The At1g65770 protein (UniProt ID: Q9SHX9) is a 360-amino acid F-box protein implicated in regulating ascorbic acid (Asc) biosynthesis via the ubiquitination pathway . Homologs such as MdAMR1L1 in apple (Malus domestica) share functional similarities, where they interact with GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase (GMP1) to modulate Asc levels .
| Protein Characteristics | Details |
|---|---|
| Gene name | At1g65770 |
| Protein class | F-box protein |
| Biological function | Ascorbate biosynthesis regulation |
| Homologs | MdAMR1L1 (apple), AtAMR1 (Arabidopsis) |
Interaction with GMP1: At1g65770 homologs (e.g., MdAMR1L1) bind GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase (GMP1), promoting its ubiquitination and degradation, thereby reducing Asc levels .
Gene Silencing: Virus-induced silencing of MdAMR1L1 in apple increased Asc levels by 40–60%, confirming its regulatory role .
Overexpression Studies: Transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing MdAMR1L1 showed reduced Asc levels despite unchanged transcription of biosynthesis genes, suggesting post-translational regulation .
| Parameter | Wild-Type | MdAMR1L1-OE | MdAMR1L1-Silenced |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ascorbate levels (µg/g FW) | 120 ± 15 | 65 ± 10 | 180 ± 20 |
| GMP1 protein abundance | 100% | 30% | 150% |
Adapted from Sun et al. (2021) .
Western Blotting: Detects endogenous At1g65770 in Arabidopsis extracts .
Functional Studies: Used to validate protein-protein interactions (e.g., MdAMR1L1-GMP1 binding via co-IP and BiFC) .
Metabolic Engineering: Guides efforts to enhance Asc content in crops by manipulating F-box protein activity .
Structural Studies: Resolving the F-box domain’s interaction with SKP1-like proteins.
Crop Improvement: Engineering At1g65770 homologs to boost stress tolerance via Asc modulation.
At1g65770 is a gene locus in Arabidopsis thaliana that encodes a protein involved in specific cellular pathways. Antibodies targeting this protein are essential tools for studying its expression, localization, and functional interactions. Similar to how anti-PEG antibodies can bind to specific repeating subunits , At1g65770 antibodies recognize unique epitopes on this protein, allowing researchers to track its presence in various experimental contexts. These antibodies enable scientists to investigate protein-protein interactions, subcellular localization, and expression levels under different experimental conditions.
Research-grade At1g65770 antibodies are typically available in several formats:
Monoclonal antibodies: Offering high specificity to single epitopes, similar to the monoclonal antibodies described in the llama nanobody research for HIV targeting
Polyclonal antibodies: Recognizing multiple epitopes on the At1g65770 protein
Recombinant antibodies: Engineered for specific binding characteristics
Each type has distinct advantages for different research applications. Monoclonal antibodies provide consistent results across experiments with minimal batch variation, while polyclonal preparations can offer enhanced sensitivity through multi-epitope recognition.
At1g65770 antibodies should be stored according to manufacturer specifications, typically following these guidelines:
Undiluted antibodies: Store at -80°C for maximum long-term stability (stable for a minimum of 3 years)
Working solutions: Store in 50% glycerol at -20°C (stable for at least one year)
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
For short-term storage (1-2 weeks), refrigeration at 4°C is acceptable for working dilutions
These storage conditions help maintain antibody binding capacity and specificity over time.
Validating antibody specificity is crucial for generating reliable data. Implement these methodological approaches:
Western blot analysis using:
Wild-type samples expressing At1g65770
Knockout/knockdown samples lacking At1g65770
Recombinant At1g65770 protein as a positive control
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to confirm target identity
Peptide competition assays to demonstrate epitope-specific binding
Cross-reactivity assessment against related proteins
Similar to how anti-PEG antibodies are validated for their binding to specific PEG structures , At1g65770 antibodies must be thoroughly validated to ensure they specifically recognize your target without cross-reactivity to related proteins.
For optimal immunofluorescence results with At1g65770 antibodies:
Sample preparation:
Fix tissues/cells with 4% paraformaldehyde (20 minutes, room temperature)
Permeabilize with 0.1% Triton X-100 (15 minutes, room temperature)
Block with 5% normal serum from the species of secondary antibody (1 hour)
Primary antibody incubation:
Use At1g65770 antibody at 1:100-1:500 dilution
Incubate overnight at 4°C in humidified chamber
Include appropriate controls (no primary antibody, isotype control)
Secondary antibody detection:
Counterstain and mounting:
DAPI for nuclear visualization
Mount with anti-fade medium to preserve fluorescence
This methodology enables precise subcellular localization of At1g65770 protein while minimizing background fluorescence.
For developing robust ELISA protocols with At1g65770 antibodies:
Coating conditions:
Coat plates with purified At1g65770 protein (1-5 μg/ml) or cell/tissue lysate containing the target
Use carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) for coating
Incubate overnight at 4°C
Blocking and antibody dilutions:
Block with 3-5% BSA or non-fat milk in PBS
Primary antibody dilution: 1:500-1:5000 depending on antibody affinity
Secondary antibody: HRP-conjugated at 1:2000-1:10000
Detection considerations:
For sandwich ELISA, use separate capture and detection antibodies that recognize different epitopes
TMB substrate provides sensitive colorimetric detection
Include standard curve for quantification
Critical controls:
Include wells without coating antigen
Include wells without primary antibody
Use gradient dilutions to establish optimal concentrations
This approach draws upon principles similar to those used in anti-PEG ELISA development , where specificity and sensitivity are carefully balanced.
