) evaluating WT1-TCB in relapsed/refractory AML is ongoing, building on preclinical evidence of efficacy and safety .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300. Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4.
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 week lead time (made-to-order)
Synonyms
RMF antibody; At3g61730 antibody; F15G16.120 antibody; F21F14.11Probable F-box protein At3g61730 antibody; Protein RFM antibody; Reduced male fertility protein antibody
Target Names
RMF
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Regulates tapetum degeneration and pollen maturation during anther development.
Database Links
Subcellular Location
Nucleus.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed in flower buds, developing anthers, pollen grains, siliques, rosette leaves and roots. Detected at lower levels in open flowers, stems and cauline leaves. Expressed in young seedling in the hydathodes, shoot apical meristem, root tips and latera

Q&A

What is RMF in antibody testing?

RMF (Relative Median Fluorescence) is a quantitative measure used in antibody detection assays, particularly in transplantation immunology. It represents the ratio of the median channel fluorescence of a test sample over that of a negative control AB serum. This measurement provides a standardized way to assess the presence and strength of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in transplant recipients. RMF values are critical for determining the positivity of crossmatch tests, with established thresholds that can vary based on whether the transplant is a primary graft or regraft .

The calculation method can be represented as:

RMF = (Median Channel Fluorescence of Test Sample) ÷ (Median Channel Fluorescence of Negative Control)

In clinical transplantation settings, RMF thresholds are typically set at 4.0 for primary grafts and 2.5 for regrafts to determine positive crossmatches . These thresholds help clinicians assess immunological compatibility and risk stratification before transplantation.

How do antibody subclasses affect transplantation outcomes?

Antibody subclasses, particularly IgG subclasses of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), have significant impacts on transplantation outcomes. Research has demonstrated that certain IgG subclasses are more strongly associated with rejection episodes and graft failure. Specifically, pretreatment IgG4 levels have been identified as predictive of acute antibody-mediated rejection, with data showing this subclass serves as an independent risk factor for early rejection and graft failure .

The mechanism behind this association relates to the specific effector functions of different IgG subclasses. Some subclasses are more efficient at complement activation or interaction with Fc receptors, leading to enhanced immune responses against the graft. Monitoring subclass distribution provides more nuanced risk assessment than measuring total IgG alone.

What methods are used for isolating monoclonal antibodies in research?

Multiple methodologies exist for isolating monoclonal antibodies, with recent advancements addressing previous technical limitations. The SMART (Switching Mechanism at the 5' ends of RNA Transcript) method has been developed specifically for efficiently isolating monoclonal antibodies from single B cells in research subjects such as rhesus macaques .

This technique offers several advantages over traditional approaches:

  • It utilizes optimized PCR conditions and SMART 5' and 3' rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) reactions to generate full-length cDNAs from individual B cells

  • It appends synthetic primer binding sites to the 5' and 3' ends of cDNA during synthesis, enabling PCR amplification of low-abundance antibody templates

  • It employs universal 5' primers to amplify the immunoglobulin variable (IgV) genes from cDNA, which simplifies the primer mixes in nested PCR reactions

  • It improves the recovery of matched heavy and light chain pairs

This methodology has particular value in vaccine development and infectious disease studies, as demonstrated by its successful application in isolating simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) envelope-specific antibodies from single-sorted rhesus macaque memory B cells .

How does IgG subclass distribution correlate with clinical outcomes in antibody incompatible transplantation?

IgG subclass distribution analysis provides critical prognostic information beyond what can be determined from total IgG measurements alone. Research has demonstrated specific correlations between IgG subclasses and clinical outcomes in antibody-incompatible kidney transplantation.

In a study of eighty HLA antibody-incompatible kidney transplant recipients, pretreatment IgG4 levels were found to be significantly predictive of acute antibody-mediated rejection (p < 0.05). Moreover, the presence of pretreatment IgG4 donor-specific antibodies (DSA) was identified as an independent risk factor for graft failure .

The following table illustrates key correlations observed between antibody characteristics and clinical outcomes:

Antibody ParameterAssociation with Acute RejectionAssociation with Graft FailureStatistical Significance
Pretreatment IgG4Strong predictorIndependent risk factorp < 0.05
Single highest pan-IgG DSA (MFI)Higher in rejection groupHigher in graft failure groupp = 0.034 / p = 0.004
Total MFI pan-IgG DSAHigher in rejection groupHigher in graft failure groupp = 0.011 / p = 0.017
CDC positivityLess predictive than IgG4Significantly associatedp = 0.006

These findings suggest that targeted monitoring of IgG4 DSA levels may provide more precise risk stratification for transplant recipients than relying solely on total DSA measurements or complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assays .

What are the mechanisms of antibody-mediated immunosuppression (AMIS) in preventing alloimmunization?

Antibody-mediated immunosuppression (AMIS) represents a crucial mechanism whereby pre-existing antibodies can prevent development of new antibody responses, with particular relevance to fetal-maternal alloimmunization. The mechanisms of AMIS have been the subject of ongoing research, with recent findings challenging previous assumptions.

The key finding is that antibodies capable of rapidly removing the target antigen from cell surfaces without triggering detectable cell clearance can convert an augmented antibody response to AMIS. This represents a fundamental shift in understanding, suggesting that antigen removal, rather than cell clearance alone, may be the critical factor in inducing immunosuppression .

This mechanistic insight has significant implications for developing targeted interventions for preventing alloimmunization, particularly in the context of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). It suggests potential approaches for designing antibody-based therapies that specifically target antigen removal without necessarily causing cell destruction .

How do cross-reactive antibodies impact Plasmodium falciparum immunity?

Cross-reactive antibodies represent an important aspect of immunity against Plasmodium falciparum (Pf), the parasite responsible for the most severe form of malaria. Recent research has identified the molecular basis for antibody cross-reactivity between different parasite life-cycle stages.

The monoclonal antibody B1E11K has been shown to exhibit cross-reactivity to various Pf proteins containing glutamate-rich repetitive elements expressed at different stages of the parasite life cycle. Structural analysis revealed that this antibody binds to a repeating epitope motif in a head-to-head conformation, engaging in affinity-matured homotypic interactions .

This mode of recognition extends beyond the previously described interactions with Pf circumsporozoite protein (PfCSP) to other repeats expressed across various stages of the parasite. The crystal structure of two B1E11K Fab domains in complex with its main antigen, RESA (expressed on asexual blood stages), provided critical insights into how glutamate-rich-repeat targeting antibodies from immune individuals can cross-react with various Pf proteins .

The potential impact of this cross-reactivity is complex. While it may provide broader immunity across multiple parasite stages, it could also hinder protective responses through antibody feedback mechanisms such as epitope masking. This represents an important consideration for vaccine development strategies targeting specific parasite stages .

What novel approaches are being developed for target-agnostic antibody identification?

This approach utilizes target-agnostic memory B cell (MBC) sorting and activation, followed by screening to assess reactivity against P. falciparum gamete lysate and gametocyte lysate. The technique effectively identified a panel of monoclonal antibodies targeting diverse P. falciparum proteins, including some with transmission-reducing activity (TRA) .

Key elements of this methodology include:

  • Single B cell activation without using recombinant proteins

  • High-throughput screening against parasite lysates

  • Functional validation of isolated antibodies

  • Structural characterization of antibody-antigen interactions

Despite screening with a parasite extract containing a mixture of intracellular and surface proteins, approximately half of the isolated monoclonal antibodies displayed binding to the surface of gametes and/or exhibited TRA. This suggests that this approach efficiently identifies functionally relevant antibodies, particularly in donors with potent transmission-reducing activity .

How should controls be designed for optimal RMF threshold determination?

Establishing appropriate controls is critical for accurate interpretation of RMF values in antibody detection assays. The design of controls directly impacts the threshold determination that discriminates positive from negative results, with significant clinical implications in transplantation settings.

Optimal control design should include:

  • Negative control selection: Use of AB serum (antibody-free) as the standard negative control provides a consistent baseline for RMF calculation. The quality and consistency of this negative control directly impacts the reliability of RMF thresholds .

  • Positive control standardization: Include well-characterized positive samples with known antibody specificities and concentrations to validate assay performance across runs.

  • Background controls: Incorporate controls that account for non-specific binding, particularly when working with complex biological samples.

  • Threshold validation: Establish RMF thresholds through ROC curve analysis correlating with clinical outcomes rather than arbitrary cutoffs. Research has established different thresholds for different clinical scenarios (e.g., 4.0 for primary grafts and 2.5 for regrafts) .

  • Internal consistency controls: Include replicates and internal standards to assess intra-assay variability.

The choice of appropriate controls is particularly important when evaluating different antibody subclasses, as their detection sensitivity may vary. Researchers should consider including subclass-specific controls when performing detailed IgG subclass analysis .

How can AI approaches enhance antibody design and analysis?

Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing antibody research, offering new capabilities for designing and analyzing antibodies with unprecedented efficiency. Recent advancements include the development of RFdiffusion, an AI tool fine-tuned for designing human-like antibodies.

RFdiffusion represents a significant breakthrough in antibody engineering, focusing particularly on building antibody loops—the intricate, flexible regions responsible for antibody binding. This approach produces novel antibody blueprints unlike any seen during training that can bind user-specified targets .