For experiments involving complex matrices or low-abundance targets:
Signal amplification strategies:
Tyramide signal amplification for immunohistochemistry
Poly-HRP secondary antibodies for Western blotting
Biotin-streptavidin systems for ELISA
Background reduction techniques:
Pre-adsorption of antibodies with irrelevant proteins
Optimization of blocking agents (5% milk vs. BSA vs. serum)
Use of detergents appropriate for your application
Sample preparation optimization:
Enrichment techniques for low-abundance proteins
Subcellular fractionation to concentrate target
This methodological approach is comparable to strategies used in antibody-antigen binding prediction studies, where optimization techniques significantly improve detection efficiency .
For investigating At1g65770 protein interactions:
Co-immunoprecipitation protocol:
Lyse cells in non-denaturing buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40)
Pre-clear lysate with protein A/G beads
Incubate with At1g65770 antibody overnight at 4°C
Pull down with protein A/G beads
Wash extensively (at least 5 times)
Elute and analyze by immunoblotting for potential interacting partners
Proximity ligation assay considerations:
Use complementary oligonucleotide-labeled secondary antibodies
Optimize antibody dilutions to minimize non-specific signals
Include appropriate controls for validation
Crosslinking strategies:
DSP or formaldehyde for reversible crosslinking
Optimize crosslinking time and concentration
These approaches are conceptually similar to methods used to study antibody-antigen complex interfaces in databases like AACDB, which catalogs comprehensive interaction data .
Advanced computational methods can significantly enhance antibody research:
Epitope prediction and antibody design:
In silico analysis of At1g65770 protein structure
Hydrophilicity and accessibility prediction of potential epitopes
Computational docking simulations
Machine learning for binding prediction:
Database integration:
This computational approach allows researchers to make informed decisions before extensive experimental work, potentially saving significant research time and resources.
| Issue | Potential Causes | Resolution Strategies |
|---|---|---|
| Low signal in Western blot | Insufficient protein, antibody denaturation, inefficient transfer | Increase protein loading, optimize transfer conditions, increase antibody concentration, use fresh antibody aliquot |
| High background in immunostaining | Inadequate blocking, excessive antibody concentration, non-specific binding | Increase blocking time/concentration, titrate antibody, pre-adsorb antibody, increase washing steps |
| No signal in immunoprecipitation | Low antibody affinity in native conditions, epitope masking, weak antibody-bead binding | Try different antibody clones, optimize lysis conditions, crosslink antibody to beads |
| Inconsistent results between experiments | Antibody batch variation, protocol inconsistencies, sample degradation | Use single antibody lot for critical experiments, standardize protocols, include positive controls |
| Cross-reactivity with unrelated proteins | Antibody specificity issues, shared epitopes | Validate with knockout samples, use peptide competition assays, try alternative antibody clones |
These troubleshooting approaches are consistent with methodologies employed in other antibody research fields, focusing on systematic problem-solving rather than trial-and-error approaches.
When confronting data inconsistencies:
Systematic validation approach:
Run parallel experiments with multiple antibody lots
Test alternative antibodies targeting different epitopes
Compare results across different detection techniques (Western blot, ELISA, immunofluorescence)
Biological variation assessment:
Standardize sample collection and processing
Include biological replicates from different sources
Consider temporal regulation of At1g65770 expression
Technical controls:
Use loading controls appropriate for your experiment
Include gradient concentrations of recombinant protein
Implement spike-in controls for complex samples
Statistical analysis:
Quantify signal variability across replicates
Apply appropriate statistical tests to determine significance
Consider power analysis to ensure adequate sample size
This methodical approach resembles validation procedures used in antibody development studies, where distinguishing biological from technical variation is critical for reliable interpretation .
Comprehensive quality control should include:
Specificity assessment:
Western blot against recombinant At1g65770 and native samples
Testing against knockout/knockdown samples
Cross-reactivity testing against related proteins
Affinity determination:
ELISA-based binding curves
Surface plasmon resonance measurements
Determination of KD values
Batch consistency verification:
Lot-to-lot comparison using standardized samples
Stability testing under various storage conditions
Functional application testing in multiple assays
Documentation requirements:
Complete validation data package
Detailed production methods and quality control results
Application-specific validation data
These quality control measures align with established practices in antibody research and development, as seen in the comprehensive approaches used for nanobody development and database curation .
Emerging imaging applications include:
Super-resolution microscopy adaptations:
Direct conjugation of fluorophores to At1g65770 antibodies
Site-specific labeling strategies using click chemistry
Optimization of antibody concentration for single-molecule localization microscopy
Live-cell imaging considerations:
Multiplexed imaging strategies:
Conjugation with spectrally distinct fluorophores
Sequential labeling protocols
Mass cytometry-compatible metal conjugation
These approaches draw inspiration from cutting-edge developments in the antibody field, including temperature-responsive antibodies that can reversibly bind targets based on temperature conditions .
For integrating At1g65770 antibody data into systems biology:
Multi-omics integration:
Correlation of antibody-based protein detection with transcriptomics
Integration with proteomics data for pathway analysis
Combination with metabolomics for functional correlation
Network analysis approaches:
Protein-protein interaction mapping using antibody-based techniques
Pathway perturbation analysis following manipulation of At1g65770
Correlation networks based on co-expression patterns
Quantitative considerations:
Absolute quantification using purified standards
Relative quantification across multiple experimental conditions
Statistical modeling of antibody binding variability
These systems-level approaches align with comprehensive databases like AACDB that integrate antibody-antigen interaction data to provide broader biological context .