Key advantages of this AI-driven approach include:

  • Generation of complete human-like antibodies (single chain variable fragments or scFvs) rather than just antibody fragments

  • Ability to design flexible loop regions that previously challenged computational approaches

  • Creation of functional antibodies purely through computational methods

  • Successful experimental validation against disease-relevant targets

The system has been experimentally validated by generating antibodies against several targets relevant to disease, including influenza hemagglutinin and a potent toxin produced by Clostridium difficile. This demonstrates the practical utility of AI-designed antibodies for therapeutic applications .

The availability of such tools to both non-profit and for-profit researchers, including for drug development, has the potential to significantly accelerate antibody discovery while reducing costs and experimental complexity .

What statistical approaches are recommended for analyzing RMF data in multivariate models?

Analyzing RMF data in the context of clinical outcomes requires sophisticated statistical approaches that account for multiple variables and complex interactions. When developing multivariate models incorporating RMF measurements, researchers should consider the following statistical considerations:

  • Multivariate regression analysis: When evaluating the independent predictive value of RMF measurements alongside other clinical variables, multivariate regression models are essential. Research has shown that pretreatment IgG4 levels retain independent predictive value for rejection and graft survival even when controlling for other factors .

  • Threshold determination: Rather than using arbitrary cutoffs, thresholds for RMF positivity should be established through ROC curve analysis that maximizes sensitivity and specificity for predicting relevant clinical outcomes.

  • Time-to-event analysis: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models are appropriate for evaluating the relationship between RMF values and time-dependent outcomes such as rejection episodes or graft survival.

  • Stratification approaches: Models should incorporate stratification based on relevant clinical variables such as transplant type (primary vs. regraft), HLA mismatch levels, and immunosuppression protocols.

  • Interaction terms: Statistical models should evaluate potential interactions between RMF values and other variables, as the clinical significance of a given RMF value may differ depending on context.

For example, in transplantation studies, researchers have found that CDC positivity (p=0.006), single highest pan-IgG DSA (p=0.004), and total MFI pan-IgG DSA (p=0.017) all showed significant associations with graft failure, but multivariate analysis demonstrated that pretreatment IgG4 levels provided independent predictive value beyond these measures .

How might emerging antibody isolation techniques impact vaccine development?

Emerging techniques for antibody isolation, such as the SMART-based method for amplifying immunoglobulin variable genes from single B cells, have significant implications for vaccine development. These methodologies address longstanding technical challenges in capturing and characterizing antigen-specific B cell responses.

The SMART approach offers several advantages that could accelerate vaccine development:

  • Unbiased capture of immunoglobulin heavy and light chain pairs enables more comprehensive characterization of immune responses to vaccine candidates

  • Improved efficiency in recovering paired antibody sequences from individual B cells increases the yield of potentially protective antibodies

  • The ability to isolate antibodies from non-human primates facilitates translation between pre-clinical and clinical studies

  • Enhanced characterization of B cell responses at the single-cell level provides deeper insights into vaccine-induced immunity

This technique has already demonstrated value in isolating simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) envelope-specific antibodies from rhesus macaque memory B cells, suggesting applications for HIV vaccine development and other challenging pathogens .

As these methodologies become more widespread, researchers will gain unprecedented access to the genetic and functional characteristics of antigen-specific B cells, potentially revealing new correlates of protection and guiding rational vaccine design strategies.

What are the implications of glutamate-rich repeat recognition for malaria vaccine development?

The discovery of antibodies that recognize glutamate-rich repeat regions across different Plasmodium falciparum proteins has important implications for malaria vaccine development. Research has revealed that antibodies like B1E11K can bind to repeating epitope motifs in a head-to-head conformation through affinity-matured homotypic interactions .

This finding extends our understanding of how the immune system recognizes repeating elements in the Plasmodium proteome beyond the previously studied circumsporozoite protein (PfCSP). The cross-reactivity of these antibodies to proteins expressed at different parasite life cycle stages presents both opportunities and challenges for vaccine development:

  • Opportunities: Vaccines targeting conserved glutamate-rich repeats might elicit antibodies effective against multiple parasite stages, potentially providing broader protection.

  • Challenges: Cross-binding to repeats-sharing proteins from different stages could impact protective responses through antibody feedback mechanisms such as epitope masking. Antibodies elicited by one protein might hinder subsequent protective responses to cross-recognized proteins expressed later in the parasite life cycle .

The observation that B1E11K exhibits a fair degree of somatic hypermutation and relatively high affinity for its targets supports the proposition that high-affinity-matured antibodies to repeats can be elicited when cross-reacting to motifs of slightly different content .

These insights should inform rational vaccine design strategies, particularly for multi-stage malaria vaccines, by considering both the potential benefits of cross-reactive responses and the need to avoid potential interference with stage-specific protection.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.